Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Michelle Independent - June West Brompton tour (meeting never happen)  (Read 16521 times)


115 review(s) for Michelle Independent (112 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline SamLP

She has a habit of lying. She lied to me about not working on a Saturday when I enquired about a booking and then a review goes up a few days later with the punter mentioning he saw her in the day she told me she won't be working, and then she had the galls to say she saw nothing wrong in what she did when I made my remark. I see a lot of wrong in someone who lies and thinks it's ok.

Offline Nagilum

Will be interesting to hear what Michelle has to say on the matter.

OP - Thank you for the review.

Offline Jason

The fact that the OP was able to leave her a RATED negative feedback on Adultwork was already sufficient proof that Michelle had confirmed the booking. If she hadn’t confirmed the booking request then the OP would have not been able to leave her rated feedback, but just an unrated “feedback only” comment instead. There was no need for him to post a screenshot of the email exchange, though of course it is a further evidence.

And a reminder for the pro$$ie who posted on here with white-knighting intentions. This is a forum for punters. It is NOT a forum where pro$$ies are allowed to surround and discredit reviewers and chip in the defence of their fellow pro$$ies. What do you think is here? Pro$$ienet? And if a review happens to be fake it is something that, we, the punters, can easily sniff out and sort it out ourselves. We don't need your worthless input for that. The only WG that has legitimate reason to comment on a negative review is the WG that is reviewed in order to give her own account of events and/or offer an apology. Usually they post bullocks and lies and get banned but that’s another story.
« Last Edit: June 06, 2016, 08:35:58 PM by Jason »

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,972
The fact that the OP was able to leave her a RATED negative feedback on Adultwork was already sufficient proof that Michelle had confirmed the booking. If she hadn’t confirmed the booking request then the OP would have not been able to leave her rated feedback, but just an unrated “feedback only” comment instead.

Yep, just as I said in post #10  :drinks:


Offline SamLP

It was aimed at the other one that posted. I would even add to Jason's comment that there has been some subtle wk going on with some punters quick to give MI excuses calling it a genuine mistake. How would they know? And even placing blame on the OP for not confirming it days earlier. A booking was confirmed and that should have been that. She didn't specify and ask him to confirm x days before or even on the day as other wg's would.

Offline azrael

Will be interesting to hear what Michelle has to say on the matter.

OP - Thank you for the review.

+1, fascinating to see what happened there :hi:

Online Michelle Independent

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 328
She has a habit of lying. She lied to me about not working on a Saturday when I enquired about a booking and then a review goes up a few days later with the punter mentioning he saw her in the day she told me she won't be working, and then she had the galls to say she saw nothing wrong in what she did when I made my remark. I see a lot of wrong in someone who lies and thinks it's ok.
Absolute fucking bollocks. I told you I can't see you. Fully booked or not working IT IS NOT RELEVANT! I couldn't see you at the day you wanted to book-simple as that.


Offline SamLP

Absolute fucking bollocks. I told you I can't see you. Fully booked or not working IT IS NOT RELEVANT! I couldn't see you at the day you wanted to book-simple as that.

You lying isn't bollocks at all. Telling someone you're fully booked is different to telling them you're not working that day. You're a liar with a bad attitude.

Online Michelle Independent

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 328
You lying isn't bollocks at all. Telling someone you're fully booked is different to telling them you're not working that day. You're a liar with a bad attitude.
You are entitled to your opinion.

Offline SamLP

You are entitled to your opinion.

I don't need you to tell me that. Had you been truthful I would have said nothing but I don't like someone who makes lying ok. To me that lacks class and stinks of a bad attitude.

Online Michelle Independent

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 328
I don't need you to tell me that. Had you been truthful I would have said nothing but I don't like someone who makes lying ok. To me that lacks class and stinks of a bad attitude.
Yes I am sure you are right and 86 other punter from this forum are wrong. That's all I got to say in this thread.

Offline fredpunter

It was aimed at the other one that posted. I would even add to Jason's comment that there has been some subtle wk going on with some punters quick to give MI excuses calling it a genuine mistake. How would they know? And even placing blame on the OP for not confirming it days earlier. A booking was confirmed and that should have been that. She didn't specify and ask him to confirm x days before or even on the day as other wg's would.

I don't think anyone claimed to know ... Quite the contrary ... and suggesting that someone reconfirm a month old booking is just common sense ... it's not defending the prossie or blaming the punter ... it's passing on experience which is what this forum is here for ... prossies generally are often criticised for being unreliable so making a booking a month in advance and then not reconfirming until you arrive is very optimisitic .... thats not making excuses for michelle .... thats just a fact of life ... a booking was confirmed ... as I stated quite clearly ... and a mistake appears to have been made ... as I stated quite clearly.... so the negative, in the absence of any further evidence is justified .... as i stated quite clearly ... I think you need to take a few deep breathes


Offline fredpunter

Yes I am sure you are right and 86 other punter from this forum are wrong. That's all I got to say in this thread.

Not for me to advise you but I think rather than arguing with Sam you may be better explaining what happened with the op ... or even just saying sorry to him

Offline SamLP

Yes I am sure you are right and 86 other punter from this forum are wrong. That's all I got to say in this thread.

What a crap response. What does 86 other people have to do with you lying and excusing yourself that it's fine to do so? Do they all know you personally? That's all the hot air up your arse giving you the sense that because your highly reviewed, you can act like a prima donna and not be questioned.

Offline sushi

If a prossie can't organise her bookings a month in advance she shouldn't accept them so far ahead of time.
Getting rich of UKP then thinking its OK to lie and forget bookings isn't a good trait.
86 x £120 = £10,320 as a conservative estimate based on her reviews fucking ungrateful if you ask me.

Offline smiths

Absolute fucking bollocks. I told you I can't see you. Fully booked or not working IT IS NOT RELEVANT! I couldn't see you at the day you wanted to book-simple as that.

No apology to the OP I note. :rolleyes: As to SamLP, I would take his word over yours every time, or indeed any WGs as he has proved himself to be an honest punter and great asset in my view to UKP.


Would the OP kindly share some more reviews of girls he has seen. More reports help us all.

Thanks.

Offline smiths

What a crap response. What does 86 other people have to do with you lying and excusing yourself that it's fine to do so? Do they all know you personally? That's all the hot air up your arse giving you the sense that because your highly reviewed, you can act like a prima donna and not be questioned.

Absolutely, its forum darling syndrome, the fact is a WG must offer ALL her genuine punters or potential punters a good service or it risks getting on here irrespective of the number of positive reviews the WG has.

I am glad to see few white knights so far charging to her rescue, thankfully admin cut some down and the London review board is generally by far better for it in my opinion. NO WG is immune from criticism.

Online The_Don

86 x £120 = £10,320 as a conservative estimate based on her reviews

Some punters haven't reviewed her on here.

As to the amount (of £) the reviews may have contributed, is truly an unknown (IMO) 

In east London Michelle, rates were £100 P/H and some may have returned or had booked more or less than 1 hour

Rate wise, in Burm (currently £120) London tours £130 - £140 P/H






Reminds me of the Hill  ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I826gxc8TvI


« Last Edit: June 06, 2016, 09:28:30 PM by The_Don »

Offline sushi

Yes agreed, who knows how much she has made off the back of these 86 UKP reviews, it could be hundreds of thousands and not an apology in sight. Ungrateful and up her own arse comes to mind.

Offline SamLP

Absolutely, its forum darling syndrome, the fact is a WG must offer ALL her genuine punters or potential punters a good service or it risks getting on here irrespective of the number of positive reviews the WG has.

I am glad to see few white knights so far charging to her rescue, thankfully admin cut some down and the London review board is generally by far better for it in my opinion. NO WG is immune from criticism.

I got a dose of it in our comms. There were several times when she would not even reply to my texts. In this instance she replied a day later with an abrupt what time do you want to come. Not even a hello even though I was polite. When I enquired about an evening time her reply was along the lines of sorry to disappoint you. At the time I thought what a condescending reply. Why would I be disappointed, and it was when I asked if she were available the following day on the Saturday she told me she sometimes works weekends but isn't doing so the next two weeks. I took her word for it, and as it turns out she was lying. Had she said sorry I'm fully booked, I wouldn't have given it another thought but it's her reaction to thinking its fine that made me state at the time that I won't be trying to book her again. I have principles and liars don't fit into my punting plans.

Offline Placebo88

kim88 , did Michelle give you any instructions as regards contacting her closer to the booking time to give a final confirmation that you were still attending ? This is standard practice with advanced bookings I have made.

Evidence shows that the booking was made and confirmed and so should have been clearly marked in her schedule .

If there is extenuating evidence it is Michelle's prerogative to supply it .

Offline Cunning Punt

Even after she denies it with a seemingly, standoffish attitude. She apparently checked her emails, and still believe she did not receive any booking requests from me. Then the last straw came, when she said she may be put me on the black list...

Mistakes and oversights happen, but, for me, it's her attitude afterwards
- repeatedly denying a booking was made (when evidence clearly shows it was)
- being dismissive of the OP and putting him on her black list when she was at fault
- then coming on here and not addressing the issue
- Not only that, but being very aggressive, having a pop at another member and boasting of all her positive feedback, which apparently proves she is incapable of making mistakes.

Yes I am sure you are right and 86 other punter from this forum are wrong. That's all I got to say in this thread.

The OP seems a reasonable guy. An immediate recognition she had made a mistake and an apology plus an offer of an alternative booking at a reduced rate would have been the best way forward.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)