Erotic Samantha

[Gspotter]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This was a Plan B as I noticed her reviews are mixed. However, Plan A whose profile implied they were in Zone 1 turned out to be near Imperial Wharf and anal had a hidden £40 surcharge.
Initial communication with Samantha was straightforward except she wants to know more about you like age and occupation before confirming. Anyway I must have been neither too young or too old as she then texted her address, an apartment building a short walk from Gloucester Rd tube. Upon arrival, I was asked to take a shower. After that, there was a wait of about 5 minutes before she entered the bedroom. Some might be annoyed by the wait (after all she knows you're about to arrive and could get ready beforehand) and I believe this and your shower are counted as part of your time.
If like me you like slim blondes with perky little tits and a pert ass, Samantha is a dream fuck. Her pictures are accurate and she looks even more lovely in real life. We started with some kissing, not deep but with tongue and then moved to OWO and 69. When I give oral, the WG usually either comes or pushes me away if she doesn't want to orgasm with a client. Samantha did neither, she was dispassionate about the whole thing, happy for me to lick her but she's clearly trained herself not to feel anything during a session. We then moved on to sex in different positions, then anal before I finished with CIM.
Overall- Samantha comes across as cool and dispassionate in the bedroom so might not be right for you if you're expecting raunchy sex with fake moans. But she is stunningly beautiful (for me anyway) and the views when having sex with her are memorable. She willingly provided all the services asked for and we had a pleasant chat afterwards about various things including her studies. Decently priced at £140 for central London including anal and OWO/CIM with an attractive girl.
By the way, she seems to only take text bookings. On AW, she has deliberately set herself as unavailable until 2017.

[The_Don]

Here the profile link

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Cunning Punt]

except she wants to know more about you like age and occupation before confirming.... On AW, she has deliberately set herself as unavailable until 2017.

She sounds an odd one. Not sure what relevance those details are - I'd just lie but doubt I'll bother.

£140 doesn't seem a particularly decent price unless you get anal, but when she's charging that much, one expects a WG to get into it a bit. She just seems a pretty but expensive fuck toy.

What few reviews there are have a similar theme - timewasting plus lack of effort and enthusiasm.

After that, there was a wait of about 5 minutes before she entered the bedroom. Some might be annoyed by the wait.. and I believe this and your shower are counted as part of your time...

She's clearly trained herself not to feel anything during a session. Overall- Samantha comes across as cool and dispassionate in the bedroom

she left the room for what seemed ages... She was quite distant..

Kept wandering off at the start for 4-5 mins at a time ? I found her just going through the motions.. Said she was to lazy to go on top ! I would give her a miss if I were you

Thanks for the review. Very useful.

[mrhappypants]

She is a notorious time-waster.  "Reasonably priced at £140" When I saw here she looked like her entire life revolved around the next line of coke.  Her back catalogue of reviews and commentary makes florid reading. 
.

[brolin_76]

she is a piss taker, wasted my time, never showed up. a total cunt.

[baltar]

I saw ES some time ago but didn't write a review (sorry).
I was meant to stay an hour, left after probably 30-45 mins by accident as I just assumed it had finished.

Very moody, made implications that she hated the job, dispassionate is an understatement. Didn't even have sex. 69 good deepthroat as I recall then she finished me off with CIM which thankfully was good. But I was hoping to extend and have anal, apparently not. Only came once in the "hour". I figured I must have got her on a really bad day since all her FB was so positive. Her comms were also so exemplary I also thought she was British. Best comms (through txt and aw messages) since Missybanks (oh how I miss her). Strange though that she was such a moody bitch lol. I couldn't even have a nice time talking with her, so while I've seen a few girls that have been worse in terms of the fact that her bj was good the fact that her mood was so sour and let me accidentally leave before my time, makes it one of the worst times I've had. oh well. Better ones since . She is the only one which seemed so good in every other way (FB/comms/etc)

[Gspotter]

Well, based on the comments I must have been lucky when I visited her!
Apart from her not getting into it, I have no complaints. She provided all the services I asked for, there was no time wasting (although the shower I took was part of the hour) and we did have a short chat afterwards.
I started a separate thread on reasonably priced WGs that are young, slim and offer anal and CIM like Samantha. Not a single answer so far which suggests that it's hard to find examples that cost less than what she is asking.
I'm not sure if I would return as London has so much variety. On the other hand, she is the type that might be friendlier to a repeat customer.

[Cunning Punt]

I started a separate thread on reasonably priced WGs that are young, slim and offer anal and CIM like Samantha. Not a single answer so far which suggests that it's hard to find examples that cost less than what she is asking

And as has been mentioned, Samantha appears to fall short in that the quality of her service for some punters is questionable and one wonders how many times she would be up for anal.

Yes, it is extremely difficult to an escort who is young, slim and good looking, plus gives a good service as well as doing CIM and, particularly anal, for no more than £140.

That doesn't mean there is little choice - in Greater London there is - but what you are asking for is a hell of a lot and probably unrealistic.

My advice is mix and match a bit and don't expect absolutely everything on your long checklist from one escort.