London Sex Parties - Pimlico

[akauya]

This is my second review for London Sex Parties. Although my last review was a negative this one just made it to positive, just!

External Link/Members Only

As per my previous review; the venue is a basement flat with two bedrooms and a reasonably sized lounge. Although in my previous review I put Victoria, in actual fact the flat is nearer to Pimlico station.

Anyway, they must have read my previous review as the flat now looked a lot tidier and obviously they put a hoover to good use. The cats are still there but not so many cat hairs everywhere as before. The sofas are still the same scratched to pieces but still usable.

The reason why I decided to visit them again is because of the line up. They had Kendradee (External Link/Members Only) who has been talked about on here and Leah a tall good looking London girl (can't find her on AW) and as usual Rebecca Ryder, a well known BBW and party girl.

It was Kendra that I wanted to fuck so off I went, after following their stupid booking procedure of course (for info look at their Wiki page External Link/Members Only).

I must say Kendra was lovely, very friendly, chatty, laid back and sexy. As for looks, I know it's an overused cliché but she looked so much better in real life. I mean the pics on her profile do not really do her justice... seriously. She looks much younger as well. Yes I know it must have been because of the lack of blood in my brain as it all went to my cock when I saw her. My only criticism is that she has massive fake tits. I really don't like fake tits. Ah yes, for those interested she is a natural red head and is not shaven, she has a natural red bush too.

As for Leah, tall, good looking in her 30s probably, fake tits (again!) and friendly.

Now here comes the weird bit... as I said I went to this party expressly to fuck Kendra which I did, twice but I couldn't cum with her. I don't know what the fuck happened to me but no matter how much I pumped I just didn't come. In between rests I fucked Leah too and I came with her twice - very easily too!

I still can't work out what happened, maybe it was Kendra and her words of "encouragement" that distracted me but I decided to ignore the annoyance of not popping with her and enjoy fucking her anyway. I didn't leave that frustrated because I did cum with Leah but still... it was weird.

Ratio of guys and girls was much better this time as there were a few of us just relaxing and chatting (recharging batteries) while others still playing with the girls on a 1 to 1 mostly.

So, despite the stupid booking procedure and despite I couldn't cum with Kendra I did enjoy myself and would probably go back only depending on the line up of course. Two hours fucking with two hots girls (well, 3 with Rebecca Ryder although she is a bit too BBW for my tastes) for £70 is not too bad either.

 

[davidgood]

Hi akauya,

Which session were you at?

Leah is on AW as The Princess Leah Organisation or something like that. If you can't find her let me know and I will look for the link.

Regards,

davidgood

[akauya]

Thanks for that david, I found Leah (or Leia as her AW profile).

Princess Leia Organa

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

and here is Kendradee

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[bobbles1945]

I went to the Lunchtime one last week-echo much of what akauya said about the place-untidy basement flat between Victoria and Pimilco.. About 12 guys showed up and so with three girls the starting ratio was pretty poor. I almost turned around and left but glad I stayed.  However (maybe because most guys were on their lunch break) the party thinned out until by the end there were only about three of us left.

Princess Leia Organa (External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only) was a stand-in for one girl who was ill and she is great, good looking (nicely done fake boobs) good OWO and took on all comers-sometimes several at once. It was good to play with her as usually she only does outcalls. But if she had not been there the party would have been a dud.

Rebecca Ryder is the BBW party organiser with a laugh you could probably hear in the street, and there was another BBW girl whose name I forget. All the girls took part with enthusiasm but Rebecca had a tendency to disappear-no doubt trying to find an evening stand in for the sick girl.

Would I go again-well the booking arrangements are complicated, the flat is untidy and there might be a lot of guys-but for £70 what can you expect? So yeah-if the line-up was attractive might give it another go. The plus side was that there girls and guys were willing to share so there was a party vibe-but LMP (or Phoenix party) it is not.

[smiths]

I went to the Lunchtime one last week-echo much of what akauya said about the place-untidy basement flat between Victoria and Pimilco.. About 12 guys showed up and so with three girls the starting ratio was pretty poor. I almost turned around and left but glad I stayed.  However (maybe because most guys were on their lunch break) the party thinned out until by the end there were only about three of us left.

Princess Leia Organa (External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only) was a stand-in for one girl who was ill and she is great, good looking (nicely done fake boobs) good OWO and took on all comers-sometimes several at once. It was good to play with her as usually she only does outcalls. But if she had not been there the party would have been a dud.

Rebecca Ryder is the BBW party organiser with a laugh you could probably hear in the street, and there was another BBW girl whose name I forget. All the girls took part with enthusiasm but Rebecca had a tendency to disappear-no doubt trying to find an evening stand in for the sick girl.

Would I go again-well the booking arrangements are complicated, the flat is untidy and there might be a lot of guys-but for £70 what can you expect? So yeah-if the line-up was attractive might give it another go. The plus side was that there girls and guys were willing to share so there was a party vibe-but LMP (or Phoenix party) it is not.

So they lied about their stated maximum of 3 WGs and 10 punters and as there were only 3 women their couldn't of been a couple of swinging couples to explain why there were 12 men.

I expect ALL providers to be honest and stick to what they say in their advertising. This outfit sounds ok for £70 but the cost shouldn't be an excuse for lying in my view.

[Steely Dan]

Their email intro says, "All parties are limited to a MAXIMUM m:f ratio of 4:1 - always!"

Not sure where they say 10 men - didn't see that.  As I said on the thread highjacked by West8, I wont go back for the combination of girls, ratio, and cost. Not my preference and I wont recommend. But I respect that others might like this set up, so not endorsing, just saying I saw no lie.

[smiths]

Their email intro says, "All parties are limited to a MAXIMUM m:f ratio of 4:1 - always!"

Not sure where they say 10 men - didn't see that.  As I said on the thread highjacked by West8, I wont go back for the combination of girls, ratio, and cost. Not my preference and I wont recommend. But I respect that others might like this set up, so not endorsing, just saying I saw no lie.

It says it when you click enter and read the text on the left hand side of the page at the bottom of said text in the link to the site the OP has given.

Now you have confirmed they say something different in their emails it proves either what it says in the text is wrong or the email was. Its really the basics to get this essential bit of information correct in my view.

[west8]

As I said on the thread highjacked by West8

Please accept my apologies Dan. That was indeed my bad and it won't happen again.

[Steely Dan]

I see that now - thanks Smiths.  Clearly a bit untidy.  Since they emailed me the 4 to 1 prior to booking, I took that as the deal.  I hoped for better, but it was not better.  I suggest they set the maximum to 10 (or lower) and write this in all coms.  But in any case, to get all coms right and consistent.  If the max were 9 guys, I might go back.  Can't explain why...I guess it is because I wouldn't book larger older girls for a 1-1, so for that experience, a party scratches the itch.

I also now note the Wiki says 3-1, but I think the Wiki is written by UKP not them.

[smiths]

I see that now - thanks Smiths.  Clearly a bit untidy.  Since they emailed me the 4 to 1 prior to booking, I took that as the deal.  I hoped for better, but it was not better.  I suggest they set the maximum to 10 (or lower) and write this in all coms.  But in any case, to get all coms right and consistent.  If the max were 9 guys, I might go back.  Can't explain why...I guess it is because I wouldn't book larger older girls for a 1-1, so for that experience, a party scratches the itch.

I also now note the Wiki says 3-1, but I think the Wiki is written by UKP not them.

At least you were aware of it and the ratio in the email was higher anyway and you still decided to go so no harm done in your case, but for future punters they should give out accurate info of course that is consistent.

The Wiki link given in the OPs post actually states in brackets a max 2.1 ratio yet it says 3 WGs and 10 punters in the text.

[spz1234]

I think the ratio used to be less although I can't be sure. Certainly advertised on their email as 4:1 max which was fairly close to where it was. Was there on Friday afternoon and I had a decent time although it was busy at times . A couple of guys, one in particular, were hogging the girls at times. I'd also confirm that Rebecca seemed to keep popping off, which then left 2 girls with lots of guys.

The flat was not the most tidiest place I've ever been but functional. Also, there was obviously some regulars there and there were a couple of times where I felt a little like I was gate crashing their get together.

Despite all this, I would be open to returning again depending on time and the advertised lineup, although that would obviously be subject to change as it was when I went.

All in all then, cheap and cheerful which will suit some people but not others.

[akauya]

I wrote the wiki page based on my experience and on their original claims of low ratios.

I noticed just now that they updated their FAQs to say:

Q: How many girls/guys will be there?

 A: Again impossible to tell - it depends on how many of us are up for it and free and how many men actually turn up! You would be surprised at how many cancel or don't show up at all. Generally we like a 3/4-1 ratio at most. We are all greedy girls but not that greedy!!! However it is impossible to actually judge and when We are having a bukkake the ratio can be as much as 6:1 but when we get to the gangbang it goes down to 3:1 - people eat shoot and leave - without the eating - Well us girls do the eating

External Link/Members Only

The thing with parties is that on rare occasions they will have very low ratios, I remember talking to a guy there who said it was very quiet once. But I think due to the low price for this party most often than not their ratios will be higher.

I wouldn't recommend this party to newbies. If anyone is trying to experience a sex party best save up a bit and try the External Link/Members Only. As I said on my OP the only reason I went tho this session (after my negative experience previously) is because of the girls line up for that day.

I'll update the wiki based on the recent comments.

[smiths]

I wrote the wiki page based on my experience and on their original claims of low ratios.

I noticed just now that they updated their FAQs to say:

The thing with parties is that on rare occasions they will have very low ratios, I remember talking to a guy there who said it was very quiet once. But I think due to the low price for this party most often than not their ratios will be higher.

I wouldn't recommend this party to newbies. If anyone is trying to experience a sex party best save up a bit and try the External Link/Members Only. As I said on my OP the only reason I went tho this session (after my negative experience previously) is because of the girls line up for that day.

I'll update the wiki based on the recent comments.

Thanks for the clarification mate. I didn't know who had written the Wiki for sure. It still says 3 WGs and a max 10 guys in their site text though when its now clear its a max 12 guys on that many WGs rising to a max 6.1 for bukkake. Yes a punter can get lucky due to other punters not turning up, I have benefited from this myself over the years at a number of party providers, great for me, terrible for the WGs especially if like LAPC that was the WGs only party of the day.

 I see they use the word like in their FAQ, that's not the same thing as clearly stating a consistent max ratio of course. And as TPC has proved its easy to impose a max ratio if a provider wishes to do so. In this outfits case they should be consistent, clear and ensure however they advertise they say the same max ratios in my view. I can see they sell themselves more on the WGs being their to enjoy being fucked, fair enough but primarily its about making money obviously just like any other party provider.

As the cost is less than half of TPC I wouldn't expect them to have a max 2.1 ratio, that's what bumps the cost up of course per punter and why a punter going to a party has to decide whether to pay more for less punters, or pay less but be aware that could mean more punters but they need the crucial info on max ratios to be able to base their decision on.

[akauya]

Thanks for the clarification mate. I didn't know who had written the Wiki for sure. It still says 3 WGs and a max 10 guys in their site text though when its now clear its a max 12 guys on that many WGs rising to a max 6.1 for bukkake. Yes a punter can get lucky due to other punters not turning up, I have benefited from this myself over the years at a number of party providers, great for me, terrible for the WGs especially if like LAPC that was the WGs only party of the day.

 I see they use the word like in their FAQ, that's not the same thing as clearly stating a consistent max ratio of course. And as TPC has proved its easy to impose a max ratio if a provider wishes to do so. In this outfits case they should be consistent, clear and ensure however they advertise they say the same max ratios in my view. I can see they sell themselves more on the WGs being their to enjoy being fucked, fair enough but primarily its about making money obviously just like any other party provider.

As the cost is less than half of TPC I wouldn't expect them to have a max 2.1 ratio, that's what bumps the cost up of course per punter and why a punter going to a party has to decide whether to pay more for less punters, or pay less but be aware that could mean more punters but they need the crucial info on max ratios to be able to base their decision on.

You're right, TPC are very strict about ratios, as I have found out a few times when I tried to book for a party too late and being turned down. I do believe London Sex Parties would be a lot busier if they didn't have that convoluted booking system.

Anyway, I updated the wiki page, if you or anyone else notice anything that needs amending, please let me know.

External Link/Members Only

 

[smiths]

You're right, TPC are very strict about ratios, as I have found out a few times when I tried to book for a party too late and being turned down. I do believe London Sex Parties would be a lot busier if they didn't have that convoluted booking system.

Anyway, I updated the wiki page, if you or anyone else notice anything that needs amending, please let me know.

External Link/Members Only

 

Thanks for that. The booking procedure is why this provider isn't one that will get my business, it doesn't suit me to punt like they insist on.