Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: WGs talking about UKP  (Read 4230 times)

This review is an example of many running to teacher, was a fluffy blood bath, duels at dawn it had all.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=73827.0

All I can say is WOW  :scare: Some blokes really aren't made for punting. At the end of the day it's paid sex SIMPLE. Some people just like to complicate things SMH.

Offline NIK

Twice now I have come across WGs talking about ukpunting post punt. I find it very off putting hence I don't review a girl till weeks after. One of them actually recommended ukpunting to me to research my next punt. I played dumb as usual and thanked her for the advice. Anybody else find it annoying or is it just me ?

Don't know about annoying but I'd certainly find it ironic.  :lol:

I've never had a WG mention UKP to me, but i have had one contact me on here crying for me to take my review down about them. I dont know why because it was a very positive review. :unknown:

So unfortunately i cant go back to her because she's likely figured out which punter i was - damn my specific review!!

She played the crying emoji? That is full on manipulation.  :cry: :cry: :cry:

I normally leave the review for some time after the booking and change some minor details to maintain a firewall of anonymity.

Offline Nagilum

Yep it's been recommended to me by a few girls, if it's post punt I don't mind them knowing I'm on it. Will not tell them my ID though.

Only the girls I see regularly know my ID on here. It's not hard to work out as I give myself away with the detail in reviews. Catch 22 for me.

Offline Ben4454

I've been blocked by a few providers. They obviously do not want their bad service coming to light. I've been seeked out by a couple. Although all the good providers do not have that much time on their hands I have found. I have also been asked about UKP and I always give a polite no I haven't heard of it. I never use my UKP membership to secure bookings or anything. Although I have told most my friends about UKP who now browse the site and a few have signed up.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 07:25:16 PM by Ben4454 »
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

I once had a woman put a post on here on a review of mine, saying what a lovely post it was and correcting a few minor details.
When I next saw her she thanked my for the post. I was a bit startled, as this is the only place I use the "Hockogrockle" avatar. She laughed at my surprise, and said she knew it was me as she could recognise my idiosyncratic writing style from my e-mails to her. Busted!

Offline Sonny Crockett

I did once tell a WG about myself being a UKP member (this was in my very early days of UKP membership) but only after she browsed through the forum to check on a review about herself and talked about it. I did a review of her as I had a great time. However she had then used my UKP membership against me whenever I tried to make another booking with her and she either never got back to me or lied to me whenever I asked about something. Ever since then I have not mentioned anything about UKP to escorts I've met as they do use UKP against punters.

Personally I don't think WGs should be members of UKP (there aren't punters who are members of SAAFE) nor should they talk about UKP to punters as the forum is not for them.... It is for punters to share their experiences. You get a lot of WGs who give the punter abuse and slag them off whenever a negative (or even a positive) review or a negative aspect about them is written. I myself was told by a WG after I wrote a negative review about her that I was a horrible person and that she wished I bumped into someone who then stuck the knife into me. As Ben 4454 has said, it is because don't like any bad aspects about them being brought out in the open. I would also add they don't like UKP as they wish to continue with their bad ways with punters. WGs only join UKP to slag the punter off or fuck them about via PMs.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,226
we chatting about soph AGAIN ??

Anyway it may actually suprize you how many punters bring it up in a meet not the escort"

we chatting about soph AGAIN ??

Anyway it may actually suprize you how many punters bring it up in a meet not the escort"

While I agree with your first point as it does seem like the bloke seems bent out of shape about it rather than shrugging his shoulders and moving on.

Your second point I am afraid is a bit pointless. You have been on and off here since I have been a member so of course some blokes are going to bring it up with you

Personally I would never bring it up with any prossie I saw. If we are going to chat I would have to be boring old bastard to discuss the internal politics of a forum rather than more interesting topics such as wood whittling

Offline pictisunum

UKP is none of their business.

I understand what you meant in your post Marmalade but due to the prominence that UKP has attained it actually has become an important marketing aspect of their business, so of course they're interested.  I know it's not the purpose of the forum but it's a reciprocal consequence of the power of UKP.


I understand what you meant in your post Marmalade but due to the prominence that UKP has attained it actually has become an important marketing aspect of their business, so of course they're interested.  I know it's not the purpose of the forum but it's a reciprocal consequence of the power of UKP.

UKP has risen in prominence and will definitely impact their marketing but their influence should start and end at their service. If they paid more attention to that than trying to manipulate their reviews they would rise to the surface as UKP superstars

Offline Sonny Crockett

UKP has risen in prominence and will definitely impact their marketing but their influence should start and end at their service. If they paid more attention to that than trying to manipulate their reviews they would rise to the surface as UKP superstars

Agree!!!
Banning reason: Troll

Offline dirkt

How many of you guys have read a negative review and still punted with a prossie?
Depending on the reason for a negative review I would still punt if there is some decent feedback too.


Online Marmalade

UKP has risen in prominence and will definitely impact their marketing but their influence should start and end at their service. If they paid more attention to that than trying to manipulate their reviews they would rise to the surface as UKP superstars
Indeed. It is largely a waste of time or counterproductive for prossies to post here with their prossie marketing hat on. Dani manages it: mostly as she seems to dissociate from her work on a personal basis but adds non-personal insights from experience and knowledge of interest to the punter (rather than what the whinging prossie demands 'should' interest the punter, which usually equals "why she is so wonderful and it is in the punter's 'interest' to know that").

Ahhhh now I see boobookins is back again after a temporary wee ban wasn't it... let's see if she can keep her head this time  :D

Online Marmalade

I understand what you meant in your post Marmalade but due to the prominence that UKP has attained it actually has become an important marketing aspect of their business,
Which, actualy, is none of our business.

I know it's not the purpose of the forum but it's a reciprocal consequence of the power of UKP.
No it is not the purpose of the forum, and UKP hardly needs the reaction of prossies to indicate its importance.

Offline Andyply

I have the same username on both AW & here.  If an escort took exception to comments I truthfully made on a punting forum for punters then good riddance, shouldn't be nosy then.  :angelgirl:

Online Marmalade

I once had a woman put a post on here on a review of mine, saying what a lovely post it was and correcting a few minor details.
When I next saw her she thanked my for the post. I was a bit startled, as this is the only place I use the "Hockogrockle" avatar. She laughed at my surprise, and said she knew it was me as she could recognise my idiosyncratic writing style from my e-mails to her. Busted!
Women can suddenly become remarkably 'astute' when it comes to getting their fucking hooks in. Like how does she expect you to react?
"Oh goody, I am such a stupid fluffy that I need your thanks and the review was written just for you dahhrrrrling!" :vomit:
or
"How nice of you to mention it since I am a sad lonely fuck and no-one says anything nice to me." :wacko:
or how about
"Yes, I thought you were quite a nice punt, but your detective skills on my writing style sugest you are really a devious little cunt, so thanks for telling me so I can go back and and write some comments to change it to a negative."
or the outright fluffy pussy-crawler:
"As I said I would, so here's your fee with the agreed discount."  :dash:

Since she has no fucking right to work out your identity, you hardly owe her the transparency she so desires. So maybe
"Yeah some of us chat by PM* so I guess someone used my description in a review. If you knew who I was you'd know I never post reviews myself: too much hassle. So how about getting on with the job?!" (*Or chat in the pub, or chat on another forum).

« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 09:11:10 PM by Marmalade »

Offline Sonny Crockett

WGs should have no place on UKP.
Banning reason: Troll

Online Marmalade

I have the same username on both AW & here.  If an escort took exception to comments I truthfully made on a punting forum for punters then good riddance, shouldn't be nosy then.  :angelgirl:
Not that simple. She might blacklist you on AW or tell lies about you. Even if she is a "nice" prossie, she may blab to her "nice" friends who turn out to be not so fucking nice. I'd get a different AW username if I were you. Having said that there are one or two people who manage it long term without problems (Smiths for instance, as far as I know) but they clearly are very clear about how they operate.

Offline Andyply

I live in hope that includes me..... :drinks:  but am not holding my breath.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2016, 09:24:34 PM by Andyply »

Offline pictisunum

No it is not the purpose of the forum, and UKP hardly needs the reaction of prossies to indicate its importance.

Not really what I said.  However as I understand it, a primary function of the forum is to facilitate communication, information-sharing, etc between punters (as consumers) in ways that ultimately inform and influence their punting decisions and behaviour.  As a rational consequence this does influence market forces and therefore WG behaviour (as service providers).  Whether directly or indirectly is UKP not premised on revealing, challenging, and ultimately seeking to change the more dubious aspects of WG behaviour?  If so it follows that WG reactions are a fundamental aspect of this forum's importance and an indication of its effectiveness.  Unless of course you believe these factors aren't inextricably linked.

Incidentally I'm more interested in debate that conflict.  Especially as I find your avitar incredibly disarming (who is she?).

Offline OakTree

I've never known a wg to bring up any forum that I can remember. I certainly wouldn't divulge any knowledge if it was brought up.

To be honest though thoughts of how a potential review may pan out whilst balls deep is farthest from my mind.

I'm actually inclined to believe  boo boo that many punters foolishly bring it up themselves.

Offline Sonny Crockett

Not that simple. She might blacklist you on AW or tell lies about you. Even if she is a "nice" prossie, she may blab to her "nice" friends who turn out to be not so fucking nice.

That is exactly what they do. In reality WGs hate UKP.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline Nagilum

WGs should have no place on UKP.

As long as they respect the ethos of the site, do not tout for business and use their actual working name it's fine. WG's on here must be transparent.

It's in the site rules and works well.

Now to more pressing matters - I'm still waiting for you to have a great punt so I can read that review that puts this mess behind you.  ;)

Offline Nagilum

I've never known a wg to bring up any forum that I can remember. I certainly wouldn't divulge any knowledge if it was brought up.

To be honest though thoughts of how a potential review may pan out whilst balls deep is farthest from my mind.

I'm actually inclined to believe  boo boo that many punters foolishly bring it up themselves.

Just don't discuss it, very simple.  The only ones that will recognise you are regulars if you have them.

The worst is using the site as a bargaining chip.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)