How do you base your reviews?

[Clattypats]

Was just wondering how everyone bases their reviews(positive,neutral,negative)..I know there is a certain criteria but would you say as you see more girls down the line  that you become harsher..For e.g. would a previous neutral review be a negative now based on your experience and a positive may be a neutral.
I know myself from experience,girls I would have gave a positive about a year ago would prob be a neutral now based on some excellent bookings I've had recently...is that fair or is it just personal opinion?

[ickydicky]

spot on clatty. when you start punting you dont have the same range of experience on whats on offer and the way it is delivered. it isnt just about how the hoor looks as long as she isnt fat and or plug ugly or old and past it.

i am a lot more discerning now that i used to be and that is why i tend to stick to the tried and trusted. it must be over a year since i had a new hoor and would like to add one to my regulars. but i am harder to please. so it is harder to find a hoor to please me.

[Jock D]

I think in the Scottish section of the Reviews, there is a tendency to give the hoor the benefit of the doubt, too many to times and not dish out as many Negatives, as are given elsewhere on this site. I have been guilty of this myself, and have given at least a couple of Nuetrals where with hindsight I should have given Negatives. Another pet hate of mine is when the Reviewer rates his punt as say a Neutral...and then you get the smart arses posting, 'reads like a positive to me' Fuck Right Off!

[ickydicky]

jock you are in angry mode this morning. a heavy nite wiz it.  mind you, i agree. And they will soon be open

[mavgoose]

Yes, some initial reviews may be higher scored than latter ones. However, I had enough punts ( pre ukp ) for me to have formed my opinion by now.

For a positive now , it must be wholly enjoyable. Start to finish. Services as advertised. Time as agreed. And I'll want to return.

My recent neutrals were neutral as I doubt very much I'll return.

[ickydicky]

Yes, some initial reviews may be higher scored than latter ones. However, I had enough punts ( pre ukp ) for me to have formed my opinion by now.

For a positive now , it must be wholly enjoyable. Start to finish. Services as advertised. Time as agreed. And I'll want to return.

My recent neutrals were neutral as I doubt very much I'll return.

that sums it up

[perfect 10]

I'm fairly new to this, but already have had some good and not so good experiences. Certainly I've learned ( from you guys) not to post a review straight after a punt when the hormones are still raging. Still got a lot to learn though as regards dictating how the punt goes and getting what I want out of it.
I've no doubt that some very early positives would now or later be neutrals

[ickydicky]

mind you i admit i take a bit of please. good owo cim and swallow usually meets with my approval

[The Man With No Name]

Was just wondering how everyone bases their reviews(positive,neutral,negative)..I know there is a certain criteria but would you say as you see more girls down the line  that you become harsher..For e.g. would a previous neutral review be a negative now based on your experience and a positive may be a neutral.
I know myself from experience,girls I would have gave a positive about a year ago would prob be a neutral now based on some excellent bookings I've had recently...is that fair or is it just personal opinion?

Good thread, Clatty! Had been meaning to start a similar one myself after finding myself in a slight dilemma of the sort with a recent review.

The notion that you review more harshly as time goes on is a definite possibility (ask me again in another year), but not one I've really encountered so far myself, with my own negatives and neutrals are pretty evenly spaced out through my timeline of reviews. I'd already had a good few punts before I started reviewing and did so retrospectively with some, but if I'd bothered to do the same with any of my very first forays into this land of debauchery (never did as I could no longer find said profiles and was already long ago), there'd have probably been a good couple of negatives in there. I'm not sure if this is purely due to the fact it takes a few punts to get accustomed to the practice of it as opposed to civvy-shagging, and therefore more time to start enjoying it. In any event, I started punting in 2011, but my best ones have all been been in the last two years, so take from that what you will.

As for a standard rating criteria for reviews, this is something I'd love to establish as far as possible.

As I spelled out in a recent review, I use the following pretty loose, yet easily applicable scoring system:
Positive  - enjoyed the experience, would at least consider returning and would recommend.
Neutral   - enjoyed enough not to regret the booking, but likely wouldn't return and would only maybe recommend if it was the type of girl really being sought.
Negative - regrettable experience, would never return and would never recommend.


I completely understand if not everyone wants to abide by the above and obviously things like time-keeping and services as advertised play into things. However, if we could all agree on some basic common framework when it comes to rating girls, I think it would benefit all involved.

What do we think, gents? 

[Clattypats]

To be honest the scoring system you've put down there fo pos,neut,neg seems very plausible and is pretty close to the way I would rate

[bigmike32]

I think how we base how our reviews depends largely on our moods at the time. But experience plays a part of it aswell the more you punt the more critical you can be. If a girl advertises owo then does ow then that it is a neutral at least.

[ickydicky]

that would be a negative in my book

[Clattypats]

that would be a negative in my book

negative in my books aswell,but he did say at the least

[bigbell]

its all about the service on offer, if its all in the list and is available, good start
description of girl accurate, ticky box
safe clean flat, ticky box
time as booked, ticky box
i wont give a positive just coz i can get 10 minutes extra, as i wouldnt have a negative if i chose to get " exited" before the time is up
if parking is a problem, i would always highlight, just as guidance
as for neutral reviews, these are subjective imo,

[Clattypats]

its all about the service on offer, if its all in the list and is available, good start
description of girl accurate, ticky box
safe clean flat, ticky box
time as booked, ticky box
i wont give a positive just coz i can get 10 minutes extra, as i wouldnt have a negative if i chose to get " exited" before the time is up
if parking is a problem, i would always highlight, just as guidance
as for neutral reviews, these are subjective imo,

if my booking gets cut short thru no fault of my own it's an automatic negative..Not done a 'neutral ' review yet, though some from months ago might be..but that was my point..when you see the best,positives could become neutrals now as opposed to b4..
So might be a bit harsh on the said lassie.
My negatives were stonewall though.

[bigbell]

if my booking gets cut short thru no fault of my own it's an automatic negative..Not done a 'neutral ' review yet, though some from months ago might be..but that was my point..when you see the best,positives could become neutrals now as opposed to b4..
So might be a bit harsh on the said lassie.
My negatives were stonewall though.

should have been "excited" not exited, skool boy error

[myothernameis]

Was just wondering how everyone bases their reviews(positive,neutral,negative)..

Before I see an escort, I list things I am looking for, so will give points for anything she does to my liking

[Jock D]

as for neutral reviews, these are subjective imo,

The point is All Reviews are subjective...they have to be, as it is the Punter's own unique experience of what took place between him and the hired hoor(s) during the booking time. Therefore, how they choose to rate that punt, is entirely up to them, and shouldn't be questioned or criticised by the UKP 'Committee'.

[ickydicky]

wheeltappers and shunters

[DG]

Some decent points made here regarding scoring/rating systems. For me it's about expectations. If all expectations are met, or possibly most, then it will be a positive. If too many expectations are not met then guaranteed negative. Neutral reviews therefore will be subjective as they will be somewhere in between.

So to put some detail on it, expectations are met;

- if the girl looks like I think she will, ie as per her pics and bio

- services provided as advertised with little or no 'at discretion'

- hospitality as advertised eg decent shower facilities, refreshments etc

- girl is enthusiastic and has a personality and easy to chat with

- venue as described

- booking starts on time or sufficient notice given if time changes or girl is delayed

If three or more of the above are not met then it's an easy negative. One or two, depending on what they are may be a neutral. But I wouldn't give a neutral or negative if everything else was fine, but the close was a bit shabby or I couldn't get parked etc. unless of course the venue was described as a penthouse with private parking.

I deliberately don't mention rate as this would be known before I book and therefore, if all expectations are met, then presumably I thought the rate was worth it. I may however comment if, for instance, I felt a similar experience could be had elsewhere for a different rate.

To illustrate the point, I gave a positive review for a girl I met where everything was as expected, albeit my expectations weren't high, but it just wasn't for me and I wouldn't return, but she kept her end of the bargain and actually did some things not on her likes list.

[Clattypats]

Some decent points made here regarding scoring/rating systems. For me it's about expectations. If all expectations are met, or possibly most, then it will be a positive. If too many expectations are not met then guaranteed negative. Neutral reviews therefore will be subjective as they will be somewhere in between.

So to put some detail on it, expectations are met;

- if the girl looks like I think she will, ie as per her pics and bio

- services provided as advertised with little or no 'at discretion'

- hospitality as advertised eg decent shower facilities, refreshments etc

- girl is enthusiastic and has a personality and easy to chat with

- venue as described

- booking starts on time or sufficient notice given if time changes or girl is delayed

If three or more of the above are not met then it's an easy negative. One or two, depending on what they are may be a neutral. But I wouldn't give a neutral or negative if everything else was fine, but the close was a bit shabby or I couldn't get parked etc. unless of course the venue was described as a penthouse with private parking.

I deliberately don't mention rate as this would be known before I book and therefore, if all expectations are met, then presumably I thought the rate was worth it. I may however comment if, for instance, I felt a similar experience could be had elsewhere for a different rate.

To illustrate the point, I gave a positive review for a girl I met where everything was as expected, albeit my expectations weren't high, but it just wasn't for me and I wouldn't return, but she kept her end of the bargain and actually did some things not on her likes list.

yip, sounds fair enough DG

[Jock D]

wheeltappers and shunters

Order...Order...Icky...Please can we have some Order