As I said above, Adele gave it as the reason for not giving me a booking.
I am going to treat this as a genuine question but I should tell you that your premise makes me doubt the sincerity of your intention. I think the girls involved keep an eye on this board, chat with each, and with pet punters, as a way of checking punters before booking them.
Because Adele told me it was, and the pattern is the same with a number of other WG's.
I should also say that, to me, what I am saying looks obvious. Read the back catalogue of reviews - starting with Beano. Look at the girls he has reviewed (multiple times) and then the other punters who have written multiple reviews on these same girls, and then the other girls they review multiple times. Look also at the girls who work together.
You will find the same names keep coming up.
Can I "prove" it - obviously not. But we are not in a court of law here.
When I read yet another blandly positive review, of one of the same girls, from one of the same group of punters, I smell bullshit. I am not an investigative journalist, I do not have time, resource or inclination to try and "prove" I am right and nor do I think I need to. All I am saying is that I think it is a good thing if punters on here are aware that these patterns may exist and able to draw their own conclusions. And if this is all just a figment of my imagination I am sure they will see through it and punt accordingly.
And as I posted in your link I agree with you. What is known is unclesnideheart who I KNEW was dodgy got banned for sharing a computer with Sylvester/Atticus Finch who i also KNEW was dodgy under both nicks. So punters conspiring HAS occurred, now to me its not a big jump to believe as I do that there are others doing the same, and conspiring with some WGs trying to undermine UKP. I smelt the bullshit from snide when he tried to undermine a negative review on Little Katie by Mr Brightside and then wrote her a love letter he called a review, admin didn't agree it was a review and moved it to the relevant regional board. Non white knight fanboys don't behave like that, they just have to put the WG first.
A punter giving a WG a good review may well result in her getting more punters as that's the power of UKP so that could be a WGs motive. For a punter it could be because he is besotted with the WG or WGs and/or he gets something in return, for example a free punt, again some WGs could see this as a small price to pay to get more punters. Now UKP is a forum not a court of law so we are free on here to post our views and opinions and this is mine. I have a number of punters who I disregard as being well dodgy and their posts not to be trusted.