Verification pictures

[brushhand811]

I recently posted a veri pic which clearly showed the girls passport in clear detail. A member suggested I blur this part of the image to protect the girl from potential identity fraud.Seems a sound suggestion so I did so.

Do other Members agree, or should we post photos that enable true age etc to be identified?

[Marmalade]

If you post it as a link to the actual photo address the pic disappears if they take it down so no privacy issues really. If you actually save it on your hard drive or imgur or somewhere it's more of an issue but heck, she did post it in the first place. Admin's call. Personally I'd only bother I think if I'd kept the photo (which I can't be bothered doing) and the girl was clearly pissing punters about

[Fully Sated]

  I visited a girl, 'Busty Brunette Jane' who had her verification photo displayed,
 complete with passport giving her real name, date of
 place/of birth etc. I would have posted it if I was
 technically savvy enough to do so and blur out the details,
 as the OP, recently did, External Link/Members Only with another girl.
 It would have helped punters to know
 that they were seeing the girl they booked and not suffer a
 bait and switch among other things. 

 When I met the 'Jane' I
 realised that she was being pimped, did not have any control
 of her profile let alone realise that her face and real
 identity were visible to the world. The pimps have since
 changed her AW profile/name (Kinky MILF Jane), hidden her verification photo
 and amended her ‘enjoys’ list.

 Here is a reason why we should post verification photos:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=85980.0

(sorry about the strange formatting, having a few IT issues)
 

[Gooner]

Is there a way to see hidden verified pictures?

[brushhand811]

I don't think so, I grab them when they are visible for new girls to my HL. They usually disappear quickly. I have some real shockers in my collection,

[vw]

Is there a way to see hidden verified pictures?

If you link them before they are hidden on AW then they stay un-hidden on the link

Bad coding by AW really very unprofessional !

[Marmalade]

If you link them before they are hidden on AW then they stay un-hidden on the link

Bad coding by AW really very unprofessional !

Really. Hadn't noticed that. Useful reference.

[vw]

Really. Hadn't noticed that. Useful reference.

If we embed them here

Fanboys often report back to prossie

Prossie hides verification

Picture remains here

Hoe gets shitty with admin on here

gets banned

[cockneybstrd]

verification pictures can be essential.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=85261 the geezer posing as a woman was reviewed twice on here as a woman. It now hides its verfication picture

[Blackpool Rock]

If the girl is stupid enough to publish a photo that give out her own personal details then surely it's in the public domain therefore your not breaching any law or confidentiality etc so I don't see an issue, from the site rules -

- Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles

Logically like a phone number posted on an advert the verification pic is also published on the advert

[Bratpack]

If the girl is stupid enough to publish a photo that give out her own personal details then surely it's in the public domain therefore your not breaching any law or confidentiality etc so I don't see an issue, from the site rules -

- Privacy of service providers
It is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles

There are two different types of verification photos. Quite often, the verification pic only contains the date and the AW ID number. I don't think there's an issue in posting those. Some of them are quite revealing. However, sometimes the verification pic includes photo ID such as ID card or passport. Some passports contain her signature. Some ID cards have her address in her home country. Personally, I don't think we should be posting verification pics that have photo ID where the photo ID is legible (other than things that are not personally attributable such as sex, nationality, year of birth, height, eye colour etc.).

[Sheer Tights]

I have found WGs Facebook pages from their passports. One is a divorced fit looking 52 yo grandmother who is a cleaner according to her Linkedin profile. Another is in a relationship with her WG flatmate.

[Marmalade]

Here's the bit from UKP rules that's relevant:

is generally not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles. Hotels may be named. General description of incall locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers and street names. Modelling, porn and media-related work are acceptable to be posted, even if it includes their real names as they actively sought publicity / higher-profile. News items may be posted depending on certain circumstances. All aforementioned restrictions do not apply to thieves and those with criminal convictions. Past name changes are never censored, regardless of reasons.

[Type_O_Negative]

Is there a way to see hidden verified pictures?

Yes. You will have to hack AW 

[Marmalade]

Yes. You will have to hack AW 

Do you know how to do it?

[Steely Dan]

Is there a way to see hidden verified pictures?

As per hidden feedback, you need Platinum membership.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86327.msg1059508#msg1059508

[Marmalade]

As per hidden feedback, you need Platinum membership.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=86327.msg1059508#msg1059508

Platinum membership was discontinued. You have to have Titanium now. Didn't you apply?? 

[Type_O_Negative]

Do you know how to do it?

I have no idea. But there are people who know how to do it (hackers and crackers). In theory and in practice it is possible to hack all websites. Even "super safe" linux run servers are not safe in these days.

[Marmalade]

I have no idea. But there are people who know how to do it (hackers and crackers). In theory and in practice it is possible to hack all websites. Even "super safe" linux run servers are not safe in these days.

Yeah. Plenty of people attempted it in the early days of UKP including the cunt who ran the (then) biggest "punter" site (that was really just a load of feminazi moderated shit). Current Admin is fortunately rather better equipped. I see "Anonymous" decided to "bring down UKP" some time ago and it didn't even cause a ripple. 

We used to get some cool information, mostly just streamlining stuff with the odd script, or explaining how to access right-click. I am guessing they have blocked most of the holes for that now -- except right-click which Mozilla and everyone firmly point out you are entitled to anyway.