I would, however, point out that, from memory, not many reviews meet your criteria whether the contributor is a new contributor or an old contributor.
My reviews included! But we have to try to have standards to aim it, and whether you think so or not. Someone reminded me recently, quite rightly, that I had included the venue (brothel name) in a review but forgotten to add the city. That is helpful. Do you think i give a fuck and want you to rate my review out of 10? It's not an ego thing ffs. It's about providing useful information.
They're not "my" criteria, although I've contributed to guidelines a few times. They're a logical basis. AW leads the punter (if doing a field report) through a different logical basis, one which will reinforce the website and prossie's profile. They're not interested in whether the profile was judged to be accurate, whether she had flabby tits or whatever, they just want embellishments. It's how they make their money.
AW wants you to make bookings. They don't care as long as you make a booking.
I'd say UKP cares about your
interests as a punter, whether you make a booking or not. That means (unless you are undiscerning) distinguishing good prossies from bad, highlighting factual details so a punter can match a prossie to his tastes, avoid getting ripped off and, in many cases, improve his experience (of course, many punters will fuck anything).
Quite often there's post reports asking Admin to move a review to the right section or add the link that's been omitted. Why not try to put the relevant info there in the first place?
I hardly use the reviews for recommendations. If I have to go to the profile to see if she fits what I want I might as well start there anyway. People will write several paragraphs anout the different positions they had but not mention she was a fat old minger. After age, build and services, the thing a lot of people then want to know is nationality as a lot of punters prefer to skip the Romanians or EEs. There's no reviews that include everything but some are more helpful than others. So I just do my hotlists, then, before I book, spend five minutes feeding the AW ref numbers into UKP. I'm looking for anything I may have overlooked or anything to be aware of. I mostly look out for the negative reviews as they have information whereas positives are usually just numerical, encouraging tick marks (the exception being when a punter has a spread of credible pos and neg reports). Anything serious, I look at the attitude of the punter, if his reviews give any meaning to pos and neg or whether he just writes in adultwankspeak.
As you say, not to me, I will try not to be "a woos" and contribute to the East and West Midlands review sections.
Well good. Enjoy your punts and we'll look forward to your reviews. I'm done trying to explain the rationale.