Author Topic: Pippa Knight and Jenny James - Nottingham Duo  (Read 8683 times)


41 review(s) for Jennifer Escada (34 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Roth]
14 review(s) for Pippa Knight (10 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Roth]

Offline arthur

Had a duo booking with Pippa Knight and Jenny James (formerly Mistress JJ).
External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only

Fairly easy paid parking in city centre, buzzed in and let into the flat. Pippa is much larger than I expected. Its mentioned in reviews but given the number of positives and her reputation I thought she must be a super hot curvy girl. For me shes a lot more than being on the ‘curvy’ side, shes more bbw and pretty plain facially, not sexually attractive IMO. Jenny has a hot body as per her profile but a bit more aged facially than I expected but still a nice toned body and looks good for 38 years as her profile states. So started off slightly deflated but still excited for my first threesome.
Told to strip naked and onto the bed for some action. Trying to kiss Jenny and while mouths are open its like a touch of lips, no tongue and shes holding back with each kiss lasting 2 seconds, so clearly no DFK (brushed teeth and had chewing gum in just prior). A very frustrating and stand-offish style of kissing.

BJ technique from either wasn’t great and when I wanted them to keep it going or go a bit more DT the requests were ignored, again like 10 seconds of basic sucking before stopping to do it by hand and moving on to other stuff when I asked several times for a prolonged bj without hands. Also had other requests fall on deaf ears so I have a feeling they saw a fairly easy booking and did what was easiest for them, not me. By this stage im feeling pretty deflated and it isn’t feeling like the threesome I wanted.

Towards the end I was losing hardness and got the ‘would you like a shower’ so clearly time over, got dressed and checked the time and there was still a quarter of my time remaining.

Given all the small irritations I was going for a neutral as they are still friendly/chatty and made a reasonable effort to please. But revisiting Pippa’s profile pics im pushing to a negative; she must know the pictures are not a representation of her and that’s frustrating as I would not have booked if I had known. I know everyone chooses the most flattering pictures to put up, but when I look at those pictures it feels like a bait and switch as I cant recognise the girl I saw at all. It looks like a totally different person as the photos are majorly photoshopped to bring in the hips and her boobs/entire body look nothing like the profile.

She really needs to upload some straight forward, non photoshopped pictures so people can make an informed decision, as I don’t think I would have booked if she had.

Summary: Disappointed with Pippas pics but she was more GFE and kissed properly. Service wise it was Jenny that seemed to cut me short; poor kissing and tried to get me to cum quick and out of there. They clearly have alot of positive feedback so YMMV but I left disappointed.

Offline Roth

Looks like Jenny has dragged her mate Pippa down :(

Maybe time for Pippa to cut her loose and find another duo partner? :unknown:

Offline arthur

Looks like Jenny has dragged her mate Pippa down :(

Maybe time for Pippa to cut her loose and find another duo partner? :unknown:

Tbh my main issue was Pippa's pics, given her rep i expected her to be hot like DITR/Mandy but was disappointed. The other things were smaller issues that added up.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Praise the punting gods, she got the first negative for her dodgy photos.

Shocked you hadn't realised for her reviews of the past. Sure it was mentioned somewhere that she was changing them.



Unfortunately i was more than a little dissapointed when she opened the door.  She's pretty but no where near what her AW pictures make out.  They're either photoshopped or taken a long time back.

Just wanted to put a post in her defence

Expect crazy  :wacko: dave will ride in this time on his trusty steed.

Just wanted to put a post in her defence


Was wondering if her photos are that different that they breach the UKE rules ?

Honest advertising
Using fake pictures is not permitted.

External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 07, 2017, 04:09:04 pm by vw »

Offline arthur

Praise the punting gods, she got the first negative for her dodgy photos.

Shocked you hadn't realised for her reviews of the past. Sure it was mentioned somewhere that she was changing them.


Expect crazy  :wacko: dave will ride in this time on his trusty steed.


Was wondering if her photos are that different that they breach the UKE rules ?

Honest advertising
Using fake pictures is not permitted.

External Link/Members Only

I read every review prior to booking and assumed those comments were people being picky, the green reviews stacked up too much.

Hopefully she will update pics if she sees this.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I read every review prior to booking and assumed those comments were people being picky, the green reviews stacked up too much.

Hopefully she will update pics if she sees this.

Well that's why i am grateful someone gave her a  red one so that pay more attention.

Your a gent  :hi:

Offline Bangers and Gash

Getting ripped for £240 is a big kick in the bollocks! Take comfort in knowing your neg will cost them more money in the long run.  :thumbsup:

IMO, this a major problem when booking 2 pro$$ies who work as a double act. They can easily manipulate the punt, so in effect they end up doing virtually fuck all for a nice wad of cash.

I'd generally think it wise never to book a duo unless you've fucked one of them already. Too many lazy bitches out there  :hi:

Offline snapontool

This review seems to go against a review only today on a Solo Jenny James (Miss JJ) !!

They are one of the same I think ?

Offline CoolTiger

A punting friend saw her recently, and was not too happy with the meet.

She definitely agreed to DFK, OWO and Rev O by text. But when he turned up she refused these, claiming she did not realise that that 's what she had agreed to.
she then made the excuse that her friend wrote her profile and she did not realise what services had been ticked.

He was prepared to walk away, so in the end she agreed to light FK and OWO, but did not allow Rev O.

He saw her for an hour and overall recommended seeing her, as she was nice and friendly and she provided the services given enthusiastically .

However, he suggested that you MAKE SURE that you have spoken to her and agree the services you require, and double confirm it with her, so that there is no confusion.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

From the following thread:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=44948.0

Offline arthur


I'd generally think it wise never to book a duo unless you've fucked one of them already. Too many lazy bitches out there  :hi:

Certainly agree with this now

There were certain girls around East Mids (DITR/Mandy/LucieBee/Pippa) that i thought were nailed on good safe punts, obviously going to have to re-think that theory for the future

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,170
  • Likes: 77
  •  
  • Reviews: 102
Sorry you had a bad time - I always get a bad feeling when someone has a disappointment with a girl I have given a positive.  I have no experience of JJ but always have a good time with Pippa.  I agree that photos are misleading, which I think I referred to in my review. However sounds like a pretty poor effort all round.

Better luck with the next one.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,206
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
For the first time in history I'd agree with my best mate Bangers comment, especially at £240 it's a rip off sadly, sorry to hear you had a bad time for that amount of money matey, but thanks for making others aware.

Offline Bangers and Gash


Online threechilliman

Certainly agree with this now

There were certain girls around East Mids (DITR/Mandy/LucieBee/Pippa) that i thought were nailed on good safe punts, obviously going to have to re-think that theory for the future

Luciebee is very good. Relaxed girl who gets on and does what you're after. I'd return if I was closer.

tcm

Offline NervousJ

That's a bugger mate.. Sorry you had a shit one.

It's made me think now going to see Jenny James. She was going to be my next punt I thought...

What is it with girls and fake photos, or photos taken 5 years ago... Update your photos or stop eating cake... It's simple really......


Sureshot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Looks like Jenny has dragged her mate Pippa down :(

Maybe time for Pippa to cut her loose and find another duo partner? :unknown:

Bollox, pippa was average to shit when i saw her last year and still using the same out of date, misrepresenting photos.

Shes riding the waves of her fluffies while she still can.

The very least she can do is post honest and up to date pictures.

Offline arthur

Bollox, pippa was average to shit when i saw her last year and still using the same out of date, misrepresenting photos.

Shes riding the waves of her fluffies while she still can.

The very least she can do is post honest and up to date pictures.

I read your review it sounds like a similar experience to mine, the expectation and then disappointment starts the punt off on a downer.

I see you've given Jessica95 a positive who is larger but has full body pics with no editing, i reckon pippa needs something similar.

Offline monkeybucket

Certainly agree with this now

There were certain girls around East Mids (DITR/Mandy/LucieBee/Pippa) that i thought were nailed on good safe punts, obviously going to have to re-think that theory for the future

Having seen all of these girls apart from Pippa I'd vouch that they would be super great in a duo.  Luciee I have done a duo with and DITR I did a duo with and I'm not sure how I survived to be honest.

On a separate note I've seen JJ before they moved flat and found her ok great body, limited BJ.  Would probably see her again. 

Thanks for confirming my thoughts that Pippa was a bigger girl though. Annoys me when they don't use up to date pictures surely there are as many guys looking for a bigger size as a slimmer one so rather than piss everyone off just be honest.

peckerwood806

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
hi was there any lesbian  interaction between them ? on their profile it says they see females and couples

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I read every review prior to booking and assumed those comments were people being picky, the green reviews stacked up too much.

Hopefully she will update pics if she sees this.

Well here is the #pippaleaks photo supplied on another review.

Hidden Image/Members Only

sirbonkalot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well here is the #pippaleaks photo supplied on another

Is it legal to post pictures of other people without their consent as I believe these pictures are no longer in the public domain!!
Whatever your reason for doing so you should ask admin to remove them as they are surely contravening the privacy rules.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Is it legal to post pictures of other people without their consent as I believe these pictures are no longer in the public domain!!
Whatever your reason for doing so you should ask admin to remove them as they are surely contravening the privacy rules.
Well take me to court or call the police !

In the mean time are you writing review 5 of your GF ?

Are the her pimp partner or just garden variety obsessive ?

Just For Fun

Do a GRIS in the photo above,  Funny as fuck !   :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
« Last Edit: February 10, 2017, 05:58:37 pm by vw »

Offline cueball


In the mean time are you writing review 5 of your GF ?

Not now he ain't  :sarcastic:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Not now he ain't  :sarcastic:

Oh well, sure pippa pimp will be glad in the long run, these obsessives and white knights usually put people off.

Offline cueball

Oh well, sure pippa plump will be glad in the long run, these obsessives and white knights usually put people off.

Agreed.... they do the lasses no favours  :dash:

BMW525d

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
if you goggle her number she is connected to an escort agency she is a pimp and her partner controls her do you control jenny as well

BMW525d

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
she had this photo in her profile then removed it its obvious why she did this this is her true size i bet she won't come and comment now????????????



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

BMW525d

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Is it legal to post pictures of other people without their consent as I believe these pictures are no longer in the public domain!!
Whatever your reason for doing so you should ask admin to remove them as they are surely contravening the privacy rules.

dont be a twat that photo was in her free profile for anybody to download are you the boyfriend pimp

BMW525d

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well here is the #pippaleaks photo supplied on another review.

Hidden Image/Members Only

oi that is not legal that is my copyright i had downloaded that photo before the stupid cow realised she was turning punters away by posting her true photo haha you can post as often as you want to show her true colors

Offline PepeMAGA

she had this photo in her profile then removed it its obvious why she did this this is her true size i bet she won't come and comment now????????????



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
Is she the one on the right?

BMW525d

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest


BMW525d

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
she still has another photo of her and jenny two of them on her profile she left it there bcoz you cant see her real figure mister vw quickly please load that photo before she hides this one as well

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Is it legal to post pictures of other people without their consent

Really, odd that the Paperazzi & press do it all the time, and the rich who are often the victims and have access to top lawyers don't appear as confident as you pretend to be  :sarcastic:

Offline j122

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,844
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 26
Looks like she's been busy with the camera, new pics uploaded on AW

James999

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Looks like she's been busy with the Photoshop, new pics uploaded on aw

Corrected it for you  :D

Offline NervousJ

They look more realistic tbh.

Be interesting to see if the OP thinks they are a true reflection..


Sureshot

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
About fucking time. Im glad shes finally listened to her customer base

Offline arthur

This one is a fairly accurate picture of her, might have been slightly larger when i saw her but you can tell shes quite plump. The rest look like they are taken from the best possible angle but i guess all girls on AW do that.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: February 12, 2017, 02:23:09 pm by arthur »

Offline cueball

I think she's slimmer than that, she's photoshopped em up, she's bloated em to catch the pork podgers  :sarcastic:

Maybe not  :D

Into my long distance porky podge hotlist she goes  :D

Offline arthur

Look at the blurring underneath the bra on the far side, she has been photoshopping  :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:

I was just thinking a lot of the pictures look better than what i remember, especially her bending over on the bed actually looks quite enticing.

Whats the point if shes going to photoshop  :dash:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Taggart

What a shame these WGs quote their aspirational size on profiles, not the real size.
But most of us know the difference between a 10 or a 14, but only if the WG is honest photos. Shame AW doesnt force  new pics every 12-18 months. Unrealistic, I know.


Offline cueball


Hidden Image/Members Only

I'm already penning the review......

"With pastry crumbs around her chops, hungrily chewing her way out of my pork star podge list comes this raunchy salad dodger"

Those bingo wings and thunder thighs don't scare me  :lol:

Offline RedKettle

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,170
  • Likes: 77
  •  
  • Reviews: 102
pictures look accurate to me, based on last visit probably 3 or 4 months ago.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,206
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
Wow that's a hell of a difference...

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

In fairness I notice she has updated her profile with more recent and accurate photos, clearly had a read of what's going on here, can't fault her for that.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2017, 11:40:15 am by Iloveoral »

Online RogerBoner

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,803
  • Likes: 21
  •  
  • Reviews: 53
There was a time a couple of years ago when I wanted to book her but the booking had to be made through the Adultwork website. Phew that was a lucky escape as she really is much larger than the photos that I perused.

Offline arthur


Hidden Image/Members Only

In fairness I notice she has updated her profile with more recent and accurate photos, clearly had a read of what's going on here, can't fault her for that.

That was my initial response too, but then clicked each image on 'View full size' on AW and noticed the weird shapes and bumps that suggest these pics have been doctored too. Have a look at the picture quoted above zoomed in, the strange bump underneath the bra on the far side shows some distortion has been done with sizes, any any signs of fat have been 'smoothed' over the back and bum.

Its a more acceptable level of deception, punters are less likely to be tricked into booking, but given whats gone on here why not just take a handful of pics and upload without any changes.  :unknown:

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,206
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
I'd agree with you Arthur, certainly have the one over.

If she's that fussed about the looks stay off the cake and put your fat ass in a gym daily or just upload regular photos, I'm a bald old fatty and it doesn't bother me, saying that no one pays to fuck me haha

peckerwood806

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I've noticed on her profile she now has 32"hh natural. where as the old profile said enhanced.

Offline thelizard

 the lass on the right looks like a salad dodger to me, great tits mind.