Author Topic: Fun Girls - Sexy_kayleigh69xx  (Read 2392 times)


1 review(s) for British_jessxx (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline EverOptimistic

External Link/Members Only

OK so I have been lurking for a little while now having found the site around 3 months ago, wish I'd stumbled upon it somewhat earlier given I've been punting pretty regularly over the last 15 - 20 years!!
Anyway this seems a good starting point review wise as there have been a few content contentious threads regarding this particular group of girls.

So I'd had no response from a girl I see regularly and I began trawling through the various AW HL's that I have accumulated.
I find myself almost manic in this situation flicking between profiles and trying to make a decision on who to call.
I wanted somebody to visit me and this left me a little short on options, the various threads on here have made me fairly apprehensive re the Fun Girls group and if I'm honest I was pretty well persuaded that I was likely to be disappointed if I made a booking.
Anyway we all know how it often goes - primal urges take over and next minute I'm texting the number. (Same for all the girls I looked at.)
I was asked which girl I was interested in and replied Chantelle, text reply indicated she wouldn't be free until 11:30 but Kayleigh was free.
At this point my head was kind of saying no but time was getting on and I knew I'd have to end up going out for a punt if I declined.

Kayleigh arrives maybe 3-4 minutes before the appointed time, no complaints here as not late which I do find annoying.
Blond, late 20's so profile accurate in that respect. Maybe 5'3", immediately struck me as attractive with startling Grey/Blue eyes which I found quite captivating.
Medium tits with nice big nipples, peachy little ass and nice shaven pussy. A little bit of a belly but this didn't put me off in the slightest particularly as I'm no perfect physical specimen myself!

I'd agreed £150 for the hour and handed it over as she walked in.
Good start as I clicked with her pretty much immediately, nice chatty and bubbly girl no awkwardness at all.

After a little bit of mucking around on the sofa I suggested upstairs and as soon as we were on the bed we were kissing and Kayleigh seemed really into it.
Watched her play with herself for a bit and then it was onto OWO and fuck me not a wet wipe in sight  :yahoo:
This was delivered enthusiastically and although she didn't take the whole length in it felt really good.
RO first with her on her back and then sitting on my face, tasted good and made the right noises without going over the top.
More OWO before the condom went on, felt nice and tight when I entered and great fucking her in mish with those gorgeous eyes looking up at me.
Responsive every time I asked to change position and no feeling of her just wanting me to come and get it over with.
She was a little reticent in the dirty talk department but with some encouragement from me she was getting the hang of it before the end  :D
Finished with a facial, was going to CIM which she was fine with but changed my mind at the last minute.
I think she was a little taken aback at how much there was but she took it like a trooper and scored 10/10 for not giving the disgusted 'what have you done to me' look that I've seen from a fair few girls previously.

At no time did I get the feeling that she was rushing me in any way and the whole experience was just what I wanted really.
We chatted for the remaining 5 - 10 mins and she is a thoroughly likable girl.
I'm fairly sure I'll try and book her again if the opportunity presents itself.

I text the number after to say she'd been terrific and to pass on my appreciation.
Got a reply saying 'Thanks, all my girls are good and all English, have a good evening.'
So shock horror I guess there's most likely a bloke behind this group, I don't really have a problem with this unless there are signs that girls are being mistreated. (None whatsoever with Kayleigh)
If I do have a negative it would be that both at drop off and pickup the car parked right outside my house, no biggie for me but I'd imagine it could cause others a few problems.




vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I text the number after to say she'd been terrific and to pass on my appreciation.
Got a reply saying 'Thanks, all my girls are good and all English, have a good evening.'
So shock horror I guess there's most likely a bloke behind this group, I don't really have a problem with this unless there are signs that girls are being mistreated. (None whatsoever with Kayleigh)
If I do have a negative it would be that both at drop off and pickup the car parked right outside my house, no biggie for me but I'd imagine it could cause others a few problems.

they also have barebackers in the group

External Link/Members Only

wonder how many are secret bb escorts or bait and switch

Veritas

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I agree with VirtualWaster....for all the comments on here about the group (and a couple of established and solid posters have given decent reviews), the smattering of barebackers with almost limitless likes lists has always rung alarm bells for me.

In the case of this one, I also thought the verification pic was pretty haggard  :crazy:

vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
In the case of this one, I also thought the verification pic was pretty haggard  :crazy:

thanks for mention

immediately struck me as attractive with startling Grey/Blue eyes which I found quite captivating.

Thank fuck i know about the eye of the beholder

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Thank fuck i know about the eye of the beholder

Hidden Image/Members Only

 :lol:   :lol:

So we have a little domestic yesterday involving a troll making references about this group - he got binned yesterday at 10.10 pm

Then within 41 minutes OP post's this slightly fluffy, but not too much so review  :unknown:

I'd say your an EverOptimistic pimp touting your girls - you know pimping is illegal mate ?

Maybe the two events are a coincidence - Either way I'm not buying it  :thumbsdown:


vw

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
:lol:   :lol:

So we have a little domestic yesterday involving a troll making references about this group - he got binned yesterday at 10.10 pm

Then within 41 minutes OP post's this slightly fluffy, but not too much so review  :unknown:

I'd say your an EverOptimistic pimp touting your girls - you know pimping is illegal mate ?

Maybe the two events are a coincidence - Either way I'm not buying it  :thumbsdown:

I hate you, you are getting called better names than me by these trolls.   :lol: :lol:

Offline Ronnieosullivan

Everoptimistic - your girls look fucking hanging mate.
£150 :lol: joker

Esclar

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Just an opinion, but I've known lasses I'd rate 9/10 with make up, but who look no better than that pic with no war paint and when they've not had enough sleep.

I've been keeping an eye out for Kayleigh or Daniella to be working at the Bracknell hotel on a day I can visit.  If I have half as much fun as Zulu Lance, I'll be one happy punter.

Offline switftjake

That’s one of the better looking verification pics I’ve seen. Just look at the regional verifications pic threads for some shockers. She looks ok to me tbh, just obviously a lot older than the photoshopped  profile pic.

Offline EverOptimistic

Hmmm ok so f I'm honest I thought it likely this would provoke comment, not sure I was quite prepared for the level of hostility though!
Obviously it's a little difficult to prove the authenticity of my review and the suspicion is understandable given it's the first I've posted.
But suggesting I'm a pimp.... a bit strong? Funnily enough I'm not as offended as perhaps I should be!

What I was actually trying to achieve was what I thought a forum like this was for, present a balanced appraisal drawn from my own experience.

The verification pic:
I had seen this and agree it's a world apart from the undoubtedly retouched example on the profile but as a couple of others have stated make up can make a huge difference with some girls.
Having skimmed through the thread containing dozens of these verification photos I really don't think its awful but as we know this is subjective.

As for bareback none of the three girls who showed a green light on the day I booked have this listed, I concur with virtualwaster and would avoid any who offer it.

In hindsight my comment "So shock horror I guess there's most likely a bloke behind this group" was somewhat flippant but was borne out of having used many agencies (or groups I suppose we call them nowadays) Most have used a fairly similar MO to Fun Girls, there was one not too long ago on AW with mainly polish girls, mostly poor and on occasion it wasn't the girl in the picture who turned up.
They normally have a fairly short lifespan as girls either get fed up or offer punters their own number and a reduced price.

So Dr Conners my pimping career is likely to be short, I'd best got off now and interview a few more girls  :lol:


Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
I'd best got off now and interview a few more girls  :lol:

A clumsy & inappropriate attempt at humour IMO  :thumbsdown:

Thanks for taking the time to reply regardless - As I posted above, your 'review' appeared with strangely coincidental timing, a fact you have, I guess, justified by stating :

What I was actually trying to achieve was what I thought a forum like this was for, present a balanced appraisal drawn from my own experience.

It is & that is I believe the purpose of UKP - we also get alot of first time posters throwing up a review in response to shall we say negative comments about how a girl looks from her verification picture or if some girls in a group offer BB services ect. Your 'review' most certainly seemed to be in that catagory from my point of view.

It's an open forum, within the rules, I'm entitled to my opinion as are you - I still reckon you are in some way affliated with this group - if not in a pimping capacity then still a fluffy fan boy  ;)  Either way the alleged 'fact' that these girls are pimped out edges this somewhat dubious pastime away from what I would consider to be 'fair game' & into shady territory. I won't be booking any of these WG's based upon that assessment alone. Those whores are yours.

It's not all bad - UKP member ZuluLance had a good time with Sexy_chantelle69xx though.

OK so I have been lurking for a little while now having found the site around 3 months ago, wish I'd stumbled upon it somewhat earlier given I've been punting pretty regularly over the last 15 - 20 years!!

There's always a positive - if the above is true then that's great, put your money where your mouth is. I'm sure we would all very much appreciate any reviews & information you can share on any current WG's you've seen & continue to function as a mutually beneficial forum.

If, as you say you've only found UKP recently, bearing in mind I'm not UKP police, have a read of the rules & just be honest  :hi:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=1.0





Offline DrConners

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,309
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
I hate you, you are getting called better names than me by these trolls.   :lol: :lol:

Your a far bigger 'White Whale' than me - the troll reward for your hide must be astronomical  ;)    :D   :D


Offline EverOptimistic

Well Dr Connors, I'm a bit miffed!!
I come in from an overly busy day at work looking forward to some verbal fisticuffs on this thread and you go and spoil it with an in the main measured response!

You're 100% wrong about me being connected in any way with this group but like you say entitled to your opinion and I can see how you may have formed it.
I would remark that its quite difficult to find a girl that's not pimped or controlled in some way but I respect your decision to avoid this group on that basis.
What would be more likely to dissuade me from using them again is the fact that some of the girls list bareback in their preferences  :thumbsdown:

I will be making an effort to contribute going forward, there are maybe 10 -15 girls still on AW that I've seen in the past but I do think reviews should be fairly current so I'm not going to post a shed load of them in one sitting.

Must admit I do quite like ''fluffy fan boy'' - would have a made a great user ID  :D