Callie Bonds Newcastle

[peter666]

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This is my first encounter with an escort, after searching many escorts I decided to go with Callie Aka naughtystudentannie1 on AW , no face picture but sounded good. I arranged a half hour booking for £60 through Bonds, Communications were good, Callie was working on the Quayside in an apartment block, easy to find. I was buzzed in and greeted by Callie wearing black bra and Knickers. she was a tall brunette with very large tits. She’s very natural looking and pretty in a girl next door kinda way.  I liked her very much.

We french kissed, groped and fondled while standing up she felt fantastic, I found myself with my trousers down and Callie kneeling in front of me, she put a condom on my dick before giving me oral doing deepthroat, would have been great with no condom on though. She used a lot of saliva for lubrication and took me deeper and deeper but would not take it all into her mouth, I was a bit disapointed,
We gradually built up momentum and she seemed happy with some gentle face fucking, then she got on the bed with her arse in the air telling me to fuck her, she had a beautyful pussy, I lick, finger fucked and tongued her before fucking her hard, I wanted to change positions with her on top of me, I lay on the bed and all she done was wank my cock and would not let me touch her pussy I was very dissapointed as I still had 10 minutes left, she would not let me cum in her mouth either,  very dissapointed. 

Although she was really nice I would not be booking her again, lots of other escorts around to try.

[Upper Brunei]

She does say on her profile 'CIM at discretion'.
I tend to find that 'at discretion' usually means 'probably not'.
Better luck next time but you might find that if there's something you particularly want it's best to clarify that before handing over your cash 

[Looking4fun]

Good first review thanks.
Could of been a negative from a few punters.

[the game]

Thanks for the review. I'm skeptical of members who join and their first post is a review but she has had a few issues as of late after initially building up a fairly good rep on here. She did find herself on my list but I will hold of a booking in the near future to see if she gets things back on the right track.

Totally agree with UB, if there is something particular you are after during a booking you should discuss this before handing over the cash 

[Smashnasty]

I suspect she started well but is either overwhelmed or jaded or both. I find with long term relationships the girl very quickly starts to be unable to keep up with me apetite. I can only imagine how bad it must be keeping up with several of me every day. With the comms surrounding the negative review I keft her, it was clear that she was very, very busy and does pack the punters in. Must get pretty sore and fed up of the taste of cock?

[The Outsider]

I'm pleased I put the following disclaimer on my own review: "If she performs like this consistently, she’s going to do well."  That's the thing that separates the top performers from the rest. 

I enjoyed both my visits to Callie, but even I'm wondering if a further visit is worth the risk?  It's a shame your booking wasn't up to scratch.   Thanks for the review. 

[daviemac]

I suspect she started well but is either overwhelmed or jaded or both. I find with long term relationships the girl very quickly starts to be unable to keep up with me apetite. I can only imagine how bad it must be keeping up with several of me every day. With the comms surrounding the negative review I keft her, it was clear that she was very, very busy and does pack the punters in. Must get pretty sore and fed up of the taste of cock?

A few strange points you raise here, seeing several punters a day and having sex with them's the nature of the game and they get paid very well to do it. If she can't cope with that then it's not for her, she should get a job stacking shelves in Asda. 

Every punter is entitled to the same level of service, all the top ones manage it without getting negative or neutral reviews.

[Smashnasty]

Deleted comment.

[Smashnasty]

A few strange points you raise here, seeing several punters a day and having sex with them's the nature of the game and they get paid very well to do it. If she can't cope with that then it's not for her, she should get a job stacking shelves in Asda. 

Every punter is entitled to the same level of service, all the top ones manage it without getting negative or neutral reviews.

Thats my point.

Some girls see just one or two. Others have more stamina. I wonder if Annie is the former, and is overworking herself. Not strange points at all, some girls can sustain it some cant. I was just aknowledging that its a tough gig and perhaps thats why she is struggling.

[daviemac]

I've yet to find a girl who can measure up to standards of girls like blonde babe honey. Shame she retired.

As you said on another thread, not quite sure what it's got to do with this one though.   

Thats my point.

Some girls see just one or two. Others have more stamina. I wonder if Annie is the former, and is overworking herself. Not strange points at all, some girls can sustain it some cant. I was just aknowledging that its a tough gig and perhaps thats why she is struggling.

Like I said if she can't cope she shouldn't do it. 

Not the best site to be feeling sorry for them on though.

[Smashnasty]

As you said on another thread, not quite sure what it's got to do with this one though.   

Should have been clearer. Though on reflection poorly put and unfair. I'll remove the comment.

[Looking4fun]

Thanks for the review. I'm skeptical of members who join and their first post is a review but she has had a few issues as of late after initially building up a fairly good rep on here. She did find herself on my list but I will hold of a booking in the near future to see if she gets things back on the right track.

Totally agree with UB, if there is something particular you are after during a booking you should discuss this before handing over the cash 

If an escort advertises that she's going to offer a service,why should you have to ask her before you hand over your cash,your both getting it the wrong way around.
She needs to stop advertising services if she doesn't want to offer them.
She just sounds like another in-consistent escort to me.

[Upper Brunei]

If an escort advertises that she's going to offer a service,why should you have to ask her before you hand over your cash,your both getting it the wrong way around.
She needs to stop advertising services if she doesn't want to offer them.
She just sounds like another in-consistent escort to me.

Because lots of escorts advertise services on AW that they don't actually provide, especially newer ones who don't have their page set up properly yet, while agencies no longer advertise services.
All I was advising the OP, as a newbie, was that if he has particular services that he wants to enjoy he should make certain it's on offer to him before paying for it. 'At discretion' is no guarantee,  abd a simple enquiry can save you from a disappointing punt.

[the game]

If an escort advertises that she's going to offer a service,why should you have to ask her before you hand over your cash,your both getting it the wrong way around.
She needs to stop advertising services if she doesn't want to offer them.
She just sounds like another in-consistent escort to me.

I disagree mate, I would have thought it pretty standard to discuss services before handing over the cash. In some cases it may be the first chance you get to actually speak with the girl if for example you have booked through an agency. Also I would have thought that with the at discression services listed you would want to know beforehand. It also recommends doing so here:

External Link/Members Only

I do agree though however that girls should not be advertising things on AW which they do not do. I think girls who do that will be sharply found out on here.

[Looking4fun]

I get both your points,but these girls need to learn to manage their business,don't advertise something if your not going to do it,punters who've been around a while understand that "discretion" part is an easy cop out for the wg,newer punters don't.

[Upper Brunei]

punters who've been around a while understand that "discretion" part is an easy cop out for the wg,newer punters don't.

Which is exactly what I was saying in my first post?

[Kev3773]

At discretion, especially when it comes to oral, from my many years of punting gives the girl a get out if she finds the punter repulsive/unclean. Which you can sort of understand after all we wouldn't be going down if there was a strong aroma of fish around. There are of course exceptions. I've never been turned down in these circumstances. 

[Looking4fun]

He paid his money she didn't offer the services she advertised & she needs to be consistent or we end up with escorts who think they can offer a below par experience for a lot of money.

[the game]

I get both your points,but these girls need to learn to manage their business,don't advertise something if your not going to do it,punters who've been around a while understand that "discretion" part is an easy cop out for the wg,newer punters don't.

I agree with you 100% but that was not my point, my point was that services should be agreed before cash exchanges hands. If a service is advertised and it is not delivered then a negative review is justified. If on discussion beforehand a service which is advertised is declined a negative is justifed and you have not wasted cash and are able to walk away.

He paid his money she didn't offer the services she advertised & she needs to be consistent or we end up with escorts who think they can offer a below par experience for a lot of money.

Again I agree 100% A discussion beforehand if a service was a deal breaker for the OP would have saved him money on a shit punt as he could have rightly walked in that situation and left a negative without being out of pocket, I will stress that girls should not be inconsistant with their services and the top girls are not but it does happen as we have seen in this case.

Which is exactly what I was saying in my first post?

That is how it read to me mate and I thought it was a valid point

[Looking4fun]

let me get this right in my own mind, so your both saying it's the op's fault that he didn't receive the advertised services because he didn't ask her before he paid his money?
A Simple yes or no will do to satisfy my curiosity.
Thanks

[the game]

let me get this right in my own mind, so your both saying it's the op's fault that he didn't receive the advertised services because he didn't ask her before he paid his money?
A Simple yes or no will do to satisfy my curiosity.
Thanks

No

[walking dead]

Has anyone had cim or owo from her ?

[The Outsider]

Has anyone had cim or owo from her ?

Yes to both. 

[the game]

Yes to both.

Haha beat me to it, was trying to find the link for your review

[johnny34]

Has anyone had cim or owo from her ?

Click on her reviews on here & it shows a couple of people have had cim with her.

[Upper Brunei]

let me get this right in my own mind, so your both saying it's the op's fault that he didn't receive the advertised services because he didn't ask her before he paid his money?
A Simple yes or no will do to satisfy my curiosity.
Thanks

Absolutely not.
I don't think it's that hard to understand?

[Looking4fun]

Agreed I don't find it hard at all,what I find hard is when members offer up reasons/excuses for an escort, that has quite clearly under-performed on this occasion.

[the game]

Agreed I don't find it hard at all,what I find hard is when members offer up reasons/excuses for an escort, that has quite clearly under-performed on this occasion.

No-one has done that. Either you have missed the point I was trying to make or for whatever reason you are deliberately trying to be awkward.

[Upper Brunei]

Agreed I don't find it hard at all,what I find hard is when members offer up reasons/excuses for an escort, that has quite clearly under-performed on this occasion.

Oh for goodness sake!
Not one person in this thread has made an excuse for her. She offers a service 'at discretion'. The OP didn't get the service, he rightly left a neutral review which could easily have been a deserved negative.
Myself and others have advised him, as a newbie, that 'at discretion' is often a cop out. It shouldn't be, but in practice it often is. He was also advised that to avoid similar disappointment in future he should check all expected services are available before handing over his cash  I've learned to through experience. Some WG' are dishonest. Then if he can't have what he's looking for he can walk and leave a negative review.
None of this advice is in any way, shape or form defending this girl who has clearly not lived up to expectations.
A couple of posts ago you appeared to understand this, now you don't. Either you've had a bang on the head at some point in between or you're being deliberately argumentative.

[Mansell]

Interesting one, as the OP has seen her through an Agency all of us are aware that services are not discussed by the Agency.

Now I don't use agencies but do the guys that use them always discuss what on offer with the girl they have not seen before when they arrive and walk if not what they want ? Would have thought they do that a few times and the Agency would block them. Or am I missing something ??

Using AW it's not a problem, everything's on the profile or you discuss beforehand if you want clarity. So don;t have to discuss when you get to the door.

[Upper Brunei]

Interesting one, as the OP has seen her through an Agency all of us are aware that services are not discussed by the Agency.

Now I don't use agencies but do the guys that use them always discuss what on offer with the girl they have not seen before when they arrive and walk if not what they want ? Would have thought they do that a few times and the Agency would block them. Or am I missing something ??

Using AW it's not a problem, everything's on the profile or you discuss beforehand if you want clarity. So don;t have to discuss when you get to the door.

If there was something I particularly wanted, e.g. anal, I would explain to the agency when I made the booking that that's what I'm after. Generally speaking the agency (the good ones at least) will advise you which girls offer that service so you can make a choice from there. I've had many conversations with agencies when arranging duos and find that they will check with girls who are listed as bi EXACTLY how bi they're prepared to get.

[Mansell]

If there was something I particularly wanted, e.g. anal, I would explain to the agency when I made the booking that that's what I'm after. Generally speaking the agency (the good ones at least) will advise you which girls offer that service so you can make a choice from there. I've had many conversations with agencies when arranging duos and find that they will check with girls who are listed as bi EXACTLY how bi they're prepared to get.

Thanks, interesting to hear that the Agencies are doing that, thought it was illegal ?

So actually your discussing services with the Agency and don't need to ask the girl, great service. 

[Upper Brunei]

Thanks, interesting to hear that the Agencies are doing that, thought it was illegal ?

So actually your discussing services with the Agency and don't need to ask the girl, great service. 

I think there's a bit of a grey area.
They obviously can't advertise services, but if you ring up and say 'I want to book a girl who does OWO, they can say 'you should consider X or Y but you probably wouldn't like Z'

[the game]

Interesting one, as the OP has seen her through an Agency all of us are aware that services are not discussed by the Agency.

Now I don't use agencies but do the guys that use them always discuss what on offer with the girl they have not seen before when they arrive and walk if not what they want ? Would have thought they do that a few times and the Agency would block them. Or am I missing something ??

Using AW it's not a problem, everything's on the profile or you discuss beforehand if you want clarity. So don;t have to discuss when you get to the door.

In my experience although an agency can not sell services to you, a good one can guide you in your choice of girl if they know what you want and what is a deal-breaker for you.

As you say AW it's not a problem or at least it should not be a problem as the girls have things listed as their likes but as you also said you have the option to discuss beforehand if you want clarity. That is what I was trying to advise to OP who's first opportunity of clarity appears to have been face to face with the girl. In no way shape or form am I defending Callie in this instance, she is in the wrong as she has services advertised which she did not deliver which imo justifies a negative review rather than a neutral. I was simply offering advise to help the OP out for future meets and to reitarate again before I'm jumped on, no if a service is advertised you should not have to clarify but as we have seen some girls can lie on their AW pages or hide behind the 'at discretion' so is it not best to get that clarity before handing over the money if its a girl you are seeing for the first time?

[Mansell]

In my experience although an agency can not sell services to you, a good one can guide you in your choice of girl if they know what you want and what is a deal-breaker for you.

As you say AW it's not a problem or at least it should not be a problem as the girls have things listed as their likes but as you also said you have the option to discuss beforehand if you want clarity. That is what I was trying to advise to OP who's first opportunity of clarity appears to have been face to face with the girl. In no way shape or form am I defending Callie in this instance, she is in the wrong as she has services advertised which she did not deliver which imo justifies a negative review rather than a neutral. I was simply offering advise to help the OP out for future meets and to reitarate again before I'm jumped on, no if a service is advertised you should not have to clarify but as we have seen some girls can lie on their AW pages or hide behind the 'at discretion' so is it not best to get that clarity before handing over the money if its a girl you are seeing for the first time?

Yeah, never had a problem with not offering services advertised on AW.

Agree with your 2nd Paragraph.

[Looking4fun]

She does say on her profile 'CIM at discretion'.
I tend to find that 'at discretion' usually means 'probably not'.
Better luck next time but you might find that if there's something you particularly want it's best to clarify that before handing over your cash 

This is your first post on the thread.
Going by his review he wasn't looking for anything that wasn't on offer so what does this mean?
Better luck next time but you might find that if there's something you particularly want it's best to clarify that before handing over your cash 
[/quote]

i know what I think!he never mentioned anything she didn't offer on her aw advert.

[Looking4fun]

Oh for goodness sake!
Not one person in this thread has made an excuse for her. She offers a service 'at discretion'. The OP didn't get the service, he rightly left a neutral review which could easily have been a deserved negative.
Myself and others have advised him, as a newbie, that 'at discretion' is often a cop out. It shouldn't be, but in practice it often is. He was also advised that to avoid similar disappointment in future he should check all expected services are available before handing over his cash  I've learned to through experience. Some WG' are dishonest. Then if he can't have what he's looking for he can walk and leave a negative review.
None of this advice is in any way, shape or form defending this girl who has clearly not lived up to expectations.
A couple of posts ago you appeared to understand this, now you don't. Either you've had a bang on the head at some point in between or you're being deliberately argumentative.

But like your posts on Millie before moving agency,she was all singing all dancing until she got a negative review, yes your trying to be-little his review with your comments al-Beit in a subtle way in my opinion!
this is a punters forum to share information on our bookings, I've had no bang on the head,  I book girls who I want to have sex with  wether their agency or indie,
I don't make bookings looking for brownie points!

[Looking4fun]

In my experience although an agency can not sell services to you, a good one can guide you in your choice of girl if they know what you want and what is a deal-breaker for you.

As you say AW it's not a problem or at least it should not be a problem as the girls have things listed as their likes but as you also said you have the option to discuss beforehand if you want clarity. That is what I was trying to advise to OP who's first opportunity of clarity appears to have been face to face with the girl. In no way shape or form am I defending Callie in this instance, she is in the wrong as she has services advertised which she did not deliver which imo justifies a negative review rather than a neutral. I was simply offering advise to help the OP out for future meets and to reitarate again before I'm jumped on, no if a service is advertised you should not have to clarify but as we have seen some girls can lie on their AW pages or hide behind the 'at discretion' so is it not best to get that clarity before handing over the money if its a girl you are seeing for the first time?

sorry mate,but no you shouldn't HAVE  to clarify anything with the escort,she's advertising it to thousands!
You should only have to clarify it with the piss poor escorts  As the quality escorts don't need reminded of what they need to do before a booking.

[the game]

sorry mate,but no you shouldn't HAVE  to clarify anything with the escort,she's advertising it to thousands!
You should only have to clarify it with the piss poor escorts  As the quality escorts don't need reminded of what they need to do before a booking.

I know you should't have to if services are advertised, if you took the time to read what I said you would have seen that I am not disputing that. I have no idea what you are beating your chest about and have a bee in your bonnet over. Take a step back and read what I have written and you will see that you are arguing with yourself on most points as I've said multiple times that I agree with what you have said.

If services are advertised you should not have to clarify them to recieve them however as this review has shown that is not always the case. All the quality escorts as you say don't need reminding of that fact but not every girl is a quality escort and some do and will take the piss if they are allowed to get away with it.

My advice to the OP who has already been stung doing things your way is valid and had he done it the way I had suggested  he would have had the option to leave with his cash still in his pocket. In an early post I made I left a link to the punting top tips page which is attatched to this site. I am going to go out on a limb and say you did not read through the link so let me quote what it says under:  'Tips for just before or during the start of the meeting:'

"Always confirm all services you require before handing over the money. So you don't have to demand it back from her when she starts refusing services that were listed on her profile etc"

That alone being in a wiki which new members are directed to when they join this site and take up this hobby is telling is it not that these things do indeed go on.

[Upper Brunei]

But like your posts on Millie before moving agency,she was all singing all dancing until she got a negative review, yes your trying to be-little his review with your comments al-Beit in a subtle way in my opinion!
this is a punters forum to share information on our bookings, I've had no bang on the head,  I book girls who I want to have sex with  wether their agency or indie,
I don't make bookings looking for brownie points!

I'm starting to think you're slightly insane.
What on Earth does Milly have to do with any of this?
All I have done on this thread is offer a new punter some advice to help him get the best out of his punts.
You do realise that SOME adultwork or agency profiles are slightly misleading don't you?
That's why there are so many deserved negative/neutral reviews on here.
That's why the Punting Wiki gives exactly the same advice that you so clearly object to me giving.
To be honest,  by making irrelevant comments about totally different escorts you're proving my earlier point that you're being deliberately argumentative.
I've no idea why.
All of my comments were aimed at helping a fellow punter, you're just being difficult.
Sometimes all advertised services are NOT on offer.
Sometimes she's NOT really 21
Sometimes she's NOT really Spanish/Italian
That's a BAD THING.
IF this happens write a NEGATIVE review.
If not having a particular service would spoil a punt, as the Punting Wiki says, make SURE it is on offer BEFORE you pay. Leave a NEGATIVE review if you decide to walk

Honestly it's like explaining rain to a 5 year old.

Yon do realise that Carlsberg probably ISN'T the best lager in the world, don't you?

[Upper Brunei]

sorry mate,but no you shouldn't HAVE  to clarify anything with the escort,she's advertising it to thousands!
You should only have to clarify it with the piss poor escorts  As the quality escorts don't need reminded of what they need to do before a booking.

In February you reviewed Heidi of Adultwork who you decided not to see because you couldn't clarify exactly which services were on offer. This is exactly what I and others have been advising the OP to do.
You left a neutral review.  This is exactly what I and others have been advising the OP to do.
You didn't waste money on a punt you might not have enjoyed. This is what I and others are advising the OP he should do next time.
It's what the Punting Wiki says to do.
Do you understand now????

[Looking4fun]

Explaining rain to a 5 year old,best quote ever,
I suggest we use pm's if you've got anymore condescending messages for me,I've said what I had to say on this review.

[Smashnasty]

Fuck me this thread got boring LOL stop feeding the troll!

[Upper Brunei]

Fuck me this thread got boring LOL stop feeding the troll!

It did get unnecessarily repetitive didn't it?