Sophia-b - Glasgow + Edinburgh

[Llama32]

Doubling up my meetings with her into one review as I doubt I'll add much to what's already been said.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Edinburgh

£130 hour incall. 

Location:
Minutes walk away from Haymarket, nice and spacious apartment.

Glasgow

£150/hour incall (Her new price for Edinburgh and Glasgow I believe)

Location:
City centre apartment, minutes walk away from Queen st station, add another 2-5 mins from central. Easy to find and fairly inconspicuous. Smaller than the Edinburgh one but bedroom is larger.

For both

Services:
owo, kissing, cuddling, dfk, ro, hr, basically all round GFE.

Looks:
Attractive, average height, blond, small breasts(big plus for me, I love em ), slim build,

Personality:
Delivers on the GFE, makes you feel like you're the only one that matters, was warm on our first meeting, remembers topics of discussion from previous meetings, good conversationalist (I enjoy a bit of chat in between rounds), a bit shy at first but changes quickly in the bedroom, has this mischievous, playful look in her eyes that she flashes which was a big turn on.

Summary:
Looks/Body: 8.5/10
Service: 8/10
Personality: 8/10
Location: 10/10 (very convenient)
Comms: 7/10(Adequate comms)

Personal Recommendation: Definitely worth a visit if she's in the area.

[ickydicky]

defo right up my street in every way cept one. £150 notes to much for me. specially after a holiday in canada

[Llama32]

defo right up my street in every way cept one. £150 notes to much for me. specially after a holiday in canada

Yeah I can see that being a turning off point for some. I personally don't mind because I think it's worth it, but worth is subjective so yeah. Each to their own and all that.

[ickydicky]

i would certainly be right in there if i could afford it. sadly i cant.

[tayboy]

With all these positive reviews I would imagine her rates ££££'s will only go in one direction. £200/hr in London can she get away with charging that here?

She mentions her new website on her AW page but doesn't actually give it out, does anybody know what it is ?

[Llama32]

With all these positive reviews I would imagine her rates ££££'s will only go in one direction. £200/hr in London can she get away with charging that here?

She mentions her new website on her AW page but doesn't actually give it out, does anybody know what it is ?

I'm worried it would, but it's her business, there's only one other girl I know of charging above £150/hr and she doesn't seem to busy if we go off AW alone. Sophia came across as a smart girl, I'd be inclined to think she wouldn't sabotage her business unless she's looking to leave the scene. But what would a guy that's only been with her for a few hours know? 

As for her website, External Link/Members Only Nothing spectacular, but it does the job and is nicer than the generic AW profile. I'm sure this helps with her Asia tour right now.

[tayboy]

I don't think it's so much an Asian tour as more of a working holiday. I hope she doesn't starting charging those rates - £360/hr !!!!

[Llama32]

Yeah, I think that's a given. I know the chinese have a real hard on for white girls, but I don't know how big escorting is over there. As for her pricing, perhaps it's to dissuade too many people trying to book her so she can enjoy her holiday.

[RandyF]

As for her website, External Link/Members Only Nothing spectacular, but it does the job and is nicer than the generic AW profile. I'm sure this helps with her Asia tour right now.

External Link/Members Only

Looks like we have a full blown international elite cuntasan on our hands lads!!  Those 30min@70 bookings are so never going to happen now 

[Inspector Gadget]

What's she like facially?  From her blurred pics she looks a bit horsey - that middle class look. A bit Chelsea Clinton. Big hooter?  But then, they are blurred. Some of the pics in her Twitter make her beak look enormous

[RandyF]

What's she like facially?  From her blurred pics she looks a bit horsey - that middle class look. A bit Chelsea Clinton. Big hooter?  But then, they are blurred. Some of the pics in her Twitter make her beak look enormous

The face has never been convincing no  - but you tend not to get any convening answers when you ask the question either 

[Llama32]

What's she like facially?  From her blurred pics she looks a bit horsey - that middle class look. A bit Chelsea Clinton. Big hooter?  But then, they are blurred. Some of the pics in her Twitter make her beak look enormous

Facially, I'd say she's aesthetically pleasing. She's attractive, not an in your face kind of attractive, pretty subtle.

[Inspector Gadget]

Facially, I'd say she's aesthetically pleasing. She's attractive, not an in your face kind of attractive, pretty subtle.

That's not helpful, but only because that could mean anything. From boring, bland, plain, to average. Back to the old 'in the eye of the beholder' method it is then.

[RandyF]

 

Delicate issue.  Llama, could you just nudge us in the right general direction, please mate-

If I look at your avatar...am I hot or cold?

[Llama32]

Delicate issue.  Llama, could you just nudge us in the right general direction, please mate-

If I look at your avatar...am I hot or cold?

I'm bad at descriptions, character fault honestly. Pray tell I never witness a crime or half the country will fit description.
 If you're asking is she's horse faced, then no, she's not.

[Inspector Gadget]

I'm bad at descriptions, character fault honestly. Pray tell I never witness a crime or half the country will fit description.
 If you're asking is she's horse faced, then no, she's not.

I'm mibbe bad at questions.

I'm bad at descriptions, character fault honestly. Pray tell I never witness a crime or half the country will fit description.
 If you're asking is she's horse faced, then no, she's not.

Let me be clearer my friend. When I said 'horse faced', I did not mean long in the face like Naughty Tanya.  I meant did she have that 'middle class look' about her?  Us working class lads call middle class birds 'horsey' , even when they don't look like horses.  It's a Slur!  Dates back to the days of middle class birds all owning horses apparently!  As in the 'horsey' type. Not looking of the housing scheme persuasion facially. Does she look like she's 'well bred' I mean?  From money?  Or just another wannabe 'cuntesan'?

 But the big beak comment was legit. Looks it on her Twitter.

[Llama32]

I'm mibbe bad at questions.
Let me be clearer my friend. When I said 'horse faced', I did not mean long in the face like Naughty Tanya.  I meant did she have that 'middle class look' about her?  Us working class lads call middle class birds 'horsey' , even when they don't look like horses.  It's a Slur!  Dates back to the days of middle class birds all owning horses apparently!  As in the 'horsey' type. Not looking of the housing scheme persuasion facially. Does she look like she's 'well bred' I mean?  From money?  Or just another wannabe 'cuntesan'?

 But the big beak comment was legit. Looks it on her Twitter.

Ah well that makes a bit more sense then. Yeah, I'd say she's middle class looker for sure, not of the overly posh type and not a chav. I'd put good money on being from background of money and well bred, looks like hers are one in a million for the housing scheme/benefits class.

[Captain Kirk]

I have visited Sophia a couple of times but her price was £130 for one hour, I would not pay more than £130 for her. Sophia's service is good and she is pleasant, but all the positive feedbacks she has received has got into her head, now she is screwing the punters with price increases.

Best to avoid her until she brings her price back to previous rates, and her previous rates were still high may I add.  I would visit her again at £130 but not more.  Her overnight rate is too high also, Scottish girls such as Lilywhite charge £130 and Lily's service is as good as Sophia's (if not better), I have visited Lilywhite also, her overnight rate is £500 but Sophia wants £1,000, she is not worth it.

[bensonhedges20]

I have visited Sophia a couple of times but her price was £130 for one hour, I would not pay more than £130 for her. Sophia's service is good and she is pleasant, but all the positive feedbacks she has received has got into her head, now she is screwing the punters with price increases.

Best to avoid her until she brings her price back to previous rates, and her previous rates were still high may I add.  I would visit her again at £130 but not more.  Her overnight rate is too high also, Scottish girls such as Lilywhite charge £130 and Lily's service is as good as Sophia's (if not better), I have visited Lilywhite also, her overnight rate is £500 but Sophia wants £1,000, she is not worth it.

Who cares about overnight rates unless you want to do it.

As for her rates

She overspends on her accomodation as well as her outfits. I doubt most punters gift her them but i guess she feels her rates reflect her level of service and fund her lifestyle.

Shes primarily edinburgh based with a two day tour to glasgow.

Seen her in her edinburgh accomodation and doesnt seem cheap.

All in all, visited her many times at 130.

Her london rate was 200ph and seems on par with most london escorts.

Id guess her reasoning is to see less people and earn the same.

As for her looks, I would say they are second to none in Glasgow. She is hot in a girl next door way, hot in a girl you would fuck in a bar or club. Shes slim, wears businessy attire and has a good likes list. She is value for money at 130.

As for 150, not so sure but if glasgows talent is what it is now id have no choice but to go to the 150 mark for a safe punt.

[Inspector Gadget]

Who cares about overnight rates unless you want to do it.

As for her rates

She overspends on her accomodation as well as her outfits. I doubt most punters gift her them but i guess she feels her rates reflect her level of service and fund her lifestyle.

Shes primarily edinburgh based with a two day tour to glasgow.

Seen her in her edinburgh accomodation and doesnt seem cheap.

All in all, visited her many times at 130.

Her london rate was 200ph and seems on par with most london escorts.

Id guess her reasoning is to see less people and earn the same.

As for her looks, I would say they are second to none in Glasgow. She is hot in a girl next door way, hot in a girl you would fuck in a bar or club. Shes slim, wears businessy attire and has a good likes list. She is value for money at 130.

As for 150, not so sure but if glasgows talent is what it is now id have no choice but to go to the 150 mark for a safe punt.

Decide to break your number one rule you always tell us?  Never visit the same prozzie more than once. She must be good, or is this the new you?

[Llama32]

I'll agree, overnight prices are expensive, but I can't imagine many people book for overnights and perhaps it's to disuade overnight stays who knows, too rich for my blood and I see no point in asking.

It all comes back down to how much you value your money, £150/hr is my cap and she still falls in it. As others have said, she's going to be at the very least, a safe punt.

[DG]

We keep coming back to this rate question. As there is no consistency it's hard to decide what VFM is. But when I think about some girls I've spent £120 per hour on, then if a top girl charges £140 or £150, then relatively it's fine. The real issue IMO is how much any of us are prepared to pay for a punt? If we have a ceiling then it probably doesn't matter if a girl is over that, cos we won't see her. But in all likelihood, in relative terms, we will spend up to our limit on poorer punts.

So the difference for me, assuming service and looks are comparable, is how the whole thing comes together, including the venue, clothing, hospitality etc. I'd be happy to pay say £150 on a top girl in a nice modern flat, wearing classy lingerie and offering good hospitality, rather than £120 on an average girl, in a basic tenement with a mouldy shower.

[Llama32]

We keep coming back to this rate question. As there is no consistency it's hard to decide what VFM is. But when I think about some girls I've spent £120 per hour on, then if a top girl charges £140 or £150, then relatively it's fine. The real issue IMO is how much any of us are prepared to pay for a punt? If we have a ceiling then it probably doesn't matter if a girl is over that, cos we won't see her. But in all likelihood, in relative terms, we will spend up to our limit on poorer punts.

So the difference for me, assuming service and looks are comparable, is how the whole thing comes together, including the venue, clothing, hospitality etc. I'd be happy to pay say £150 on a top girl in a nice modern flat, wearing classy lingerie and offering good hospitality, rather than £120 on an average girl, in a basic tenement with a mouldy shower.

I enjoyed my time with her, I used the same criteria as you, venue, hospitality ect and it was all great. I'd be somewhat disappointed if she raised her prices, but it might just be a case I cut further back in punts to see her, or see her less frequently. It's not like there aren't other WG's but when you find one that works for you and all.