PLEASE PUT AN AREA IN YOUR SUBJECT TITLE

[Skippy2708]

Dear all, just to help with a small frustration that I’m sure others may experience, can you please put an area in your subject title as it would really help with not wasting time if it’s nowhere near your punting area.  Sorry to moan.

[Moby Dick]

Do you prefer square feet, metres, acres, hectares or something else? 

[Foxtail17]

Dear all, just to help with a small frustration that I’m sure others may experience, can you please put an area in your subject title as it would really help with not wasting time if it’s nowhere near your punting area.  Sorry to moan.

Well said that man. Simple thing to do. I just ignore any reviews with no area now.

[WASA38]

Dear all, just to help with a small frustration that I’m sure others may experience, can you please put an area in your subject title as it would really help with not wasting time if it’s nowhere near your punting area.  Sorry to moan.

Heartily agreed, but might this not be applicable generally and not just East England and hence be posted under Regional Discussion ?

[scutty brown]

If people read the rules it would help:

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criterion is that she has accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban.
Reviews must be within the last 6 months, for ALL members now.
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exceptions are sex parties, duos, etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicised by the service provider).
The title of the review should only have SP Name - Location - (B&S / TOFTT / SCAM label if needed), and there are no abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review

The highlighted bit covers this

[PilotMan]

Dear all, just to help with a small frustration that I’m sure others may experience, can you please put an area in your subject title as it would really help with not wasting time if it’s nowhere near your punting area.  Sorry to moan.

I'm surprised you find it to be an issue.

Myself and many other helpers do check the reviews and where the location is missing or vague, we correct it if obvious, or request the reviewer to clarify.

I just checked the "recent reviews" page which shows the last 200 reviews, and there were only two that didn't have clear locations in the title

[daviemac]

Dear all, just to help with a small frustration that I’m sure others may experience, can you please put an area in your subject title as it would really help with not wasting time if it’s nowhere near your punting area.  Sorry to moan.

Do you really think this need a thread of it's own, let alone one with the title in capitals? 

That's apart from the fact there's rules about what has or hasn't got to be put in the title, rules that the mods are here to enforce

[puntingking]

Dear all, just to help with a small frustration that I’m sure others may experience, can you please put an area in your subject title as it would really help with not wasting time if it’s nowhere near your punting area.  Sorry to moan.

Well said, sir 

[daviemac]

Dear all, just to help with a small frustration that I’m sure others may experience, can you please put an area in your subject title as it would really help with not wasting time if it’s nowhere near your punting area.  Sorry to moan.

I should add that as well as being in the rules as Scutty has pointed out it's also made clear in red on the post new review page that the location goes in the title.

Hidden Image/Members Only

However can you, or anyone else, link to threads where this is an issue?   

[puntingking]

I should add that as well as being in the rules as Scutty has pointed out it's also made clear in red on the post new review page that the location goes in the title.

Hidden Image/Members Only

However can you, or anyone else, link to threads where this is an issue?   

I did come across a review yesterday but I think it had since been fix by a forum helper. 

[Paul9144]

I should add that as well as being in the rules as Scutty has pointed out it's also made clear in red on the post new review page that the location goes in the title.

Hidden Image/Members Only

It's also in the reviewing guide.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=422371.0#new

[RedKettle]

I am not convinced he meant reviews, perhaps topics in the discussion sections?  I would be amazed if any reviews survived more than a few hours without a location being added to the title - FHs are all over that and indexing.

[daviemac]

I am not convinced he meant reviews, perhaps topics in the discussion sections?  I would be amazed if any reviews survived more than a few hours without a location being added to the title - FHs are all over that and indexing.

I've no idea what he means or what the issue is to be honest. As you say FHs sort review locations out pretty quick and mods do it on first reviews before approving if it's missing.

Just had a look at the East England general discussion section and there isn't many without a location? 

[Skippy2708]

Yes as someone pointed out it’s not the reviews but general discussion (I didn’t actually put reviews in my title so the assumption was made).  I know you guys are on top of the reviews and sort it out shame really that punters don’t read the rules in the first place.  But there has been some replies that concur with my post so there maybe is a small issue with this which can be frustrating as a user who complies. In regard to the capitals in the title, I didn’t realise I had done that until it was mentioned here, but it got their attention 😜  Anyway keep up the good work.

[daviemac]

Yes as someone pointed out it’s not the reviews but general discussion (I didn’t actually put reviews in my title so the assumption was made).  I know you guys are on top of the reviews and sort it out shame really that punters don’t read the rules in the first place.  But there has been some replies that concur with my post so there maybe is a small issue with this which can be frustrating as a user who complies. In regard to the capitals in the title, I didn’t realise I had done that until it was mentioned here, but it got their attention 😜  Anyway keep up the good work.

Complies with what? there's no requirement to put the location in the title of a post in the general discussion sections, mainly because it isn't needed.

Maybe you could explain exactly what your issue is, after all if it's a "has anyone seen xxxx" type question you either have or haven't seen them and you could have seen them in a different location to the OP. If it's a general who to see type question the one's I've seen in the NE always give the location where the poster's going to be or they're general questions about the whole area.

You are complaining about an issue that doesn't exist and to make matters worse you are shouting about it. BTW I do not believe you didn't notice as you were typing that all the letters were capitals.

Edit
Are those who have agreed with you referring to general discussions or like most people reviews. 

Also I'll ask again can you link to any post where the lack of location is an issue that needs to be addressed.

[TomTank]

I'm not sure which part of the country you are referring to, as it wasn't in the thread title?

[daviemac]

I'm not sure which part of the country you are referring to, as it wasn't in the thread title?

[puntingking]

Location was not mentioned here - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=462994.0 

[puntingking]

Location was not mentioned here aswell - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=449039.0
I know where House Of Divine place is but there may well be punters who don't know the place so the location is still important.

It looks like the op does have a point that some times well meaning reviewers do occasionally forget to put the location into the subject title. 

[puntingking]

and another reviewer who left out the location in it - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=462255.0


It does seem to be more common than you may think 

[shed]

and another reviewer who left out the location in it - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=462255.0


It does seem to be more common than you may think 

Doesn't it say Islington 

[daviemac]

Location was not mentioned here - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=462994.0 

" Came to address, came in the flat she was in thr room and the next minute gone texting me I need  to leave .."

Reads like an outcall, no location needed, unless you want to post yours.

Location was not mentioned here aswell - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=449039.0
I know where House Of Divine place is but there may well be punters who don't know the place so the location is still important.

It looks like the op does have a point that some times well meaning reviewers do occasionally forget to put the location into the subject title. 

Had you or someone else reported it it would have been sorted in February.

and another reviewer who left out the location in it - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=462255.0

It does seem to be more common than you may think 

Now I know it's been added.

BTW since February there's been 1340 reviews posted and you've found 3 with the location missing, in fact it's only 2 because outcalls don't require a member to disclose his location.

That's apart from the fact the OP wasn't referring to reviews, he was talking about posts in general discussions where there's no requirement to include a location.

 Skippy2708 still hasn't replied to the question of what it is he complies with that others don't.   

[puntingking]

Doesn't it say Islington 

It has been put in now. 

[puntingking]

" Came to address, came in the flat she was in thr room and the next minute gone texting me I need  to leave .."

Reads like an outcall, no location needed, unless you want to post yours.

Had you or someone else reported it it would have been sorted in February.

Now I know it's been added.

BTW since February there's been 1340 reviews posted and you've found 3 with the location missing, in fact it's only 2 because outcalls don't require a member to disclose his location.

That's apart from the fact the OP wasn't referring to reviews, he was talking about posts in general discussions where there's no requirement to include a location.

 Skippy2708 still hasn't replied to the question of what it is he complies with that others don't.   

 

[puntingking]

" Came to address, came in the flat she was in thr room and the next minute gone texting me I need  to leave .."

Reads like an outcall, no location needed, unless you want to post yours.

This would be an incall. I have seen this sp and she doesn't do outcalls at all. The op didn't make it clear but I think he means he came to the address rather than the sp came to his address.

This sp doesn't do outcalls, I should know cause I have seen her too. 

[daviemac]

This would be an incall. I have seen this sp and she doesn't do outcalls at all. The op didn't make it clear but I think he means he came to the address rather than the sp came to his address.

This sp doesn't do outcalls, I should know cause I have seen her too. 

I may have misread that but it makes no difference, the OP isn't talking about reviews and in any case 2 out of 1340 or about 0.02% (one has been corrected) that don't have a location is not worth bothering about.

Don't forget I said - "Also I'll ask again can you link to any post where the lack of location is an issue that needs to be addressed."

[puntingking]

I may have misread that but it makes no difference, the OP isn't talking about reviews and in any case 2 out of 1340 or about 0.02% (one has been corrected) that don't have a location is not worth bothering about.

Don't forget I said - "Also I'll ask again can you link to any post where the lack of location is an issue that needs to be addressed."