Popular media on UKEscorting.com

Author Topic: Getting a flavour for Punters who leave positive feedback on AdultWork.  (Read 2980 times)

Ravanelli

  • Guest
After a disappointing punt last week I looked deeper into the characters who had left positive feedback on a WG I thought was awful. The very first punter I checked also left a 10/10 rating on this stunner...

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Says it all really. I normally do these checks but I got a bit complacent this time.  :timeout

Offline NIK

After a disappointing punt last week I looked deeper into the characters who had left positive feedback on a WG I thought was awful. The very first punter I checked also left a 10/10 rating on this stunner...

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Says it all really. I normally do these checks but I got a bit complacent this time.  :timeout

Who'd trust any fucker who'd pay for that? You have to take the AW feeback with a pinch of salt and a a large dose of pepper.
Half of them say 'wow' for a start.
Who the fuck really says 'wow'?  :rolleyes:


Online smiths

Who'd trust any fucker who'd pay for that? You have to take the AW feeback with a pinch of salt and a a large dose of pepper.
Half of them say 'wow' for a start.
Who the fuck really says 'wow'?  :rolleyes:

Indeed, i dont just trust any strangers word. Unless i know, trust and/or respect the punter i dont believe a word written on that rotten to the core site set-up to bleed punters dry, with no interest in helping them.

Ravanelli

  • Guest
Indeed, i dont just trust any strangers word. Unless i know, trust and/or respect the punter i dont believe a word written on that rotten to the core site set-up to bleed punters dry, with no interest in helping them.

I take your point but this particular issue is only half related to AW which is shit because it gives WG's the choice on whether or not girls publish negative reviews. There is no balance and you know every review will be positive.
I used to work with a guy who put us all to shame in the showers, I kid you not, a cock nearly down to his Knee's but as a friend of mine pointed out, 'yes but look what's attached to it.' He was indeed an ugly bastard and precisely the type who might be leaving 10/10 positive ratings on equally attractive WG's. AW reviews tell you nothing more than the fact that the girl is there and working and I'm starting to steer away more and more from girls who don't show enough of their face to let me make an informed decision. When I think back it amazes me how many times I've made a booking based on seeing a pair of tits and a few positive reviews.

What a babe  :lol:

Sorry to hear that you've been hoodwinked   :(

I always try and make sure they're genuine punters but as has been said it's no guarentee. Better luck next time.

Online smiths

I take your point but this particular issue is only half related to AW which is shit because it gives WG's the choice on whether or not girls publish negative reviews. There is no balance and you know every review will be positive.
I used to work with a guy who put us all to shame in the showers, I kid you not, a cock nearly down to his Knee's but as a friend of mine pointed out, 'yes but look what's attached to it.' He was indeed an ugly bastard and precisely the type who might be leaving 10/10 positive ratings on equally attractive WG's. AW reviews tell you nothing more than the fact that the girl is there and working and I'm starting to steer away more and more from girls who don't show enough of their face to let me make an informed decision. When I think back it amazes me how many times I've made a booking based on seeing a pair of tits and a few positive reviews.

Look at the positives, for over half my 30 year punting career i never knew what ANY WG looked like until she opened her door to me. :scare: Fortunately i was less fussy in my younger days and didnt need to find a WG attractive to punt with her, nowadays though i do or its a cock no show. ;)


Offline Thor

After a disappointing punt last week I looked deeper into the characters who had left positive feedback on a WG I thought was awful. The very first punter I checked also left a 10/10 rating on this stunner...

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Says it all really. I normally do these checks but I got a bit complacent this time.  :timeout

Definitely.  Next time I would look at the photo as a bare minimum.  :scare:

Offline MethodMan

Banning reason: Fluffy white-knight caught out harassing, stalking and outing another member for daring to criticize his favourite whore whom he is obsessed with


Offline Whore Of Babylon

 :scare:
Look at the pictures first!
I  think AW feedback can be useful, I'm sure the punters who booked her were really pleased. That's because they like the way she looks. The problem is the wide variety of tastes.
Take note of messages that say: pictures are real/ accurate and will return. Particularly from well established punters (guys with lots of feedback from quite a few girls) they have a reference point.

You can see from her first piece of feedback from sexxxy ricado, he has 11 positive 9 of which are from the same lovey lady. Most probably self written (maybe not but looks suspicious). Oh on second look I see he's a male escort! They probably have a positive feedback exchange system going on.

Out of curiosity what was bad about the punt, her looks or everything in general?


Some guys might big up girls so they will receive better feedback or they are just the cunt struck type.  :kissgirl:
A good indicator is to see if she has regulars, but check they have other feedback from different girls as it could be self reported.

All this checking probably isn't what you want to be doing when you're horny. My advice: do some homework and put girls in your hot list which you can visit when in need.

« Last Edit: December 23, 2012, 12:43:44 pm by Whore Of Babylon »


Ravanelli

  • Guest
It is disappointing that a lot of WG's don't seem to realise that us middle aged gentlemen have been around long enough not to get excited at the first sight of a bit of cleavage. Everything works (more often than not) but we do need a bit more mental, visual and physical stimulation to put things on an upward slant... Or is that just me?


Offline Whore Of Babylon

I hate fake tits! Why lie on the phone? She received your money and got some neg reviews in return.
Good on ya.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2012, 12:55:34 pm by Whore Of Babylon »

Offline Marmalade

My current approach to aw feedback is roughly like this:

I always look at feedback. Even if it says "0" there will often be feedback.

Negative feedback gives a bigger indication than positive feedback. No feedback at all is offputting if the girl has been registered for some time unless she just does phone bookings (and has phone number displayed).

I won't see someone who has feedback hidden.

I look at who has posted feedback (this is more useful in a small town than a big one). I take more notice of feedback from punters whose names I recognise, give varied feedback, and who have left feedback with women I know that I can judge to be reasonable.

I keep a small amount of positive feedback on my own name. This is useful for some bookings ("You can check my feedback and see I'm not a weirdo). Very non-JRC, but the fact is many quality girls up here only accept bookings from people with good, recent, feedback; or failing that, require a more drawn-out booking process.

I rarely leave feedback. If my feedback has not been topped up for a while, I will pick a prossie that has given me excellent service and give her two or three words of honst feedback, prompting her to leave me useful positive feedback.

If I am dissatisfied with a prossie, I leave a report on here or ISG. (Unless I know I can get away with it - someone else can play the aw hero and good on them). Most crap prossies will attack you with a wrench on AW if you leave adverse comments.

Offline Whore Of Babylon

Most crap prossies will attack you with a wrench on AW if you leave adverse comments.
Too true. This is why a lot of punters don't leave negative feedback, fear of messing their own otherwise perfect FB rating.

Online smiths

Too true. This is why a lot of punters don't leave negative feedback, fear of messing their own otherwise perfect FB rating.

Which totally undermines an already rotten system in my opinion.

Offline Whore Of Babylon

And why this forum is increasing with popularity.  :thumbsup:

From a SP point of view - AW ratings are better than nothing as you can sift out timewasters. And maybe unwittingly, you feel that a prossie murderer might think twice about making a AW booking.

Online smiths

And why this forum is increasing with popularity.  :thumbsup:

From a SP point of view - AW ratings are better than nothing as you can sift out timewasters. And maybe unwittingly, you feel that a prossie murderer might think twice about making a AW booking.

Indeed so, and from a SPs point of view if it makes them feel safer fair enough. ;)

Online CatBBW

  • Posts: 1,958
After a disappointing punt last week I looked deeper into the characters who had left positive feedback on a WG I thought was awful. The very first punter I checked also left a 10/10 rating on this stunner...

[[Link hidden, login to view]]

Says it all really. I normally do these checks but I got a bit complacent this time.  :timeout

From her profile: "IM...THE ONLY FEMALE ON ADULTWORK THAT HAS 3 PARTS OF HER BODY THAT ARE HAIRY" - if she's talking muff and pits, then I can think of at least 2 more who maintains and cultivates carpet and drapes (I'm one of them!).

Hello all. Yes, I did just sign up to post that! :coolgirl:
Looking forward to joining in more, now that I've finally taken the plunge to register.

Offline Marmalade

Which totally undermines an already rotten system in my opinion.

I don't think you can undermine a system that is rotten anyway, but good luck.

My interest is
A) what helps me
B) what helps other punters
In that order.

I think my policy is quite reasonable in that respect. I also think the way I view the AW feedback is common sense. And if you want to write a two-liner about the smelly fat cow advertising herself as a page3 star, you could do do more effectively on here than on ISG, and with less damage to yourself. I would, however, post an Aw feedback if the WG was guilty of something as heinous as theft.

Recognise each system for what it is and encourage others to do the same.  Unless you are on a holy grail to change the world of course.

Offline Deliciousmsdee

From her profile: "IM...THE ONLY FEMALE ON ADULTWORK THAT HAS 3 PARTS OF HER BODY THAT ARE HAIRY" - if she's talking muff and pits, then I can think of at least 2 more who maintains and cultivates carpet and drapes (I'm one of them!).

Hello all. Yes, I did just sign up to post that! :coolgirl:
Looking forward to joining in more, now that I've finally taken the plunge to register.

As a wg those eyebrows need a good plucking and those armpits and dear god what if she has a hairy bumhole  :thumbsdown:

Online CatBBW

  • Posts: 1,958
As a wg those eyebrows need a good plucking and those armpits and dear god what if she has a hairy bumhole  :thumbsdown:

Hairy armpits for WGs are perfectly fine :dance: (dear god, I love these smilies on here!)

Bumholes are fine too, as long as the WG is offering a hairy bumhole - not very nice for the punter if she states she's "waxed/shaved completely" and then gets flipped over for doggy to reveal a curly welcome mat at the tradesman's entrance :D

Eyebrows I agree with keeping tidy *covers own brow with hand to hide lazy winter growth*


Latest media on UKEscorting.com