Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Anyone seen chelsealeighxx  (Read 1367 times)

I know her feedback is blocked but like the pics im willing to pay the price if she real and good

https://www.adultwork.com/3370693 or https://www.adultwork.com/chelsealeighxx

I was just looking at her, she's in my HL for now... wouldn't mind knowing the deal with her too.

Best thing is she lives round corner from me to so no need to travel


Her profile gives me the impression she's full of herself and looking for a sugar daddy.

Offline Timtom

 Has her feedback hidden  I personally wouldn't go there .


Offline coolguy1990

Maybe she's just trying to be post-modern ironic, but for a young sophisticate, she has quite an unrefined taste in holiday destinations. Las Vegas?
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline daviemac

I know her feedback is blocked but like the pics im willing to pay the price if she real and good

https://www.adultwork.com/3370693 or https://www.adultwork.com/chelsealeighxx

She's got 2 negatives in her feedback and who knows how many 'feedback only' negs as well. No wonder she's hidden it.   :hi:

Same dress size and height as my missus and she only weighs 7st 4lbs....this wg say she is 10st ??? and only a size 6 Hmm ???

I think this girl used to go under a couple of other names, brooke1996 and alicemay. I'm not 100% sure but the profiles are very similar in lay out. I did see Brooke/Amber a couple of times and although on the expensive side she was a pretty good punt (very sexy, fit body and tight pussy).

The pictures aren't genuine if what I believe is correct.

Also I believe the neg feedback will be for scamming (asking for deposit and not showing) as this happened on the alicemay profile. But this never happened to me.

This is just my own assumption.

Yeah she asked me to put deposit down as i contected her last week she was fine with me as i said il just pay when i meet

Offline coolguy1990

Has her feedback hidden  I personally wouldn't go there .

I can't believe AW gives the option to hide feedback.
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline maxxblue

I can't believe AW gives the option to hide feedback.

I see what you are saying, coolguy, but I am glad that it gives this option - if a WG hides feedback then I definitely don't want to see her.

If AW didn't give this option, there would be more unscrupulous WG's to screen out.

Well bit the bullet and meet her brought her home defo the girl in the pics but she wasnt done up with makeup ect

Had pair jeans on which i asked for something else very nice body little tits just how i like and pussy was so little but very wet bj was probs 8/10 and sex was shit she just layed there while i flung her about not werth £80 for harf hour

Would pay 50 tho

Thanks for the information.Chelsealeigh was on my HL.Don't think I will bother now.

Offline maxxblue

Well bit the bullet and meet her brought her home defo the girl in the pics but she wasnt done up with makeup ect

Had pair jeans on which i asked for something else very nice body little tits just how i like and pussy was so little but very wet bj was probs 8/10 and sex was shit she just layed there while i flung her about not werth £80 for harf hour

Would pay 50 tho

Just wondering why you would pay £50 when you say that sex was shit, when there are some girls on here who, according to numerous reviews, provide an excellent service for the same price?

If something is shit, it is shit, no matter how much it costs.

Just because she lives round the corner from me and shes young and a little blonde chav what i like

Offline maxxblue

Just because she lives round the corner from me and shes young and a little blonde chav what i like

If I like hotdogs, and there is a hotdog van round the corner from me selling hotdogs at £5 a time, what would I do if I bought one and it tasted like shite?  :unknown:

And if they dropped the price of these shitty-tasting hotdogs to £1, would I buy one?

I don't think so.
« Last Edit: May 25, 2016, 11:19:51 PM by maxxblue »

Just because she lives round the corner from me and shes young and a little blonde chav what i like

I totally get that. Just getting naked and getting your balls juiced from someone you fancy, even if they're not the best in the sack, is, to me, preferable than someone I don't find attractive and is has all the experience under the sun. I'm more about a cute face than a porn star. Each to their own.

Offline coolguy1990

I think this girl used to go under a couple of other names, brooke1996 and alicemay. I'm not 100% sure but the profiles are very similar in lay out. I did see Brooke/Amber a couple of times and although on the expensive side she was a pretty good punt (very sexy, fit body and tight pussy).

The pictures aren't genuine if what I believe is correct.

Also I believe the neg feedback will be for scamming (asking for deposit and not showing) as this happened on the alicemay profile. But this never happened to me.

This is just my own assumption.

She wasn't Amber-Brooke who was on AW last year was she?
Banning reason: White-knight

Personally I think it is but can't confirm as haven't met her. Everything about her is very similar profile wise. Height, weight, age, breast size and similar profiles. The op says pics genuine though so that says not.

Offline coolguy1990

Personally I think it is but can't confirm as haven't met her. Everything about her is very similar profile wise. Height, weight, age, breast size and similar profiles. The op says pics genuine though so that says not.

Same price as well.

Mind you she looks nowhere near as pretty as I thought she would. Guys on here were raving that she was beautiful. "Insanely pretty" is how one poster described her. She's plain to good looking in my book.

I wouldn't care, I booked Amber-Brooke last summer for an hour and she canceled on me after I drove an hour to see her. Bad craic.
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline coolguy1990

Actually, I just thought, if someone can confirm that this is Amber Brooke, I could finally do the review I was going to do for her last year,before she took her profile down.
Banning reason: White-knight

Offline coolguy1990

Hmmm,

I did a search of Amber-Brooke's old reviews and came up with daveev's negative review of her, which linked to this girl's profile:

SeductiveSweetSarah:

https://www.adultwork.com/3210062

Suggesting that SeductiveSweetSarah is Amber-Brooke.

However, I'm still wondering if this Chelsea Leigh is also Amber as her prices are so similar and it's the same location. I've pm'd daveev to see if he recognises either of the girls, but in the meantime, anybody else have any idea?
Banning reason: White-knight


2 review(s) found for Amber-Brooke linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline sesalovdarlo

One of bustbrooke123's friends. Same shit service. I saw her when she made a brief visit to darlington. Looked very hot, but shit service, no owo boring sex.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)