naughtyHannahX - Derby

[sanjman]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This was a fairly short notice punt.  Well about 4 hours notice.  Comms by text were initially excellent, quick responses and postcode given. Punt time was confirmed.

Hannah knew I was travelling 30 mins to see her so I said I would text as a I was leaving. When I texted just before heading off, there was total radio silence.  Texted a few times and aborted my journey before I drove for too long.

Never heard back from her, even when I texted after the appointed time to offer her a chance to explain.

I see she's touring in London now.

[Ramone78]

IMHO you dodged a Bullet there Mate.
I saw her a couple of weeks ago and not at all impressed

[GolfNut]

Sorry to hear you got bumped OP, that's pretty crap. Thanks for your report and hope you have better luck next punt.

IMHO you dodged a Bullet there Mate.
I saw her a couple of weeks ago and not at all impressed

Maybe a review would be in order if you feel so strongly about her being below par.

I found her okay personally. Chavvy yep I agree, chatty, yep that as well. Bolt on tits I did say so in my review. But as far as service went I found her pretty good and she was a good shag and did everything on her likes so I had no reason not to give a positive in my opinion. I did also say I'd go for the half hour rather than an hour if I returned. 

[_Bender_]

I was a bit confused for moment, why is this in the West Midlands thread??

[GolfNut]

I was a bit confused for moment, why is this in the West Midlands thread??

I've asked Admin to move it to E Mids. Think he posted it incorrectly.

[CoolTiger]

IMHO you dodged a Bullet there Mate.
I saw her a couple of weeks ago and not at all impressed

Sorry to hear you got bumped OP, that's pretty crap. Thanks for your report and hope you have better luck next punt.

Maybe a review would be in order if you feel so strongly about her being below par.

I found her okay personally. Chavvy yep I agree, chatty, yep that as well. Bolt on tits I did say so in my review. But as far as service went I found her pretty good and she was a good shag and did everything on her likes so I had no reason not to give a positive in my opinion. I did also say I'd go for the half hour rather than an hour if I returned. 

I saw her recently and have to say not my type at all, constant inane chatter, chavvy and over-made up
Flat was a bit Strange, pictures of her Child on the wall didn't really do much for me
Almost skeletal frame, with one of the worst pairs of false tits I've seen in a while, when she rubbed them on my Chest it was like being caressed with a Couple of bowling balls.
TBH all I wanted to do was get it over with, so OWO and out.
The whole punt compounded itself when I checked my phone and Princess Pippa (my favourite in Derby) had replied to my earlier text and was available and I had not seen the message 
Each to their own, just my experience

Agree with GN. You went as far as putting the above in a review of hers. You could have easily gone further, copied and pasted the above and turned it into a neutral/negative review within seconds.

[Ramone78]

Agree with GN. You went as far as putting the above in a review of hers. You could have easily gone further, copied and pasted the above and turned it into a neutral/negative review within seconds.

So you're not supposed to put conflicting opinions on a Report ?
I assumed (incorrectly ??) that it would be more useful to add a recent experiece to an existing thread

[RedKettle]

So you're not supposed to put conflicting opinions on a Report ?
I assumed (incorrectly ??) that it would be more useful to add a recent experiece to an existing thread

separate reviews are great - that way people can if they wish focus on the numbers of reviews.  There might be 3 positive reviews so a punter goes for it without seeing the negative comments from others on some of the reviews.  Yes they should have read the threads but not always the time.

[Ramone78]

separate reviews are great - that way people can if they wish focus on the numbers of reviews.  There might be 3 positive reviews so a punter goes for it without seeing the negative comments from others on some of the reviews.  Yes they should have read the threads but not always the time.

Research, research, research.. IMHO 

[GolfNut]

So you're not supposed to put conflicting opinions on a Report ?
I assumed (incorrectly ??) that it would be more useful to add a recent experiece to an existing thread

This is a forum for punters. Agree? Good.

So the general idea is that we share our experiences to enable other punters to make informed decisions about how to spend their punting money.

Comments are fine, but if your experience is vastly different to an OP's review then by not writing a review you are not giving other punters a fair chance to share your experience.

Negative comments in positive reviews are all well and good but chances are they are not as obvious to anybody researching the SP in question and so have significantly less impact than a full review.

GN

[Ramone78]

Oh ok fine shoot me down,
So using this logic the only reason that we have the right of reply to a Field Report is so it can be agreed with ? seems pointless to allow replys then.
I was trying to be helpful however I shall keep my experiences to myself in future

[vw]

Oh ok fine shoot me down,
I was trying to be helpful however I shall keep my experiences to myself in future

Would ignore them and roam sherwood as you wish,  be wary of the knights though.

[RedKettle]

Oh ok fine shoot me down,
I was trying to be helpful however I shall keep my experiences to myself in future

no need to throw toys out - I was just explaining why new reviews are better than comments on the threads.  We try and make this forum as useful as possible.  If there are 20+ reviews on a girl you are not likely to read each on in detail but you will look at the one negative review.

If you do not want to join in fine, but if you do then grow a thicker skin.

[Ramone78]

no need to throw toys out - I was just explaining why new reviews are better than comments on the threads.  We try and make this forum as useful as possible.  If there are 20+ reviews on a girl you are not likely to read each on in detail but you will look at the one negative review.

If you do not want to join in fine, but if you do then grow a thicker skin.

Whatever, 

[GolfNut]

no need to throw toys out - I was just explaining why new reviews are better than comments on the threads.  We try and make this forum as useful as possible.  If there are 20+ reviews on a girl you are not likely to read each on in detail but you will look at the one negative review.

If you do not want to join in fine, but if you do then grow a thicker skin.

He's been around longer than most and clearly is just a leech. 7 reviews in nearly 3 years says it all IMHO.

Happy to use other reviews for his own research but can't be arsed to share his own experiences. 

Save your breath RK it's wasted on his sort.

[Ramone78]

He's been around longer than most and clearly is just a leech. 7 reviews in nearly 3 years says it all IMHO.

Happy to use other reviews for his own research but can't be arsed to share his own experiences. 

Save your breath RK it's wasted on his sort.

Absolutely

[vw]

He's been around longer than most and clearly is just a leech. 7 reviews in nearly 3 years says it all IMHO.

Happy to use other reviews for his own research but can't be arsed to share his own experiences. 

Save your breath RK it's wasted on his sort.

2 of ramone's last 3 reviews are toftt.   Unlike some punters who never contribute,  i think you are swinging in the wrong bunker. 

[GolfNut]

2 of ramone's last 3 reviews are toftt.   Unlike some punters who never contribute,  i think you are swinging in the wrong bunker.

True indeed vw and a few in the last couple of months. Perhaps a little hasty in my conclusion. But still stand by the fact that a review is merited where he has a different experience than that which has been reported.

[vw]

True indeed vw and a few in the last couple of months. Perhaps a little hasty in my conclusion. But still stand by the fact that a review is merited where he has a different experience than that which has been reported.

Well a post is better than nothing even though reviews are nice sometimes not just possible.

Sure you posted last week about encouraging new reviewers, maybe I could give you some etiquette lessons next time we are on the fairway ? 

[GolfNut]

Well a post is better than nothing even though reviews are nice sometimes not just possible.

Sure you posted last week about encouraging new reviewers, maybe I could give you some etiquette lessons next time we are on the fairway ? 

He's not a new reviewer. He's been around much longer than I have. 

[vw]

He's been around much longer than I have. 

Maybe you should call him Sir then 

My point was all reviewers should be encouraged to review (then chased out of town if they are fluffies.)

[Ramone78]

He's not a new reviewer. He's been around much longer than I have. 

I have made on average a review every 6 months and (seemingly wrongly) commented on other reviews of girls I have seen,
I may be in the minority in not feeling the need to get involved in every discussion, or become judgemental of members I dont know.

[vw]

To be pedantic golfie

He has spent 6 days online with 7 reviews

You have spent 66 days online  11 times more than him. 

This you should have 11 times the amount of reviews which is  77, could say you are3 a slacker with these stats ?   

[GolfNut]

To be pedantic golfie

He has spent 6 days online with 7 reviews

You have spent 66 days online  11 times more than him. 

This you should have 11 times the amount of reviews which is  77, could say you are3 a slacker with these stats ?   

 

Didn't know you were a statistician vw. Lie and damned lies and all that. Maybe look at how he compares to you on that basis

[vw]

Didn't know you were a statistician vw. Lie and damned lies and all that. Maybe look at how he compares to you on that basis

WELL as I said stats can prove anything.

I go by the rules judge not those who don't white knight and cast the others down with polished armour.

[GolfNut]

I have made on average a review every 6 months and (seemingly wrongly) commented on other reviews of girls I have seen,
I may be in the minority in not feeling the need to get involved in every discussion, or become judgemental of members I dont know.

Seeing as you joined up in 2014, I'm assuming rightly or wrongly, that you have a considerable amount of punting experience to share with the forum.

I never said comments weren't appreciated did I?

I was however trying to emphasise that reviews are appreciated more and as CoolTiger pointed out, it would take very little to take the bullet points you posted on my positive review and put them up as your own review. That indeed would be far more useful than some throwaway comments that serve little purpose to those trying to decide if she is worth a punt or not.

3 reviews is not much to go on so the more the better.

[Ramone78]

"Throwaway " how condescending

[GolfNut]

"Throwaway " how condescending

So how else would you describe the following??:

IMHO you dodged a Bullet there Mate.
I saw her a couple of weeks ago and not at all impressed

Looks like a throwaway comment from where I'm standing 

[cueball]

Fear not golfie, you've got a proper super fan in the deluded posts dustbin 

He thinks the sun shines out of your arse, but the rest of us know that's just a blinding reflection from over use of brasso 

[GolfNut]

Fear not golfie, you've got a proper super fan in the deluded posts dustbin 

He thinks the sun shines out of your arse, but the rest of us know that's just a blinding reflection from over use of brasso 

It's me dad. He's very proud. 

[demonic]

I have to smile at this thread ... 2 established and respected members having a bit of lively banter and Ramone78 trying to justify himself.

Ramone ... given that your feedback was so contrary to the original tone of the post you ABSOLUTELY should have created a new thread ... no if's or but's ....

Nothing more to say ...

[Ramone78]

Who am I supposed to be justifying myself to ?
Please remind me

[RedKettle]

Who am I supposed to be justifying myself to ?
Please remind me

You do not need to justify yourself to anyone. 

Entirely up to you (subject to Admin's views) how you use this forum - however many of us from time to time offer advice on how to get the most from the forum, which is what we were doing above.  You chose to have a hissy fit and again entirely up to you.

I would just add that most of us have been on the receiving end of far stronger "advice" than was passed onto you and we took it on board and have increased our involvement in and fun from UKP.  Golfie even got himself banned for a while to ensure that he learnt - now that's a good example that he did not just throw his clubs away and stomp off, he has learned and come back for more laughs and shagging.

You have no need to change at all.  Entirely up to you.

Is that all friendly enough for you......

[Ramone78]

Understood and appreciated 

However my point I believe is valid, if each reviewed Service Provider had ONE review IMHO that would work far better, Punters could add to it so a constantly evolving record of performance and service could be viewed and referred too, Instead of reading multiple reports and Threads.
Just saying 

[Dorsetpunter]

I think the system works well, especially when you search on AW number you get all relevant information, and by posting the links you get all reviews. That's sort of how trip advisor works too, all reviews stand on their own and are linked to the SP.

On this site everyone should be encouraged, as they usually are, to post reviews especially if they have a vastly different experience to reports already posted.

If you saw a positive review you would take that on face value, if someone then comments their experience is different but doesn't post a review how is anyone going to judge whether to rely on the positive or the negative.

Just my thoughts

[GolfNut]

Understood and appreciated 

However my point I believe is valid, if each reviewed Service Provider had ONE review IMHO that would work far better, Punters could add to it so a constantly evolving record of performance and service could be viewed and referred too, Instead of reading multiple reports and Threads.
Just saying 

Some girls have dozens of reviews with dozens of pages of comments.

Can you imagine having to read a single review for all reviews for Michelle Independent or Adele or any of the popular girls? That would be a nightmare.

Your suggestion is completely impractical. Can you not see that? You're just trying to make a crappy excuse for not posting a review.

Again being on here for such a long time and suddenly deciding it doesn't work for you. It works fine for the rest of us!

I have a suggestion....read my mind   

[Ramone78]

Some girls have dozens of reviews with dozens of pages of comments.

Can you imagine having to read a single review for all reviews for Michelle Independent or Adele or any of the popular girls? That would be a nightmare.

Your suggestion is completely impractical. Can you not see that? You're just trying to make a crappy excuse for not posting a review.

Again being on here for such a long time and suddenly deciding it doesn't work for you. It works fine for the rest of us!

I have a suggestion....read my mind   

If I were you I would find it quite frustrating to be the only person with all the answers AND a valid opinion.

You seemingly feel the need to answer every post on here and dismiss anyone who's views differ from your own self opinionated views .

Opposing opinion obviously frustrates you.

Perhaps more time on the Golf Course  would help ?

So good luck and jog on, lets just agree to disagree

Goodbye

[GolfNut]

If I were you I would find it quite frustrating to be the only person with all the answers AND a valid opinion.

You seemingly feel the need to answer every post on here and dismiss anyone who's views differ from your own self opinionated views .

Opposing opinion obviously frustrates you.

Perhaps more time on the Golf Course  would help ?

So good luck and jog on, lets just agree to disagree

Goodbye

Yawn! You just don't get it do you RamOne

I count at least 5 other people who've said exactly the same thing to you as I've said but you seem oblivious to that fact.

You're not a Politician by any chance are you, or maybe a Councillor? That would make total sense. 

[vw]

If I were you I would find it quite frustrating to be the only person with all the answers AND a valid opinion.

Are you talking about me ?   

Even golfie said I have all the answers.

[GolfNut]

Are you talking about me ?   

Even golfie said I have all the answers.

  Most definitely