Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Naughty Angie - neutral because the owo  (Read 596 times)


1 review(s) for xx Naughty Angie xx (0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline holland

 
Naughty Angie

https://www.adultwork.com/3270552 or https://www.adultwork.com/xx+Naughty+Angie+xx

I met Naughty Angie and i wasnt very impressed by the look of her. I 've done my homework on ukpunting and she had many positive reviews so i was expecting a better looking girl..may be people liked her more for her service than her look..but never mind. It wasn t too bad overall.

Location: tooting..few minutes walk from the station
Paid: 60£ for 30 minutes
Look: as i said she is not that attactive imo but she is not too bad either. Tallish girl in her thirties, not fat but not slim either. Face ok. Breast a bit saggy.
Attitude/personality: positive and chatty but not a time waster
Service: dfk, ro, owo, penetration, doggy, fingering

I gave her a neutal because she knows how to suck a dick a she made me come twice in 30 minutes. I found her owo superb. Shame that doesnt cim.

Would i visit her again? Probabily not...but she deserve a neutral review for the owo and the attidute

« Last Edit: June 04, 2016, 05:55:44 PM by holland »


1 review(s) found for xx Naughty Angie xx linked to in above post (0 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline punther

Could you describe her owo skills and technique in more detail please?

Offline Cunning Punt

So basically she gave you a great service, but the only reason for the neutral - the first non-positive in 16 - is because you didn't find her stunning?

I guess looks are subjective and, from memory, a few posters have mentioned they didn't particularly fancy her.

That said, on top of fantastic service (though, yes, shame about no CIM) and reasonable rates (£70ph in Queensbury), I - and quite a few others - find her attractive, but each to their own.  :hi:

Thanks for the review.

As it isn't linking to previous reviews:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=1429
« Last Edit: June 04, 2016, 07:25:09 PM by Cunning Punt »

Could you describe her owo skills and technique in more detail please?

It was pretty skilled and toe-curling from what I remember from ages ago. Her OWO and Dee's (forum darling) was almost identical. Quite slow and sensual and tantalising with plenty of tongue movement. A lot of licking involved. It and was a nice alternative to the good old fashioned fast and tight 'mouth fuck' technique which Xenia and Michelle Independent are great at.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2016, 07:39:24 PM by Tony_Red »

Offline holland

Could you describe her owo skills and technique in more detail please?

Owo was quite deep. She use her tongue very much as well.

Offline webpunter

Could you describe her owo skills and technique in more detail please?
1.  opened mouth
2.  placed on bell-end
3.  started noshing

Offline holland

So basically she gave you a great service, but the only reason for the neutral - the first non-positive in 16 - is because you didn't find her stunning?

I guess looks are subjective and, from memory, a few posters have mentioned they didn't particularly fancy her.

That said, on top of fantastic service (though, yes, shame about no CIM) and reasonable rates (£70ph in Queensbury), I - and quite a few others - find her attractive, but each to their own.  :hi:

Thanks for the review.

As it isn't linking to previous reviews:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=1429
I gave her a positive at the beginning based on the service. Then i changed my mind because i really was expecting a better looking girl and she is not really my type. Strech marks, saggy breast, ass to soft..she is ageing. Sorry i respect all the positives she had but i pretend a good looking girl when i visit an escort
« Last Edit: June 04, 2016, 07:48:08 PM by holland »

Offline Cunning Punt

No need to apologise - your review and ratings don't matter if they are as detailed as yours.

Some people won't find her attractive so a question mark worth raising.

Was just double checking that was the only reason for non positive - which it was.

Offline holland

No need to apologise - your review and ratings don't matter if they are as detailed as yours.

Some people won't find her attractive so a question mark worth raising.

Was just double checking that was the only reason for non positive - which it was.

Ok no problem. She said that she put some wheight on as well. So may be this could be also a reason. I reckon with few pounds less she could be much better. Sucking cock perhaps is not enough exercize for her :lol: she  does it very well thought


A few months ago I realised I would never get great service AND a stunner/v pretty lady (for my tastes) for under 100/hr.

Of course, there are exceptions and i've happened to come across a few gems that meet both requirements but these are quite rare.

A few months ago I realised I would never get great service AND a stunner/v pretty lady (for my tastes) for under 100/hr.

Of course, there are exceptions and i've happened to come across a few gems that meet both requirements but these are quite rare.
I agree with this, tbh there are only a couple of wg's I can think of that I would call stunning regardless of cost




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)