when we were having somewhat of a civil discussion about punters that see bb girls as you rightly said i said fair enough. because that was your opinion and i accepted it (though you did then try to be cheeky and say you believe punters that see girls with bb ticked on their likes list secretly bareback in a subsequent post which was a bit rude....and a ridiculous process of thought....and this was clearly the first dig from you)
That was a general comment, and a personal opinion on anyone who sees bb girls. Not a dig, so don't get too sensitive. I just believe it's fucking reckless to see someone who bb's and in my personal opinion can lead to a punter bb'ing a girl. The moment can overpower someone's senses and if a girl is opening her legs and willing you to stick it in, there are many punters who will say "fuck it" and do so. None will admit to it on a forum of course, so the best course of prevention is to not see a girl who offers bb in the first place. Funny how you keep your sly insults by using the word "cheeky". No that's being called honest.
you then went on to side with ludwig referring to a post of his which i personally found insulting.....the second dig from you
so because of this i saw you as one as by agreeing with him basically indirectly expressed the same viewpoint. if you still stand by that post you made siding with him then i stand by everything i have said and you will not be getting an apology( i also will not be doing one)
There you go, another sensitive soul. He insulted me and you agreed, therefore you're having a dig nonesense. Actually, I only mentioned that he made a good point after you referred to anyone who has criticised you as "hyenas"
Ludwig actually gave you some good advice which is what I was agreeing with. Had you read carefully you would have seen sense in mine and his posts, yet you choose to take the criticisms and overlook the helpful nature of the post. What's with this siding nonesense? It isn't primary school.
now you are getting upset because you are now getting back some?
Getting back what? Childish insults that make you look foolish?
tbh i have never had a problem with you but i feel the way you have approached someone with a differing point of view to yours is not ideal. we are both grown men. going back to the initial topic (before it got derailed when several members decided to make personal insults) you said you choose not to see girls that advertise bb at all. this is fine and you are an adult and have the right to make your own choices and express your own opinion
i said i have problem with punters who see girls who advertise bb (for protected services) this is my opinion and i am entitled to express it. this is where it should have ended
You're not making sense. You were insulted by others who got personal with you but decided to bracket me in because I have strong opinions on punters seeing girls who offer bb. Opinions that were aimed at all punters who do so, and not you in particular. Why should an opinion end there. This is how the pool gets contaminated. Punter A sees WG1. WG1 offers bb, and may have an infection. Punter A goes to WG1 and may or may not engage in unprotected sex, but WG1 has seen several other punters that day all week in fact and has had unprotected sex both vaginal and anal, and inbetween rounds sucks those punters back to life. She DT's punter A, kisses him and has sex. Punter A decides to see WG2 a week later. WG2 practices safe sex but offers OWO. Punter A unknowingly may or may not have been infected by WG1's reckless attitude to her health. Punter 1 has recklessly decided to contaminate the pool by seeing WG2, who will in turn be seeing Punter's B, C and so on. Get a grip, it's an opinion which will not just end there.
you (and ludwig) may need to eat a bit of humble pie and you may need to realise it is you that was struggling to accept that someone else did not hold the same view as you, which you believed to be THE correct viewpoint and had no regard for your 'constructive feedback' because clearly you believe that the person on the receiving end of this feedback should see some value in it...but when it turns out they do not you then see them as hard headed or arrogant or thinking they are infallible or whatever
Now that's what I call deluded. You can "defend" yourself all you want. I wasn't attacking you and neither did I get the feeling that Ludwig did either, but you do have this sense of self grandeur and self delusion about you that when someone criticises a point, you get all personal and defensive..oh and apparently you flip the coin on the other head with childish retorts and make stupid statements about how we can't take it. I can take it, and I don't look at post and review counts of other punters to regard them as credible. I have huge respect for many punters who have contributed to the site but don't necessarily have dozens of reviews. It's not about that. It's about info shared, trust between punters and honesty without the need to big yourself up.
