I was not able to comment fully when I chipped in above - people came into the room
I expressed the same reservation in my review about the size, although overall I rated it a positive. I had a great time and have done so again a few times - I enjoyed the next sessions more as I knew what I was expecting. She is a clever girl (which makes her unusual amongst WGs
) so it is a shame she does not realised the damage she is doing with the old photos.
I came to the judgement that it was a positive because I had a great time and would go back again - as I have. However this review is also very fair and reasoned - I can see merit in neutral in these circumstances. Some above have suggested negative and I think that would be a strange grade to give if you had a great time - and also not all the photos are old, last time I looked there were some more recent ones. (However if his view had been a negative that is of course fine - it is for the punter to decide.)
The great thing about the review system here is that anyone reading them will get a dam good idea of what she is like.
I do find it disappointing that some people are looking for an excuse to throw the WK thing around - I really cannot see it here. It is just punters sharing their views and helping get to the truth.
Anyway I have me a punting opportunity tomorrow so now I will get to the serious business of deciding who is on the shortlist and build the anticipation up
Regular? Newbie? TOFTT? Which hole? Role play? Tie and tease? Sometimes this bit is better than the actual punting day - especially as it is probably only a 50% chance I will actually manage to arrange something.