Author Topic: KazXox. Cancelled a £150 incall booking. All for asking for a mobile number  (Read 17681 times)

Offline Belgarion

As much as you think this is about my intentions to protect a damsel in distress you are actually wrong.

For me it is about protecting the integrity of a valuable site.

- Site ethos & mission
This site puts the interests of punters (sex buyers) first. The site serves as a platform to help punters exchange info and make more informed decisions about the purchase of sexual services.

Indeed, so why were you attacking punters who made comments on this thread including the reports to admin?

GolfNut

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Indeed, so why were you attacking punters who made comments on this thread including the reports to admin?

And I thought you had more than a single brain cell Belgarion.  :rolleyes:

Read the review and tell me where I've attacked anyone as opposed to responding to personal attacks?

My first post explains the reports quite clearly.

Offline Belgarion

And I thought you had more than a single brain cell Belgarion.  :rolleyes:

Read the review and tell me where I've attacked anyone as opposed to responding to personal attacks?

My first post explains the reports quite clearly.

There you go again with the insults. Really helping your case there aren't you.

No one here has insulted you, you've had a go at everyone though.

Yeah, you are just trying to make sure punters make the right decisions

 :sarcastic:

For all my supposed stupidity, I'm not the one that has given the lady the negative attention by constantly white knighting her.

Wonder if she will take another booking from you after all this drama

GolfNut

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
There you go again with the insults. Really helping your case there aren't you.

No one here has insulted you, you've had a go at everyone though.

Yeah, you are just trying to make sure punters make the right decisions

 :sarcastic:

For all my supposed stupidity, I'm not the one that has given the lady the negative attention by constantly white knighting her.

Wonder if she will take another booking from you after all this drama

Are you really concerned about whether or not I get another booking?  :sarcastic:

I've repeatedly made my point which is that the OP is claiming to have had a negative experience with a WG because he asked for her mobile number.

In this instance I've applied some common sense that tells me you don't get that sort of response without a reason unless the person is a crank and having met her, I'd say she was quite the opposite. Which has led me to my conclusion that the OP has not given us the full story.

If you believe that is correct then like the others who have read the review and concluded she is a bad un you will blacklist her and move on.

If like me you believe there is more to it than that and decide to ask a few questions before concluding she is a bad un then you will disregard this review.

If he can demonstrate as he said he would that he's had poor service and had abuse for no reason then I'll accept I am in the wrong and take the relevant consequences which may well be a ban for White Knighting as you call it.

And if your posts are tainted by the concern of losing bookings with the girl in question that really doesn't put you in a good light Belgarion  :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 11:50:01 am by GolfNut »

Offline Eddie Chapman

Quote
In this instance I've applied some common sense that tells me you don't get that sort of response without a reason unless the person is a crank and having met her, I'd say she was quite the opposite. Which has led me to my conclusion that the OP has not given us the full story

Here lies the problem. Assuming the OP isn't being completely honest, because you've met WG & have decided that she wouldn't do something like that.

How well do you actually know her?,  given the admission earlier that she turned you fluffy? Surely you can see that this has all the hallmarks of white knighting. Defending her through assumptions.

GolfNut

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Here lies the problem. Assuming the OP isn't being completely honest, because you've met WG & have decided that she wouldn't do something like that.

How well do you actually know her?,  given the admission earlier that she turned you fluffy? Surely you can see that this has all the hallmarks of white knighting. Defending her through assumptions.

Hi Eddie no reviews Chapman. Did you get your GCSE in reading? Obviously not  :sarcastic:

Offline PleadInsanity

Guess it was bound to happen......
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 01:05:33 pm by PleadInsanity »

Offline SamLP

And I thought you had more than a single brain cell Belgarion.  :rolleyes:

Well that's one more than a certain banned member  :hi:

Offline Belgarion

Well that's one more than a certain banned member  :hi:

Really worry about the health of some punters to be honest.

Not sure why he got so worked up about this thread to be honest

Offline SamLP

Really worry about the health of some punters to be honest.

Not sure why he got so worked up about this thread to be honest

No disrespect of course to you Belgarion. I'm sure you possess more than one brain cell.

Some punters get too emotionally involved, especially when the wg complains to them via pm which I'm sure was the case here.
Read and move on. If the wg had her grievances, she could of emailed admin with her own screenshots, but you have a punter trying to put the onus on another punter to provide proof, and picking imaginary holes in the story because he's seen her, and then making wild claims about someone trying to destroy the competition when they don't even work from the same area.. and then rather than back down starts to insult everyone who catches him out with his childish retorts  :wacko: :crazy: :bomb:

Offline Belgarion

No disrespect of course to you Belgarion. I'm sure you possess more than one brain cell.

Some punters get too emotionally involved, especially when the wg complains to them via pm which I'm sure was the case here.
Read and move on. If the wg had her grievances, she could of emailed admin with her own screenshots, but you have a punter trying to put the onus on another punter to provide proof, and picking imaginary holes in the story because he's seen her, and then making wild claims about someone trying to destroy the competition when they don't even work from the same area.. and then rather than back down starts to insult everyone who catches him out with his childish retorts  :wacko: :crazy: :bomb:

This is the problem Sam, those of us with single brain cells know we should not get involved.

I have received PMs from WGs in the past thanking me for reviews or criticising me for negatives.

I take both on the chin and move on. Wish more punters did, would make everyone's life easy
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 02:58:12 pm by Belgarion »

Offline cueball

Bloody work, it gets in the way of all my fun, only just caught up with this  :dash:

 :sarcastic: golfie back on the naughty step...  :sarcastic:

Offline Kev3773

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,048
  • Likes: 28
  •  
  • Reviews: 89
Bloody work, it gets in the way of all my fun, only just caught up with this  :dash:

 :sarcastic: golfie back on the naughty step...  :sarcastic:

Some halfwits never learn  :wacko:

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
No disrespect of course to you Belgarion. I'm sure you possess more than one brain cell.

Some punters get too emotionally involved, especially when the wg complains to them via pm which I'm sure was the case here.
Read and move on. If the wg had her grievances, she could of emailed admin with her own screenshots, but you have a punter trying to put the onus on another punter to provide proof, and picking imaginary holes in the story because he's seen her, and then making wild claims about someone trying to destroy the competition when they don't even work from the same area.. and then rather than back down starts to insult everyone who catches him out with his childish retorts  :wacko: :crazy: :bomb:

If a WG complained to me about a review I had done on her I would tell her to go fuck herself, she did after all fuck me about to get a negative review in the first place. And if one PMd me complaining about another punters review I would ask them what its got to do with me, and that's whether I have had a good punt with the WG or not myself. What other punters experience with a WG has nothing to do with me. Plus obviously as you say they should be PMing admin with proof not me.

Some punters who have good punts with a WG simply cant accept the same WG offered the other punter a bad service, so decide to stick their nose in in an attempt to help the WG and/or curry favour with them. A BIG mistake in my view. As to Golfnut I called him a white knight on a thread some time ago which he didn't like but instead of getting abusive as he has with you he PMd me to protest he wasn't one. I didn't reply as I know a WK when I see one. He is very lucky its only a temp ban in my opinion.

Offline cueball


He is very lucky its only a temp ban in my opinion.

Indeed.... this is golfies second sitting on the naughty step.

The boss has cut him some decent slack but I'd guess that won't last indefinitely.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2016, 05:24:58 pm by cueball »

Offline nikmeister

The things work makes you miss..
Sam mate, you literally had replied exactly what I was thinking when going through all this.

Why can't people follow one of the basic rules of punting. This thread has been given way too much time in the spot light now, it doesn't deserve it.

TheNewSeeker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
An open post to GN

Dear dear GN, why do you get so involved on so little, nay, zero evidence lad! I'm not going to disregard your reviews, as they're useful for their detail about services offered. But, you can't make such judgements on the 'sound mind' of a pross after one, even a few meetings, sometimes. A clue is in this line:

   "Babe how could you imply I was going to stand you up or that I am unprofessional?"

Now that's weird, but in my experience such 'blurts' are not unusual in this game. She's obviously approaching (got?) ragtime, or, does not like being called out for incompetence, or any other myriad of reasons you've no need to give a flying fuck about. We've all seen SPs wobblies, and learn to read them. For me that's a "walk-away she's having a bad day" line.

The OP got time-wasted, big time - no reason to distrust him. Yes, scrutiny is good, and adds value to this site which you correctly point out. But, to be honest, this level of distrust is what puts many newbies of posting reviews IMO.

I don't think you're a true WK, but have matched the pattern to many reading this thread and given a new reviewer an unwarranted hard time. Keep your blood pressure down and rest assured, duff posters usually out themselves in the end as do true WKs; thank your lucky stars Admin has made a decent call, but I suspect it may be three strikes!

 :timeout:

Offline macattack

Fooooookin helll ...seems world war 3 broken out ..

ONLY BECAUSE OF SOME SMELLY FISH BETWEEN WGS LEGS.....(they have grip on our BALLS)

 US MEN WILL NEVER LEARN 

Offline nervyfooker

Fooooookin helll ...seems world war 3 broken out ..

ONLY BECAUSE OF SOME SMELLY FISH BETWEEN WGS LEGS.....(they have grip on our BALLS)

 US MEN WILL NEVER LEARN

did you write this sober?

Offline Bangers and Gash

I'm not going to disregard your reviews...

I disregard all Golfhut's reviews/posts and those that belong to the other WK's on UKP. When I'm picking a punt I want information from a trusted, unbiased reviewer, one who isn't cunt struck or meddles in behind the scenes shit that has nothing to do with them.

WK's and cheerleaders never change, they just modify their behaviour to avoid being culled.

 :hi:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I disregard all Golfhut's reviews/posts and those that belong to the other WK's on UKP. When I'm picking a punt I want information from a trusted, unbiased reviewer, one who isn't cunt struck or meddles in behind the scenes shit that has nothing to do with them.

WK's and cheerleaders never change, they just modify their behaviour to avoid being culled.

 :hi:

it's the back slappers I hate the most but many of them went in last year's Christmas cull. 

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I disregard all Golfhut's reviews/posts and those that belong to the other WK's on UKP. When I'm picking a punt I want information from a trusted, unbiased reviewer, one who isn't cunt struck or meddles in behind the scenes shit that has nothing to do with them.

WK's and cheerleaders never change, they just modify their behaviour to avoid being culled.

 :hi:

Spot on Bangers, a WK is a WK, the fact some are smart enough to be less blatant about it sometimes doesn't change that fact. I identified Golfnut as a WK and called him one as I posted above, this thread just confirms I was right. Still a few in the London area on here but less than ever, hopefully it will stay like that.

Offline jimmycallum

Hi Eddie no reviews Chapman. Did you get your GCSE in reading? Obviously not  :sarcastic:


Golfnut dude, why do you always do this! When I wrote a bad review for ameera, you were sticking up for her and she stopped talking to you. Nobody likes a brown noser, it's not going to make them fall in love with you or get you a discount.

Offline Bangers and Gash

Still a few in the London area on here but less than ever, hopefully it will stay like that.

Try spending some time in the East Mids sections - at times it's like the 2:15 at Doncaster.  :D

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,657
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Not sure why it's so hard to understand for some that 99 punters can have a great time with a prossie, and one punter can have a shit time. And, they're all correct. Because it's their review of their experience.

Bandit-King

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Neither obviously  :rolleyes:

Like you I'm a punter sharing my experience so others can benefit. I have no qualms about either posting a negative review, or supporting a negative review where it is clearly deserved even if it is for a girl I have seen and reviewed. My posting history will confirm that.

I've taken this review at face value and it appears that he apparently lost his booking after doing something that caused the WG to block him.

On that basis I'd say he was the cause of the problem, so I am not inclined to sympathise with him in this instance. Quite simple really.


This is too funny, this is hore we're talking about, she gets fucked and gets paid for it. If someone has had a bad experience and wants to rant about it, let it be!

Simple she may have some good reviews by guys who see her regular and might be experienced punters who review regularly, she's just playing a game, she knows all these suckers will be back for more, she's not offering anything exclusive to one person, she gets fucked by all in the same way.

So my message to all the White night's, the next punter who see's her will fuck her the same way you did and so will the one after. In a nutshell, don't get too hung over it if someone gives her a bad review because she's up for sale to the next punter who will fuck her senseless. Let the man rant about his bad experience, she won't loose any business, because you'll be there to cover her loss's.

With that in mind happy punting.

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Not sure why it's so hard to understand for some that 99 punters can have a great time with a prossie, and one punter can have a shit time. And, they're all correct. Because it's their review of their experience.

Or that the same punter can have a good booking with a prossie, and then a bad one. To paraphrase from one of those stocks investment account disclaimers:

It should not be assumed that future experiences will be positive or will equal past performance, real, indicated or implied.

peter296

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have to say it is quite entertaining to read all 6 pages of this thread on the commute to work. Makes it a quicker. But even if she has 1 negative. She has many positive reviews as well. So the 1 negative wouldn't ruin her reputation with the punters who gave her a positive, so let the OP have his say.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
And if you read the post that I got banned on that you so kindly referred to you will find neither did I demand on that post either  :hi:

This lot ?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84730.msg1043714#msg1043714

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
You were polite and patient

She is unprofessionally pathetic

Many more delicious beautiful mangos out there
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline baranabus96

ah! zombie thread back from the grave.

Persie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She done a blog post singling out Tarzan..lol

Offline baranabus96

She done a blog post singling out Tarzan..lol

could you provide a link?

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She done a blog post singling out Tarzan..lol

Took a screen shot in case she removes.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline claretandblue

She sounds like a bit of a fruitcake  :wackogirl:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
She sounds like a bit of a fruitcake  :wackogirl:

Spitting venom mentioned

Does she realise it's king tarzan and not king cobra. 
« Last Edit: February 21, 2017, 05:41:49 pm by vw »

Offline dami3n

Quote
having a beautiful day, working out, catching up with friends...
...then I go on UKP to catch up on a long ass negative review :lol:

 if you're working out and catching up with friends and you end up on a UKP negative review? you're probably not really having a beautiful day and definitely reading your only negative review way too much and blogging about it :rolleyes: but cool story though

mangos is also cool as a plural by the way so we'll allow it
« Last Edit: February 21, 2017, 05:47:00 pm by dami3n »

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
...then I go on UKP to catch up on a long ass negative review :lol:

 if you're working out and catching up with friends and you end up on a UKP negative review? you're probably not really having a beautiful day and definitely reading your only negative review way too much and blogging about it :rolleyes: but cool story though

mangos is also cool as a plural by the way so we'll allow it

Would hazard a guess a WK helped her with he blog.  Has a a certain stench to it.  :bomb:

Offline jimmycallum

Only commenting on professional aspect

How dare she insult "the king"!.....dirty romanian filth....would still bang her though.

If it helps you seem a decent normal guy King Tarzan....omg look at me I am white knighting a punter.

Offline baranabus96

How dare she insult "the king"!.....dirty romanian filth....would still bang her though.

If it helps you seem a decent normal guy King Tarzan....omg look at me I am white knighting a punter.

BURN THE HERETIC

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline baranabus96

Meaning?

twas a joke, because he jokingly said he was white knighting.

Offline OutForJustice80

twas a joke, because he jokingly said he was white knighting.
Although also you are a ridiculous fruit loop.

Offline jimmycallum

Do you guys know where she is?
Is she retired?

Offline OutForJustice80

Do you guys know where she is?
Is she retired?
Apparently she is retired. Can’t remember who had messages about it but there’s a thread on Uke where someone said so pretty conclusively.

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Apparently she is retired. Can’t remember who had messages about it but there’s a thread on Uke where someone said so pretty conclusively.

correct according to this devastated poster  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:

She messaged me (and others) on UKE to say she has.  :(

Offline OutForJustice80

correct according to this devastated poster  :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
I liked her. Would definitely have been back to see her if she’d stuck around.

Offline jimmycallum

I liked her. Would definitely have been back to see her if she’d stuck around.

Same.

Did she say why?

Offline Chorley

I think this ( resurrected) thread proves that each punter has their own unique experience with a WG, and that other punters can't then be critical if you give a negative review to a previously stellar WG, or indeed a positive when a WG has many negs.

You could see the same WG on separate occasions and have completely contrasting experiences. I know I have and I'm sure others have as well.

I don't get upset and defensive, I just respect the opinion of the other punter.  :thumbsup: