Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Adultwork Women Who Are Up Themselves  (Read 17567 times)

Offline hockogrockle

I realise this is potentially a controversial topic, but every now and again, I come across an Adultwork profile where the woman seems to be completely up herself. It's only my interpretation of the profile, and I accept that if I name women whom I think come in that category, other UKP members may leap to their defence, possibly justifiably.
Nevertheless, I thought I'd start this thread, with the intention that anybody else who has a view on an "up herself" prossie might care to contribute to it.
So I'll get the ball rolling with this one:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Nice looking woman, from what you can see of her, and the (very wordy) profile is highly literate and well organised. . She may well be telling the truth when she says she has a "proper" job, and this is just a hobby. I can only think her job must demand intellect but pay very little, like being a librarian in a theological college.
But what makes the profile "up itself" is the remarkable requirement that if you have not seen her before, you have to pay her for a 60 minute social meeting, to take place at a venue of her choice. If you don't "click", then she says goodbye. In other words, you end up £120 out of pocket,plus the cost of the drinks which no doubt, with a classy lady like her, includes a couple of glasses of champagne. If you do hit it off, you then, it would appear, have to pay for another hour to shag her. What a racket! I can see that she might want the "neutral territory" meeting for her own protection, but to pay a three-figure sum for it is a bloody piss-take. Your time is being wasted as much as hers. It's not just her senses that twirl (I quote from her profile) but mine at her impudence. And you are required to confirm that you have read her profile and understand the terms and conditions. Amazingly, several people have gone through this ludicrous charade, to judge by her feedback. I look forward to a negative post saying "She said I was an uncouth fat slob and buggered off leaving me over £150 out of pocket".
That's enough on her. Any comments, whether in agreement or dissenting?
My next up herself woman will follow shortly. Right now, I'm going ot have a drink: I need one after re-reading that profile.

vw

  • Guest
Sounds deluded to me, no need for chat before hand, usualy a time wasting ruse to not give sex but earn money.

Do like her payment option though, does the machine take notes ?

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline bristolbcfc

I tried to make a booking a while back and she replied 'please read the whole of my profile' so i did and thought fuck that, just wanna fuck not play the dating game. I think i've read on here somewhere someone has gone through the process!!

I realise this is potentially a controversial topic, but every now and again, I come across an Adultwork profile where the woman seems to be completely up herself. It's only my interpretation of the profile, and I accept that if I name women whom I think come in that category, other UKP members may leap to their defence, possibly justifiably.
Nevertheless, I thought I'd start this thread, with the intention that anybody else who has a view on an "up herself" prossie might care to contribute to it.
So I'll get the ball rolling with this one:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Nice looking woman, from what you can see of her, and the (very wordy) profile is highly literate and well organised. . She may well be telling the truth when she says she has a "proper" job, and this is just a hobby. I can only think her job must demand intellect but pay very little, like being a librarian in a theological college.
But what makes the profile "up itself" is the remarkable requirement that if you have not seen her before, you have to pay her for a 60 minute social meeting, to take place at a venue of her choice. If you don't "click", then she says goodbye. In other words, you end up £120 out of pocket,plus the cost of the drinks which no doubt, with a classy lady like her, includes a couple of glasses of champagne. If you do hit it off, you then, it would appear, have to pay for another hour to shag her. What a racket! I can see that she might want the "neutral territory" meeting for her own protection, but to pay a three-figure sum for it is a bloody piss-take. Your time is being wasted as much as hers. It's not just her senses that twirl (I quote from her profile) but mine at her impudence. And you are required to confirm that you have read her profile and understand the terms and conditions. Amazingly, several people have gone through this ludicrous charade, to judge by her feedback. I look forward to a negative post saying "She said I was an uncouth fat slob and buggered off leaving me over £150 out of pocket".
That's enough on her. Any comments, whether in agreement or dissenting?
My next up herself woman will follow shortly. Right now, I'm going ot have a drink: I need one after re-reading that profile.

Offline hockogrockle

Here's my second candidate:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

The photograph on the profile page, showing her lounging in a graveyard while wearing a  Halloween fright outfit is hardly a good start, especially as necrophilia is not an option on the Adultwork likes/dislikes list.
For somebody to be "classy" in my books, they have to do better than post profiles that contain numerous spelling mistakes and grammatical errors. Nor do I think there is anything particularly "classy" about earning money by selling your soiled panties (among numerous other money-grubbing ruses she lists.
She claims to be artistic, and gives the name of a gallery in London which she says sells her work. i looked up its website, and there was nothing on it by any of the female artists which remotely resembled the stuff on her profile. Make what you like of that.
But what puts her in the "up herself" category is the fact that she expects punters to pay £200 per hour to see her. Yes, you read that correctly: £200. That wouldn't exactly be a bargain for a woman half her age in central London.
For a fifty-something with a face faintly like a donkey, it is a joke. She gives her location as "Preston", but a use of the Google map facility gives it as Kirkham, halfway from Preston to Blackpool, and a place chiefly famous as the location of a large open prison. Well, she may be the best escort in easy absconding distance of the prison, but even a lag would have to be desperate to pay her £200 for her services in a depressed are like the Fylde coast.
Amazingly, she has some escorting feedback, so there are some mugs out there prepared to pay her what she asks. Otherwise, I would have dismissed her as delusional. As it is, it must be the punters who are delusional.
And that will do for now. More contributions from all and sundry very welcome.

Offline threechilliman

Great thread! I love some of these profiles of deluded pro$$ies - always good for a laugh! :wackogirl:

tcm

WaitingforGodot

  • Guest
I responded to one of these ads a few months ago as much as anything else out of curiosity.  I liked the look of the girl from her profile so I thought WTF?  Stage One was an exchange of photos which was no great shakes for me (I blanked my face out and used a one-off shot) and, having passed this test, Stage 2 was a "phone interview."  I'm being serious, mind.

The phone call went swimmingly.  It was obvious we were getting along and for about half an hour, we both talked the ear off a donkey to the point where I was actually feeling quite good about meeting her.  At this point, she introduced stage 3.  We would meet for a coffee or a meal (my choice, which I'd pay for) and if, after that, things were still good, we could then meet for a booking.  Even at this stage, I was ok with it.  I mean what the hell, a bit laborious but it's a date with a nice-sounding girl and I'm going to expense the meal anyway.  Then, she dropped the boom.  Her charge for attending said meal was "only" half her punting rate; i.e. 75 quid for the privilege of eating with her (as opposed to eating her) and then going home alone.

I pointed out that she'd now already interviewed me three times, seen my photo and did she seriously expect I was going to PAY for the privilege of feeding her over a FOURTH interview which I yet might fail.  Apparently she did.  Anyway, I politely told her to fuck off...half an hour wasted and no damage done...and moved on.  So that was my experience.  All part of punting's rich tapestry.  Her profile is still on AW so I guess some morons are giving her business.

Offline NIK

I realise this is potentially a controversial topic, but every now and again, I come across an Adultwork profile where the woman seems to be completely up herself. It's only my interpretation of the profile, and I accept that if I name women whom I think come in that category, other UKP members may leap to their defence, possibly justifiably.
Nevertheless, I thought I'd start this thread, with the intention that anybody else who has a view on an "up herself" prossie might care to contribute to it.
So I'll get the ball rolling with this one:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Nice looking woman, from what you can see of her, and the (very wordy) profile is highly literate and well organised. . She may well be telling the truth when she says she has a "proper" job, and this is just a hobby. I can only think her job must demand intellect but pay very little, like being a librarian in a theological college.
But what makes the profile "up itself" is the remarkable requirement that if you have not seen her before, you have to pay her for a 60 minute social meeting, to take place at a venue of her choice. If you don't "click", then she says goodbye. In other words, you end up £120 out of pocket,plus the cost of the drinks which no doubt, with a classy lady like her, includes a couple of glasses of champagne. If you do hit it off, you then, it would appear, have to pay for another hour to shag her. What a racket! I can see that she might want the "neutral territory" meeting for her own protection, but to pay a three-figure sum for it is a bloody piss-take. Your time is being wasted as much as hers. It's not just her senses that twirl (I quote from her profile) but mine at her impudence. And you are required to confirm that you have read her profile and understand the terms and conditions. Amazingly, several people have gone through this ludicrous charade, to judge by her feedback. I look forward to a negative post saying "She said I was an uncouth fat slob and buggered off leaving me over £150 out of pocket".
That's enough on her. Any comments, whether in agreement or dissenting?
My next up herself woman will follow shortly. Right now, I'm going ot have a drink: I need one after re-reading that profile.

No it is not controversial. You are perfectly right. profiles such as this are deluded up their own arse bints who are trying to take men for mugs. It's up to blokes with any sense to ensure they don't get any business. However undoubtedly some daft twats will patronise them which will only encourage them.
This isn't the first profile I've seen like this recently.  :mad:
Some years ago one of the good girls told me the bad uns talk amongst themselves and laugh at men who fall for such bollocks saying it's like taking candy from a baby.

Bluefin

  • Guest
This fucker
External Link/Members Only


Starts out by calling potential clients devoted paypigs.
Goes on to say that she will make you her bitch and you will do what she says.
Sorry, but is it not up to the paying punter to decide how the meeting goes?
The whole tone of her profile is not exactly going to have potential punters beating down her door, its no wonder she only had 2 feedback ratings for 2015.

pking_paul

  • Guest
Hi OP, not controversial in my book and yes, I am one of the punters for your first post. I think at least one other on here has met her too. I hope they reply as well?

Horses for courses I imagine and trying to book her is a nightmare and can take a few weeks, but its my choice. It worked well for me, and I've seen her a few times now, usually just for an hour though. Only the first meeting was the social thing, which actually added to the fun for me.

I make no bones about liking mature slim part timers as it floats my boat, and this is one I certainly don't regret seeing once in a while.

Is she for everyone? Most likely not. Does she live up to the suggested intelligence? Darn right she does, and not short of few bob either. That's clear from what she spends out and what she wears. TBH, that classiness also adds to it for me, especially when she turns into a bedroom whore who looks you straight in the eye during CIM  :cool:

I punt as I wish, my choice, my fun, my money.


Offline pong

Don't want to hijack the OP's post, but Classi Blond has the strangest arse crack ever.
Hidden Image/Members Only


Offline hockogrockle

This fucker
External Link/Members Only


Starts out by calling potential clients devoted paypigs.
Goes on to say that she will make you her bitch and you will do what she says.
Sorry, but is it not up to the paying punter to decide how the meeting goes?
The whole tone of her profile is not exactly going to have potential punters beating down her door, its no wonder she only had 2 feedback ratings for 2015.
I think this is what is known as "financial domination". I don't get it myself.

Burnside

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
This one for me, as her prices are steep for her age, and the bit about if you subscribe to U.K punting no need to contact her. :angry: :manhater:
Having said that reading her profile this put the idea in my head about joining what has proved to be a valuable site. :drinks:

Mysterion

  • Guest
There is a simple reason that stuff like this happens, the market allows it to happen. These people are charging what they are charging and someone must be paying, or they would have gone out of business.

Steve sutherland

  • Guest
For my money (and it was a fair bit of money) Classic Blonde was well worth it. Two meetings at hotels, yes a bit of verbal foreplay on the phone. We opted for tea the first time (so no coffee breath) rather than a 4 course Tudor dinner. Both were great punts. She dresses and undresses really well, kisses like a harlot at the moulin rouge and sucked me dry. So, well worth it and classy rather than up herself. I did see one WG in Bristol who was not as part time as she pretended. The so-called in-call was in a hotel, dinner was drawn out and a la carte and the conversation was all about her profession (linked to nursing as I remember). She was up herself when what I wanted was to get up her. Yup, the rare ones who are up themselves and do the stringing along are crap. They are either young and very pretty, or slightly past their best but not comfortable with it. The other trait is that they don't really enjoy the sex at all really. Personally if they're that bad I walk away now before too much piss gets taken ( no, not in that way, not my thing).

Leveve

  • Guest
There is a simple reason that stuff like this happens, the market allows it to happen. These people are charging what they are charging and someone must be paying, or they would have gone out of business.

This one requires a photo of you before she'd meet you and look at the prices. She's been around for a while charging like this as well so presumably some Plymouthians have got far too much money to burn  :wacko:

External Link/Members Only

Chuckman

  • Guest
This one requires a photo of you before she'd meet you and look at the prices. She's been around for a while charging like this as well so presumably some Plymouthians have got far too much money to burn  :wacko:

External Link/Members Only

£90 for fifteen minutes??? Stuff that for a game of soldiers!  :thumbsdown:

Offline GreyDave

No it is not controversial. You are perfectly right. profiles such as this are deluded up their own arse bints who are trying to take men for mugs. It's up to blokes with any sense to ensure they don't get any business. However undoubtedly some daft twats will patronise them which will only encourage them.
This isn't the first profile I've seen like this recently.  :mad:
Some years ago one of the good girls told me the bad uns talk amongst themselves and laugh at men who fall for such bollocks saying it's like taking candy from a baby.

 :drinks: :drinks:      This sort of thing reminds me of one of my ex`s, bitch I used to spend £100`s on her before she would allow log like fuck ( I reckonI love punting as a result of her lack of interest in any thing but cash )

Offline Deepstroker

£90 for fifteen minutes??? Stuff that for a game of soldiers!  :thumbsdown:

Well someone is paying it and thats why she is charging.

I agree though, there are too many women who are well up their arses. There are others who seem to feel the need to say they are "high born" (WTF?) or their parents are wealthy and all sorts of shite. Im not easily impressed. All i need them to do is be pleasant, decent, clean,attractive to me, charge the rate im willing to pay and pretend that they are my lover for 1/2/1 hour. I dont need their fookin life history..

Beef Flaps

  • Guest
Worthy discussion.  :hi:

I've never understood the whole "classy" thing. No you're not "classy" no matter how hard you convince yourself. When all is said and done you're slurping down the contents of ball sacks for money and possibly rimming my shitter. Nothing "classy" about that I'm afraid.

Any whore (yes whore, that's what they are) that presents themselves this way. Will treat your punt as a date rather than you paying for a service that you may have certain expectations off.

If I wanted a date I would go on one, paying the whore for the privilege of taking her out on a date - that's one for the fluffs. Personally I would gather the money that I would of spent on her and seen a well reviewed young slapper and paint her face with the white stuff after pounding her arse than seeing some stuck up old tart !

Each to their own in this regard, for me why the fuck when there are so many other options available. Looking over the SAAFE forum, the amount of whores that get in a rage over young hotties under cutting there prices is shocking. Best read between the lines with this hobby, If they are up them selves its more than likely your going to be ripped off. Not to say the service will be shit. The price will not match the cobwebs in her Beef Flaps.  :thumbsup:

Placing the pussy on a pedestal comes to mind. And to be even further blunt - It's like reading a review where the punter spent 90% of his time pleasing the whore. Your paying not the other way round. Fucking delusional if you ask me. Don't get me wrong I have respect for the Whores of this world who deliver a good service at a good price and treat them with respect and in turn I expect to pay for her to please me not the other way round.

To many fluffy delusional cunts hiking up the prices. Don't be fooled.

Offline hockogrockle

Hi OP, not controversial in my book and yes, I am one of the punters for your first post. I think at least one other on here has met her too. I hope they reply as well?

Horses for courses I imagine and trying to book her is a nightmare and can take a few weeks, but its my choice. It worked well for me, and I've seen her a few times now, usually just for an hour though. Only the first meeting was the social thing, which actually added to the fun for me.

I make no bones about liking mature slim part timers as it floats my boat, and this is one I certainly don't regret seeing once in a while.

Is she for everyone? Most likely not. Does she live up to the suggested intelligence? Darn right she does, and not short of few bob either. That's clear from what she spends out and what she wears. TBH, that classiness also adds to it for me, especially when she turns into a bedroom whore who looks you straight in the eye during CIM  :cool:

I punt as I wish, my choice, my fun, my money.
Thank you for the courteous reply. It is reassuring to learn that the persona projected by the profile is reflected in the reality. She was in my "hot list" until I read the small print, whereupon my jaw dropped.
 Why she cannot undertake her filtering exercise to eliminate unsuitable punters in a more efficient  and (for the would-be punter) less expensive way I cannot imagine. A phone call and a couple of open-ended questions by e-mail should do the trick.
She remains in the "up herself" category as far as I am concerned. But as you say (in effect) it's your money to spend as you please.

Offline madeinwales56

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
This one for me, as her prices are steep for her age, and the bit about if you subscribe to U.K punting no need to contact her. :angry: :manhater:
Having said that reading her profile this put the idea in my head about joining what has proved to be a valuable site. :drinks:

And she's on tour. Glasgow and Chelsea SW3. Stupid cow.

Offline StevenS

For my money (and it was a fair bit of money) Classic Blonde was well worth it. Two meetings at hotels, yes a bit of verbal foreplay on the phone. We opted for tea the first time (so no coffee breath) rather than a 4 course Tudor dinner. Both were great punts. She dresses and undresses really well, kisses like a harlot at the moulin rouge and sucked me dry. So, well worth it and classy rather than up herself. I did see one WG in Bristol who was not as part time as she pretended. The so-called in-call was in a hotel, dinner was drawn out and a la carte and the conversation was all about her profession (linked to nursing as I remember). She was up herself when what I wanted was to get up her. Yup, the rare ones who are up themselves and do the stringing along are crap. They are either young and very pretty, or slightly past their best but not comfortable with it. The other trait is that they don't really enjoy the sex at all really. Personally if they're that bad I walk away now before too much piss gets taken ( no, not in that way, not my thing).

I read her profile as having to do 120 notes to have a chat with her and then more money if she decides I'm worth fucking. Therefore possible that over a £2 a minute coffee she could equally say no thanks.

Burnside

  • Guest
And she's on tour. Glasgow and Chelsea SW3. Stupid cow.
She might not be daft, as she no doubt has use of her own private jet :sarcastic:, and i had forgot to mention her snobby locations when putting this up last night. :mad:

cockneybstrd

  • Guest

Diehard

  • Guest
I responded to one of these ads a few months ago as much as anything else out of curiosity.  I liked the look of the girl from her profile so I thought WTF?  Stage One was an exchange of photos which was no great shakes for me (I blanked my face out and used a one-off shot) and, having passed this test, Stage 2 was a "phone interview."  I'm being serious, mind.

The phone call went swimmingly.  It was obvious we were getting along and for about half an hour, we both talked the ear off a donkey to the point where I was actually feeling quite good about meeting her.  At this point, she introduced stage 3.  We would meet for a coffee or a meal (my choice, which I'd pay for) and if, after that, things were still good, we could then meet for a booking.  Even at this stage, I was ok with it.  I mean what the hell, a bit laborious but it's a date with a nice-sounding girl and I'm going to expense the meal anyway.  Then, she dropped the boom.  Her charge for attending said meal was "only" half her punting rate; i.e. 75 quid for the privilege of eating with her (as opposed to eating her) and then going home alone.

I pointed out that she'd now already interviewed me three times, seen my photo and did she seriously expect I was going to PAY for the privilege of feeding her over a FOURTH interview which I yet might fail.  Apparently she did.  Anyway, I politely told her to fuck off...half an hour wasted and no damage done...and moved on.  So that was my experience.  All part of punting's rich tapestry.  Her profile is still on AW so I guess some morons are giving her business.

You got her link please....I'd love to contact this Bint.

Diehard

  • Guest
I don't quite get why the OP says this could be a controversial thread.

Hookers are delusional at the best of times, the ones with the profiles highlighted in this thread need sectioning.

Hookers need to understand that being on the game is not complicated.

1. Advertise accurately what services are provided
2. Agree with punter the contract price
3. Ensure punter has fantastic sex for the entire duration of the booking, so no massage, chit chat or other timewasting shit.
4. At end of booking get dressed, shake hands say goodbye and both forget about each other.

It's so simple really.

Beef Flaps

  • Guest
I don't quite get why the OP says this could be a controversial thread.

Hookers are delusional at the best of times, the ones with the profiles highlighted in this thread need sectioning.

Hookers need to understand that being on the game is not complicated.

1. Advertise accurately what services are provided
2. Agree with punter the contract price
3. Ensure punter has fantastic sex for the entire duration of the booking, so no massage, chit chat or other timewasting shit.
4. At end of booking get dressed, shake hands say goodbye and both forget about each other.

It's so simple really.

I quite like a back rub before she gobbles down my Man Goo. Chit chat no thanks.

Offline hockogrockle

I don't quite get why the OP says this could be a controversial thread.

Hookers are delusional at the best of times, the ones with the profiles highlighted in this thread need sectioning.

Hookers need to understand that being on the game is not complicated.

1. Advertise accurately what services are provided
2. Agree with punter the contract price
3. Ensure punter has fantastic sex for the entire duration of the booking, so no massage, chit chat or other timewasting shit.
4. At end of booking get dressed, shake hands say goodbye and both forget about each other.

It's so simple really.
I take your point. But you will probably have noticed that "Classic Blonde" has already received two posts from punters who find her 60-minute preliminary meeting quite justifiable, and are loud in her praise. So, as I half expected, my two posts so far of women whom I put in the "up themselves" category have not met with complete approval all round.

Offline hockogrockle

And here's another "up herself" lady:
//www.adultwork.com/3165784 or External Link/Members Only

She's been mentioned on her before, so I won't say too much.
However, it would be  fair to say that she must have the most pretentiously wordy profile on Adultwork. She claims to have an academic career and to do this part-time,. But that is no excuse for an over-written profile which takes a very long time to say very little. If she really is an academic, I would hate to be taught by her.
She only offers tantric services, unless you book her for four hours, in which case you may, just possibly, get to shag her, by which time you will have spent £400 and wasted half a day.
She has refused to allow feedback on the basis that "What happens in Cardiff stays in Cardiff". A statement which I find completely meaningless. If she is as fussy as she claims about only accepting clients with a high IQ, I would have thought she would be only too pleased to get some high-quality feedback. And anyway, what does IQ have ot do with it when you are having an expensive wank?
Definitely up herself!


2 review(s) found for carry-on-hollie linked to in above post (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline yonimax

To be fair there are profiles with gals who look alright but the moment you meet them F2F they start showing airs as if they expected some aristocrat to sweep them off their feet but what can they do they have to deal with an average bloke like moi.
Guess as long as there are suckers there will be posers! This may also be because of the sheer number of women on AW. I guess historically you saw a few tart cards and that was good enough, now you have to market yourself for a niche or whatever

5th Musketeer

  • Guest
And here's another "up herself" lady:
//www.adultwork.com/3165784 or External Link/Members Only

She's been mentioned on her before, so I won't say too much.
However, it would be  fair to say that she must have the most pretentiously wordy profile on Adultwork. She claims to have an academic career and to do this part-time,. But that is no excuse for an over-written profile which takes a very long time to say very little. If she really is an academic, I would hate to be taught by her.
She only offers tantric services, unless you book her for four hours, in which case you may, just possibly, get to shag her, by which time you will have spent £400 and wasted half a day.
She has refused to allow feedback on the basis that "What happens in Cardiff stays in Cardiff". A statement which I find completely meaningless. If she is as fussy as she claims about only accepting clients with a high IQ, I would have thought she would be only too pleased to get some high-quality feedback. And anyway, what does IQ have ot do with it when you are having an expensive wank?
Definitely up herself!
Having looked at her website (supposedly only found by reading clues in her profile - WTF) I don't think she would fall into the category of "academic" and certainly not professorial.  I'm not sure how she expects to judge anyone's IQ, because pure wordiness is no indication of that.

External Link/Members Only

To be fair to her, she doesn't offer penetration in her AW profile, so if you "pays your money you takes your choice."  Personally those huge great balloon false tits put me off - I don't know why women do that, but as someone said earlier on here, "horses for courses."

And at the bottom of her website she advertises UKP's old competitor - maybe she hasn't heard of UKP. 


2 review(s) found for carry-on-hollie linked to in above post (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline saf1976

This one ...

External Link/Members Only


I saw her a few years ago under a different profile. A really stuck up bitch ... however quite a good fuck, but not enough for me to return given the chat afters.

After she was trying to talk me into some overpriced gang bang with a mate of hers. It was so expensive as they was having champagne and catering. She was discussing this site and said 'oh I hate them all on there. I don't want Lorry Drivers and their sort'. Although I'm not a driver I took offence to it as why should their money be different to some guy in an office? I think my facial reaction must have let her know what a cunt she is.

Offline hockogrockle

And this one probably deservie an "honourable mention", although to be fair, I suspect the problem is that she hasn't got a clue.
/www.adultwork.com/897816 or External Link/Members Only

The profile shows that she knows nothing about either punctuation or capitalisation, and verges on the unreadable. It would scarcely be less alluring if she had put "not doing bareback at the moment, as I am recovering from gonorrhoea".
But what makes it remarkable is that she refuses to put any prices. These have to be discussed on the phone. But she doesn't give her phone number. Presumably, you have to e-mail her for it.
Does she really think people are going to indulge in protracted session of horse-trading over the phone?
The refusal to give prices is naive, arrogant, or plain dishonest.
I can see the conversation:
 "I fancy seeing you for half an hour".
"That'll be sixty quid".
"That's fine".
"You did only want hand relief, didn't you"?
"I wanted a fuck"
"That's an extra twenty".
"Oh, all right".
"Oral"
"Of course."
"That's another tenner."
"Oh, very well"
"Did you want it uncovered?"
"Yes, please"
"That's another twenty on top."
"Um".
"And did you want to do it in more than one position? There's an extra fiver per position, which...hello, hello".
She had not had any AW feedback since October 2013. I wonder why?
As I say, possibly not up herself, just clueless.

Offline Turtle Z

I've encountered a couple in the East Mids...

This one... External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only   

Zero interest in sex and trades on showing her tits to 'gentlemen' whilst serving them tea and chatting. Of course anyone who uses the 'courtesan' tag is clearly up themselves. Oh, yes, and she thinks she's so amazing that she charges mug punters £4.80 to look at her PG for 24 hours.

Then there's this one... External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only

A complete fucking idiot who thinks that she's both intelligent (she isn't) and gods gift to men. What can I say apart from the fact that I visited and she got on my fucking nerves, all me, me, me. Totally fucking deluded.

Interestingly despite the time both these women have been around, neither is reviewed on UKP, I wonder why that is?
« Last Edit: April 14, 2016, 03:21:41 pm by Turtle Z »

Steve sutherland

  • Guest
I read her profile as having to do 120 notes to have a chat with her and then more money if she decides I'm worth fucking. Therefore possible that over a £2 a minute coffee she could equally say no thanks.

That would be true, but I thought that having passed the telephone interview I was in and the tea was a bit of foreplay. So it was, tea didn't last long and it was up to the room for horny crumpet. I guess we clicked and I hadn't thought that she might say no thanks after the earl gray.

Offline Turtle Z

Sounds deluded to me, no need for chat before hand, usualy a time wasting ruse to not give sex but earn money.

Do like her payment option though, does the machine take notes ?


I know but I'd still be tempted if she was closer.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Steve sutherland

  • Guest
Reading some of these posts it proves we are a broad church (odd church it may be). I have enjoyed dinner or a drink with a WG before now, but rarely: they have to have something about them and seem interested and interesting. The contact, innuendo and hiking up of anticipation can be mind blowing before you blow your load in bed. If all you want is a shag (sometimes that's all I want) then fine, but whatever you may think of WGs, I have always found that if you treat them with respect they respond - they are people. IMHO the sex is better for it and anyway, it's the right thing to do. That probably makes me fluffy, but sod it - I'm comfortable in my masculinity. Here's to the next punt!

Offline Turtle Z

Reading some of these posts it proves we are a broad church (odd church it may be). I have enjoyed dinner or a drink with a WG before now, but rarely: they have to have something about them and seem interested and interesting. The contact, innuendo and hiking up of anticipation can be mind blowing before you blow your load in bed. If all you want is a shag (sometimes that's all I want) then fine, but whatever you may think of WGs, I have always found that if you treat them with respect they respond - they are people. IMHO the sex is better for it and anyway, it's the right thing to do. That probably makes me fluffy, but sod it - I'm comfortable in my masculinity. Here's to the next punt!

No, I wouldn't say that makes you a fluffy and I completely agree that you get out what you put in. There are girls who I've had no interest in socially or indeed with regard to anything beyond the punt, but I'd still treat them with respect. Why wouldn't you. I had a real issue recently with a girl who said she'd never go out with one of her clients, that was not because I was in any way interested in her but rather ironically because she looked down on her clients, one of whom was me. She saw the punter paying for her massage and HE as somehow tainted whereas she was still a catch, despite providing those hand jobs.  I don't think that anyone who sells or pays for sex is in a position to judge the other and personally I've never judged people on what they do unless they give me reason to. Of course there are punters on here who have no interest in the girl getting anything out of the punt, in my view their punts are the worse for it.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2016, 06:45:04 pm by Turtle Z »

Steve sutherland

  • Guest

5th Musketeer

  • Guest
Reading some of these posts it proves we are a broad church (odd church it may be). I have enjoyed dinner or a drink with a WG before now, but rarely: they have to have something about them and seem interested and interesting. The contact, innuendo and hiking up of anticipation can be mind blowing before you blow your load in bed. If all you want is a shag (sometimes that's all I want) then fine, but whatever you may think of WGs, I have always found that if you treat them with respect they respond - they are people. IMHO the sex is better for it and anyway, it's the right thing to do. That probably makes me fluffy, but sod it - I'm comfortable in my masculinity. Here's to the next punt!
I have had a drink with two WGs (of the very few who I have met) because I wanted to get to know them a bit better - it always helps me afterwards, in one case exceptionally so.  They worked out well, but with the others I did not and everything also worked out pretty well.  I don't think I am fluffy because of the way I operate, because that's just me.

pking_paul

  • Guest
I take your point. But you will probably have noticed that "Classic Blonde" has already received two posts from punters who find her 60-minute preliminary meeting quite justifiable, and are loud in her praise. So, as I half expected, my two posts so far of women whom I put in the "up themselves" category have not met with complete approval all round.

I like your balanced view. I don't complain when a ferrari goes past my new motor, its their choice even if theirs is older than mine most likely. We are in different purchasing positions with different aims in life, and as long as the prossies deliver what we want as punters, and admittedly some don't here by the sounds of it, then why gripe about other people's likes and dislikes?

I've been bored by an hour with a fit young thing whose gobbled every drop, and find a monied woman who wants a bit of fun playing at being a prossie a bit of a turn on.

Am I mad? Maybe in some UKP eyes? Do I worry, hell no.

Why does she do it?  Simply because she can, and I'd like a few less to keep trying. That way I can get a look in again.  :hi:

Life should be a game to enjoy gents, whatever floats your boat. If it doesn't hurt anyone, then why not?  :drinks:

Back on topic, has anyone met one of the other prossies discussed on here and disagreed with the OP?

Online EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
And here's another "up herself" lady:
//www.adultwork.com/3165784 or External Link/Members Only

She's been mentioned on her before, so I won't say too much.
However, it would be  fair to say that she must have the most pretentiously wordy profile on Adultwork. She claims to have an academic career and to do this part-time,. But that is no excuse for an over-written profile which takes a very long time to say very little. If she really is an academic, I would hate to be taught by her.
She only offers tantric services, unless you book her for four hours, in which case you may, just possibly, get to shag her, by which time you will have spent £400 and wasted half a day.
She has refused to allow feedback on the basis that "What happens in Cardiff stays in Cardiff". A statement which I find completely meaningless. If she is as fussy as she claims about only accepting clients with a high IQ, I would have thought she would be only too pleased to get some high-quality feedback. And anyway, what does IQ have ot do with it when you are having an expensive wank?
Definitely up herself!


as i said she has no belly button wtf!
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1


2 review(s) found for carry-on-hollie linked to in above post (1 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)

will-ow

  • Guest
gahhh the phrase Courtesan always puts me off! to me it reads "im classy and high class" but just cos the you call a cooked gold fish monk fish doesnt make it so!

Chuckman

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only Here is one for consideration

Clearly someone who has read far too many Mills & Boon books and is asking £500 minimum bookings and prefers longer? That is top drawer delusionism.


Having looked at her website (supposedly only found by reading clues in her profile - WTF) I don't think she would fall into the category of "academic" and certainly not professorial.  I'm not sure how she expects to judge anyone's IQ, because pure wordiness is no indication of that.

External Link/Members Only

To be fair to her, she doesn't offer penetration in her AW profile, so if you "pays your money you takes your choice."  Personally those huge great balloon false tits put me off - I don't know why women do that, but as someone said earlier on here, "horses for courses."

And at the bottom of her website she advertises UKP's old competitor - maybe she hasn't heard of UKP.

It's nice to see a tribute to the good old days of Geocities websites.

Offline tazman1002001

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I'm sure she is a lovely girl and her pics really make me want to see her but her prices are just away out of most peoples budgets, she started her profile at £500 an hour a few months ago and slowly but surely her prices came down .....she is now stuck at this ridiculous £150 hh and £250 hour pricing.

Still after saying all that if her prices do come down to the going rate of £70-£80 hh and
£130-£140 for the hour I would not hesitate to go and see her  ;)
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline nervyfooker

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


A bit up herself maybe but i do like this:

"Q. Can I get a discount?    A. Yes, you can have a 100% discount! Have a wank!"

Offline fantasticmrfox

I agree with the observations and viewpoints from these profiles.... But regardless of how stuck up or nonsensical they are...the abiding thing is that they must have some sort of demand from punters...its not for me and I'm not going to be critical of peoples tastes..but some of these ladies will no doubt have a great following and good on them , if it works

Gonad123

  • Guest
I've encountered a couple in the East Mids...

This one... External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only   

Zero interest in sex and trades on showing her tits to 'gentlemen' whilst serving them tea and chatting. Of course anyone who uses the 'courtesan' tag is clearly up themselves. Oh, yes, and she thinks she's so amazing that she charges mug punters £4.80 to look at her PG for 24 hours.

Then there's this one... External Link/Members Only  External Link/Members Only

A complete fucking idiot who thinks that she's both intelligent (she isn't) and gods gift to men. What can I say apart from the fact that I visited and she got on my fucking nerves, all me, me, me. Totally fucking deluded.

Interestingly despite the time both these women have been around, neither is reviewed on UKP, I wonder why that is?

Turtle,

Thanks for the heads-up! I have both of these girls on my HL. Have you seen Annabel, too?


Offline Turtle Z

Turtle,

Thanks for the heads-up! I have both of these girls on my HL. Have you seen Annabel, too?

Yes, she was just terrible. She is not remotely interested in sex. Only likes (likes may be a bit strong, perhaps 'does' is a better choice) missionary position and doesn't like her tits touched, which is a bit shit given that they're her  one and only USP. You couldn't make it up but if ever a woman was in the wrong job... Nobody ever goes back!

She seems to tour a lot now, I suspect because her local pool has completely dried up!
« Last Edit: April 15, 2016, 06:04:24 pm by Turtle Z »

Offline Turtle Z

Yes, she was just terrible. She is not remotely interested in sex. Only likes (likes may be a bit strong, perhaps 'does' is a better choice) missionary position and doesn't like her tits touched, which is a bit shit given that they're her  one and only USP. You couldn't make it up but if ever a woman was in the wrong job... Nobody ever goes back!

She seems to tour a lot now, I suspect because her local pool has completely dried up!

It's an absolute travesty but just noticed that this woman has got over 12,000 followers on Twitter. All for having a big pair of tits and zero aptitude for her chosen career. You have to hand it to her though, whoever is doing her marketing is doing a great job with the smoke and mirrors.

And heres one of her reviews from some fuckwit, no surprises from me that he somehow "missed out on the sex"... But as you'll see he did get lots of chat, drinks, and even Pate'   :dash:

I was given a very warm welcome by this lovely lady. Once seated on her sofa (I like sofas) I was plied with Bucks Fizz as we got to know each other. This inevitably led to kissing and caressing which led us to moving to the bedroom.

Annabel is a wonderfully skilled lover. We enjoyed more kisses and cuddles along with OWO, sweet and responsive RO and 69. Somehow we missed out on the sex but it didn't matter, I had a wonderful time.

Annabel is a most interesting person to chat to, being full of, as she says, life experiences. Perhaps the biggest surprise of the evening was the production of a light supper - pate, cold roast beef and fresh fruit washed down with orange juice. A surprise and a really great way to finish off our assignation.

It is far too simplistic to describe what Annabel provides as a GFE, it is a truly wonderful experience. Very very highly recommended.
« Last Edit: April 15, 2016, 06:31:46 pm by Turtle Z »