Sienna_x - Bristol

[thegent]

External Link/Members Only

Met her in a pretty nice hotel in Bristol city centre.

I'll start with the positives first:
Nice hotel
Great body (9/10)
Freindly enough at first.

Negatives:
Facially I didn't find her attractive at all - she had acne, her lips had work done and were overblown for my liking, she was orange, fake eye lashes, hair extensions, poor make up.
No owo
No anal
It all felt a bit mechanical and rushed - I got the impression she was trying to make me come ASAP even though I paid £200 for an hour!
Poor kissing technique.

I finished over half an hour early - asked for a part refund and she hit the roof, told me that I was rude and other working girls do not do that sort of thing and she was very offended. When I told her I would stick around until the hour was up she checked her messages to see when I arrived because she didn't believe me. It was all a massive turn off and I got dressed as quick as I could and left.

For £200 I expected exceptional service and it was far from it.

Save your money lads.

[mrdiamond77]

Thanks for the interesting and informative review and sorry you did not have a good time.  As I am based in South Wales I have been thinking about seeing her this year as I have seen a few of the other girls who are in her price range in Cardiff.  This review has certainly made me think as it is a lot of money to be spending. 

[thegent]

No problem at all.

It pisses me off that prossies think they can charge whatever they want just because they go to the gym a few days a week. She is going to have seriously up her game - there are plenty of better girls out there.

[Belisknor]

This review is the complete opposite to my experience with her !!! I met her back in November. She's absolutely stunning and a really great fuck, we spent pretty much the whole booking bar 5 minutes either shagging or giving each other oral  only negatives I found was that she wasn't keen on kissing (She's not keen on beards) but in hindsight was probably just an excuse but couldn't fault her anywhere else really friendly and would definitely like to see her again.

As for Mr Diamond I personally preferred Molly Matthews whom I know you have also met but would still recommend Sienna.

[mrdiamond77]

This review is the complete opposite to my experience with her !!! I met her back in November. She's absolutely stunning and a really great fuck, we spent pretty much the whole booking bar 5 minutes either shagging or giving each other oral  only negatives I found was that she wasn't keen on kissing (She's not keen on beards) but in hindsight was probably just an excuse but couldn't fault her anywhere else really friendly and would definitely like to see her again.

As for Mr Diamond I personally preferred Molly Matthews whom I know you have also met but would still recommend Sienna.

[/b]

OK, both yourself and Mr Matrix seemed to have a good time with Sienna, I am not in a hurry anyway, not planning to punt probably this month, but I will keep an eye out for any future reviews of her.  I don't mind spending £200 if the girl is very good, although there are girls who charge about £50 cheaper that can be every bit as good, if not better. 

[thegent]

I was probably a bit harsh about her appearance in hindsight. I was mainly put out by the fact she was a clock watcher and didn't believe me when I said I was there for less than half an hour.

It would have been a positive right up until the point when she went all weird after I asked if she would charge for half an hour instead of the hour and accused me of being rude and disrespectful. If she left it at "no" I would have been cool with that but she overreacted and it was one of my most awkward punts.

The whole thing has put me off punting altogether and I think it's time to call it a day. Giving negative reviews when you've had bad experiences just isn't worth the hassle.

[Sienna_m1]

Hi guys,

I would like to take the opportunity to respond to 'the gents' negative review on myself. Firstly, I would like to say that I respect that everyone is entitled to their own preferences & opinions, however, I do feel he has contradicted hiself in the initial review & the following comments.

When he first arrived I instantly felt as though he was fishing for faults and was not very friendly towards me. 45 minutes into the appointment he demanded half of his money back. He was very rude and I felt extremely intimated by him. I do not offer half hour appointments, he would of known this beforehand, hence why it was a one hour booking. Also, if he had taken the time out to read my 'likes list' he would of known what was on offer instead of making assumptions.

After reading his reviews on other woman, which are also all negative, I have come to the conclusion that he is a very awkward & disrespectful client.

In all my time in this industry I have never come across anyone like him. If everyone was like him I would seriously reconsider my career.

I hope I have put my point across and that clients take note of my positive feedback.

Love Sienna x

[Belisknor]

When he first arrived I instantly felt as though he was fishing for faults and was not very friendly towards me. 45 minutes into the appointment he demanded half of his money back. He was very rude and I felt extremely intimated by him. I do not offer half hour appointments, he would of known this beforehand, hence why it was a one hour booking. Also, if he had taken the time out to read my 'likes list' he would of known what was on offer instead of making assumptions.

After reading his reviews on other woman, which are also all negative, I have come to the conclusion that he is a very awkward & disrespectful client.

+1 totally agree with Sienna ! This review seems like nothing more than sour grapes for not getting his own way and in my opinion it's really not cool to demand money back when it clearly states on her profile that her minimum booking length is 1 hour. 

[sigmund]

You pays your money and takes your chance.

Personally I wouldn't pay £200 when there are great SPs at £150 or less as I wouldn't expect any of them to be offering a substandard service. If you're happy to pay £200 then that's fine but to expect something exceptional doesn't make sense to me, none of them have a magic pussy.

[MrMatrix]

Sienna's profile is currently off radar. Hopefully "the Gent"s sour grapes hasn't put her off being a WG, cos I rather liked her and would defo see again. And I had no problems with any aspect of services provided.

[theGOAT]

Just reading this as Sienna is in Bristol this week and was wondering whether to see her or not. Thanks OP for your review, and I notice BristolLad also wrote a negative review.  So I'm out!

At £200/hr she should be something special as she is positioning herself above other very well rated WGs in Bristol.

I don't like her comment on this thread - surprised she wasn't banned for attacking a member?    I doubt very much that the OP was "very rude and intimidating" - that's the sort of lying bollocks WG's write to try to discredit punters.

Saddened by the OP's comment that he may give up punting due to the reaction of White Knights on this thread to his Negative.  The whole point of this forum is that punters should be able to declare a punt positive/neutral/negative based on their own experience and judgement.  Just because you wrote a positive review and had a good time doesn't mean the OP is wrong to write a Negative - shame on you to accuse him of "sour grapes".

I personally make a point of always writing a review whenever I have a Neutral/Negative punt as I think they are the most valuable to other punters.  I have been attacked as a result by WGs and WKs but I don't care.  I could easily write 20-30 additional Positive reviews but haven't as they would just be repetition for girls that already have plenty of Positive reviews. 
 
Cheers! 

[James999]

When he first arrived I instantly felt as though he was fishing for faults and was not very friendly towards me.

Guys don't arrive looking for fault, but he stated he found your appearance disappointing

Facially I didn't find her attractive at all - she had acne, her lips had work done and were overblown for my liking, she was orange, fake eye lashes, hair extensions, poor make up.

And

45 minutes into the appointment he demanded half of his money back.

Perhaps because you didn't provide the services you offered / charged for 

No owo
No anal
It all felt a bit mechanical and rushed - I got the impression she was trying to make me come ASAP even though I paid £200 for an hour!
Poor kissing technique.

[James999]

I don't like her comment on this thread - surprised she wasn't banned for attacking a member?    I doubt very much that the OP was "very rude and intimidating" - that's the sort of lying bollocks WG's write to try to discredit punters.

So call her to task on it, she's clearly pissed off at getting a negative and instead of trying to resolve the issue she's gone on the attack, it's far more productive for you to call her out on her response than report it, if nothing else it keeps her negative to the top of the list 

[James999]

Hi guys,

Well Sienna, yo've logged back in and read the responses above but you now seem unwilling to post / clarify the situation, does this mean that you were lying and have been caught out? 

[Belisknor]

I don't like her comment on this thread - surprised she wasn't banned for attacking a member?    I doubt very much that the OP was "very rude and intimidating" - that's the sort of lying bollocks WG's write to try to discredit punters.

Saddened by the OP's comment that he may give up punting due to the reaction of White Knights on this thread to his Negative.  The whole point of this forum is that punters should be able to declare a punt positive/neutral/negative based on their own experience and judgement.  Just because you wrote a positive review and had a good time doesn't mean the OP is wrong to write a Negative - shame on you to accuse him of "sour grapes".

To be honest with you Taleyho ( previous name before he changed it ) you of all people really shouldn't be accusing me of white knighting 

You say it's OK for members to voice there opinions but accuse me of being a white knight because I don't agree with the OP's review which for the record sounds like complete bollocks !!! Funny how he changed his tune when I mentioned what a good time I had. 

[MrMatrix]

First of all the OP is entitled to his opinion as after all it is his review and it is to be respected as such. As it happens he has moderated it a bit with a second comment. For what its worth OP I too have had some of my reviews critisised and this forum can be quite rough at times, but don't let this put you off. Providing you are satisfied that you have given an honest and fair review, stick to your guns. It is also reasonable for someone to say but thats not my experience with this WG I found her to be ok. Also you were disappointed how she looked and thats fair comment as well after all her face is obscured on profile pictures you may have been disappointed, stick to your guns its your opinion and thats what the forum is about. Someone may well say shes gorgeous and they too can think that- its all quite subjective to the OP at the time but its your view that counts.
The WG is taking a chance coming on here and does risk a banning, however it depends on how she goes about it. The thing is we can agree to disagree in an adult way.
Sorry the punt didn't live up to your expectation and that the FK was disappointing, I too would have been pissed off. I have recently done a review and my experience was different. What I'm saying is keep the reviews going as that way we are all better informed and so is the WG in this case.

[theGOAT]

To be honest with you Taleyho ( previous name before he changed it ) you of all people really shouldn't be accusing me of white knighting.

You say it's OK for members to voice there opinions but accuse me of being a white knight because I don't agree with the OP's review which for the record sounds like complete bollocks !!! Funny how he changed his tune when I mentioned what a good time I had. 

You are a White Knight - for LK, Sienna, and others probably.  You have attacked the OP and now me - but then that's what WK's do!  You cant accept that other punters have genuine bad experiences with Pro$$ies that you like.

As to you keeping tabs of my nick names, do you really think I give a damn? 

Cheers! 

[vw]

You are a White Knight - for LK, Sienna, and others probably.  You have attacked the OP and now me - but then that's what WK's do!  You cant accept that other punters have genuine bad experiences with Pro$$ies that you like.

As to you keeping tabs of my nick names, do you really think I give a damn? 

Cheers! 

Fucking weird behaviour of his broadcasting your old names.

Seems his begging and white knighting on the lancspunter review got him his booking with LK, maybe having a pop at you will get him an extra 15 minutes.

Cheers for re-highlighting this WK.