Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Littlehoneyjessica - Peterborough  (Read 2162 times)


12 review(s) for littlehoneyjessica (12 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline signy

Littlehoneyjessica seen whilst she was in Peterborough. £130 for 1 hour.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Jess has had a few reviews and comments on here, mostly positive, but with a few negative comments thrown in. However, 500+ feedback on AW (FWIW) suggested that she was deserving of a little more attention, one way or another, and so the subject of my first review.

Booking. OK, getting the big negative out of the way; Jess is a nightmare to book. She only works irregularly, and then for 1-2 days at a time; various locations, but mostly Peterborough. These details only appear on her profile about a week beforehand. So it is necessary to monitor her profile and hope that you are free at the same time. Until then, Jess does not appear interested in providing any information or answering questions.

Comms. After all that, the comms were surprisingly excellent. A few AW emails each way to agree on details. Location by text, and a phone call when I arrived to get flat number. Smooth and easy.

Location. A new development (still building) near the by-pass and easily accessible. Not loads of parking, but spaces available no problem. Residents about, but not interested in me, and all felt very safe. An almost new serviced flat, so as you would expect, clean, tidy, good facilities, but impersonal.

Appearance. Jess is definitely the girl in her profile; cute and pretty and 22 +/- isn’t far off (I’m not good at ages). Totally clean and well presented in nice underwear. The photos are accurate, but don’t really reflect her small size; the 5’3’’, size 6 and 32”B figures are a better indication, although the first might be stretching it a bit. Certainly petite, and seemed happier once she had climbed down off her heels. English, and could talk intelligently.

Services. A standard GFE, but all done pretty well. A bit of kissing on arrival, before paperwork which made it seem like the money wasn’t the first consideration (as if!, but appreciated). More kissing, FK not mega deep, but plenty of variation and enthusiasm to maintain interest. OWO very good, deepish, some spit and not much hand; again enough variation to suggest that she was thinking about the service provided; there was a little gentle use of the teeth (lovely for me, but I know others object to this, so be aware). RO was nice, some reaction, but not OTT (some people might like more moaning, but again it was good for me). More OWO (I think this is Jess’s default mode if nothing else is requested). Then protected sex in missionary and variations thereof. Intended to CIM, but too slow with the transfer and ended up with COB; no suggestion that she was not going to do CIM, just my poor timing. Afterwards, Jess was happy to cuddle and chat, and could talk sensibly on a range of subjects. I showered (good facilities) and left, just about bang on time. Timekeeping not tested, although I didn’t feel rushed out (radio on throughout, which was probably her timing device).

Overall. Recommended for a top GFE experience in a nice location, but nothing beyond GFE. Maybe priced at the upper end of the scale for that service, but I felt I got quality for my money. I probably won’t see Jess again due to the effort required to book, but if I am looking at short notice I will definitely check her availability and wouldn’t hesitate to visit again if timings matched.


Offline eyeseebee

Good review Signy and pleased you enjoyed Jess. One thing I will say is that once you have seen Jess, follow up bookings are far far easier to arrange. She clearly and understandably has a plentiful pool of regulars, and I and others have found that once you have seen her once, you will always get priority in the future  :)

Offline uutarn

Yea man, that pretty much echos my review of LHJ.

Have tried to arrange a follow up meet but alas it was not meant to be; my bad, not hers.

She does seem to have a "default mode," and that's not a problem of course, but i have been told she gets more dirty the more times you see her so i'm willing to see that through ;).

Offline PeteSmyth

Signy - I'd be interested to know how your time with Jess represented only a GFE, rather than a PSE? What else could she have done which would've made you think it was a PSE? Cheers  :thumbsup:

Offline signy

Pretty much the definition of GFE as far as I understand it. Lots of kissing, cuddling, being nice, oral & sex. No super-moaning, multiple & odd positions, heavy pounding, very DT, lots of dirty talk, etc., which are the sort of things that, for me, push it towards PSE. I've no problem with either, but it's good to know what to expect.

Offline eyeseebee

Pretty much the definition of GFE as far as I understand it. Lots of kissing, cuddling, being nice, oral & sex. No super-moaning, multiple & odd positions, heavy pounding, very DT, lots of dirty talk, etc., which are the sort of things that, for me, push it towards PSE. I've no problem with either, but it's good to know what to expect.
My advice would be to tell Jess that you want those things. I've fucked her in every position imaginable, and had plenty of dirty talk and deep throat from her too.

Offline PeteSmyth

This girl seems to be an enigma. Some guys rave about her, others think she's only average. A real mixed bag of reviews. I'm confused. I've tried, and failed to book an appointment with her during any of her previous Norwich tours (all fully booked). I don't especially want to travel all the way to Peterborough for a GFE I could easily get in Norwich from a touring escort.  :dash:

Offline eyeseebee

I suppose the way I would describe is this:

You won't go wrong with Jess of you want a petite, fit young English girl who sucks cock and fucks very well, and provides French kissing and deep throat. She will also talk dirty if that's what you want. If you're looking for a girl who'll let you fuck her arse and piss on her, then she isn't for you. I travel to see her because she is the best in the area in my opinion, but like anything, it's all about opinions.

James999

  • Guest
.  Jess is definitely the girl in her profile; cute and pretty and 22 +/- isn’t far off (I’m not good at ages). Totally clean and well presented in nice underwear. The photos are accurate, but don’t really reflect her small size; the 5’3’’, size 6 and 32”B figures are a better indication, although the first might be stretching it a bit.

Do you mean she's older than her stated age? Some of her images do make her look more mature (Still Fit) but more around 30?

Offline signy

No, she's nowhere near 30; the age was about right within my judgement. The " stretching it" referred to her height.

James999

  • Guest
What as in she's shorer or taller than the stated 5'3 ?

Offline uutarn

What as in she's shorer or taller than the stated 5'3 ?
I would say she's 5'3, maybe 5'4 at a push.