Members who don't submit reviews.

[PleadInsanity]

If you punt and use this forum to guide you in any way then it's just simple common courtesy to return information via a review now and again.

[Marmalade]

Despite being a pachyderm and not being good with computers  the OP has managed to write a very good and reasoned defence of his lack of reviews.  I think that would be the skill set required for his first review of an FBSM that he has experienced.  The multiple review he suggests is a very lazy way of trying to catch up on his homework.

Another possibility though: he says, "When I find a good SP I stick with her. I have had 50 + sessions with several SPs and I am quite happy with them."

Nothing wrong with that but it does suggest a possibility of some fluff between the teeth...

Hopefully the dog does not eat it.

Still waiting for the promised "review, as I understand it, cannot feature several SPs at the same time so I will post info in Regional Punting - Greater London."

Pet pooch holding on to it?   

Hidden Image/Members Only

[sigmund]

Clearly you don't have to do reviews but I have no respect for those who use the information here but don't add back their experience. Whatever your way of punting there will be others in those circumstances so saying I'm not a typical punter is no real reason.  IMO not reciprocating shows contempt for those members who do add reviews.

[smiths]

This morning I posted on the Jamie Oliver thread and was asked why I had submitted no reviews but could find the time to write a lengthy "article" on our Jamie. A relevant question in the circumstances and here are my reasons.
First of all this site is about Punting / using prostitutes or Service Providers as they are also known. It is not exclusively about reviews and reviewing SPs. The Reviews section is one of 5 Main sections and I have contributed to the other 4 quite a few times.
" OK smartarse " I hear you say " Those of us who have taken many for the team have risked a load of dosh on sorting out the good from the bad and all your type do is lurk and never contribute a review"
In other words I am a parasite.
Secondly.
In my defence , and possibly for others, I have only used an Adultwork based SP once and will never do so again. It's just not my thing. I don't do FS anyway I prefer massage. I am over 65 and have issues with ED. I find the whole FS thing stressful and I don't enjoy it. I want to get relief for my " stress" and spend some time with a much younger pretty lady.
So I am not anything like the "typical" UKP member.
Thirdly.
When I find a good SP I stick with her. I have had 50 + sessions with several SPs and I am quite happy with them. So I don't need continually to be fed with real time information on who is new and who is hot. I occasionally read a review but it is likely to be about a party as I have never had the courage to go to one and they hold a sort of voyeuristic fascination for me.
Final point: I was over 50 when PCs came into use in Offices and am capable of logging on and posting but I wouldn't have a clue
how to do set up a review.
As I would like to contribute some relevant information I would like to share my experience of FBSM suppliers who I rate in the Greater London area. A review, as I understand it, cannot feature several SPs at the same time so I will post info in Regional Punting - Greater London.
In conclusion- thanks to all those who have made multiple reviews or indeed any reviews at all.

Its up the punter whether he wishes to do reviews or not, I would hope a punter would do a negative review on a bad WG to warn others as that's no skin off his nose, a review only has to be a few lines long.

[Northerndave666]

admin has said some members on here are allowed to have two profiles, ie a separate one for reviewing due to the other being known.
I have no idea who these people are, but maybe think before calling someone out on non reviewing

I must have missed that, was that in a thread? Unless that is common knowledge (it wasn't to me), then the only was of knowing the contribution to a site is the 2 numbers under all our posts. Number of posts and number of reviews. I'm not bloody psychic ! 

[daviemac]

I must have missed that, was that in a thread? Unless that is common knowledge (it wasn't to me), then the only was of knowing the contribution to a site is the 2 numbers under all our posts. Number of posts and number of reviews. I'm not bloody psychic ! 

Admin made that statement the last time the issue of non reviewing members was discussed.   

[DannyJames]

Admin made that statement the last time the issue of non reviewing members was discussed.   

I seem to remember something being mentioned but I can#t remember the specifics.

I'm sure Admin will clarify once he is back, since HP has reported the issue.

[Punter115]

I have came pretty late in life to this hobby but it seems to me the purpose of this site is to give your honest and timely reviews of all your punts whether good or bad so that all punters can decide from such . It is pointless having this site if members do not actively participate and the most important aspect for all members is your posting of your experience with the lady.
Members who for whatever reason do not share their experiences , should be blocked from the site after 12 months non participation i.e. Posting Reviews of their Escort visits and if they have no posts to review what is the point for them being on the site !

[hullad]

I do not think anything much will change some people and putting un Draconian measures won' t help. We have over in the Yorks &Hunberside board persuaded a long term member who contributes but has not made a report, to make a report. Its a good one too and thankfully he will make more and help others to put reports in.

In life we have alsorts of people some like to get involved, some do not and we will just have to get used to it. We can only persuade nicely, being bombastic, sarcastic, sanctions, and horrible is not going to help .

[tesla]

I have came pretty late in life to this hobby but it seems to me the purpose of this site is to give your honest and timely reviews of all your punts whether good or bad so that all punters can decide from such . It is pointless having this site if members do not actively participate and the most important aspect for all members is your posting of your experience with the lady.
Members who for whatever reason do not share their experiences , should be blocked from the site after 12 months non participation i.e. Posting Reviews of their Escort visits and if they have no posts to review what is the point for them being on the site !

that does not work for every one, some people have a wealth of experience to offer but may no longer punt or not be able to leave a review.

I have been punting 37 years now, currently have two regulars, neither of which have any form of advertising anymore, one has removed her profile and just keeps a few regs, the other has no public profile and I am her only client. My last punt with some one I could review was months ago (August 2016), so by your reckoning I should be removed from the site this coming July????

[Home Alone]

I have came pretty late in life to this hobby but it seems to me the purpose of this site is to give your honest and timely reviews of all your punts whether good or bad so that all punters can decide from such . It is pointless having this site if members do not actively participate and the most important aspect for all members is your posting of your experience with the lady.
Members who for whatever reason do not share their experiences , should be blocked from the site after 12 months non participation i.e. Posting Reviews of their Escort visits and if they have no posts to review what is the point for them being on the site !

that does not work for every one, some people have a wealth of experience to offer but may no longer punt or not be able to leave a review.

I have been punting 37 years now, currently have two regulars, neither of which have any form of advertising anymore, one has removed her profile and just keeps a few regs, the other has no public profile and I am her only client. My last punt with some one I could review was months ago (August 2016), so by your reckoning I should be removed from the site this coming July????

In the light of tesla's comments, maybe a less draconian solution would be to bar anyone of 12 months' standing on here who hasn't offered any Review and then asks for help finding a WG.  People in tesla's situation would not then be affected.

The other thing about people who don't post FRs and then ask for help which makes me is their "inability" to carry out a search of FRs on here about WGs in their area.

[Punter115]

Maybe I am missing something and apologies if I am.  But if you have not punted with an Escort within 12 months that  can allow you to provide a relevant review to current members, what is the point of you having access to this site.

[tesla]

yes you are missing the point I think, my situation is good at the moment but it will not last, 37 years of punting has taught me that, sooner or later my regs are going to move on, their personal circumstances will change and I will have to find other punting partners, I would like to opportunity to use site such as this to help me do that

[DannyJames]

Maybe I am missing something and apologies if I am.  But if you have not punted with an Escort within 12 months that  can allow you to provide a relevant review to current members, what is the point of you having access to this site.

I think Nik, the founder of this site, has probably had a 12 months hiatus during the time UKP has been around - does that mean he shouldn't have had access to the site?

I agree that punters should all be encouraged to leave reviews, it is a hugely important part of the site. Some might say that they are its backbone. But there are contributors who don't have any reviews listed (yes, James999 is one) or have stopped posting them (CoolTiger for example) who are a helpful to this community and if they weren't around on the basis that they weren't posting any reviews, then we'd miss out on the good they do.

[smiths]

Maybe I am missing something and apologies if I am.  But if you have not punted with an Escort within 12 months that  can allow you to provide a relevant review to current members, what is the point of you having access to this site.

The point is its not up to you, admin decides who can be a member of UKP not someone who has been a member a few months saying what should happen.

There are punters on here who no longer punt due to health or financial reasons, punters who use another nick with admin permission to post reviews for security reasons, and punters who help to out trolls, pimps and other assorted low lifes so UKP can function along with admin. All these punters are entitled to post unless admin says they cant. And as mentioned above the site founder NIK hasn't punted for a long time as he has posted, if you had your way he would be told to fuck off.

I have found such punters to be very helpful for many years and their knowledge is priceless to me, whether they do reviews or not makes no odds to me because I know it doesn't stop others doing reviews as the review figures show. UKP isn't just a review site, its also a forum and such members are very welcome in my book.

[Punter115]

DJ...Regarding you first paragraph  .....there are always exceptions to the standard rule and anyway he is Admin ..site could hardly function in any meaningful way without him!
Your second paragraph ..I don't know the punters you have mentioned but again,as I said there are always exceptions to the standard rule ...Admin would have to be the arbiter.
But within the spirit of the rule no meaningful report within twelve months ..you are out ...maybe not for ever but for a substantial period of time.

[Gordon Bennett]

If you ban or restrict or limit access to members who don't leave reviews I reckon some would just lash up fake reviews. How hard would it be to cobble together a few credible sounding lines together about say, Amazing Victoria without even seeing her?
I reckon the info available on here is invaluable and is comprehensive as can be expected..... any move to force or nudge contributions could actually lead to a dilution of the quality of info for the sake of blindly chasing quantity.

[Punter115]

The thread is about "Members who don't submit reviews"
I just gave what I thought was a sensible proposal on how to deal with the small number of dormant members. Given the majority of members on this site are presumably "active" and welcome relevant reviews therefore Is that not the main purpose of UK Punting to receive such ongoing reviews?
I am aware that I am a new member but I was only trying to put forward constructive ideas obviously if I have offended any member (s) that was not my intention and I do apologise.

[Marmalade]

The thread is about "Members who don't submit reviews"
I just gave what I thought was a sensible proposal on how to deal with the small number of dormant members. Given the majority of members on this site are presumably "active" and welcome relevant reviews therefore Is that not the main purpose of UK Punting to receive such ongoing reviews?
I am aware that I am a new member but I was only trying to put forward constructive ideas obviously if I have offended any member (s) that was not my intention and I do apologise.

You're not offensive, just new.
1. The site isn't a democracy. When the owner wants opinions on something he usually asks.
2. Experience has shown he's better at running it professionally and for the benefit of punters than all of the amateur suggestions put together.
3. The site has more lurkers than active members as far as I know. Lurkers are not a problem.

[DannyJames]

DJ...Regarding you first paragraph  .....there are always exceptions to the standard rule and anyway he is Admin ..site could hardly function in any meaningful way without him!
Your second paragraph ..I don't know the punters you have mentioned but again,as I said there are always exceptions to the standard rule ...Admin would have to be the arbiter.
But within the spirit of the rule no meaningful report within twelve months ..you are out ...maybe not for ever but for a substantial period of time.

Nik is not admin. Admin is admin.

Anyway. The point you are failing to take in is that there are plenty of valuable posts beyond reviews. We would lose that info under your rules.

[OakTree]

Maybe I am missing something and apologies if I am.  But if you have not punted with an Escort within 12 months that  can allow you to provide a relevant review to current members, what is the point of you having access to this site.

Take a browse through the membership list and you'll see the vast majority of members have never posted. If your restrictions were ever put in place this forum would have a membership of barely a few thousand.

As others have said this forum isn't a democracy but it isn't a dictatorship either with set levels of obligations. This pastime is a hobby and membership to a forum is a voluntary commitment. If mandatory volume of info is required to maintain membership it would either encourage false made up info or people just not bothering to commit to the forum.

[Sparta Prada]

I'm not really bothered about who does and doesn't submit reviews. What I would say is that anyone who adds to a punting related thread will have much more credibility if they have made reviews than someone who hasn't IMO.

[Horizontal pleasures]

3. The site has more lurkers than active members as far as I know. Lurkers are not a problem.

as long as they are not the Feds.

[Marmalade]

as long as they are not the Feds.

There you go telling us too much about yourself again HP.

[hungrypunt]

You dont have to write a review mate, just go over to the review section and under the London area , add a post about a girl you have experienced for your FBSM, and tell us if she was good or bad.

[Marmalade]

You dont have to write a review mate, just go over to the review section and under the London area , add a post about a girl you have experienced for your FBSM, and tell us if she was good or bad.

 

[MrMan1973]

Maybe we could set up a ranking system for members so we know where we stand, we could set up a Dungeons & Dragons level system.

Examples could be Level 1 lurker; Level 7 White Knight; Level 10 Barebacker; Level 57 Dirty old bastard.

Members could gain XP by adding reviews etc...

I'm drunk.

[cigano8]

Maybe we could set up a ranking system for members so we know where we stand, we could set up a Dungeons & Dragons level system.

Examples could be Level 1 lurker; Level 7 White Knight; Level 10 Barebacker; Level 57 Dirty old bastard.

Members could gain XP by adding reviews etc...

I'm drunk.

Brilliant! 


Personally I actually skim the reviews section for "massage" in the title and just read them. I don't see why other FBSM fans shouldn't post a review of a massage.

[cigano8]

What's the thoughts on not reviewing because the WG ( or fancy wank masseuse in my case) is already well reviewed?

[Tony_Red]

Haven't read every single post but another good reason to post a review is that the WG keeps busy and stays in the area. For e.g. a WG I really enjoyed my time with has left because she's not busy enough, which is a fucking shame. She told me hotel costs are high and not worth it for 1-2 punts a day after dealing with transport, meals, plane tickets, staying up till late etc. Of course, in some circumstances (often city centres/busy areas) they can become busy/put rates up...but I'd rather have them around then not at all.

[Home Alone]

What's the thoughts on not reviewing because the WG ( or fancy wank masseuse in my case) is already well reviewed?

As I'm now in my 70s, I'm a good few years older and surely less 'energetic' , than reviewers such as cueball and threechilliman in the North West.  So I've reviewed some of the WGs they've seen but from the perspective of the older, less energetic, punter.

[mrfishyfoo]

What's the thoughts on not reviewing because the WG ( or fancy wank masseuse in my case) is already well reviewed?

The more the merrier IMHO. 

Thing is that Your Mileage May Vary (YMMV) always applies to WG's meaning that just because a lass fucked my brains out doesn't mean she'll do the same to the next bloke.

The more varied the experiences that get reviewed of the same lass the broader the picture of what that lass is capable of becomes.

[5th Musketeer]

Maybe we could set up a ranking system for members so we know where we stand, we could set up a Dungeons & Dragons level system.

Members could gain XP by adding reviews etc...

I'm drunk.

I have a problem with this suggestion ---- what are Dungeons and Dragons?  And what is XP apart from an outdated OS?

I'm old
  Yes - THAT old 

[cultvoid]

I need to get around to review now that I've started posting, but my last 3 or 4 punts have all been "meh" punts at the basic rub and tug in Piccadilly Manchester. I'd review a disaster or a great one, but a meh at Piccadilly just doesn't seem like news, and since they don't publish a rota its not like anyone could act on the information.

I will make an effort in future mind 

[Marmalade]

I need to get around to review now that I've started posting, but my last 3 or 4 punts have all been "meh" punts at the basic rub and tug in Piccadilly Manchester. I'd review a disaster or a great one, but a meh at Piccadilly just doesn't seem like news, and since they don't publish a rota its not like anyone could act on the information.

I will make an effort in future mind 

If "meh" has a link or other public identifying info I'm sure others would appreciate a short review of the meh-ness.   

[cueball]

I need to get around to review now that I've started posting, but my last 3 or 4 punts have all been "meh" punts at the basic rub and tug in Piccadilly Manchester. I'd review a disaster or a great one, but a meh at Piccadilly just doesn't seem like news, and since they don't publish a rota its not like anyone could act on the information.

I will make an effort in future mind 

As marmalade says above, I too would rather read a review of your meh experiences. Reviews aren't about ego busting self proclamations, just give me hard facts that I can work with.

[mrfishyfoo]

As marmalade says above, I too would rather read a review of your meh experiences. Reviews aren't about ego busting self proclamations, just give me hard facts that I can work with.

+1

It's the meh/mediocre punts the show a lasses "true colours".

[GolfNut]

I need to get around to review now that I've started posting, but my last 3 or 4 punts have all been "meh" punts at the basic rub and tug in Piccadilly Manchester. I'd review a disaster or a great one, but a meh at Piccadilly just doesn't seem like news, and since they don't publish a rota its not like anyone could act on the information.

I will make an effort in future mind 

As marmalade says above, I too would rather read a review of your meh experiences. Reviews aren't about ego busting self proclamations, just give me hard facts that I can work with.

If anything a "meh" could be considered more important, as the reason for your indifference might be something another punter has no problem with therefore making it a positive for some but a dealbreaker turning it into a negative for others.

Every little helps according to a well known high street shop.

GN 

[Gordon Bennett]

What's the thoughts on not reviewing because the WG ( or fancy wank masseuse in my case) is already well reviewed?

Depends on context.... I do feel that if she has 50 glowing positive reviews, including 10 in last several days I just cannot see point of posting glowing review number 51 today; I find myself wondering what the motivation is of person who posts that 51st review is and what value it brings. Like I say, depends on context.

[smiths]

Depends on context.... I do feel that if she has 50 glowing positive reviews, including 10 in last several days I just cannot see point of posting glowing review number 51 today; I find myself wondering what the motivation is of person who posts that 51st review is and what value it brings. Like I say, depends on context.

I don't agree, every review is that punters experience of the WG so to me its irrelevant how many other similar reviews a WG has, every review from another punter is valid assuming its genuine and some may find it useful.

[cueball]

Depends on context.... I do feel that if she has 50 glowing positive reviews, including 10 in last several days I just cannot see point of posting glowing review number 51 today; I find myself wondering what the motivation is of person who posts that 51st review is and what value it brings. Like I say, depends on context.

Narr, not from my point of view... I like/want to see as many reviews as possible. It shows a consistent regular service from her to a variety of punters.