Would someone with more brains and powers of concentration than me be prepared to provide a 2 or 3 line synopsis of the above please?
- OP wrote a review fuelled by a breakdown on their "relationship" rather than because of a poor service. His main argument was that she was leading him on at one point and that Paloma is crazy in a way.
- Paloma came on and said her piece, refuting near enough 99% of what he said. Her main argument was that he was painting a very different picture from what transpired. Said he was suffering from EAS and an email screenshot sent from OP pretty much confirms that.
I missed a LOT of things out as I wanted to post the meat of the "review" but if you have about 45 minutes to spare, it's worth a read. It's archetypal internet drama but with sex involved. Character assassinations, personal attacks, threats by email and voicemail and more; it really contains and really is everything a transactional escort-client relationship shouldn't and shouldn't be.