Totally disagree with this but you're entitled to your opinion - because that's all it is - opinion as you've not seen her.
I'm going by fact.
I know I wrote my review like I have done all my others before her, and like all the others I will do after her, for my own benefit and for the benefit of the punters of this forum - You can challenge that all you wish t
NG why are you being overly defensive about your review? The "truths" of the SP's reviews are not the only thing in question. Here're some facts for you:
- Of all the positives you've dropped in 2 years the one you dropped for this SP was within a week, not the couple or several or months for the others, one of which was for a regular you valued. You changed your MO for her.
- She was first mentioned here Sept 22 a week after she dropped anchor. You, yourself, thought she had been poorly reviewed previously but never linked them under whichever AW ID they may've been and sadly no further mention in your review, so we're none the wiser to that truth.
- Apparently she's also on SA.
- JS was the first review more than a month after she'd been trading her "excellence that won't go unsung".
- in the next 2 weeks a couple more reviews and JS saw her again and she mentioned UKPers calling and visiting, all revealing UKP

- Suddenly a clamour, some trusted sources but also a number of rarely voiced opinions.
- Still no review from KT, did JS spot him in the lobby?
So whilst the reviews for this SP may well be "honest" many have materialised much sooner after visits unlike so many reviewer MOs about waiting weeks and months or never to protect their anonymity. So why change their behaviours now? Why this SP? Why is this SP, who will surely id every single reviewer (regardless if they change their number) so trustworthy? She likely also knows about CE, perhaps from the blabbing of a simp UKPer.
We are questioning motivation. All power to the girl if she's twisted so many (not all) around her finger, let's all hope that whatever she's doing for them she's offering to everyone for however long she can keep it up. That's exactly what she's hoping we'll believe to keep her paying cock-traffic high. All power to the punters who can continue to enjoy the web she's weaved.
We all know that there are UKPers vocal and silent who harass SPs about reviews, bargaining for services, threatening negs and whatever other means they employ to try to secure what they want from an SP. When you mix this with this SP's practices it becomes murkier still. Perhaps she's hedged against trolling by recruiting so many knights, perhaps she silences all her would be naysayers (truth-tellers included) with the risk of them being unmasked here or elsewhere with truths or lies.
Whilst this kind of risk for us exists with any SP, the fact she's manipulating her reputation on here means she's a greater risk. Look at the chap who complained about being screened because of his nationality. He may well enjoy a fabulous time with her but will he only get her "standard" winning service or will she pull out a few more stops? How "free" is he to make his review if she knows what he looks like and perhaps gleans other detail about him? She will know who "he" is; the punting number he was using, what he looks like, perhaps his AWID and his UKP id.
Ultimately if she's a genuine trooper then we all win in the short term but PYWM's points are all VERY valid and a cautionary reminder that UKP continues to be exploited and undermined which is not a win for those here collaborating for our independent benefit.
Edit for most recent posts:
4 hour overstay - watch out for EAS.
We aren't having a pop at you but you are very much taking it that way. Which isn't a good sign.[/list]