Well of those I've only seen Kimmie. Of the remainder, Helen is the most attractive, but those pics have been swapping profiles every so often for 5 or 6 years now so she'll be a good deal older if it's even her. In any case Helen's profile is bringing up Rose's reviews so they're pretty much worthless.
I agree about all the negs, but when you look at them it's mostly the b&s that's provoking the negs. Which says a lot about the way the group is run, but often not a fat lot that you can pin down to individual girls when they keep swapping profiles. Again worthless.
It's seems this Thai setup has the ultimate anarchic answer to the sanity offered by UKP. They provide girls who will for the most part provide the services stated for a price that is a pittance compared to the same range of services from other providers. This is very attractive to those on a budget who still want some of the more exotic services such as anal.
The catch is, you have to take a gamble on seeing the girl you want regardless of reviews. As they may or may not refer to the girl you actually see and it's 50/50 as to whether you'll come out grinning ear to ear. Although I often have in spite of being b&s'd.
We need 4 other volunteers to see at least one each and report back. We should then have a good idea of which ones aren't worth the effort by the end of the week.
I'll take Kimmie.
