Author Topic: CuteGingerSub - Manchester  (Read 2396 times)


11 review(s) for CuteGingerSub (6 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Blue Moon

CuteGingerSub - Manchester

£130 for 1 hour incall (now up to £160, I see)

External Link/Members Only

Background
I’ve had CGS on my HL for a while. I’ve tried some submissive girls in the past (eg Submissive Lauren) and enjoyed the dominant role – although I’m not very good at it. I don’t really like to inflict pain so I’ve limited myself to activities such as face-fucking, gagging and a bit of light spanking and I only do these when pre-arranged, obviously. Now, CGS struck me as being rather different from my previous subs. She appears to actually enjoy pain and is very agreeable to being tied, humiliated, etc. I checked out her photos and liked what I saw – she seemed trim, pretty and carried the schoolgirl look off well (although I didn’t request that).  The long hair was appealing too – and she likes having it pulled hard. I decided that I’d get over there and have a go at some proper dominance.

Comms
All good. Arranged by email and text. I gave her a list of my requirements of her as a submissive and she was obviously well up for it. She told me she has all sorts of BDSM toys (ropes, paddle, whips, crop, pinwheel, toys, collars, etc). I asked her to wear a short skirt, front-fastening blouse, high-heel shoes, no bra and her hair was to be down.To prepare myself for the sesh, I spent hours on the internet, researching all sorts of restraining methods, use of toys, roleplays, etc and was ready to go! (However, when I rehearsed some of the knots used in bondage scenarios, I discovered I was shit at them, so went to Halfords and bought some of those stretchy rope things with hooks on.)
CGS had given me her address when the appointment was made so I knew where she was located - no last-minute direction problems.

Come the day, I confirmed, she confirmed and off I went.

I texted when parked and she texted back to say she was ready and to walk straight in through the unlocked front door and go up the stairs. I found that rather exciting and was already mentally constructing a future roleplay where I would burst in as a burglar (I sometime worry about what goes on in my mind….)

Location
One of a series of terraced houses, area seemed OK. Nothing to report about the house and bedroom.

Appearance
Now this when it all started to go tits up. I climbed the stairs to be greeted by CGS, wearing what I’d requested – but she wasn’t physically what I’d expected. I’d say she was rather older than her cutesy photos suggest and, having looked at then again, I can see that they’ve also been cropped dramatically. Her profile description was rather exagerated too. No problem with her stated height, but petite? Not really. Size 8 – no way (now describing herself as size 10 but even that is incorrect, IMO). The short skirt emphasized her thighs which were rather large and she has a large arse too. Now, I’ve reported my dislike of horizontally-excessive ladies on here before. They’re not for me (I’m probably shallow in that respect) so I usually try to avoid such meetings. But CGS’s description and photos convinced me that I was about to meet up with a slim, pretty young thing who likes to be thrown about a bit. When I laid eyes on her, all my pre-prepared roleplay stuff went out of the window and I knew I’d have difficulty getting turned on. And there was no way I’d be able to ‘throw her around a bit’.

The Session
I have to say things improved once we got going. CGS was obviously not kidding when she described her pain threshold. I was encouraged to use the paddle on her arse and she asked me to use it harder and harder. Eventually, it was me that backed off, not her. Then the crop was used and I concentrated on the same spot on the inside of her thigh for countless strokes – no problem to CGS! She’s obviously quite a trooper. The pinwheel was used to good effect and I thought I saw her grit her teeth as the spikes rolled over her nipples (small nipples, though). I tied her up (using my stretchy ropes!) and forced my cock in her mouth and throat. I grabbed her hair and used it to hold her head in place so it was a true face-fuck rather than a blowjob. Eventually I came in her mouth and ordered her to swallow everything, which she did. I spent about 35 minutes using her in ways that a gentleman shouldn’t. Once I’d partially switched off the physical problem, I quite enjoyed it.

Conclusion
There is no doubt that CGS gave every aspect of her service full commitment and she is an excellent sub. Others with more experience and desire in this sexual area will definitely be able to push her more than I did – and she’d be up for it too. When we chatted afterwards, it was also apparent that she’s a nice person – no edge or rush to get me out. But – there is the physical difference between what is portayed on her AW profile and herself. Yes, the photos are of her but I reckon some were taken a while ago and there’s no proper full body photo (I haven’t looked in her private gallery though). Also, the textual description is misleading IMO. I know that CGS is a member of this forum and may well read this review. I have no wish to hurt her feelings – she gave a good service, exactly as described, but I encourage her to get more candid with her physical description and to update her photos. She should remember that for every bloke like me who doesn’t go for the larger lady, there are many who do – so there’s no need to hide it.

Thoughts on the way back to the car:
Not angry or annoyed…just disappointed.

Rating
I’ve had to go for a neutral with this meeting because of the misleading description (a negative for me) but the pendulum swings back to positive (and a bit) for the services delivered. Probably a Neutral Plus, if such a thing exists. I have to call it as I see it.

Bm

Offline manc36

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 1,795
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 2
Banned reason: Abuse
Banned by: daviemac

VOLPONE

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Blue Moon, many thanks for that superb review.
I have considered seeing her but your accurate description of her physique ensures I will not be doing so. As you say though there are plenty of punters who do like the fatter birds....

Offline cueball

Cheers for the review bm

Fwiw, I'd be ok with her being a strapping lass. She sounds an experience does this lass. One for the maybe list. I can't pretend I'm a big follower of all this dom sub pollaver but I'm more than happy to tan a nice arse and I'll fuck her face happily.

Cheers, she's on the list

Offline Blue Moon

Fwiw, I'd be ok with her being a strapping lass. She sounds an experience does this lass. One for the maybe list. I can't pretend I'm a big follower of all this dom sub pollaver but I'm more than happy to tan a nice arse and I'll fuck her face happily.
Cheers, she's on the list
That's good, cueball. I'm sure you'll have a great time with her. As I inferred in my review, it's probably a failing on my part that I'm not keen on the bigger body!    Bm

Offline Blackpool Rock

Thanks for the review BM, i'm with you on having a preference for petite girls and while i'd say that even a size 12 isn't large I totally get where you are coming from.
I've seen her profile loads of times when searching for sub girls but never been tempted to book her as she just doesn't float my boat however as you say her service was good for those who like the look of her.
Need Laaauren to make a comeback  :thumbsup:   

Offline frankc

A misleading AW profile gets a Neg from me every time but I can understand your reasons for plumping for a Neutral....thanks for the honest review Pal..

VOLPONE

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
plumping for a neutral

Great choice of word under the circumstances ! :lol:

Offline Golovkin

She was on my to do list. The price rise and the misleading profile takes her off the list. Cheers for the review.  :thumbsup:

Offline cueball

The price rise

Aahh.... a 30 quid price hike..... that's a major snag to me.... maybe to maybe not now

Jay-Jay

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks for the honest review. I've been dangling for yonks on seeing her though found making the arrangements a task. I honestly won't bother now as, like you, I like slimmer rather than chunky. You've no need to make apologies for that, we all like what WE like. As a few have said, she can just get some honest pics up as there are plenty who like the "solid" look.

Jay

Offline Blue Moon

Thanks for your comments, guys.    Bm  :hi:

Offline Scotpunter

Thanks for the review from me too. I have her in my hot list too. With the price rise I'd have to say she is unlikely to get a booking from me either.
Banned reason: Cunt
Banned by: daviemac

Offline NigelF

Good review.

For me, her comms are absolutely shocking and not just the delay in getting back to you but during and after meetings have been arranged. I kid you not, I have arranged (confirmed by text in advance and attempted on the day) a meeting with this girl on 3 separate occasions but she cancelled twice and for the most recent she simply stopped replying.

It is unfair that I've done negatives for WGs very quickly for just one failed booking but haven't for this girl and I will do a review soon but because I'm fucking thick, I've still been trying to see her due to the whole sub, ginger & Scottish/Irish heritage thing.

I think I must be doing something wrong but surely she wouldn't have agreed to 3 meets if I was (she apologised for cancelling the first 2, well I think she only actually said sorry for the first one). Also, if you're not gonna see someone then surely it's best to just say so rather than not replying, as far as I can tell she's not blocked me (yet).

Offline threechilliman

Aahh.... a 30 quid price hike..... that's a major snag to me.... maybe to maybe not now

+1.

tcm

Jay-Jay

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It's not you Nigel I'm sure. I was thinking exactly the same after similar experiences to yours. Just felt if she didn't want to see me, that's her choice and I would respect her for saying so rather than messing me about. Her loss because I am an amazing fuck !  ;)

Jay

Offline bigthickdick

Thanks for the great review, I really liked reading it  :hi:. I was checking her profile out a few weeks ago searching for a real sub with no size limit anal on offer. @ £130/h I was going to book her in the near future. @160/h it's not going to happen now. Wouldn't mind her being slightly on the larger side, but IMHO that price tag can not be justified (even the 130 was borderline OK only.)

Offline NigelF

Thanks for the great review, I really liked reading it  :hi:. I was checking her profile out a few weeks ago searching for a real sub with no size limit anal on offer. @ £130/h I was going to book her in the near future. @160/h it's not going to happen now. Wouldn't mind her being slightly on the larger side, but IMHO that price tag can not be justified (even the 130 was borderline OK only.)

I tend to prefer half hour bookings but since it used to be 100 and you could do more stuff in the time with her than a normal WG, I thought £130 for the hour was ok considering she's somewhat of a "specialist" however £160 is taking the piss, well actually it isn't even that because she doesn't even offer watersports!

Offline bigthickdick

I thought £130 for the hour was ok considering she's somewhat of a "specialist" however £160 is taking the piss, well actually it isn't even that because she doesn't even offer watersports!

Exactly, I would've booked her for £130 for the very same reason.

Offline opal

I've still been trying to see her due to the whole sub, ginger & Scottish/Irish heritage thing.

I think I must be doing something wrong but surely she wouldn't have agreed to 3 meets if I was (she apologised for cancelling the first 2, well I think she only actually said sorry for the first one). Also, if you're not gonna see someone then surely it's best too just say so rather than not replying, as far as I can tell she's not blocked me (yet).

The thing is that WGs can pick and choose just like we as punters do. Im sure we've all had let downs through poor communication. Some WGs are better at comunications than others and some WGs  get hundreds of messages to reply to.

Sometimes the fact that a booking is not easily made and patchy comms is an actually attraction to me and is probably to you too since you have made 3 bookings and not yet seen her.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 07:32:35 am by opal »

Offline NigelF

The thing is that WGs can pick and choose just like we as punters do. Im sure we've all had let downs through poor communication. Some WGs are better at comunications than others and some WGs  get hundreds of messages to reply to.

Sometimes the fact that a booking is not easily made and patchy comms is an actually attraction to me and is probably to you too since you have made 3 bookings and not yet seen her.

Yep she absolutely has a right to choose. My main gripe isn't really poor/delayed comms, it's confirming an appointment and being let down on the day twice and hearing nothing the final time. It is this final time and a subsequent  total lack of comms for which I will post a negative review today.

It being difficult to book and the patchy comms are NOT what attracts me to her. I value my time and see it as poor service on her part, albeit somewhat understandable given the volume she's dealing with (although she could always hire help). As I've said it's her profile, services (see other reviews), looks and the fact that via text and the 1 post she has on here she seems switched on and likely to be a good punt. I've kept trying to because of that and the fact that she cancelled at least a couple of hours in advance (albeit on the day), she had excuses (although they could be made up) and she did at least apologise for the first cancellation.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2017, 12:46:09 pm by NigelF »