diamondintheruff

[spurs]

ive seen vicky a few times love her to bits but have been messed around a lot ! booked vicky for 3 hours this monday .................................NO SHOW NOT HEARD A THING  :

[NottsNylonLuvr]

You've been waiting since Monday?   

[threechilliman]

Sounds like she's an habitual TW.

I'd be leaving a red review for that, I can tell you. Look on thecbright side though, you've still got your cash in your pocket.

tcm

[Turtle Z]

ive seen vicky a few times love her to bits but have been messed around a lot ! booked vicky for 3 hours this monday .................................NO SHOW NOT HEARD A THING  :

How did you book her?

[demonic]

Registered last month .... first ever post 

Thinking something may not be exactly as it appears .......

[DITR]

ive seen vicky a few times love her to bits but have been messed around a lot ! booked vicky for 3 hours this monday .................................NO SHOW NOT HEARD A THING  :

No booking made here, someone obviously trying to add to Monday's disaster. Don't know this guy and I have no idea why he is trying to make things worst for me.
DITR

[DITR]

ive seen vicky a few times love her to bits but have been messed around a lot ! booked vicky for 3 hours this monday .................................NO SHOW NOT HEARD A THING  :

Ps, don't offer 3 hours!
Oh dear

[cueball]

Ps, don't offer 3 hours!
Oh dear

Why aren't you on here under your proper AW name? Have you read the rules?

Or, maybe this is you too.... https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=102918

Or maybe this is you as well.... https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=49353

You got a couple of accounts going spare?

[DITR]

This is my only account, initially for reading only.
DITR abbreviation to Diamondintheruff xx babe.
Honestly, never have, would or will use this site for my own advantages

[cueball]

This is my only account, initially for reading only.
DITR abbreviation to Diamondintheruff xx babe.
Honestly, never have, would or will use this site for my own advantages

Yes, I know what the abbreviation is, I'd already worked it out 

But, they're not my rules, their the bosses rules and he is the gaffer on here.

Just to remind you......

- Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but there is zero tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers. All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'. Transsexual service providers may be members, but not male service providers.

DITR is not a suitable reveal of your working name imo,, fine whilst you're posting on a thread about you but down the line you'll be posting elsewhere,  some member could assume you're a punter and treat you accordingly.

For me, I don't trust lasses that come on here not disclosing their working names.

[Name redacted]

To be fair, I'm sure most of us knew it was diamondintheruff posting, as we use DITR to abbreviate when referring to her ourselves. Don't think it matters does it.

[cueball]

To be fair, I'm sure most of us knew it was diamondintheruff posting, as we use DITR to abbreviate when referring to her ourselves. Don't think it matters does it.

Yes it does, it's in the rules from the owner of the site. If it didn't matter then it wouldn't be there would it.

[GolfNut]

Just to remind you......

- Service Providers
This site allows service providers to be members, but there is zero tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters. Service providers must respect the ethos of the site. This site is not a chat platform between clients and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers. All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'. Transsexual service providers may be members, but not male service providers.

DITR is not a suitable reveal of your working name imo,, fine whilst you're posting on a thread about you but down the line you'll be posting elsewhere,  some member could assume you're a punter and treat you accordingly.

For me, I don't trust lasses that come on here not disclosing their working names.

Obviously the final decision rests with Admin, but the rules don't specifically say the WG must use her AW name do they?  So that's purely your interpretation of the site rules. DITR has hardly been anonymous. She's made her identity blatantly obvious in her posts for all to see.

I'm guessing there are plenty of SP's who's names do not match up to their AW nics logging in regularly. Just need to see how many non posting active accounts there are to get a feel for the number of lurking SPs.

[cueball]

Obviously the final decision rests with Admin, but the rules don't specifically say the WG must use her AW name do they?  So that's purely your interpretation of the site rules. DITR has hardly been anonymous. She's made her identity blatantly obvious in her posts for all to see.

I'm guessing there are plenty of SP's who's names do not match up to their AW nics logging in regularly. Just need to see how many non posting active accounts there are to get a feel for the number of lurking SPs.

That's your opinion golfie, mine is different to that.

DITR is just one example, as you know, there's plenty more lurking. I prefer to know who (prossie or punter) I'm interacting with.

Me and you certainly read that rule different.

[Name redacted]

That's your opinion golfie, mine is different to that.

It's not his opinion, its in the rules from the admin of the site.

[GolfNut]

That's your opinion golfie, mine is different to that.

DITR is just one example, as you know, there's plenty more lurking. I prefer to know who (prossie or punter) I'm interacting with.

Me and you certainly read that rule different.

Agree we see it differently CB. There has been much debate about SP presence on UKP, and personally if it were possible I believe it would be best if we could keep the site to punters only, but guess that's not possible to police 100% and so agree that SP's need to make themselves known when posting, which IMO DITR has indeed done, unlike many others who get found out eventually.

Pretty sure if it was an issue Vicki would change her nic to make it easier to identify her, much as Rebecca did when she had been on here as BooBoo for yonks.

Some of the punter nics are pretty ambiguous, and unless you are going to try and cross reference UKP members names to AW, far simpler to judge the person on their posts than trying to work out who they are. Some of the AW nics are not so obvious to make them easily identifiable as SP's.

The touting, flirting and attitude/behaviour are the key elements of the rules as far as SP's are concerned is my take on the rules and ethos.

[cueball]

It's not his opinion, its in the rules from the admin of the site.

Nice little try, but you're attempt at twisting failed, golfie doesn't need you to stick up for him, he's a big lad, the opinion is the interpretation of the rule, you know that already though.

Agree we see it differently CB.

It's about knowing who we're dealing with golfie, DITR is only an example. In one week, one month, one year it'll be forgotten but one of the membership could inadvertently share info with a prossie (you know what I'm on about without going round the houses) that he wouldn't have normally done.

The lasses should be easily recognisable on a punters forum, and I think we've got a rule that makes it quite clear.

[Mr Farkyhars]

Yes it does, it's in the rules from the owner of the site. If it didn't matter then it wouldn't be there would it.

+1 - not everyone, especially newbies, is going to have any idea what some random abbreviation means.

[GolfNut]

Nice little try, but you're attempt at twisting failed, golfie doesn't need you to stick up for him, he's a big lad, the opinion is the interpretation of the rule, you know that already though.

It's about knowing who we're dealing with golfie, DITR is only an example. In one week, one month, one year it'll be forgotten but one of the membership could inadvertently share info with a prossie (you know what I'm on about without going round the houses) that he wouldn't have normally done.

The lasses should be easily recognisable on a punters forum, and I think we've got a rule that makes it quite clear.

Don't disagree with you CB, I think we differ on the fact that you're stating the ideal situation and I'm stating the fact, which is that it's impossible to enforce and if an SP makes herself known, that's good enough for me.

If anyone confuses DITR with a punter then that's their problem. As I see it she's out in the open. Lots of examples of SP's pretending to be punters on the sly that we should be rooting out before having a go just because her name is not the same as her AW. Like I said how on earth do you know if a name exists on AW without spending your whole life checking up who you're interacting with. I got better things to do with my time, punting being one of them 

[PepeMAGA]

If she's agreeable admin could change her username to the full name or use one of her AW pictures  as the avatar. problem solved.

[RedKettle]

there are worse things to be worrying about that this - it is clear who she is and she has made no attempt to pretend otherwise.

[OldAdmin]

I don't see issue as it's abbreviation of her working name.
That specific bit in the rules was introduced to stop prossies joining with names like "SexyLady" and refusing to reveal who they are. That happened years ago.

In coming days I'll change the site so posts include some kind of indication they are by service provider and their AW profile. Her account is already tagged as service provider in the database (that's why the reviews counter doesn't show on her post).

[cueball]

I don't see issue as it's abbreviation of her working name.
That specific bit in the rules was introduced to stop prossies joining with names like "SexyLady" and refusing to reveal who they are. That happened years ago.

In coming days I'll change the site so posts include some kind of indication they are by service provider and their AW profile. Her account is already tagged as service provider in the database (that's why the reviews counter doesn't show on her post).

Ok boss, if you're happy then that'll do.

The penny has just dropped with the review counter thing you've just mentioned too, that makes sense 

[GolfNut]

Thanks for the clarification Admin. I think that sounds spot on. I hadn't noticed the lack of review count, so an SP flag is a very good idea.

All is well in the forest again for the time being then   

[threechilliman]

personally if it were possible I believe it would be best if we could keep the site to punters only, but guess that's not possible to police 100%

On that point Golfie, I agree with you. Didn't used to think that, but I've changed my view on it.

tcm

[Turtle Z]

Obviously the final decision rests with Admin, but the rules don't specifically say the WG must use her AW name do they?  So that's purely your interpretation of the site rules. DITR has hardly been anonymous. She's made her identity blatantly obvious in her posts for all to see.

I'm guessing there are plenty of SP's who's names do not match up to their AW nics logging in regularly. Just need to see how many non posting active accounts there are to get a feel for the number of lurking SPs.

Yes, I agree, whatever 'the rules' say, its about the  posters intent  and clearly Vicki was intent on making it clear who she was.

[DITR]

Yh sure, go for it.
Admin, if you could change the name to Diamondintheruff xx please?

DITR xx

[TheNewSeeker]

To reflect his recent game, GolfNut would also like it to be known that he wishes henceforth to be named GolfintheRough 

[GolfNut]

To reflect his recent game, GolfNut would also like it to be known that he wishes henceforth to be named GolfintheRough 

 

GolfballsintheRuff may be more appropriate