UKEscorting

[somefun]

Had a look over in UKEscorting.  It seems like a decent site which allows for some banter with girls and indeed other punters.  I'm not sure how it would work if you posted a negative against one of the main posters such as for the sake of argument KENDRA who is a prolific punter on there.  Therefore I'm not sure about using the same handle on there as here.  Any thoughts?

[mavgoose]

I use uke. Same user name. Find it pretty decent.

I understand what you're saying regards negative input. However , I find it gives more positives than negatives.

[Llama32]

If you're that concerned about the fallout from posting a negative regarding a girl over there, use a different username. For security reasons, you probably should be using different usernames and passwords for everything, even in normal life, although this isn't practical. The girls there are mostly civil, provided you treat them like a decent human being, not all of them are there to advertise, some just are there for a bit of socialising, casual flirting.

[seeker]

Im also on uke
And use the same handle there as well ..
The girls on there ive found are usually top of thier game and ive
Seen all of the ones that fall into punting criteria
And have had a great time ...
Ive met Kendra a few times now ..she may be a bit Vanilla for some
But the vanilla she dispenses is mighty mighty  good 

If a sp gave  me a bad punt
I would give her a neg on ukp
Irrespective of if she was on uke or not ..
If i had a bad punt i wouldn't be see her again anyway ...

[Matrix]

Had a look over in UKEscorting.  It seems like a decent site which allows for some banter with girls and indeed other punters.  I'm not sure how it would work if you posted a negative against one of the main posters such as for the sake of argument KENDRA who is a prolific punter on there.  Therefore I'm not sure about using the same handle on there as here.  Any thoughts?

I'm not on the site. You should use another name. It will stop any unnecessary hassle and white knighting spreading to this site. Your example can't handle a neutral on here and always sends in the damage control team. God only knows what the reaction on that site would be.

[MrMatrix]

I'm not on the site. You should use another name. It will stop any unnecessary hassle and white knighting spreading to this site. Your example can't handle a neutral on here and always sends in the damage control team. God only knows what the reaction on that site would be.

I agree with my namesake. I too am not on UKE , haven't got the time really. But you should always use different names etc. 

[ik8133]

I'm on both and use different handles for both.  No real reason, just wanted a change from the one I have here.

[Lilywhite]

It's one of the reasons I try not to 'flirt' on there, I'd not want anyone on here to question a review or call out favouritism.
Also me trying to flirt is embarrassing.

[somefun]

I use uke. Same user name. Find it pretty decent.

I understand what you're saying regards negative input. However , I find it gives more positives than negatives.

/

Thanks for the comments guys and Lily

I see positives for the site - what I'm not seeing are the positives for using the same handle Mav?

I'm just thinking you have a chat and agree a meet - Oh sorry MAV I don't want to meet you as I don't want a UKP member reviewing me / you said nasty things about "Sandra" or even simply just getting banter impacted because a girl ignores you because you called some escort a munter.  I can see people taking a more fluffy persona on UKE - not a criticism its just that is what is needed to work on that forum.

I can just see myself coming  back from an iffy "alright" punt and thinking well there is a reason for not saying anything on UKP as I'm having some good chat with her and her pals on UKE - no point in disturbing that cosy banter by saying anything on here about her. (I'll just keep it to myself and not say anything and not see her).

Bottom like is I see some trusted names on UKP, and I'm thinking they may not be in a position to be as honest on here (even if not deliberate and maybe by simply not saying anything).  If I was on UKE under SOMEFUN I would be worried about calling out (on here) a fat munter with more craters on her face than the moon as it may impact my ability to see other girls just as some girls will not see guys who have put a negative on AW.

[Clattypats]

Im also on uke
And use the same handle there as well ..
The girls on there ive found are usually top of thier game and ive
Seen all of the ones that fall into punting criteria
And have had a great time ...
Ive met Kendra a few times now ..she may be a bit Vanilla for some
But the vanilla she dispenses is mighty mighty  good 

If a sp gave  me a bad punt
I would give her a neg on ukp
Irrespective of if she was on uke or not ..
If i had a bad punt i wouldn't be see her again anyway ...

Aha good point..I use the same name on both,cause I don't care..And can differentiate between the two sites,and what they are about

The problem however arises when you do a review (even though its honest) and someone slates that review as being"Fit for uke consumption"  Even though I've gave someone that is on there a NEG..what you think seeker? 

Bearing in mind I can differentiate between the two sites,which are both helpful

[Game on]

/

Thanks for the comments guys and Lily

I see positives for the site - what I'm not seeing are the positives for using the same handle Mav?

I'm just thinking you have a chat and agree a meet - Oh sorry MAV I don't want to meet you as I don't want a UKP member reviewing me / you said nasty things about "Sandra" or even simply just getting banter impacted because a girl ignores you because you called some escort a munter.  I can see people taking a more fluffy persona on UKE - not a criticism its just that is what is needed to work on that forum.

I can just see myself coming  back from an iffy "alright" punt and thinking well there is a reason for not saying anything on UKP as I'm having some good chat with her and her pals on UKE - no point in disturbing that cosy banter by saying anything on here about her. (I'll just keep it to myself and not say anything and not see her).

Bottom like is I see some trusted names on UKP, and I'm thinking they may not be in a position to be as honest on here (even if not deliberate and maybe by simply not saying anything).  If I was on UKE under SOMEFUN I would be worried about calling out (on here) a fat munter with more craters on her face than the moon as it may impact my ability to see other girls just as some girls will not see guys who have put a negative on AW.

Totally agree with  you. I think if you use the same nickname, your not going to give any information about escorts who use UKE, if the question was asked on here, for fear of not getting another booking?

[Lilywhite]

I can just see myself coming  back from an iffy "alright" punt and thinking well there is a reason for not saying anything on UKP as I'm having some good chat with her and her pals on UKE - no point in disturbing that cosy banter by saying anything on here about her. (I'll just keep it to myself and not say anything and not see her).

If the punt could have been improved and you've got good chat with her surely constructive criticism would be appreciated so the service could get better, or so the profile could be changed to make it more accurate? If the girls on UKE are as top notch as they appear I'd think it wouldn't get in the way unless it was nasty unnecessarily?

[Clattypats]

Totally agree with  you. I think if you use the same nickname, your not going to give any information about escorts who use UKE, if the question was asked on here, for fear of not getting another booking?

well at the end of the day tbh..if they were shite. .would you want another booking with them?

[Clattypats]

If the punt could have been improved and you've got good chat with her surely constructive criticism would be appreciated so the service could get better, or so the profile could be changed to make it more accurate? If the girls on UKE are as top notch as they appear I'd think it wouldn't get in the way unless it was nasty unnecessarily?

it's still a NEG review if anyone searches it though..No? Unless you give a neutral for the benefit of the doubt

[Lilywhite]

it's still a NEG review if anyone searches it though..No? Unless you give a neutral for the benefit of the doubt

I have a negative review which shows in a search? It's not made any difference to me other than when I came back from my break I made sure my comms had improved because numerous people mentoned i was unreliable.
So I guess it worked?
I'd still see the person who made the review if they wanted to give me another chance.
This is a business at the end of the day, one we get paid huge amounts for, if someone's not happy with my standards then it's my problem, not theirs.

[somefun]

well at the end of the day tbh..if they were shite. .would you want another booking with them?

Clatty  - on the basis she was shite, we are not taking about getting another booking with the same girl.  Some WGs look at the feedback given on AW and refuse to meet punters who have given any WG negative feedback.  WGs could quite easily look at our reviews here and decide not to accept booking - why make it easy for them to do that.

Also for example I reviewed emily simmons but called out she was a bit larger than the profile.  I might see her again but I would not like her to know I said that as it would spoil the punt.  If I had met her using UKE and I had planned to see her again I would not have mentioned size in a review on here.

Also again I might see a girl who is on AW as say 30 but I see her and punt is fine but she is actually 40, then even if it is positive review some punters would be interested to know that she is actually 40.  Naturally if I'm planning to see her again I'm not going to mention that on here if she knows it was me who said it.

[Clattypats]

Clatty  - on the basis she was shite, we are not taking about getting another booking with the same girl.  Some WGs look at the feedback given on AW and refuse to meet punters who have given any WG negative feedback.  WGs could quite easily look at our reviews here and decide not to accept booking - why make it easy for them to do that.

Also for example I reviewed emily simmons but called out she was a bit larger than the profile.  I might see her again but I would not like her to know I said that as it would spoil the punt.  If I had met her using UKE and I had planned to see her again I would not have mentioned size in a review on here.

Also again I might see a girl who is on AW as say 30 but I see her and punt is fine but she is actually 40, then even if it is positive review some punters would be interested to know that she is actually 40.  Naturally if I'm planning to see her again I'm not going to mention that on here if she knows it was me who said it.

Naw..Fair point totally...

It's the chance you take by using the same user name some fun. .agree..

But I agree with seeker(for once) on one point...usually when they are on uke they are reputable otherwise I don't think they would be on there..It's a double edged sword though bud

[somefun]

If the punt could have been improved and you've got good chat with her surely constructive criticism would be appreciated so the service could get better, or so the profile could be changed to make it more accurate? If the girls on UKE are as top notch as they appear I'd think it wouldn't get in the way unless it was nasty unnecessarily?

I think your comments have some merit where as you say punts could be improved by "talking". 
In that category would be stuff like oral technique (recently had a girl who was giving good service but my knob would have been in shreds if I stayed an hr "so cut it short"  , timing of the activities within the punt etc.  There is one girl I have in mind where a wee bit subtle banter around the time it takes for her to get down to business would be the ideal solution.

Where the things are stuff like looks, size, age etc there is more of a problem and as you touched upon where we say something in public it could well mean tempers are frayed as there livelihoods and cash at stake.   

Somewhere in between is a girl I have in mind, where she was fine/good but I could not review her without mentioning she has a really bad wrinkly saggy tum that she tries to cover-up with a six inch wide suspender belt. 

[muffherwell91]

I use the same user name on both sites. However, if I had a bad experience I wouldn’t think twice about giving her a negative review on here. Whether she was a member of UKE or not.

[somefun]

But I agree with seeker(for once) on one point...usually when they are on uke they are reputable otherwise I don't think they would be on there..It's a double edged sword though bud

Agree the girls I've recognised so far are reputable / legit.  It takes a wee bit effort so hopefully the fake Roms will stay away  .  MyRuna is on it but she is not a standard Rom. 

[Clattypats]

I use the same user name on both sites. However, if I had a bad experience I wouldn’t think twice about giving her a negative review on here. Whether she was a member of UKE or not.

Been there done that But think a few of my points are valid..WGs  wouldn't be on uke if they weren't reputable..I could still give a NEG if it warranted it....But because of reviews etc on ukp or meets thru uke ..I tend to find none of my reviews recently warrant it...And that's what it's all about..They're still honest reviews

[Clattypats]

Agree the girls I've recognised so far are reputable / legit.  It takes a wee bit effort so hopefully the fake Roms will stay away  .  MyRuna is on it but she is not a standard Rom.

your right..I've been chatting to her on there..seems decent..But since,I've seen links to other sites ,where she is Greek. .she still seems ok..But I'll do my homework on that before I comment

[Cactus]

If the punt could have been improved and you've got good chat with her surely constructive criticism would be appreciated so the service could get better, or so the profile could be changed to make it more accurate? If the girls on UKE are as top notch as they appear I'd think it wouldn't get in the way unless it was nasty unnecessarily?

Aye, but you've got your head screwed on. 9 out of 10 girls will see the criticism and then go straight into defense mode, which usually leads to a PR disaster. Look at the recent 'massage with Emily' thread, where she's come on and basically fucked herself by reacting to negative comments. The girls are offering a service and this site allows their customers to review their experience, like tripadvisor for hookers.  You're offering a service and being paid very well for it, if your service is sub par then why shouldn't you be criticized (I know I would in my line of work).  This isn't directed at you by the way Lily 

As for UKE.  I'm not on there, had a look a couple of times and occassionally I've clicked on the pictures on UKP along the top banner while logging in when my interest in piqued.  The comments on there, with punters blowing smoke up the arse of escorts and flirting in an open forum isn't for me. I'm all for a little flirting and chatter between me and an escort to build anticipation for a punt, but in an open forum it's not for me.

[Clattypats]

Aye, but you've got your head screwed on. 9 out of 10 girls will see the criticism and then go straight into defense mode, which usually leads to a PR disaster. Look at the recent 'massage with Emily' thread, where she's come on and basically fucked herself by reacting to negative comments. The girls are offering a service and this site allows their customers to review their experience, like tripadvisor for hookers.  You're offering a service and being paid very well for it, if your service is sub par then why shouldn't you be criticized (I know I would in my line of work).  This isn't directed at you by the way Lily 

As for UKE.  I'm not on there, had a look a couple of times and occassionally I've clicked on the pictures on UKP along the top banner while logging in when my interest in piqued.  The comments on there, with punters blowing smoke up the arse of escorts and flirting in an open forum isn't for me. I'm all for a little flirting and chatter between me and an escort to build anticipation for a punt, but in an open forum it's not for me.

your right..But that's where you need to differentiate between two forums..Difficult to do..Prob not (no slate on u by the way)it's down to the individual and opinions..might be fur sum..maybe no for others..This is why we live in a democracy m8..Admin runs the two sites and they are equally good/successful....It's either fur ye or against..Everyone to their own but

[Clattypats]

I have to say but...Great question posed by the OP

[Game on]

well at the end of the day tbh..if they were shite. .would you want another booking with them?

That's the point, how do we know if they are shite, you wouldn't have given any info on the wg's for fear of not getting another booking 

[Clattypats]

That's the point, how do we know if they are shite, you wouldn't have given any info on the wg's for fear of not getting another booking 

Because you stick up a pos,neg , or neutral review..Did u no read my earlier post!

[seeker]

That's the point, how do we know if they are shite, you wouldn't have given any info on the wg's for fear of not getting another booking 

Game on 
Yove done 2 reviews  back in april 2016
I punt more than that in a week
Ive done 35 reviews, quite a few Negative.
As ive already stated if ,i had a bad punt i would give the wg a Negative review
As i wouldn't be seeing her again anyhow .
If you wish not to believe a fellow punter because hes on uke with same handle
Then thats up to you .
I Always review a bad punt thats the point of UKP  and in return
Othere should also do the same ...I dont do positives anymore
For various reasons which ive explained in the past .
Ive not had a bad punt for a long time as i only see uk girls now .
Also i cross reference them on here UKP
There are only about 5 girls on the Scottish section of uke i consider
Worthy of receiving my hard earned cash .
Of whom id met 4 before uke started.
That leaves about another 5 whom im not interested to punt with
For various reasons such as age or body size .
Most of the Girls know im "seeker" as some numb nut posted it on here
and was correctly and quickly Banned on here by Admin ...
I Dont believe any  sensible wg would not see me because i had given
another wg a negative review that would be stupid of them and the
bests wgs are i find clever and shrewed not stupid .
Guys that are not prepard to at least share a bad experience
With thier fellow Punters dont deserve to be on this site ..
I hold the belief even long term lurkers who dont contribute here
Should after a period of time be removed ..
But that Admins business as its his board .
Sorry for any grammar mistakes i do this on
My  punting phone 

[Game on]

Because you stick up a pos,neg , or neutral review..Did u no read my earlier post!

Yes i read your last post. but i think it will be harder for you's to leave a  review if it warrants, neutral or negative. you will have a got to close like friends, it's a double edged sword, fucked if you do, and fucked if you don't. 

[Game on]

Game on 
Yove done 2 reviews  back in april 2016
I punt more than that in a week
Ive done 35 reviews, quite a few Negative.
As ive already stated if ,i had a bad punt i would give the wg a Negative review
As i wouldn't be seeing her again anyhow .
If you wish not to believe a fellow punter because hes on uke with same handle
Then thats up to you .
I Always review a bad punt thats the point of UKP  and in return
Othere should also do the same ...I dont do positives anymore
For various reasons which ive explained in the past .
Ive not had a bad punt for a long time as i only see uk girls now .
Also i cross reference them on here UKP
There are only about 5 girls on the Scottish section of uke i consider
Worthy of receiving my hard earned cash .
Of whom id met 4 before uke started.
That leaves about another 5 whom im not interested to punt with
For various reasons such as age or body size .
Most of the Girls know im "seeker" as some numb nut posted it on here
and was correctly and quickly Banned on here by Admin ...
I Dont believe any  sensible wg would not see me because i had given
another wg a negative review that would be stupid of them and the
bests wgs are i find clever and shrewed not stupid .
Guys that are not prepard to at least share a bad experience
With thier fellow Punters dont deserve to be on this site ..
I hold the belief even long term lurkers who dont contribute here
Should after a period of time be removed ..
But that Admins business as its his board .
Sorry for any grammar mistakes i do this on
My  punting phone 

Thanks for reminding me I've only left 2 reviews, you were the 1 who tried to tell me how to write a review, like i said before, i will write a review when i think i need to. If we're all having paid sex with the same wg's, their's not going to be much difference between each other's punts, unless you add a wee bit of bullshit,  anyway, i see your holding back some information? 

[Matrix]

Thanks for reminding me I've only left 2 reviews, you were the 1 who tried to tell me how to write a review, like i said before, i will write a review when i think i need to. If we're all having paid sex with the same wg's, their's not going to be much difference between each other's punts, unless you add a wee bit of bullshit,  anyway, i see your holding back some information? 

Aye, his membership is longer than yours. 

It's clearly an advantage not having the same handle on different accounts. There'll always be someone with an axe to grind.

[Jock D]

It's clearly an advantage not having the same handle on different accounts. There'll always be someone with an axe to grind.

^^^^^ Is the correct answer to the OP's original question...but then he knew that already

[laim1690]

I could imagine if you met one of Scotland uke's loyal bitches and youd not enjoyed your self then came on here and wrote neg or even a neutral but honest review. Then went on there (uke) using the same handle/name.Every time you posted something youd get slaughtered by the uke faithful cliques.

It makes great reading right enough very entertaining.Theres the odd bitch fight on it about silly things,the bitches be like toe to toe and all the guys/white knights/frequent posters stand at the sides and watch then the bitches kiss make up and say sorry and all the guys/white knghts/frequent posters are like glad to see you guys have made up.

Fucking brilliant

[seeker]

Laim1690
It makes great reading right enough very entertaining.Theres the odd bitch fight on it about silly things,the bitches be like toe to toe and all the guys/white knights/frequent posters stand at the sides and watch then the bitches kiss make up and say sorry and all the guys/white knghts/frequent posters are like glad to see you guys have made up.

Fucking brilliant
[/quote]

+1 yea there is that 

[GraysonD]

Is this the site everyone who got banned from here went to?

[laim1690]

Is this the site everyone who got banned from here went to?

Yes that's right