why do we all give fluffy feedback instead of how we really feel?

[robs one]

I know I can be guilty of this as when I have a good punt "I write great time, will see again"
what I should say is" what a fucking slut! she could suck a golf ball down 50ft of hosepipe!
or when it’s a crap punt I don't comment at all
when I should write " what a waste of fucking time, I might have well stuck my cock in an apple pie!"

[smiths]

I know I can be guilty of this as when I have a good punt "I write great time, will see again"
what I should say is" what a fucking slut! she could suck a golf ball down 50ft of hosepipe!
or when it’s a crap punt I don't comment at all
when I should write " what a waste of fucking time, I might have well stuck my cock in an apple pie!"

Speak for yourself, i am not part of the ALL you mention in the thread title, i give bad feedback if i get bad service and i give good feedback if i get good service.

IMO its really important to give bad feedback even if a punter doesnt wish to share his good punts. He presumably isnt going to return to a bad WG and has hopefully used a punting phone or sim and not given the WG real personal information about him so has nothing to lose by giving honest bad feedback in my view.

[Corus Boy]

Speak for yourself, i am not part of the ALL you mention in the thread title, i give bad feedback if i get bad service and i give good feedback if i get good service.

IMO its really important to give bad feedback even if a punter doesnt wish to share his good punts. He presumably isnt going to return to a bad WG and has hopefully used a punting phone or sim and not given the WG real personal information about him so has nothing to lose by giving honest bad feedback in my view.

+1

[Bangers and Gash]

I know I can be guilty of this as when I have a good punt "I write great time, will see again"
what I should say is" what a fucking slut! she could suck a golf ball down 50ft of hosepipe!
or when it’s a crap punt I don't comment at all
when I should write " what a waste of fucking time, I might have well stuck my cock in an apple pie!"

Bit of a generalisation to say we all give fluffy feedback.

Maybe people don't feel the need to use vulgar language due to plain old good manners. 

[SamLP]

Many negatives and neutrals posted in the reviews section, and many honest punters saying it was borderline positive etc. so not ALL members give fluffy feedback.

[PumpAction]

I know I can be guilty of this as when I have a good punt "I write great time, will see again"
what I should say is" what a fucking slut! she could suck a golf ball down 50ft of hosepipe!
or when it’s a crap punt I don't comment at all
when I should write " what a waste of fucking time, I might have well stuck my cock in an apple pie!"

Are you that guy that writes "treat her well chaps" at the end of every review?

[robs one]

My apologies , I should not have generalized

and no I don't write "treat her well Chaps"

id be interested in seeing an example of when you left negative feed back as its very rare when I check that I see it?

[CBPaul]

I know I can be guilty of this as when I have a good punt "I write great time, will see again"
what I should say is" what a fucking slut! she could suck a golf ball down 50ft of hosepipe!
or when it’s a crap punt I don't comment at all
when I should write " what a waste of fucking time, I might have well stuck my cock in an apple pie!"

I take it you mean feedback on AW because the majority of reviews I read on here tend to be pretty objective and any fluffiness is easy enough to weed out.

I don't tend to leave feedback on AW, only 3 in the last 2 years as most punts have avoided the AW booking system.

The AW feedback system is well known to be crap and best ignored, the only useful ones are the neutrals and negatives but they are indeed few and far between.

The fluffiness and useless comments like 'treat her well', 'wow' and all the others are a product of those wanting to trade good feedback and being shit scared of bad comments. It's like all those protecting their ratings on ebay etc. Of course there are also those who are trying to get into the prossie's good books so that they will be welcomed back and the generally deluded who actually believe all the crap.

[robs one]

Pumpaction, you do exactly the same as me in that you failed to leave a negative feed back on Busty milf Sandra? I know you wrote it on here but not on AW?

[robs one]

I take it you mean feedback on AW because the majority of reviews I read on here tend to be pretty objective and any fluffiness is easy enough to weed out.

I don't tend to leave feedback on AW, only 3 in the last 2 years as most punts have avoided the AW booking system.

The AW feedback system is well known to be crap and best ignored, the only useful ones are the neutrals and negatives but they are indeed few and far between.

The fluffiness and useless comments like 'treat her well', 'wow' and all the others are a product of those wanting to trade good feedback and being shit scared of bad comments. It's like all those protecting their ratings on ebay etc. Of course there are also those who are trying to get into the prossie's good books so that they will be welcomed back and the generally deluded who actually believe all the crap.

sorry did I not make it clear, yes feed back on AW

[robs one]

Speak for yourself, i am not part of the ALL you mention in the thread title, i give bad feedback if i get bad service and i give good feedback if i get good service.

IMO its really important to give bad feedback even if a punter doesnt wish to share his good punts. He presumably isnt going to return to a bad WG and has hopefully used a punting phone or sim and not given the WG real personal information about him so has nothing to lose by giving honest bad feedback in my view.

no you don't, the last one you reviewed on here has no record on AW?

[smiths]

no you don't, the last one you reviewed on here has no record on AW?

Get it right, you didnt mention you were referring to A/W only in the post i quoted. I am not a member on A/W as its a site run by low lifes, if i give feedback its been on punting forums, and most recently on here.

So i gave FB on a WG on here who you say has no record on A/W, apart from the fact she DID have an A/W profile when i did the review at least i gave feedback on here. Edit, just checked the last review i did on here and it still links to a WGs active profile so no idea where you got it doesnt from. IF a WGs profile disappears AFTER i have punted with them thats nothing to do with me, i do the review when the profile is still online.

[robs one]

as I have said before, yes I was referring AW. you don't normally refer to reviews as feed back do you?

[PumpAction]

Pumpaction, you do exactly the same as me in that you failed to leave a negative feed back on Busty milf Sandra? I know you wrote it on here but not on AW?

I booked her over the phone not through A/W and so I couldn't leave feedback. In the past I tried to book through the A/W system but find it much easier to just call to arrange a meeting.

I would most definitely have left her a negative.

[smiths]

as I have said before, yes I was referring AW. you don't normally refer to reviews as feed back do you?

You didnt mention A/W in the post i quoted though and yes i certainly do refer to reviews as feedback, its FB on the WG i punted with.

[robs one]

You didnt mention A/W in the post i quoted though and yes i certainly do refer to reviews as feedback, its FB on the WG i punted with.

my apologies, I should have said AW on the title but that was what I was referring to.
why do you not comment on AW as its only people like you that would leave negative feed back on there?

[smiths]

my apologies, I should have said AW on the title but that was what I was referring to.
why do you not comment on AW as its only people like you that would leave negative feed back on there?

I have already explained why i dont leave FB on A/W, i am not a member as i dont need to be to punt with the WGs i punt with, those with displayed phone numbers. A/W is run by low lifes with NO interest in helping punters whereas UKP is here to specifically help punters.

In addition in my view A/Ws FB system is VERY much against the interests of punters as WGs can give punters FB back which means some punters as they have posted on here wont leave negative FB on a bad WG in case she does the same back out of spite thus potentially putting off a future WG which no doubt means bad WGs and pimps are laughing their heads off. What use is that set-up for punters. I have used A/W for many years as a location tool because its the best for that function but it allows many low lifes to advertise on it ripping and scamming punters with A/W always benefiting in the end as they of course get to keep any accrued credits of profiles they delete if they choose to.

So i choose to leave any FB on here instead.

[Daffodil]

There are probably several reasons a punter gives glowing feedback. Some are just fluffy bastards, impossible to displease.

But some may have a more cynical outlook. They believe women love flattery and prefer fluffy language to "and she gagged on my ballbag like a trooper" so if they intend to see her again (or it's a possibility) they send some glowing praise her way. It may get them a better service, or that's what they think.

It's a bit like guys who take presents with them. Fluffy bastards? Or playing the game?

[Corus Boy]

id be interested in seeing an example of when you left negative feed back as its very rare when I check that I see it?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=40625.0

My review, listed as Positive but I clearly say what was not good, however it was MY evaluation that the good outweighed the bad by enough to warrant a Positive review over either Neutral or Negative.

PS. I err to the side of fluffy but with reviews the truth for other punters comes first.

[bakerted]

It's a bit like guys who take presents with them. Fluffy bastards? Or playing the game?

In your opinion which is it Daffodil?

[Daffodil]

In your opinion which is it Daffodil?

Fluffy bastards 

[Daffodil]

But I've taken gifts on a few, rare occasions. A prossie I saw 2-3 times would let me film and do anal with her for a bottle of wine. £3 well spent 

[backofthenet]

yes, as you've now no doubt realised, you could have titled this thread a little more carefully.

The reason it happens is because punters don't want to run the risk of receiving recriminatory feedback if they post negative comments on aw. By the same token, the more postive they are in their feedback, the more positive the feedback they are likely to receive, and, often, selfish motives dominate. It's more important to maintain and add to your own positive reviews than warn other punters about issues or shortcomings in service.

[bakerted]

Filming & anal for a bottle of antifreeze 
Now that's what I call playing the game.

[socks]

For me a similar theme but more interesting question would be why don't we all give feedback? On here.

[robs one]

yes, as you've now no doubt realised, you could have titled this thread a little more carefully.

The reason it happens is because punters don't want to run the risk of receiving recriminatory feedback if they post negative comments on aw. By the same token, the more postive they are in their feedback, the more positive the feedback they are likely to receive, and, often, selfish motives dominate. It's more important to maintain and add to your own positive reviews than warn other punters about issues or shortcomings in service.

my point of this post is that if we all left feedback on AW that we really wanted too you could  look at the feedback and see clearly which ones were more trouble than there worth?

[FLYING BLUE]

I know I can be guilty of this as when I have a good punt "I write great time, will see again"
what I should say is" what a fucking slut! she could suck a golf ball down 50ft of hosepipe!
or when it’s a crap punt I don't comment at all
when I should write " what a waste of fucking time, I might have well stuck my cock in an apple pie!"

Following a punt, if I write a report, I write down exactly what I feel - good, bad, indifferent - nothing remotely 'fluffy' about that

[CBPaul]

my point of this post is that if we all left feedback on AW that we really wanted too you could  look at the feedback and see clearly which ones were more trouble than there worth?

Problem is the whole AW feedback system is utter rubbish and isn't likely to change. When punters could leave 'feedback only' you did see the odd disparaging comment but having to go through the whole booking process to enable feedback simply means those running shit service and shit profiles don't confirm a booking requests.

Making bookings by text means no option for feedback on AW - so leave it here instead.

[galcom666]

I was reading this article:

External Link/Members Only

And thought of this thread. In that there are WG which seek to out and ruin the lives of punters should they be given a bad review. Recently for instance I fancied banging a WG looked it up on here and she sought to out him for a neutral review!

[robs one]

Following a punt, if I write a report, I write down exactly what I feel - good, bad, indifferent - nothing remotely 'fluffy' about that

yes, but do you leave feed back on AW?