Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: I WALKED - London  (Read 1523 times)

Offline collector

That's what I missed. She was not showing her belly.
That's a shame, hoped you could finally answered this.
I'm still of the idea the pics belong to Amelia, locaion is the same and price structure is the same. This new Ola is just using her old pics. If I remember correctly they used to be in old Amelia's PG which I saw last year. Unfortunately I forgot to save them.
Glad to be corrected if I'm wrong and someone has more info.

Offline punther

Punther,

Thanks for your thought on this but I am not persuaded by your suggestion.

In any of the eventualities you spell out in your opening post, I would, will (and have) simply file a short negative review.

Since reviews are picked up automatically if a WG's number is quoted, this is better than your proposed solution.

Dave

yh i can see where you are coming from

the thinking behind this was an alternative and structured information stream because as we know not all members review

this was not an attempt to replace reviews but to seep up any other info out there particularly on formally unreviewed girls

as i mentioned there are some instances where if i personally got cold feet and did not go ahead with a punt would find it unfair to review the girl negatively so probably would not post anything at all about the event hence nothing at all gets fed back to the forum

im not trying to force this onto anyone just started the thread as i thought it would benefit the forum if all possible info could be extracted

not long ago i aborted a punt and called the wg to cancel as there was a police car  very close to the house. there is no way i could give a negative or even review this event as nothing took place and the police car could have been there for a completely unrelated reason but that bit of info may have been useful for others in deciding if they were comfortable visiting that premesis

Offline punther

It was a good idea but some, including me didn't like your rigid format and rules for it. Then your lengthy responses to try to justify this have become a bit tiresome - sorry.

ive never said this is what i said and this is what it has to be but it was logical to start the thread with some structure

rather than being childish, as you have admitted you think its a good idea what would have made sense was for you to build on it by making a positive suggestion on how the idea could be improved - sorry

ive never said this is what i said and this is what it has to be but it was logical to start the thread with some structure

rather than being childish, as you have admitted you think its a good idea what would have made sense was for you to build on it by making a positive suggestion on how the idea could be improved - sorry

I like this idea.

Already made 2 contributions which are not reviews.

Offline LL

rather than being childish, as you have admitted you think its a good idea what would have made sense was for you to build on it by making a positive suggestion on how the idea could be improved - sorry
You think quite highly of yourself don't you? :lol:

Offline punther

You think quite highly of yourself don't you? :lol:

no not at all. im no better or worse than anyone


but when i feel people are trying to have a go and be cheeky i give it back to them




Offline punther

I like this idea.

Already made 2 contributions which are not reviews.

thanks mate

youve just proved that this thread will be useful for some members

https://www.adultwork.com/3533288 or https://www.adultwork.com/90irene

Location: N Finchley

Answered the door looking like Undertaker from WWE, awoken after 1000 years of slumber

https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=1451900

Location - Paddington

Much, much, much, much bigger than photos suggest


2 review(s) found for CURVY_CLAUDIA linked to in above post (2 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline mrhappypants

yh i can see where you are coming from

the thinking behind this was an alternative and structured information stream because as we know not all members review

this was not an attempt to replace reviews but to seep up any other info out there particularly on formally unreviewed girls

as i mentioned there are some instances where if i personally got cold feet and did not go ahead with a punt would find it unfair to review the girl negatively so probably would not post anything at all about the event hence nothing at all gets fed back to the forum

im not trying to force this onto anyone just started the thread as i thought it would benefit the forum if all possible info could be extracted

not long ago i aborted a punt and called the wg to cancel as there was a police car  very close to the house. there is no way i could give a negative or even review this event as nothing took place and the police car could have been there for a completely unrelated reason but that bit of info may have been useful for others in deciding if they were comfortable visiting that premesis

Punther,  My key point is  that *reviews* are picked up and linked in the list at the bottom of a post which quotes her AW number, where other posts will not be. Personally I think looks, location and communications are legitimate subject for commentary and rating in a review.  If you turn up and she is sufficiently unattractive you don't want to proceed other punters would like to know this, same if you felt threated by the location.  Grade it neutral if you prefer but let us know,  and do it in a review so we can find it easily.

And despite my cool reaction on this one I also want to thank you as one punter to another for your other suggestions which I think have generally been innovative and very useful.

Dave

Offline punther

And despite my cool reaction on this one I also want to thank you as one punter to another for your other suggestions which I think have generally been innovative and very useful.

Dave

Thanks mate  :drinks:

Punther,  My key point is  that *reviews* are picked up and linked in the list at the bottom of a post which quotes her AW number, where other posts will not be. Personally I think looks, location and communications are legitimate subject for commentary and rating in a review.  If you turn up and she is sufficiently unattractive you don't want to proceed other punters would like to know this, same if you felt threated by the location.  Grade it neutral if you prefer but let us know,  and do it in a review so we can find it easily.

I do agree that the review functionality and the way it links is ideal (though threads that contain an AW ID that is searched for will still show up in a search)

Re reading the rules on review I think maybe I misunderstood it

Out of curiousity though in this situation specifically what would you do?:


not long ago i aborted a punt and called the wg to cancel as there was a police car  very close to the house.

As when  I saw the car close to the premises in my mind I was thinking maybe this is a stakeout on the house hence why I did not proceed and called to cancel.

I had not met her, could not say she if she was a B+S, had a poor attitude, backed out of agreed services, poor comms/ no response on arrival etc etc.  - Basically the things that we would all say requires a formal review

What exactly would I say I was reviewing as I could not really say anything about the girl at that point

In your opinion would you say this still holds true? From the rules for reviews:

"- Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking (e.g. verbally or by textual messaging). A meet does not need to take place, money does not need change hands, the only requirement is that the she had accepted the initial booking. Only one review thread is permissible per punt. Do not combine multiple punts in the same review thread, neither should a single punt be split into multiple review threads. Only sex workers can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency / establishment / brothel."

Would be interesting to get admins view on  this as if he say a neutral review would be the way to go about situations like this then you are right maybe there is no need for a thread like this


Offline mrhappypants

My view; if you haven't got enough information to reasonably write a review then a short post titled with the WG's name, linking her profile and headlining your concern should show up for any punter who searches for her profile reference, and invite others to share confirming or contradictory experience.

As in https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=97667.msg1169035#msg1169035

Dave
« Last Edit: June 07, 2016, 09:46:58 PM by mrhappypants »

Offline punther

My view; if you haven't got enough information to reasonably write a review then a short post titled with the WG's name, linking her profile and headlining your concern should show up for any punter who searches for her profile reference, and invite others to share confirming or contradictory experience.

As in https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=97667.msg1169035#msg1169035

Dave

OK yes I see

I think we have the same view in essence the only difference being this thread brings all such instances into 1 place

But yeah at its core i think our approaches are actually the same funnily enough

Guess the usefulness of the thread will be determined by members/london board and if they choose to use it on not. If not useful it will die a slow silent death lol

Offline Expl1cit

Guess the usefulness of the thread will be determined by members/london board and if they choose to use it on not. If not useful it will die a slow silent death lol

Not if you keep bumping it up with opinions :dash:

I see where you are coming from BUT...   :rolleyes:





Banning reason: White-knight

Offline punther

Not if you keep bumping it up with opinions :dash:

I see where you are coming from BUT...   :rolleyes:

You do make some valid points here  :hi:

 ;)




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)