Author Topic: Atomicredi Edinburgh  (Read 9321 times)


13 review(s) for atomicredi (9 positive, 3 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
I agree, perhaps marmalade can explain why he calls a child a "mongol brat".
Simply because too many people were getting all watery-eyed white knight over her. Shock value if you like. But it pisses me off to hear people getting all bleeding heart when it does fuck all to help the person they are supposedly expressing sympathy for. How is all your moralistic high ground going to help one tiny fucking bit. And do you think the child would be one bit better off if her mother could not work at all, possibly to feed and have the money for the special care needed, and all because you suddenly find her profession socially  'objectionable.' What on earth is your objective? Have the child taken into care? Make her feel guilty? How many of you have the faintest idea of what it takes to raise such a child? Perhaps you should give a week's wages to the relevant charity yourself, or work as a trained volunteer to give her some respite. But you think you know better than the mother. You want to be respected for your high moral values. Well I think your values frankly stink. But I did not criticise them. I criticised the inappropriateness of airing them on a prossie review thread. Instead of just leaving it as a review, which is the job of this website, you now have a whole fucking thread immortalising the situation. Who gives a fuck what you think when your good wishes don't help.

chico1000

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
How can you write that pish and defend the indefensible.  Yeah your right shocking and fucking sick.

mavgoose

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
First time I've logged in today. I hate myself for perpetuating this thread , but , marmalade - you're wrong. I assume you're not a parent as what you have said is less than heartless.

Lowest of the low. Be it on this forum , or any other forum anywhere online.
Lowest of the low. I won't comment again on this thread.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
You are entitled to your view. I would point out you don't actually know me.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Agree disgusting calling a child that!! Pathetic
Yeah really. Like I walked up to the child and said, hey, you're a mongol brat.  :rolleyes:

You're obviously a sensitive old fucker. You felt 'abused' earlier when someone pulled you up. Now you're projected your poor wee hurt onto an imagined hurt by someone you don't know, and let's be fucking honest, you don't give a fuck about and are not in a position to give a fuck about. You use PC as some sort of crutch. Get into the real world ffs before it eats you.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
How can you write that pish and defend the indefensible.  Yeah your right shocking and fucking sick.
You need to get a sense of perspective.  :P :hi:

Andy1967

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You really are a first class c#nt!! And a poor excuse of a human being. Now that people are seeing you for what you are you decide to turn on folk - as I said before your pathetic!
« Last Edit: April 10, 2016, 12:15:37 am by Andy1967 »

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
You really are a first class c#nt!! And a poor excuse of a human being. Now that people are seeing you for what you are you decide to turn on folk - as I said before your pathetic!
Dear AndyPandy, no offence mate, but do you really think I'm bothered that fluffie fucks like you "turn on me" as you say?? Do you think I enjoy telling pussywhipped punters they are full of poo?  :rolleyes:

Do you really think I approve of the term "mongol brat"? Or "paki"? Or 101 other such un-PC terms? You not only don't know me my friend, you don't even know my onscreen persona or you would see a bit more if you read my posts.

I also refer you to the forum rules:
"Complaining about the lack of 'political correctness', accusing the site moderation of being biased for / against something or throwing accusations of racism will equally not be tolerated;"
"It is not acceptable to demand the suppression of info that may be of use to other punters;"

Do you have any idea of the social work involved where a child with Down’s syndrome is concerned? Or even any idea what is involved in raising one? Let me put it by way of another example.

Most of you will be treated by GPs at some point in your lives. Most, if not all of you, will undergo a surgical operation at some point in your lives. Would you like to know the sort of things that GPs call you (in coded language) on your notes when they think you are being a fucking twat? Would you like to know some of the jokes that surgeons make about patients that might be dying? I do.

Perhaps you would find it disgusting and decide never to let a disgusting creature known as a 'doctor' come near you again. Yet it is doctors that can save your life. Do you want to know why doctors say such terrible things about patients? Is it that they disrespect them? Hate them? Secretly want to make their lives hell?? God forgive you if you think that. With the pressure that doctors and surgeons are under, it is a coping mechanism, and rightly or wrongly sometimes a way of communicating profiles. It is particularly a way of coping with twats that to an extent abuse the service, even well-meaningly.

Fluffies and white knight continually abuse the service of UKP: a first class service that is provided for free. In the days when there was group moderation mods would have little choice but talk about some punters 'behind their backs': that was not ideal. The aim is not to vilify punters, even ones that really can't see straight, but to get them to wake up: in other words help them. The thanks is putting up with your abuse but it is part of the price, like a patient who screams blue murder at the doctor over an ingrowing nail.

Defending prossies, defending their families, being social workers, is not the business of this site. If this were a philosophy forum or a social work forum or whatever we might discuss it very differently. It's not. It's a punters' forum. You pay women for sex. You sometimes pay women for sex when you disapprove of them. You do your best in whatever circumstances you find yourself in. If you want to help or pull up a prossie that you think needs it, try SAAFE. If you want a nice discussion with prossies like they're your buddies, try UK-Escorting. We're not here to defend prossies' feelings: they are responsible for their own actions. On the rare cases where there is real evidence that a punter has been a real cunt -- and there are indeed, horrifically,  real cunts that steal from prossies, beat them up or rape them -- there are places to report that as well (eg Crimestoppers) but I happen to know that UKP takes it seriously even if it is not possible to take action.

You should not, in my opinion, call (for instance to their face or to their parent) a child a 'fucking mongol' even if he or she was born in bloody Mongolia. But we are not talking to children on here. We are not talking to prossies: even if they happen to have a child with down's syndrome. If punters are so easily offended, this is not really the place for them. This is what I mean when I say, get real.

If fluffiness, whether aimed at prossies or their children, takes hold on here we are fucked. If you want to call social services or Crimestoppers, get on with it (though it hardly sounds appropriate in this case). If you think a punter has been completely out of order on a punt or broken the rules, say so. If you think someone is making a false review, say so. Everyone is equal on here, it's a level playing field. But try to think of the effect, of what will really help, instead of getting so carried away with hand-wringing.  :hi:

Argento79

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Absolutely world class trolling from the OP.  He must be loving this.

chico1000

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Marmalade
Your defence of this is awesome and galling.  Its like the defence of Nazi guards at Nuremberg "I was just following orders"
Just because you are on a punter forum does not mean you need to be a total cunt all the time. Most folk would never even contemplate stating that in private mode.   Call me a fluffy cunt I don't care but you crossed a line and you know it.
I think I am done arguing with you but you forget this is an open forum open to anybody that chooses to read it.  Therin lies the problem most normal people (albeit they use prostitutes and enjoy using this site) don't want in anyway to be associated with your comments no matter how you wrap them up in an anti fluffy tirade. Your warped reasoning is  that folk who rightly object to them are some kind of bleeding heart liberal social workers and you are doing doing us all a favour by waking us up from our slumber.
  You may well be a philanthropist and Christian in real life good on you but my warped moral compass does not stretch to being a total inflammatory bastard to prove a very fucking small point.

Offline Name Not Found

Dear AndyPandy, no offence mate,  -X-snip-X-

Seriously? WTF mate? How long did it take you to come up with that sanctimonious, self-justifying, drivel. Suggesting a moral equivalency between what doctors call their patients and what you called the kid is hilarious.

People were annoyed with you at first. Now they're just laughing at you.

wilderbeast

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Marmalade
Your defence of this is awesome and galling.  Its like the defence of Nazi guards at Nuremberg "I was just following orders"
Just because you are on a punter forum does not mean you need to be a total cunt all the time. Most folk would never even contemplate stating that in private mode.   Call me a fluffy cunt I don't care but you crossed a line and you know it.
I think I am done arguing with you but you forget this is an open forum open to anybody that chooses to read it.  Therin lies the problem most normal people (albeit they use prostitutes and enjoy using this site) don't want in anyway to be associated with your comments no matter how you wrap them up in an anti fluffy tirade. Your warped reasoning is  that folk who rightly object to them are some kind of bleeding heart liberal social workers and you are doing doing us all a favour by waking us up from our slumber.
  You may well be a philanthropist and Christian in real life good on you but my warped moral compass does not stretch to being a total inflammatory bastard to prove a very fucking small point.

I don't post too often in this forum but have to say this is the most sensible post I've seen here in a long time.



     

Offline auldie63


Do you really think I approve of the term "mongol brat"? Or "paki"? Or 101 other such un-PC terms? You not only don't know me my friend, you don't even know my onscreen persona or you would see a bit more if you read my posts.
If you don't approve of the term then why use it in a post?
All that other pish about white knights and forum rules does not in any way answer that question.
In two wee words you have completely sidetracked the purpose of this thread.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2016, 10:12:10 am by auldie63 »

Offline Poopster

I find life on this forum much more palatable with judicious use of the ignore function.  It's already been made clear by the hierarchy that the user in question is given free rein to say and do as he pleases because he's been around from the start.  He isn't going to get banned for his destructive and inflammatory posts and his massive ego isn't going to let him fuck off on his own accord, so simply put him on ignore and the forum becomes a much nicer place.

Easy.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Absolutely world class trolling from the OP.  He must be loving this.
Indeed. Refreshing that someone noticed as well.  :hi:
If you don't approve of the term then why use it in a post?
All that other pish about white knights and forum rules does not in any way answer that question.
In two wee words you have completely sidetracked the purpose of this thread.
Well I don't think it was pish auldie, but some people are getting very upset over it, however needlessly in my opinion, so I apologise.

Offline DickDiver

I apologise.

Right, before we get into another round of willy waving can we all agree just to accept this, let the thread die and drop off our screens?

Offline S.X. MacHine

Right, before we get into another round of willy waving can we all agree just to accept this, let the thread die and drop off our screens?
I agree. Time to move on. Strange how such an acrimonious and divisive  debate has come about as the result of a very suspect OP.

RandyF

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Welcome to the Scottish region Marmalade  :rolleyes: :hi:

They can be a strange, strange, unfathomable lot at times  :timeout:

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,784
  • Likes: 12
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
Funny, I remember when Marmalade got all excited because somebody called themselves "Patrick Bateman". Oh the irony.

Offline Cactus

I've seen atomicredi at her work place for a one hour punt late at night.  There wasn't really much of a spark and I didn't particularly enjoy myself, so I cut the booking short. Not her fault per se, I just wasn't really feeling what was going on.

There was absolutely no signs of a child in the flat though.

I feel for the girl, this seems like she's being victimised for whatever reason.

Also, Marmalade, you've been one of the most helpful punters on here since I joined, we've exchanged many PMs etc and I generally find your posts helpful, funny if a little wordy at times.  I'm just struggling to fathom why you had to use such antagonistic wording when describing the girls kid.

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Funny, I remember when Marmalade got all excited because somebody called themselves "Patrick Bateman". Oh the irony.
The difference, though I don't recall the exact post, was the possibility of someone seriously being harmed, possibly the punter  -- if you have been here long enough you would recall "rusty spoon -gate" where a punter was outed and his life ruined after a prossie interpreted it as a threat (it wasn't). No-one here was harmed by the use of an un-PC term but it has smoked out a lot of people who would be more at home on not allowed.

I apologised as the furore was clearly drawing away from (what I see as) slightly more serious issues. 1) that a prossie's lifestyle was unfairly disrupted by someone outing her as a swinger (actual harm); 2) that apparently the OP was a fake review.

I asked the opinion of two or three people on here I respect concerning my post and two of them thought it was a storm in a teacup but the third suggested I toned it down. I accepted the advice and apologised. No offence was intended to the prossie (who some people seem more concerned about) or her child, and neither is this forum averse to un-PC terms. But I clearly hadn't got my point across and there was no point in further upsetting punters even I didn't agree with them.

Two people in this thread suggested the matter should be dropped: a request I respected. It seems that some people disagree.

If you want to continue the debate on language or have a go at me you are welcome, but I suggest you could maybe ask Admin to move the relevant part of the thread to off-topic. There is some merit in the argument that bumping the thread draws attention to what is in all likelihood a fake review by a troll. (If you read the prossie's blog, that's all she objects to, and although she's possibly not in the age range I go for, she sounds sort of reasonable.)
« Last Edit: April 11, 2016, 11:17:48 pm by Marmalade »

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,784
  • Likes: 12
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
The difference, though I don't recall the exact post, was the possibility of someone seriously being harmed, possibly the punter  -- if you have been here long enough you would recall "rusty spoon -gate" where a punter was outed and his life ruined after a prossie interpreted it as a threat (it wasn't). No-one here was harmed by the use of an un-PC term but it has smoked out a lot of people who would be more at home on not allowed.

I apologised as the furore was clearly drawing away from (what I see as) slightly more serious issues. 1) that a prossie's lifestyle was unfairly disrupted by someone outing her as a swinger (actual harm); 2) that apparently the OP was a fake review.

I asked the opinion of two or three people on here I respect concerning my post and two of them thought it was a storm in a teacup but the third suggested I toned it down. I accepted the advice and apologised. No offence was intended to the prossie (who some people seem more concerned about) or her child, and neither is this forum averse to un-PC terms. But I clearly hadn't got my point across and there was no point in further upsetting punters even I didn't agree with them.

Two people in this thread suggested the matter should be dropped: a request I respected. It seems that some people disagree.

If you want to continue the debate on language or have a go at me you are welcome, but I suggest you could maybe ask Admin to move the relevant part of the thread to off-topic. There is some merit in the argument that bumping the thread draws attention to what is in all likelihood a fake review by a troll. (If you read the prossie's blog, that's all she objects to, and although she's possibly not in the age range I go for, she sounds sort of reasonable.)

I'm not having a go at anyone and I'm all for freedom of speech, unlike a great number of posters. Some folk are far too sensitive.

Offline auldie63

Yep, more than nuff sed on this post, let it die.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
but I suggest you could maybe ask Admin to move the relevant part of the thread to off-topic. There is some merit in the argument that bumping the thread draws attention to what is in all likelihood a fake review by a troll. (If you read the prossie's blog, that's all she objects to, and although she's possibly not in the age range I go for, she sounds sort of reasonable.)

Marm as you put up the comment you want removed it's best you contact admin and message him the date and time of the post you want removed and he will do this for you  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline Marmalade

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,778
  • Likes: 37
  •  
  • Reviews: 58
Marm as you put up the comment you want removed it's best you contact admin and message him the date and time of the post you want removed and he will do this for you  :thumbsup:
I'm not bothered whether anything is removed. The OP has been exposed. I have, I hope, drawn attention to the malcreant that outed her swinging habit. I said if people want to discuss the use of PC language or have a go at me personally move over to the general section. Most people wanted to just let the thread drop. You seem to want to keep bumping it. It was not me that made what is probably a fake review.
« Last Edit: April 13, 2016, 01:23:48 pm by Marmalade »