Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: WGs talking about UKP  (Read 4702 times)

Offline Titi

Twice now I have come across WGs talking about ukpunting post punt. I find it very off putting hence I don't review a girl till weeks after. One of them actually recommended ukpunting to me to research my next punt. I played dumb as usual and thanked her for the advice. Anybody else find it annoying or is it just me ?

vw

  • Guest
Yes, and will never punt forum members for that very reason.  All Blacklisted !!

Wont engage about the site personally

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
If they ask I tell them I'm a lurker

Offline cueball

More and more, I've had ukp recommended, I've been asked if I'm on it.

I just shrug my shoulders and play dumb.

One or two lasses know me from here as I've punted a couple via here but every other lass knows nothing of my ukp and I like to keep it that way.

It doesn't annoy me as such, it just tells me how popular and relevant ukp is.

I tend not to use ukp as a punting arrangement tool, share and discuss is my mo on here.

Offline Johny Stone

Twice now I have come across WGs talking about ukpunting post punt. I find it very off putting hence I don't review a girl till weeks after. One of them actually recommended ukpunting to me to research my next punt. I played dumb as usual and thanked her for the advice. Anybody else find it annoying or is it just me ?

I`ve had that too but I find it a nice touch. If a prossie recommends ukp to punters it means she`s a good un and has nothing to hide :thumbsup:

dirkt

  • Guest
I've had the opposite. I foolishly let slip I'd seen her reviews on here, She didn't like it one bit.
From now on my response to any UKP talk will be 'Que :unknown:'

Offline anyfucker

what's a WG?
what's ukpunting?
what's ukescorting?
Me, I'm naive, know nothing, am almost a virgin.

Offline Silver Birch

Anybody else find it annoying or is it just me ?

It doesn't bother me at all. I have had a few post punt chats about UKP and I was interested to hear a tale or two. I have only revealed my UKP ID to one wg in a moment of fluffy madness but luckily not had any comeback. Personally I couldn't care less if SB was mentioned to other punters, she doesn't know my real identity and neither do any punters.

Offline Silver Birch

I've had the opposite. I foolishly let slip I'd seen her reviews on here, She didn't like it one bit.

I have chatted to 2-3 wgs about UKP and they ALL said they do not like the really graphic reviews about them.

dirkt

  • Guest
I can see their point but reviews on here take the guess work and risk out of punting.
I'd rather be blacklisted by the odd WG for being on here than walk into a con or B&S.

Offline Marmalade

UKP is none of their business.

Offline Marmalade

I don't review a girl till weeks after.
A good attitude IMO. They can come on here and stalk reviewers or even stalk them on behalf their 'mates' that have been reviewed. Even had one prossie complain about a positive review (scumbag thought she was too 'high class' to be even mentioned on UKP. She wasn't.)

As to getting annoyed, I don't think it's worth it to let yourself get genuinely annoyed about a prossie. Sound off about her to warn other punters, yes, but annoyed, no. They are our 'employees', and should be viewed as such.

Offline Titi

A good attitude IMO. They can come on here and stalk reviewers or even stalk them on behalf their 'mates' that have been reviewed. Even had one prossie complain about a positive review (scumbag thought she was too 'high class' to be even mentioned on UKP. She wasn't.)

As to getting annoyed, I don't think it's worth it to let yourself get genuinely annoyed about a prossie. Sound off about her to warn other punters, yes, but annoyed, no. They are our 'employees', and should be viewed as such.

Oh I don't get really annoyed but more irritated TBH. I suppose women can't help but be nosey irregardless of their background. I am keen to preserve my anonymity and punting persona if you get my drift. It's part of what I enjoy about punting and keeping it away from other aspects of my life.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 03:45:03 pm by Titi »

vw

  • Guest
Oh I don't get really annoyed but more irritated TBH. I suppose women can't help but be nosey irregardless of their background. I am keen to preserve my animosity and punting persona if you get my drift. It's part of what I enjoy about punting and keeping it away from other aspects of my life.

Smart Phones  :dash: :dash: :dash: :dash:

Anonymity I presume.   :lol: :lol: :lol:


Offline Titi


Offline Marmalade

Oh I don't get really annoyed but more irritated TBH. I suppose women can't help but be nosey irregardless of their background. I am keen to preserve my anonymity and punting persona if you get my drift. It's part of what I enjoy about punting and keeping it away from other aspects of my life.

Yes, see your point.

Generally though women can be annoying full stop. One has to learn to live with it to an extent, just view their aimless wittering like the feathered variety making wittering noises on the branches of trees. Smile, say "yes dear" when they pause for breath and switch off again without worrying about what they assume the "yes dear" was for.

In Japan, it's generally considered rude to say the word for "no." Instead, one says "yes" meaning "yes, I hear what you're saying." The attitude can be quite useful for talking to bird-brained women (eg prossies). If they start to press, expecting you to really have listened, just look a bit blank and change the subject. They rarely stick to the same subject very long anyway unless they're having a bitch, and who the fuck is not going to tune out to a woman bitching. It's a bit like dealing with children and pets really. Just smile kindly, keep them amused and minding their own business. I don't mean women have smaller brains or anything, just that it pays sometimes to act as if they do. They usually read it as being gentlemanly if done with a smile and a 'yes dear.'

Treat your employees well and keep 'em in their place. It's politeness, not 'respect' that is required (though it is ok for them to interpret it as 'respect.') If you seriously respect an employee as an equal then you've lost your place and also, incidentally, lost the respect of that employee.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 04:02:19 pm by Marmalade »

dirkt

  • Guest
UKP is none of their business.

Shame they don't see it that way. It doesn't help when their fluffies go running to tell teacher what's been said about them.

Offline Titi

Yes, see your point.

Generally though women can be annoying full stop. One has to learn to live with it to an extent, just view their aimless wittering like the feathered variety making wittering noises on the branches of trees. Smile, say "yes dear" when they pause for breath and switch off again without worrying about what they assume the "yes dear" was for.

In Japan, it's generally considered rude to say the word for "no." Instead, one says "yes" meaning "yes, I hear what you're saying." The attitude can be quite useful for talking to bird-brained women (eg prossies). If they start to press, expecting you to really have listened, just look a bit blank and change the subject. They rarely stick to the same subject very long anyway unless they're having a bitch, and who the fuck is not going to tune out to a woman bitching. It's a bit like dealing with children and pets really. Just smile kindly, keep them amused and minding their own business. I don't mean women have smaller brains or anything, just that it pays sometimes to act as if they do. They usually read it as being gentlemanly if done with a smile and a 'yes dear.'

Treat your employees well and keep 'em in their place. It's politeness, not 'respect' that is required (though it is ok for them to interpret it as 'respect.') If you seriously respect an employee as an equal then you've lost your place and also, incidentally, lost the respect of that employee.

Very interesting view. Especially the bit about treating them like employees. I suppose I do something similar now that I am more confident with WGs compared to when I started out. I state clearly from the start of a punt what I want and how I would like the session to proceed. Think it's important that the WG knows who's in control i.e. the paying customer. The best girls do this effortlessly and let you the punter take charge.

vw

  • Guest
Shame they don't see it that way. It doesn't help when their fluffies go running to tell teacher what's been said about them.

This review is an example of many running to teacher, was a fluffy blood bath, duels at dawn it had all.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=73827.0

dirkt

  • Guest
This review is an example of many running to teacher, was a fluffy blood bath, duels at dawn it had all.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=73827.0

Is that a record for the longest review on here? It may take me some time to read it all :D

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Is that a record for the longest review on here? It may take me some time to read it all :D

I think some of the West8 classics stretched on a bit most of them ended in lockings. i think the little katie episode saw the most bannings ever on ukpunting

dirkt

  • Guest
I think some of the West8 classics stretched on a bit most of them ended in lockings. i think the little katie episode saw the most bannings ever on ukpunting

Reading it now, I have seen banned under quite a few usernames and I'm only on page 2.

Offline DickDiver

This review is an example of many running to teacher, was a fluffy blood bath, duels at dawn it had all.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=73827.0

Fuck, that's a fluffy hunger games in there.  I only made it to page 3, had to stop reading in case the killings got more gruesome.

A point that was well made is that the fan boy posturing does the WG far more damage than the negative review which would drop off the front page pretty quickly without all the chivalrous bumping.

Offline MJ.spritzen

I've never had a WG mention UKP to me, but i have had one contact me on here crying for me to take my review down about them. I dont know why because it was a very positive review. :unknown:

So unfortunately i cant go back to her because she's likely figured out which punter i was - damn my specific review!!

Offline RedKettle

I don't find it irritating - understandable that they take an interest in such an important factor in their business.  However I did in the early days make the mistake of letting on that I was on UKP after being asked about it, something that led to me not reviewing one punt - for a well reviewed girl on here.  I now play it dumb all the way and either have never heard of UKP or perhaps say I have looked at it but not a member.

In fact I make out like finding a girl on AW is a stretch for my computer skills.

Offline Titi

This review is an example of many running to teacher, was a fluffy blood bath, duels at dawn it had all.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=73827.0

All I can say is WOW  :scare: Some blokes really aren't made for punting. At the end of the day it's paid sex SIMPLE. Some people just like to complicate things SMH.

Offline NIK

Twice now I have come across WGs talking about ukpunting post punt. I find it very off putting hence I don't review a girl till weeks after. One of them actually recommended ukpunting to me to research my next punt. I played dumb as usual and thanked her for the advice. Anybody else find it annoying or is it just me ?

Don't know about annoying but I'd certainly find it ironic.  :lol:

Offline DickDiver

I've never had a WG mention UKP to me, but i have had one contact me on here crying for me to take my review down about them. I dont know why because it was a very positive review. :unknown:

So unfortunately i cant go back to her because she's likely figured out which punter i was - damn my specific review!!

She played the crying emoji? That is full on manipulation.  :cry: :cry: :cry:

I normally leave the review for some time after the booking and change some minor details to maintain a firewall of anonymity.

Offline Nagilum

Yep it's been recommended to me by a few girls, if it's post punt I don't mind them knowing I'm on it. Will not tell them my ID though.

Only the girls I see regularly know my ID on here. It's not hard to work out as I give myself away with the detail in reviews. Catch 22 for me.

Ben4454

  • Guest
I've been blocked by a few providers. They obviously do not want their bad service coming to light. I've been seeked out by a couple. Although all the good providers do not have that much time on their hands I have found. I have also been asked about UKP and I always give a polite no I haven't heard of it. I never use my UKP membership to secure bookings or anything. Although I have told most my friends about UKP who now browse the site and a few have signed up.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 07:25:16 pm by Ben4454 »

Offline hockogrockle

I once had a woman put a post on here on a review of mine, saying what a lovely post it was and correcting a few minor details.
When I next saw her she thanked my for the post. I was a bit startled, as this is the only place I use the "Hockogrockle" avatar. She laughed at my surprise, and said she knew it was me as she could recognise my idiosyncratic writing style from my e-mails to her. Busted!

Offline Sonny Crockett

I did once tell a WG about myself being a UKP member (this was in my very early days of UKP membership) but only after she browsed through the forum to check on a review about herself and talked about it. I did a review of her as I had a great time. However she had then used my UKP membership against me whenever I tried to make another booking with her and she either never got back to me or lied to me whenever I asked about something. Ever since then I have not mentioned anything about UKP to escorts I've met as they do use UKP against punters.

Personally I don't think WGs should be members of UKP (there aren't punters who are members of SAAFE) nor should they talk about UKP to punters as the forum is not for them.... It is for punters to share their experiences. You get a lot of WGs who give the punter abuse and slag them off whenever a negative (or even a positive) review or a negative aspect about them is written. I myself was told by a WG after I wrote a negative review about her that I was a horrible person and that she wished I bumped into someone who then stuck the knife into me. As Ben 4454 has said, it is because don't like any bad aspects about them being brought out in the open. I would also add they don't like UKP as they wish to continue with their bad ways with punters. WGs only join UKP to slag the punter off or fuck them about via PMs.

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
we chatting about soph AGAIN ??

Anyway it may actually suprize you how many punters bring it up in a meet not the escort"
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
we chatting about soph AGAIN ??

Anyway it may actually suprize you how many punters bring it up in a meet not the escort"

While I agree with your first point as it does seem like the bloke seems bent out of shape about it rather than shrugging his shoulders and moving on.

Your second point I am afraid is a bit pointless. You have been on and off here since I have been a member so of course some blokes are going to bring it up with you

Personally I would never bring it up with any prossie I saw. If we are going to chat I would have to be boring old bastard to discuss the internal politics of a forum rather than more interesting topics such as wood whittling

Offline Picti

UKP is none of their business.

I understand what you meant in your post Marmalade but due to the prominence that UKP has attained it actually has become an important marketing aspect of their business, so of course they're interested.  I know it's not the purpose of the forum but it's a reciprocal consequence of the power of UKP.


Offline DickDiver

I understand what you meant in your post Marmalade but due to the prominence that UKP has attained it actually has become an important marketing aspect of their business, so of course they're interested.  I know it's not the purpose of the forum but it's a reciprocal consequence of the power of UKP.

UKP has risen in prominence and will definitely impact their marketing but their influence should start and end at their service. If they paid more attention to that than trying to manipulate their reviews they would rise to the surface as UKP superstars

Offline Sonny Crockett

UKP has risen in prominence and will definitely impact their marketing but their influence should start and end at their service. If they paid more attention to that than trying to manipulate their reviews they would rise to the surface as UKP superstars

Agree!!!

dirkt

  • Guest
How many of you guys have read a negative review and still punted with a prossie?
Depending on the reason for a negative review I would still punt if there is some decent feedback too.


Offline Marmalade

UKP has risen in prominence and will definitely impact their marketing but their influence should start and end at their service. If they paid more attention to that than trying to manipulate their reviews they would rise to the surface as UKP superstars
Indeed. It is largely a waste of time or counterproductive for prossies to post here with their prossie marketing hat on. Dani manages it: mostly as she seems to dissociate from her work on a personal basis but adds non-personal insights from experience and knowledge of interest to the punter (rather than what the whinging prossie demands 'should' interest the punter, which usually equals "why she is so wonderful and it is in the punter's 'interest' to know that").

Ahhhh now I see boobookins is back again after a temporary wee ban wasn't it... let's see if she can keep her head this time  :D

Offline Marmalade

I understand what you meant in your post Marmalade but due to the prominence that UKP has attained it actually has become an important marketing aspect of their business,
Which, actualy, is none of our business.

I know it's not the purpose of the forum but it's a reciprocal consequence of the power of UKP.
No it is not the purpose of the forum, and UKP hardly needs the reaction of prossies to indicate its importance.

bristolqwerty

  • Guest
I have the same username on both AW & here.  If an escort took exception to comments I truthfully made on a punting forum for punters then good riddance, shouldn't be nosy then.  :angelgirl:

Offline Marmalade

I once had a woman put a post on here on a review of mine, saying what a lovely post it was and correcting a few minor details.
When I next saw her she thanked my for the post. I was a bit startled, as this is the only place I use the "Hockogrockle" avatar. She laughed at my surprise, and said she knew it was me as she could recognise my idiosyncratic writing style from my e-mails to her. Busted!
Women can suddenly become remarkably 'astute' when it comes to getting their fucking hooks in. Like how does she expect you to react?
"Oh goody, I am such a stupid fluffy that I need your thanks and the review was written just for you dahhrrrrling!" :vomit:
or
"How nice of you to mention it since I am a sad lonely fuck and no-one says anything nice to me." :wacko:
or how about
"Yes, I thought you were quite a nice punt, but your detective skills on my writing style sugest you are really a devious little cunt, so thanks for telling me so I can go back and and write some comments to change it to a negative."
or the outright fluffy pussy-crawler:
"As I said I would, so here's your fee with the agreed discount."  :dash:

Since she has no fucking right to work out your identity, you hardly owe her the transparency she so desires. So maybe
"Yeah some of us chat by PM* so I guess someone used my description in a review. If you knew who I was you'd know I never post reviews myself: too much hassle. So how about getting on with the job?!" (*Or chat in the pub, or chat on another forum).

« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 09:11:10 pm by Marmalade »

Offline Sonny Crockett

WGs should have no place on UKP.

Offline Marmalade

I have the same username on both AW & here.  If an escort took exception to comments I truthfully made on a punting forum for punters then good riddance, shouldn't be nosy then.  :angelgirl:
Not that simple. She might blacklist you on AW or tell lies about you. Even if she is a "nice" prossie, she may blab to her "nice" friends who turn out to be not so fucking nice. I'd get a different AW username if I were you. Having said that there are one or two people who manage it long term without problems (Smiths for instance, as far as I know) but they clearly are very clear about how they operate.

bristolqwerty

  • Guest
I live in hope that includes me..... :drinks:  but am not holding my breath.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 09:24:34 pm by bristolqwerty »

Offline Picti

No it is not the purpose of the forum, and UKP hardly needs the reaction of prossies to indicate its importance.

Not really what I said.  However as I understand it, a primary function of the forum is to facilitate communication, information-sharing, etc between punters (as consumers) in ways that ultimately inform and influence their punting decisions and behaviour.  As a rational consequence this does influence market forces and therefore WG behaviour (as service providers).  Whether directly or indirectly is UKP not premised on revealing, challenging, and ultimately seeking to change the more dubious aspects of WG behaviour?  If so it follows that WG reactions are a fundamental aspect of this forum's importance and an indication of its effectiveness.  Unless of course you believe these factors aren't inextricably linked.

Incidentally I'm more interested in debate that conflict.  Especially as I find your avitar incredibly disarming (who is she?).

Offline OakTree

I've never known a wg to bring up any forum that I can remember. I certainly wouldn't divulge any knowledge if it was brought up.

To be honest though thoughts of how a potential review may pan out whilst balls deep is farthest from my mind.

I'm actually inclined to believe  boo boo that many punters foolishly bring it up themselves.

Offline Sonny Crockett

Not that simple. She might blacklist you on AW or tell lies about you. Even if she is a "nice" prossie, she may blab to her "nice" friends who turn out to be not so fucking nice.

That is exactly what they do. In reality WGs hate UKP.

Offline Nagilum

WGs should have no place on UKP.

As long as they respect the ethos of the site, do not tout for business and use their actual working name it's fine. WG's on here must be transparent.

It's in the site rules and works well.

Now to more pressing matters - I'm still waiting for you to have a great punt so I can read that review that puts this mess behind you.  ;)

Offline Nagilum

I've never known a wg to bring up any forum that I can remember. I certainly wouldn't divulge any knowledge if it was brought up.

To be honest though thoughts of how a potential review may pan out whilst balls deep is farthest from my mind.

I'm actually inclined to believe  boo boo that many punters foolishly bring it up themselves.

Just don't discuss it, very simple.  The only ones that will recognise you are regulars if you have them.

The worst is using the site as a bargaining chip.