Louisa Fox English - North Fareham

[stefanow]

External Link/Members Only

First review, from quite a while back but only just joined UKP... (UKP has been interesting reading so far Gentlemen!)

Writing this as Louisa Fox has had some pretty negative reviews from respected members of this site.
Not looking to change anyone's minds but feel I should give you my perspective IF you like what I like.

And that is edging...  I'm not a prolific punter but I've been doing it for a while on and off, and generally always
after the same old thing.  And I thought she was pretty damn good at it!  I take on board negative comments
about the long cup of tea at the start, and she could have been more attentive/sexy/gagging for it, etc in a PSE
kind of way (it's always nice to feel wanted), but I came away feeling very happy with the session and I'm sure
one day I will go back... I've yet to bump into anyone better at edging since.

Other positives.  Great comms, relaxed and straightforward, great looking lady, happy to dress as asked, listened
to my requests and acted upon them.  She is not the youngest of ladies out there, but she is fit as.  The pictures
on her profile don't look like the person I met exactly, so the usual airbrushing filter thing is going on, but I'm
pretty picky about looks and Louisa Fox is good looking, for sure.

Welcome all kind comments from you good people.  Glad I've joined this site now... some of the reviews have had
me in bits (sadly mostly the negative ones), and I'm looking forward to being an active member.  Will put some more
historical reviews up as and when.  Seems there's quite a few AW members out there not been mentioned on here so
far...  will do my best to plug the gaps.

[DrConners]

First review, from quite a while back but only just joined UKP... (UKP has been interesting reading so far Gentlemen!)

Welcome to UKP 

Writing this as Louisa Fox has had some pretty negative reviews from respected members of this site.
Not looking to change anyone's minds but feel I should give you my perspective IF you like what I like.

That's putting it mildly, here's a few comments from other members than have seen her too (I have not)

Overall, what the hell can I say?!? She does look good and could fulfil a MILF fantasy if/when that mood strikes, but……, man, it was like fucking a doll (not that I have ever done that…..   ), or a corpse (again, I haven’t done that either…..      ).

Will I go back? I am not a necrofile, so not a chance. 

Totally reflects my experience with her OP, glad it wasn’t just me that had the same feeling about her.

Shame because as you say, she could be a cracker. But too much talking and lifeless fucking really counts against her. I don’t think escorting is for her!

I also had a similar disappointing experience with this SP.
Detached attitude throughout made worse because she "doesn't like to be touched" after sex (not by me anyway)
Shame because she is good looking, especially naked.
I won't be calling her again.

Back to your review

I'm not a prolific punter but I've been doing it for a while on and off, and generally always
after the same old thing. I take on board negative comments about the long cup of tea at the start, and she could have been more attentive/sexy/gagging for it, etc in a PSE kind of way (it's always nice to feel wanted), but I came away feeling very happy with the session and I'm sure one day I will go back... I've yet to bump into anyone better at edging since.

Other positives.  Great comms, relaxed and straightforward, great looking lady, happy to dress as asked, listened
to my requests and acted upon them.  She is not the youngest of ladies out there, but she is fit as.  The pictures
on her profile don't look like the person I met exactly, so the usual airbrushing filter thing is going on, but I'm
pretty picky about looks and Louisa Fox is good looking, for sure.

These points are fair enough, however it would appear she is not the most enthusiastic WG according to other members. If you have just joined here to white knight her don't be surprised if your credibility is questioned or your intentions for that matter (I mean looking at her profile she's got a serious case of dusty phone  ). I appreciate every WG is a person with all the nuances that come with it - Some clients preferences she prefers more than others, her likes list is limited so why anyone would book her expecting a PSE instead of a GFE is beyond me 

Welcome all kind comments from you good people.  Glad I've joined this site now... some of the reviews have had
me in bits (sadly mostly the negative ones), and I'm looking forward to being an active member.  Will put some more
historical reviews up as and when.  Seems there's quite a few AW members out there not been mentioned on here so
far...  will do my best to plug the gaps.

Historical reviews are pointless, unless the WG in question is still working - Plus according to the rules :

- Reviews

* Positive reviews can only be placed in the 12 months after the punt. No time limit on negative or neutral reviews.

Your review is too vague & fluffy IMO 

Take a read of this :

External Link/Members Only

You are aware that she is a member here & is more than capable of speaking for herself aren't you ?

 

[stefanow]

Afternoon Dr C, thanks for the hello and considered comments.

Couple of things... I need to get my head around the lingo a little.  Guessing White Knight is
some muppet who has decided they are a little in love with a lady and want to protect her...?

Well, I'm a bit of a lover not a fighter and I do find it hard to find the bad in most people.  But
when someone pisses me off, they'll know about it!  With respect to my review, I was definitely
not WK'ing her.  Just trying to give a bit of balance... and explain that I still think she's given me
the best edge I've ever had (and I've had a fair few).  Imagine I'm not the only one who likes that
sort of thing. (Oh, and the meet was less than 12 months ago, but again thanks for the info.)

With regards your link to review writing... Thanks.  I do need to read that properly and I will
try my best to adhere to the rules... but getting back to my previous paragraph start, I know
I will struggle to give the same graphic detail that most do
(a) I'm pretty specific in what I try to achieve and can easily be outed by my session antics
(b) It is a niche that few tend to be too interested in, so it may be in everyone's interests that
I keep to more general overviews and considered opinions of their character and attributes???

Anywhos, so far UKP has helped me from making a couple of mistakes with respect to my
considered next moves, and for that I'm truly grateful within the first 24 hours of being on here.
Hope to return the favours in some way in the future.

PS.  What the fuck does TOFTT mean?

[south_fifty]

TOFTT

Take one for the team ...

I guess meet someone new or whose profile is a bit iffy

[stefanow]

Oh, of course.  Ta.  I was thinking on a totally different tangent!

[DrConners]

Afternoon Dr C, thanks for the hello and considered comments.

Couple of things... I need to get my head around the lingo a little.  Guessing White Knight is
some muppet who has decided they are a little in love with a lady and want to protect her...?

Well, I'm a bit of a lover not a fighter and I do find it hard to find the bad in most people.  But
when someone pisses me off, they'll know about it!  With respect to my review, I was definitely
not WK'ing her.  Just trying to give a bit of balance... and explain that I still think she's given me
the best edge I've ever had (and I've had a fair few).  Imagine I'm not the only one who likes that
sort of thing. (Oh, and the meet was less than 12 months ago, but again thanks for the info.)

With regards your link to review writing... Thanks.  I do need to read that properly and I will
try my best to adhere to the rules... but getting back to my previous paragraph start, I know
I will struggle to give the same graphic detail that most do
(a) I'm pretty specific in what I try to achieve and can easily be outed by my session antics
(b) It is a niche that few tend to be too interested in, so it may be in everyone's interests that
I keep to more general overviews and considered opinions of their character and attributes???

Anywhos, so far UKP has helped me from making a couple of mistakes with respect to my
considered next moves, and for that I'm truly grateful within the first 24 hours of being on here.
Hope to return the favours in some way in the future.

It's all good - New members (certainly starting their post history as you did) are often questioned about their credibility.

It happens.

It's not my site & I'm the same as every other member here, just a contributor.

My only advice would be make sure you are honest & factual in your posts/reviews if you decide to make any.

Returning members are often caught out - Look up 'EAS' on here whilst your at it. 

Look forward to further contributions from you if you see fit to make any ect - Cheers.

[Bunbury]

Think the Doc makes valid points re this review.
Fluffy as fuck. Reading some of the feedback from these ageing has been prossies is enough to make you vomit. 

[Hantsolo]

The “edging” I experienced with her was sitting on the edge of the sofa waiting for the tea drinking and chatting to stop so I could actually get what I’d paid for....

Am guessing that’s not what you’re referring to? 

[stefanow]

No, that was not the sort that of edging I was talking about, but thankyou for making me chuckle.

LouisaFox used to work with a few other ladies based just down the road (Garden of Eden).  The one
and only time I visited the place (to meet English Fearn), there was the slightly off-putting chat on the
settee - wondering if it is the same settee to which you refer?

I was still quite new to all of this back then, so just went with the flow, but it did put me off going back.
Wouldn’t mind if the chat had been more focused on the session but seem to recall discussing a
lot of random life related bollocks which was obviously not on my agenda at that particular moment.

[stefanow]

Think the Doc makes valid points re this review.
Fluffy as fuck. Reading some of the feedback from these ageing has been prossies is enough to make you vomit. 

Sorry to make you feel unwell with all of this.  Trouble is, I’m not into seeing girls who have just
been given the vote...  I prefer models with a few more miles on the clock - I guess because I’m
one of those weird blokes for whom personality is just about as important as looks (I know, I should
have sought help decades ago). 

And I take the fluffy-ness on the chin.  But get used to it.  I’m never going to be as graphic as most
would like on here, but I promise to be honest with my thoughts and give viewpoints which I hope
can help people (who are similar in their approach to me) in making good choices on where to spend
their money on AW.

[CoolTiger]

External Link/Members Only

First review, from quite a while back but only just joined UKP... (UKP has been interesting reading so far Gentlemen!)

Stefanow, can you please confirm approx when this punt took place?

Cheers.

[stefanow]

Errrm...  I could, but why do you ask?

It was within the last twelve months, so as to fit within the UKP guidelines.  Don’t want to be more accurate than that really... unless there is a good reason to be???

[daviemac]

Errrm...  I could, but why do you ask?

It was within the last twelve months, so as to fit within the UKP guidelines.  Don’t want to be more accurate than that really... unless there is a good reason to be???

CT did say approx, it was just to confirm it was within the last 12 months as you gave no indication how long ago it was other than "quite a while back".   

[stefanow]

Just double checked when I met Louisa Fox English...  I'm well within the 12 month period allowed.

Needless to say, I'm happy to supply proof should it be needed, but wouldn't expect to have to do
this publicly (I was led to believe we should not give any information out which could lead to
cross-referencing of our AW profile?).

Here to learn...

[daviemac]

Just double checked when I met Louisa Fox English...  I'm well within the 12 month period allowed.

Needless to say, I'm happy to supply proof should it be needed, but wouldn't expect to have to do
this publicly (I was led to believe we should not give any information out which could lead to
cross-referencing of our AW profile?).

Here to learn...

Nobody's asking you to prove anything, I don't know why you keep brining it up. Your post wasn't entirely clear regarding how long ago it was, more so as you mentioned 'historical reviews', you were asked to clarify and now we know it was within 12 months there isn't a problem.

It was your first review and no one knows if you were aware of the 12 month rule, you'd be surprised how many don't even know there are rules let alone have read them.

[stefanow]

No problem.

You are correct - I wasn’t aware of any rules when I wrote my first review.

Dr C kindly gave me some good feedback and some well needed education.

Can’t say I was looking for Review Guidelines before I wrote it, but there was nothing obvious
that jumped out at me.  It goes without saying UKP’s finest welcoming committee have laid out
the red carpet, rose petals and bunting since then, so I’m nearly ready for another go.

Wish me luck! 

[daviemac]

No problem.

You are correct - I wasn’t aware of any rules when I wrote my first review.

Dr C kindly gave me some good feedback and some well needed education.

Can’t say I was looking for Review Guidelines before I wrote it, but there was nothing obvious
that jumped out at me.  It goes without saying UKP’s finest welcoming committee have laid out
the red carpet, rose petals and bunting since then, so I’m nearly ready for another go.

Wish me luck!

DC gave you a link to the review writing guide, there's also a link at the bottom of every page to the actual forum rules. There's not many and are quite easy to adhere to.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0

[aronteo]

The “edging” I experienced with her was sitting on the edge of the sofa waiting for the tea drinking and chatting to stop so I could actually get what I’d paid for....
 

 

Oh man......., that does ring a bell..............

[Bornslippy]

So.....after reading all of this it seems she is an older lady who loves nothing better than cuppa, and a natter, and you pay for the "privilege"....fuck that!

[Hantsolo]

So.....after reading all of this it seems she is an older lady who loves nothing better than cuppa, and a natter, and you pay for the "privilege"....fuck that!

Yep, that pretty much sums it up! 

[glamourtog]

Here’s my take: bullshit review. I read it and then read her profile. Same voice to me. Written by a woman. You can tell me I’m wrong but I’m fucking not.

[DrConners]

Here’s my take: bullshit review. I read it and then read her profile. Same voice to me. Written by a woman. You can tell me I’m wrong but I’m fucking not.

Well I've never met the OP  - but I assure you your not the only one who thinks 'his' gender may be in question.

Dearest Banbury, please explain how you arrive at calling me a fanboy?

(I’m assuming you are being derogatory.)

Are you suggesting it’s impossible to think highly of an escort without being
some sort of weak minded sycophant?  Are only bad opinions valid on this site?
If so, what is the point of this place?

Please explain and justify yourself or scurry back to you grim little cave with your
twisted negative thoughts.  Sweet dreams.

As DrC has stated you need to man up but I'm not sure if you can.
Starting a post with Dearest and ending with Sweet dreams and the rather heavy handed ''explain and justify' sounds rather like a remark a member of the opposite sex might make.

Since waving 'his' handbag in Bunbury's general direction has been very guarded in 'his' posts - Especially as a couple of mods have come seeking clarification.

A failed touting attempt - I reckon tic-tock with this one