Natalya_ Bayswater

[p1970]

External Link/Members Only

I have been a lurker for some time and it is my time to share.  Just had an amazing experience with Natalya who I found thanks to this website and the other positive reviews.  They were all spot-on, she is a gem.  I know that 250GBP for the hour is more expensive than other options out there but she is definitely worth it. I have paid more for a lot less.  Natalya is super sexy and friendly.  Our initial phone call was interesting. I was on my way to the airport in a taxi and she wanted to know what were my sexual interests and what I expected of our meeting.  I tried to be discreet but clearly noticed that the driver was keen to listen in on my conversation.  Anyway, once I finally made it to London and her incall hotel after a long day of meetings I was not disappointed. Natalya received me with a deep french kiss and pleasant roaming before inviting me to shower.  More DFK as soon as I stepped out of the shower until she guided me to face the mirror where she kneeled for some amazing owo with plenty of eye contact.  Moved to the bed where I let her guide me as I went down for some well appreciated RO until I had to get inside her.  Began with her favorite: doggy which she requested outright and followed in mish with plenty of DFK and breast play until I was getting too close and she finished me with her amazing mouth.  Please treat her well

[daviemac]

Are you insinuating the majority of punters on here mistreat escorts.   

In your nearly 12 months of membership I would have thought you would have read reviews and had an idea of contents, however I would advise reading the guide to review writing and taking note of the 'what not to say' part.

External Link/Members Only

[delta69]

External Link/Members Only

Please treat her well

We're not animals on this site
PlEaSe TrEaT hEr WeLl 

[PLeisure]

Please tell us that you were trying your hardest to be ironic 

[Fuzzyduck]

What a load of bollocks.

[NuruGuru]

Please treat her well

Thanks for the heads up. After my first meeting with her, I was planning on going back and treating her like shit and giving her an experience that would force her into early retirement.

But luckily, you've let us know how we should all treat working girls. Keep up the good reviews, and better yet, keep up with the even better advice.

[ss100]

Did you book via call or txt first?

[king tarzan]

Thanks for the heads up. After my first meeting with her, I was planning on going back and treating her like shit and giving her an experience that would force her into early retirement.

But luckily, you've let us know how we should all treat working girls. Keep up the good reviews, and better yet, keep up with the even better advice.

I always go to escorts looking and behaving like Dracula and speak with a French accent 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Payyourwaymate]

Thanks for the heads up. After my first meeting with her, I was planning on going back and treating her like shit and giving her an experience that would force her into early retirement.

But luckily, you've let us know how we should all treat working girls. Keep up the good reviews, and better yet, keep up with the even better advice.

 

[Momodan38]

I’m been a member less than a year so asking out of curiosity. I’ve seen three of these reviews in as many days. Do these members ever comeback and eventually redeem themselves? It’ll be interesting if the OP genuinely just made an error of judgment due to the way he worded the review.

[PLeisure]

I always go to escorts looking and behaving like Dracula and speak with a French accent 🤣🤣🤣🤣

I'm partial to biting their necks, too. But stop short of bruising them 

[PLeisure]

I’m been a member less than a year so asking out of curiosity. I’ve seen three of these reviews in as many days. Do these members ever comeback and eventually redeem themselves? It’ll be interesting if the OP genuinely just made an error of judgment due to the way he worded the review.

Depends.
Some take it on the chin and, if smart about life, enter into the spirit of things. i.e. Have the maturity and perspective to laugh about it whilst making notes not to repeat their transgression.
Some get butthurt and go passive-aggressive. They start bitching about the forum. They eventually get banned.
Others go quiet and lurk for the rest of their UKP lives.

[Fuzzyduck]

Depends.
Some take it on the chin and, if smart about life, enter into the spirit of things. i.e. Have the maturity and perspective to laugh about it whilst making notes not to repeat their transgression.
Some get butthurt and go passive-aggressive. They start bitching about the forum. They eventually get banned.
Others go quiet and lurk for the rest of their UKP lives.

Not saying it's the case here but if it's the SP herself or a tout/pimp, they sometimes just don't bother logging in again.

[PLeisure]

Not saying it's the case here but if it's the SP herself or a tout/pimp, they sometimes just don't bother logging in again.

This particular SP monitors her reviews very closely. In fact, she's on right now.

[JackSaint]

This particular SP monitors her reviews very closely. In fact, she's on right now.

How do you know she's online PL, I can't see a her name in the online now section?

[PLeisure]

How do you know she's online PL, I can't see a her name in the online now section?

PM incoming…

[asianguy251]

This particular SP monitors her reviews very closely. In fact, she's on right now.

Always like an escort who is  looking at feedback and trying to improve her performance.

[PLeisure]

Always like an escort who is  looking at feedback and trying to improve her performance.

Exactly 
The good ones understand that this forum acts as a barometer; they can gauge how their service is being received and revise accordingly.
The bad or mediocre ones shun the forum. Which can cost them potential income 

On the main UKP board, a WG has weighed in with her thoughts on the "How much impact does UKP have?" thread.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=327358.msg3435151#msg3435151

[Global_Punter]

Everything is amazing  glad you had fun buddy!

[Geko12]

Great review Natalya, 

[asianguy251]

Exactly 
The good ones understand that this forum acts as a barometer; they can gauge how their service is being received and revise accordingly.
The bad or mediocre ones shun the forum. Which can cost them potential income 

On the main UKP board, a WG has weighed in with her thoughts on the "How much impact does UKP have?" thread.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=327358.msg3435151#msg3435151

Yes for sure. An escort needs to try to become the best version of herself.  Always looking to improve. The competition out there is fierce.

[JackSaint]

Great review Natalya, 

Harsh and probably way wide of the mark, all her reviews, including mine are stellar.

[asianguy251]

Harsh and probably way wide of the mark, all her reviews, including mine are stellar.

Exactly she doesn't need to make reviews for herself.  In such a short time she's had tremendous feedback.

[lamboman]

Are you insinuating the majority of punters on here mistreat escorts.   

I don't think he is why do you think that?

[NuruGuru]

I don't think he is why do you think that?

The term "treat her well" OP used.

We're not savages, we don't need to be told that we have to have decent common courtesy and to treat SP's respectfully.

[p1970]

Well this got out of hand quickly.
I just did a quick review of "what not to say" and "treat her well" was not one of them.
Forgive me for using an Americanism. Probably overused in American reviews so I will declare myself guilty of being unimaginative but in no way was I implying anything about you gentlemen.
Peace!!

[NuruGuru]

Well this got out of hand quickly.
I just did a quick review of "what not to say" and "treat her well" was not one of them.
Forgive me for using an Americanism. Probably overused in American reviews so I will declare myself guilty of being unimaginative but in no way was I implying anything about you gentlemen.
Peace!!

Took it on the chin......just like Natalya 

[king tarzan]

Exactly 
The good ones understand that this forum acts as a barometer; they can gauge how their service is being received and revise accordingly.
The bad or mediocre ones shun the forum. Which can cost them potential income 

On the main UKP board, a WG has weighed in with her thoughts on the "How much impact does UKP have?" thread.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=327358.msg3435151#msg3435151

The power of the 🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅🐅 unit force 🥊🥊🥊🥊🥊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊🥊🥊🥊🥊👊👊👊

[WAP]

External Link/Members Only
Please treat her well

It was just a spelling mistake. What he meant to write was:

Please eat her well 🥭 🥭 🥭

and I will when I get round to seeing her.

[WAP]

Well this got out of hand quickly.
I just did a quick review of "what not to say" and "treat her well" was not one of them.
Forgive me for using an Americanism. Probably overused in American reviews so I will declare myself guilty of being unimaginative but in no way was I implying anything about you gentlemen.
Peace!!

External Link/Members Only



Hidden Image/Members Only

[LLPunting]

Exactly she doesn't need to make reviews for herself.  In such a short time she's had tremendous feedback.

It would be safe to assume that every positive review gets a fair amount of attention and drives a ton of leeches and contributors to enquire after the SPs concerned.  This SP is not the prettiest reviewed in the past month or so and she's at the pricier end of the range that contributors have typically mentioned so I find it a bit suspect that this particular lass should get so many more mentions than others so quickly, most especially from members who have otherwise been keeping schtumm for many months or years.

She also seems to be conducting damage control so it would not surprise me if she's been asking (some) punters to review her here and perhaps offering inducements.

There is definitely something fishy in this part of Denmark.

[NuruGuru]

It would be safe to assume that every positive review gets a fair amount of attention and drives a ton of leeches and contributors to enquire after the SPs concerned.  This SP is not the prettiest reviewed in the past month or so and she's at the pricier end of the range that contributors have typically mentioned so I find it a bit suspect that this particular lass should get so many more mentions than others so quickly, most especially from members who have otherwise been keeping schtumm for many months or years.

She also seems to be conducting damage control so it would not surprise me if she's been asking (some) punters to review her here and perhaps offering inducements.

There is definitely something fishy in this part of Denmark.

I think it’s because she actively uses UKP and likes checking her reviews. She knows the power of this forum. She actively encourages punters to review her here.

[asianguy251]

I think it’s because she actively uses UKP and likes checking her reviews. She knows the power of this forum. She actively encourages punters to review her here.

I don't know why she does that tbh.  Girls with extremely high feedback and lots of reviews kind of put me off sometimes.  It's like this girl has been around the block a lot and you'll just be another client for them.   If a guy has such a great experience and wants to make a review that's a different thing

[LLPunting]

I think it’s because she actively uses UKP and likes checking her reviews. She knows the power of this forum. She actively encourages punters to review her here.

So is she offering any inducements other than hopefully maintaining consistent performance levels and services for all cummers new and familiar?

[PLeisure]

So is she offering any inducements other than hopefully maintaining consistent performance levels and services for all cummers new and familiar?

Not for me

[p1970]

Same here. Just wanted to leave a positive review following an enjoyable experience. Thanks to the reviewers who guided me to her and others I have neglected to review.
Peace!

[Geko12]

fair play to her, she has her business head screwed on.

[Payyourwaymate]

I think it’s because she actively uses UKP and likes checking her reviews. She knows the power of this forum. She actively encourages punters to review her here.

Oh, I see. I guess others should know to take any of her future reviews with a pinch of salt then.

[NuruGuru]

Oh, I see. I guess others should know to take any of her future reviews with a pinch of salt then.

Why?

She’s not standing over a punters shoulder and making them write a positive review. Once you’re out of there, and it’s negative and not going to return, you can write a negative one if that was the experience surely. I don’t think asking a punter to post a review here means their experiences should be taken with a pinch of salt - she simple understands that giving a great service plus that service being backed up by good reviews  ensures she makes ££

[puntingpumping1920]

Why?

She’s not standing over a punters shoulder and making them write a positive review. Once you’re out of there, and it’s negative and not going to return, you can write a negative one if that was the experience surely. I don’t think asking a punter to post a review here means their experiences should be taken with a pinch of salt - she simple understands that giving a great service plus that service being backed up by good reviews  ensures she makes ££

 
She monitors the forum
 
If a punter wants to see her again it will influence what he writes in the review
 

[puntingpumping1920]

Oh, I see. I guess others should know to take any of her future reviews with a pinch of salt then.

 
Before you reply read his review 
 
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=329847.0
 
He wrote a love letter

[JackSaint]

I've been back to see her a few times, consistently top class meets, she does monitor the forum and is keen to maintain her reputation as we UKP punters give her a lot of business. If I had a bad punt with her I'd write a negative, for sure, regardless of the fact she'd see it. I think it's crucial to be honest with reviews, they are here to help other punters and there should be no walking on eggshells to please a girl.

[Payyourwaymate]

 
Before you reply read his review 
 
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=329847.0
 
He wrote a love letter

Thanks, you just saved me a lot of time replying lol.

[Payyourwaymate]

I've been back to see her a few times, consistently top class meets, she does monitor the forum and is keen to maintain her reputation as we UKP punters give her a lot of business. If I had a bad punt with her I'd write a negative, for sure, regardless of the fact she'd see it. I think it's crucial to be honest with reviews, they are here to help other punters and there should be no walking on eggshells to please a girl.

In an ideal world we would hope for that to happen but time and time again men are prepared to bend over backwards for women in anything, including punting reviews which are meant to benefit fellow punters who are men.

Imagine if more WGs were like this one and getting punters to review for her benefit of getting footfall and more £££££. Overtime the integrity of the review section will be compromised because we won't know what is genuine and which punter is trying to get into a WGs good books. Women are never direct, it's always an insidious infiltration then before you know it's too late.

[NuruGuru]

 
She monitors the forum
 
If a punter wants to see her again it will influence what he writes in the review

If a punter wanted to see her again, it wouldn’t matter whether he wrote a review.

I don’t know many punters that have horrible experiences, want to go back, and then write a positive review because an SP asked them too.

If a punter has a positive experience and they want to write about it, they will.

If they have a negative experience, it’s highly likely they won’t go back so what would stop them writing a negative review?

[NuruGuru]

In an ideal world we would hope for that to happen but time and time again men are prepared to bend over backwards for women in anything, including punting reviews which are meant to benefit fellow punters who are men.

Imagine if more WGs were like this one and getting punters to review for her benefit of getting footfall and more £££££. Overtime the integrity of the review section will be compromised because we won't know what is genuine and which punter is trying to get into a WGs good books. Women are never direct, it's always an insidious infiltration then before you know it's too late.

Ridiculous.

Why would a punter who had a negative experience write a positive review on UKP to get into the good books of an SP who gave them a shit service?

You seem overly skeptical of a WG who is actually quite good at what she does (the thing most of us are here to look for) yet, when one comes along, you seem to want to discredit fellow punters for their reviews and question them.

[Payyourwaymate]

Ridiculous.

Why would a punter who had a negative experience write a positive review on UKP to get into the good books of an SP who gave them a shit service?

You seem overly skeptical of a WG who is actually quite good at what she does (the thing most of us are here to look for) yet, when one comes along, you seem to want to discredit fellow punters for their reviews and question them.

See, it's already begun. You are now fighting a battle for her and she did not even have to say a word. All she did was fuck you good. My issue is not punters reviewing her.  I have not said anything about a punter getting a neg experience and still rating it positive. My issue is her telling punters to review her. That leads to punters not reviewing for the benefit of punters but for the sole benefit of the WG with perhaps them going into the WGs good books. How can you trust a review of a WG that is known to tell punters to review her? Odds are the punter is not going to review her unfavourably, what if she promises extras for review? An unsupecting punter will not know this. You may be transparent enough to admit to her telling punters to review but do you reckon every other punter is transparent in why they review or what took place?

There are plenty of WGs that have many positive reviews and are "forum darlings", I have no issue with them. My issue is that she seems to be trying to force it by telling punters to review her. It's not solely about her, it's the bigger picture of if multiple WGs take her approach then the reviews will lose credibility in the long run. Everything will become smoke and mirrors. If she is a good provider that is fine, her telling punters to review her on here is an issue. She has no business trying to use the site to her benefit, she is not a punter. This is the insidious infiltration I am talking about.

[ollielon]

External Link/Members Only

Please treat her well

looks like someone has fallen in love 

[Tom.Punter]

At 150 ph, I would give it a try 

[NuruGuru]

That leads to punters not reviewing for the benefit of punters but for the sole benefit of the WG with perhaps them going into the WGs good books. How can you trust a review of a WG that is known to tell punters to review her?

Totally disagree with this but you're entitled to your opinion - because that's all it is - opinion as you've not seen her.

I'm going by fact.

I know I wrote my review like I have done all my others before her, and like all the others I will do after her, for my own benefit and for the benefit of the punters of this forum - You can challenge that all you wish to.