Service providers posting on this site

[arrons222]

Been checking out this site a bit too often! It's quite addictive...

One thing that I've noticed whilst reading through the site is that occasionally service providers pitch in an attempt to ingratiate themselves by commenting in the meekest, mildest way possible as if they want to show they're on 'the punter's side'. English Rebecca comes to mind.
I get that they perhaps want to tout (without appearing to do so) but it just comes across as a bit pathetic. It's essentially the equivalent of a punter going on Saafe and attempting to cosy up to the girls by agreeing with everything they say. In that case, I'd think the punter was being a spineless wanker and I feel the same about simpering SP's on here. There's something about their lack of loyalty to their own side that is deeply unattractive.

Does anyone actually find their brown-nosing endearing?

[vw]

Does anyone actually find their brown-nosing endearing?

Lady Dita is the worst, she really embarrassed herself today.

NW - you know the punters respect you. You’re just verbose and love the narrative. Not everyone does. . 

Anyway,  when you going to pop a review up?

Are you into health ad fitness

[Jay-Jay]

Sorry, I hadn't realised we are on two "sides"? Buyers and sellers yes but I never regard it as having to be some sort of conflict.

Jay

[OldAdmin]

Have you been on this site before?

[arrons222]

Errm yes. Sorry, have I said something out of turn?

[vw]

Errm yes. Sorry, have I said something out of turn?

what name?

[arrons222]

Name?

[mike63]

It occurred to me some time ago that Admin controls the membership, and if he didn't want SPs on the site, they wouldn't be here. So it's fine by me.

[lewisjones23]

It occurred to me some time ago that Admin controls the membership, and if he didn't want SPs on the site, they wouldn't be here. So it's fine by me.

They tread a very fine line on here and are quite rightly banned when they get all arsey about a negative report or whatever else they cry about

Much more suited to UKE

[catweazle]

Have you been on this site before?

The boss meant "were you previously a member here? And if so, what name did you then use?"

[vw]

Name?

the name before you used here. 


Now the play dumb routine 

[arrons222]

Apologies, I misunderstood. I've never been a member before but I've been browsing for the past few weeks.

[vw]

Apologies, I misunderstood. I've never been a member before but I've been browsing for the past few weeks.

My bullshit detector is peaking

2 topics per day when not logged in, hardly browsing.   

[arrons222]

Sorry, I hadn't realised we are on two "sides"? Buyers and sellers yes but I never regard it as having to be some sort of conflict.

Jay

On a rational level, I agree with you that in many cases our interests are aligned and there is no reason why service providers can't make a valuable contribution to the site. However, on an instinctive level, in many cases when I read one of their posts I can sense that they are treading extremely carefully and there is a level of disingenuousness to that. If they feel the need to do that, why post at all? I'd have a bit more respect for them if they occasionally said what they thought, even if it was a bit controversial.

[Midori]

I'm not on here to tout, that's what UKE is for to a certain extent. Some of us might appear meek because we are toeing the line because we value our membership here and would rather not get banned for being aggressive or touting.
Sometimes we do have something to contribute that is helpful. I read on here for market research, where best to find out what to do and what not to do than straight out of prospective customers mouths, especially ones who are not sugarcoating it to please us? Also, if you are brave and can handle the criticism, reading your own reviews can give you constructive criticism on where your strengths lie and where you need to improve.

 I keep abreast of reviews and discussions in my area because here is an important resource for example to find out who is barebacking in my area and try and avoid their clients where I can, and also to keep up on which escorts have a professional attitude and play safe, who would be fine to duo with.
Also, this probably is specific to me, but I also very very occasionally book escorts myself and I have in the past received advice on here. I just can't review because being an escort myself that is a conflict of interest.

Hope this answers your question as to why some of us escorts might be on here, rather than being "turncoats" to our own kind.

[Rochelle]

They tread a very fine line on here and are quite rightly banned when they get all arsey about a negative report or whatever else they cry about

Much more suited to UKE

There's nothing wrong with disputing a review if it's bollocks.

[Jonestown]

My bullshit detector is peaking

2 topics per day when not logged in, hardly browsing.   

Most of his posts are about wanting to pay £600/hr for a real redhead.

[vw]

I'm not on here to tout, that's what UKE is for to a certain extent.

Says queen of the touts.   

Product placement is touting IMO.   

But the majority is anti-touting anyway

[lewisjones23]

There's nothing wrong with disputing a review if it's bollocks.

dispute it on the open forum by all accounts but plenty of WG report them to Admin with shit excuses hoping he will take their side

[arrons222]

Most of his posts are about wanting to pay £600/hr for a real redhead.

I like my ladies fiery... hence my distaste for SP's being so meek on here

[lewisjones23]

I like my ladies fiery... hence my distaste for SP's being so meek on here

fuck off and open your own forum then

make a WG a mod and let them rule the roost

[Sureshot]

Returning member or not, the OPs right.  Most hookers have very little worth contributing and any involvement is a thinly veiled attempt to tout, even if its just dropping their name.

Rebecca is the biggest twat in whoreland and like a fucking wasp at a picnic round here.

[arrons222]

fuck off and open your own forum then

make a WG a mod and let them rule the roost

That's more like it Lewis! What are your rates?

[lewisjones23]

That's more like it Lewis! What are your rates?

comparable to a rom straight off the boat

[vw]

Returning member or not, the OPs right.  Most hookers have very little worth contributing and any involvement is a thinly veiled attempt to tout, even if its just dropping their name.

Rebecca is the biggest twat in whoreland and like a fucking wasp at a picnic round here.

Indeed and the butter wouldn't melt types crack me up and IMO are much worse.   

[arrons222]

Returning member or not, the OPs right.  Most hookers have very little worth contributing and any involvement is a thinly veiled attempt to tout, even if its just dropping their name.

Rebecca is the biggest twat in whoreland and like a fucking wasp at a picnic round here.

Agreed. Her's are the most annoying I saw

[TailSeeker]

On a rational level, I agree with you that in many cases our interests are aligned and there is no reason why service providers can't make a valuable contribution to the site. However, on an instinctive level, in many cases when I read one of their posts I can sense that they are treading extremely carefully and there is a level of disingenuousness to that. If they feel the need to do that, why post at all? I'd have a bit more respect for them if they occasionally said what they thought, even if it was a bit controversial.

We tread a fine line so as not to tout, or be seen as touting. I think most of my posts on here now are about STIs and the realities of transmission routes. The occasional one in response to myself (owning my mistake for my bad review).

That said, I also call out bullshitters who don't review. Don't whinge unless you're properly contributing. Leachers are viewed with just as much annoyance here (maybe more, maybe less, one of the more seasoned members could say).

[OldAdmin]

If someone thinks it's bad today then I wonder what they would have thought about UKP 4 years ago when there was no UKEscorting, back then there were many many more WGs on UKP, with constant fighting between WGs and punters and regular threads like this with suggestions of WGs not being allowed on UKP against those who want more WGs, etc.

So comparing UKP what it is today to back then, I don't see much of an issue.

[arrons222]

We tread a fine line so as not to tout, or be seen as touting. I think most of my posts on here now are about STIs and the realities of transmission routes. The occasional one in response to myself (owning my mistake for my bad review).

That said, I also call out bullshitters who don't review. Don't whinge unless you're properly contributing. Leachers are viewed with just as much annoyance here (maybe more, maybe less, one of the more seasoned members could say).

I'm afraid your post kind of proves my point. Self depreciating and deferring to 'more seasoned members'.

Ah well, perhaps it's just a difference in taste.

At least Lewis will likely appreciate your contribution. He likes the beaten down housewife vibe 

[Ali Katt]

Been checking out this site a bit too often! It's quite addictive...

One thing that I've noticed whilst reading through the site is that occasionally service providers pitch in an attempt to ingratiate themselves by commenting in the meekest, mildest way possible as if they want to show they're on 'the punter's side'. English Rebecca comes to mind.
I get that they perhaps want to tout (without appearing to do so) but it just comes across as a bit pathetic. It's essentially the equivalent of a punter going on Saafe and attempting to cosy up to the girls by agreeing with everything they say. In that case, I'd think the punter was being a spineless wanker and I feel the same about simpering SP's on here. There's something about their lack of loyalty to their own side that is deeply unattractive.

Does anyone actually find their brown-nosing endearing?

Hidden Image/Members OnlyExternal Link/Members Only

[Rochelle]

I'm afraid your post kind of proves my point. Self depreciating and deferring to 'more seasoned members'.

Ah well, perhaps it's just a difference in taste.

At least Lewis will likely appreciate your contribution. He likes the beaten down housewife vibe

Seriously, who were you?

[lewisjones23]

I'm afraid your post kind of proves my point. Self depreciating and deferring to 'more seasoned members'.

Ah well, perhaps it's just a difference in taste.

At least Lewis will likely appreciate your contribution. He likes the beaten down housewife vibe

You’ll have to do better than that I’m afraid 

[vw]

Seriously, who were you?

I think health and fitness

Or maybe captainroscoe

[arrons222]

Seriously, who were you?

I'm brand new sweetie.

Just to clarify though, I am by no means complaining about the site or its moderation as it's clearly a very finely balanced topic. My point was more about whether other members found the simpering comments endearing or annoying

[Rochelle]

I'm brand new sweetie.

Just to clarify though, I am by no means complaining about the site or its moderation as it's clearly a very finely balanced topic. My point was more about whether other members found the simpering comments endearing or annoying

Uh-huh.
 

[datwabbit]

There's nothing wrong with disputing a review if it's bollocks.

Who says it's bollocks?

The NE has had a few disputes and with popular girls too. Dead easy to throw doubt into the review and other punters may support you, especially if they had a good experience themselves or are going off the general opinions of the sp.

[Ali Katt]

Who says it's bollocks?

The NE has had a few disputes and with popular girls too. Dead easy to throw doubt into the review and other punters may support you, especially if they had a good experience themselves or are going off the general opinions of the sp.

TBH I think it's important to share experiences. I had a negative review posted, another guy saw the same girl and did a positive we simply had a different experience, his wasn't bollocks, she just got on better with him.

[Rochelle]

Who says it's bollocks?

The NE has had a few disputes and with popular girls too. Dead easy to throw doubt into the review and other punters may support you, especially if they had a good experience themselves or are going off the general opinions of the sp.

I didn't mean just a different experience, I mean when someone's deliberately writing bollocks and making shit up.

[vw]

Who says it's bollocks?

The NE has had a few disputes and with popular girls too. Dead easy to throw doubt into the review and other punters may support you, especially if they had a good experience themselves or are going off the general opinions of the sp.

this got disputed and marked malicious, most recent one i can think of

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=197234.0

[hungrypunt]

OP....you come across very suss to me. Ill lay maccies odds youve been on here before. And tbh looks to me like your stalkin these WGs here if u have such a small amount of posts but know about all the so called simpering.
It smeelz...really Smellz....
Admin will sort this I can see it coming.

Nice backtrack making it clear your not complaining about the site in case you get another ban. as for simpering....i vuew the wgs posts as any other if its bollocks ill call it so and yes somtimes the posts are decent...sometimes not. As it stands to me you have no more credibilty here than any of them yet.

[TailSeeker]

I'm afraid your post kind of proves my point. Self depreciating and deferring to 'more seasoned members'.

Ah well, perhaps it's just a difference in taste.

At least Lewis will likely appreciate your contribution. He likes the beaten down housewife vibe

Oh bite me. Want to bitch, contribute and prove you're actually worth listening to, like the seasoned members of this site.

And kindly go fuck yourself about the housewife quip. Am not one, and even if I was, nothing wrong with that

Have you ever actually seen an escort, or just a fantasist?

[Ali Katt]

OP....you come across very suss to me. Ill lay maccies odds youve been on here before. And tbh looks to me like your stalkin these WGs here if u have such a small amount of posts but know about all the so called simpering.
It smeelz...really Smellz....
Admin will sort this I can see it coming.

Nice backtrack making it clear your not complaining about the site in case you get another ban. as for simpering....i vuew the wgs posts as any other if its bollocks ill call it so and yes somtimes the posts are decent...sometimes not. As it stands to me you have no more credibilty here than any of them yet.

I've since seen something similar where new "punters" will try to create a pack mentality to pit other punters against each other, you know the sort of thing "can you believe these wankers posting fake reviews?" by a one time poster, or the female equivalent to gain favour "I love reading the funny comments" and the post how vile they are on another site.

[Ali Katt]

We tread a fine line so as not to tout, or be seen as touting. I think most of my posts on here now are about STIs and the realities of transmission routes. The occasional one in response to myself (owning my mistake for my bad review).

That said, I also call out bullshitters who don't review. Don't whinge unless you're properly contributing. Leachers are viewed with just as much annoyance here (maybe more, maybe less, one of the more seasoned members could say).

In all honesty reviews aren't the be all and end all, many sites have closed because the focus was reviews and it lead to loads of two line reviews just designed to promote the girl, stuff which would look fawning even on adultwork. Leechers I don't know sometimes they make good and post some top reviews, as I've said most people have a sixth sense about whether someone is genuine or not and the modding is some of the most efficient I've seen on a forum.

[RogerBoner]

I'm brand new sweetie 

Just to clarify though, I am by no means complaining about the site or its moderation as it's clearly a very finely balanced topic. My point was more about whether other members found the simpering comments endearing or annoying

Even his first post in the thread sounds like a girl.

[TailSeeker]

In all honesty reviews aren't the be all and end all, many sites have closed because the focus was reviews and it lead to loads of two line reviews just designed to promote the girl, stuff which would look fawning even on adultwork. Leechers I don't know sometimes they make good and post some top reviews, as I've said most people have a sixth sense about whether someone is genuine or not and the modding is some of the most efficient I've seen on a forum.

Certainly true, there are some who contribute to the massage threads, which never count towards review totals, or who add to the site through other ways. Or had reviewed in the past, but not now (still valuable for their wisdom). But I'm smelling leaches off this one.

And admin is very good here, but only to be expected for something that has lasted this long.

[Formicahunt]

In my short time on here it seems that admin sets the rules and posters set the tone, that's the way it should be. OP didn't see the irony of posting something useless that criticised others.

[Ali Katt]

In my short time on here it seems that admin sets the rules and posters set the tone, that's the way it should be. OP didn't see the irony of posting something useless that criticised others.

I agree. But it is a clear attempt by him to win people over by appearing like Bertie Big Bollocks. I've seen it before the real irony is the people who are genuine don't need to post bollocks, by all means I love seeing new and interesting topics being posted by new members, this isn't one of them it's been done to death and it's a clear "all prossies are cunts, eh lads?" thread.

[datwabbit]

I didn't mean just a different experience, I mean when someone's deliberately writing bollocks and making shit up.

I'm saying that it's easier for an escort who is generally liked to dispute a genuine bad review. I think obvious bollocks becomes clear to punters because the reviewer is questioned by punters. Usually questions are around whether the punter told the wg what he wanted. If he believed he did, then it's hard to show it's wrong.

Other stuff like time wasting is mentioned and has taught me the benefit in keeping messages. Hard to do without a smart phone.

Saying a client is unclean is another one that's easy to say.

[datwabbit]

this got disputed and marked malicious, most recent one i can think of

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=197234.0

I wondered what you meant. I rarely leave the safety of the NE shire on here.

[nigel4498]

Seriously, who were you?

The opening gambit of mentioning English Rebecca made me think perhaps AgentTrance, previously Health and Fitness.