Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Premium escorts using FAKE PHOTOS-Holly Hagan  (Read 1024 times)


Offline Robbouk

Looks as if she's been removed already

Offline AnthG

Before a possible storm kicks off on this. I know Diamonds, Amour and Allure before professional photos get taken of the girls and get put up on the site.

They use the ones that the girl has given them to use as an intermediary so punters have an idea of what the girl looks like as it takes sometimes weeks to get professional ones taken.

I am guessing from this Premium must do that too and thus its Britney people should be annoyed at and not Premium for the fakes.

Just saying so people don't start kicking off at the wrong people. (Also to say, I wasn't prompted by anyone to say this. I just know this has happened in the past with Diamonds a few times and I have raised this).
« Last Edit: June 04, 2016, 04:17:31 PM by AnthG »

Offline DaveyJJ

How annoying. I guess the rule is wait for professional pics then

Offline AnthG

How annoying. I guess the rule is wait for professional pics then

Or just have Google Reverse Image Search and Tineye extensions installed on your internet browser and check every pic with each of them before booking any girl and then post on the forum if you get any results from them.

Premium took Britney down off the site pretty much instantly that this was topic was posted on the forum. Worth remembering for the next time that a WG thinks of trying it on.

Offline smiths

Before a possible storm kicks off on this. I know Diamonds, Amour and Allure before professional photos get taken of the girls and get put up on the site.

They use the ones that the girl has given them to use as an intermediary so punters have an idea of what the girl looks like as it takes sometimes weeks to get professional ones taken.

I am guessing from this Premium must do that too and thus its Britney people should be annoyed at and not Premium for the fakes.

Just saying so people don't start kicking off at the wrong people. (Also to say, I wasn't prompted by anyone to say this. I just know this has happened in the past with Diamonds a few times and I have raised this).

It only takes weeks if a WG chooses for it to take weeks, photographers aren't ALL booked up for weeks in advance. As I always say if I see a WGs pics on a pimps website BOTH the WG AND the pimp are responsible for the accuracy of those pics. I couldn't disagree more that its solely down to the WG, the pimp is advertising the WG on their site, its an excuse I have often read from pimps and it doesn't wash with me at all.

Its quite simple, a WG should look like she does NOW on any site, if she doesn't she is a liar as is the pimp on an Agency or Brothel site.

Offline smiths

Or just have Google Reverse Image Search and Tineye extensions installed on your internet browser and check every pic with each of them before booking any girl and then post on the forum if you get any results from them.

Premium took Britney down off the site pretty much instantly that this was topic was posted on the forum. Worth remembering for the next time that a WG thinks of trying it on.

But why on earth were the pics put up in the first place, the pimp would know what the WG looked like and if they didn't that just shows you cant trust them to even meet the WG in person which is a basic. What kind of thick and/or dodgy pimp would put pics up before meeting a WG to ensure its definitely her.

So if I asked to be on their books they would agree and let me put up pics that were not of me ?
Huge bollock dropped.

Offline Addicted65

To be fair who would want to fuck Hulk Hagan ?




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)