Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Anyone seen this escort Finger&mouthonlySir  (Read 1193 times)

has anyone seen or can confirm if shes legit? Finger&mouthonlySir on AW

https://www.adultwork.com/2557531 or https://www.adultwork.com/Finger%26mouthonlySir

seems like shes been around on AW for a while since 2014 but only has 15 ratings so far and here's the part
why I question if shes legit or not, her ratings and reviews are set to private so it's making me think twice about it  :unknown:


on a side note, if you hadn't guessed it she only offers oral 'giving and recieving', CIM and Swallow at disceration,
and anything to do with hands/fingering, but no inserting your vehicle into her garage - if you catch my drift  :lol:

is it just me or does anyone else get a bigger urge in wanting to park their vehicle into someones garage when they
told you they don't allow it? kinda like telling a child he's only allowed to lick the cake and but not allowed to eat it? :lol:
sorry for all the innuendos :blush: haha

anywho I hope someone can help me on this, thanks guys I'm going to have a bit of cake now  :D

I may be wrong and don't wish to cast aspersions but whenever I have studied the pictures and profiles of this advertiser I have always had this nagging thought in my mind that it could be a transgender person. There is nothing wrong inherently with this although if it is the case then it should be clearly stated.

The services offered would be consistent with this as well which could also be coincidence.


Offline Ali Katt

I may be wrong and don't wish to cast aspersions but whenever I have studied the pictures and profiles of this advertiser I have always had this nagging thought in my mind that it could be a transgender person. There is nothing wrong inherently with this although if it is the case then it should be clearly stated.

The services offered would be consistent with this as well which could also be coincidence.
You could be right but the tits look a bit too good.

Really? Do you fellas really think so, could it be the angle of the photo being taken? Making her/his :unknown: tits look 'too good' and she looks like she's laid down in it Which could make her tits look that way?

Can you guys tell me in what way her tits are too good?
You guys make me feel inexperienced looking at tits now haha!  :lol:

Hang on, what if her username 'Finger&mouthonlySir' and the sir part is actually referring to herself? And not actually addressing us? Are we looking way too deep into this?  :timeout: man we need to get laid haha!  :lol:


Well either way I'm not too close minded if she is transgender :blush: but like you guys said/pointed out, if she is transgender, she hasn't been truthful about it by stating it on her profile unless we're mistaken  :unknown: But I'd at least like to know beforehand even if I'm not close minded about it

Well for now she's at the back of my punt list unless someone shred some new light on this, I'd probably will try her out and take one for the team but it'll be in the far future.

Do you guys think she'll be mad if I asked her if she's transgender?  :lol:

« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 08:42:53 AM by luckyleon »

Offline stevedave

She looks alright to me, I'd say it's a lass. The tits don't jump out at me as false.

Hidden feedback is more of an issue for me.

Offline Ali Katt

Really? Do you fellas really think so, could it be the angle of the photo being taken? Making her/his :unknown: tits look 'too good' and she looks like she's laid down in it Which could make her tits look that way?

Do you guys think she'll be mad if I asked her if she's transgender?  :lol:
Not too sure as Steve Dave says they don't look fake. With transgenders the tits usually look like really small, but soft breasts, not man boobs, but not like small women's tits either, unless they've had implants. It was hard to find a good example but maybe this.

If she is transgender she'll probably deny it and if she isn't she will be mad. TBH I would be half-tempted if full sex was on offer as she looks good.

She looks alright to me, I'd say it's a lass. The tits don't jump out at me as false.

Hidden feedback is more of an issue for me.

Her breasts certainly seem to splay very naturally in her public photos.

Feedback is 15 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative and 0 disputes so there must be a reason other than bad comments why it's hidden. Nevertheless, combined with limited services for a fee that would be typical for a more complete service, why bother?

Offline cueball


Feedback is 15 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative and 0 disputes so there must be a reason other than bad comments why it's hidden.

Maybe one says.... "nicest looking bloke I've ever shagged"  :sarcastic:

Her breasts certainly seem to splay very naturally in her public photos.

Feedback is 15 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative and 0 disputes so there must be a reason other than bad comments why it's hidden. Nevertheless, combined with limited services for a fee that would be typical for a more complete service, why bother?

is it possible she or someone created false feedback with different separate accounts? and she didnt want people to see those accounts cause if they were fake, they'd most likely have one post under each of them all going to her and no one other WG hence why its hidden so no one knows the truth? are we thinking too deep into this again?   :lol:


as for your question - why bother?  :unknown:

I actually didn't bother at first, but came back later mostly tempted by her service of including CIM and OWO. Now I know there's plenty of WGs out there that does OWO on top with full sex play, but very few give CIM and the ones that does do it are usually at an extra £XYZ or if its already included are usually at a higher rate than most WGs which is understandable. But they're also usually the ones are inconveniently located/strict contacting rules/only sees feedback etc.  :dash:

The ones that does do everything I lsited have poor/negative reviews - didnt do a proper CIM - looks away/no enthusiasm and the major one being I didn't really like the look of them either - looked a bit rough'd like they've seen better days or they're near their end game 50+ years of age which also includes service like bareback - WGs like those typically don't care about their health anymore since they're already near retirement - sounds harsh but its usually the truth and besides they're too old for my liking    :cool:

personally for me Finger&mouthonlySir's rates are fairly reasonable, does the two service I'm mainly after, convenient and looks quite good, since she mostly focuses on oral, she must be fairly good at it as an assumption and judging by her amount of feedback and profile view vists etc. shes practically a fresh escort new on the scene (I know she isn't since her profile was created back in 2014 but) she I'm assuming again probably doesn't see a lot of punts based on her profile views and amount of feedback which is a double edged sword I know but hey theres no such thing as a (very) bad blowjob right? kinda like pizza, all pizza is good pizza even bad pizza is still good pizza cause its pizza :lol: I mean how bad can it be? if thats literally the main focus of her service  :unknown:

well like I said I'm probably going to to see her in the far future, but for now shes at the back of my list  :P
« Last Edit: April 02, 2016, 10:13:34 PM by luckyleon »


personally for me Finger&mouthonlySir's rates are fairly reasonable, does the two service I'm mainly after, convenient and looks quite good

Perfectly fair argument :hi: You'll have to take the plunge with her report back to resolve the uncertainty...

Offline Bangman

Ive asked if she wants to live dangerously and have a cock up her pussy. Will let you know the reply if she doesn't ban me.
Banning reason: White-knight attacking negative reviewer

Ive asked if she wants to live dangerously and have a cock up her pussy. Will let you know the reply if she doesn't ban me.

oh wow what did you do?! she's offering penetration protected on her profile now  :yahoo:

unless it's not actual penetration but with toys  :dash:

well guess she has to change her profile name now https://www.adultwork.com/2557531

oh yeah at one point her profile name changed to fuck me good or something along those lines but had notice she was offering period play as well, strange did the time of the month change her mind? :unknown:

Offline normal_guy

Someone needs to toftt.

If swallow is included as profile seems to suggest this is a good deal for 30 mins.

I have seen her, but she offered a full service (including A levels) back then. She had a ridculously low price as well, something around £70/hr for an outcall. She suffers from alopetia, so she's bald as an egg and wears wigs. She isn't a TV/TS, as she has a child. I know this because her profile popped up on my facebook 'people you may know' as I had her number stored in my phone. She was proper horny back then, wet as fuck and not too bad. The baldness put me off a bit, but the wig stayed on throughout the meet. I would not see her again at her current rates and service levels (fingers and mouth only? WTF?), but I would see her again for another £70/hr outcall.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)