English Rebecca 121 ~ Bristol

[Sonny Crockett]

I think you might be missing B&G's humour. I would have added she will get 2 decent Bristol WG's to join the party at her expense. You know the type of girls, they kiss full on, actually earn their money and feel short changed if they don't totally empty you on an overnight. Rebecca can spend her time collecting full condoms and sitting on the onsuite shitter. Then again she might not click with the seat and decide to stand all night only to quote later on it's her worst one night lav stand in 4 years. 

 

[dubs]

It was you who suggested a full refund, but as mentioned earlier, your issue is not about the Punt or the thread, rather your sniping at Bangers because he gave a neg to michelle 

Not sniping, but in checking out what you're on about, I realise I've said almost exactly the same thing as Jimmyredcab, so if I'm a white knight, so is Jimmy.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=65661.msg838248#msg838248
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=65661.msg838322#msg838322

With 15 negative out of 25 reviews, either B&G is very unlucky or a difficult person to please.  If I only enjoyed my hobby 40% of the time, I'd give up and try something else.

Great minds think alike eh?

[vw]

Great minds think alike eh?

Oh dear, great minds many would disagree !

Do you walk the dog to ?

Clearly a WK who is upset with bangers for not sharing the good ones !

[madeinwales56]

Isn't it the case that from time to time punters and prossies don't click and the whole situation gets a bit uncomfortable for both parties? And in which case the chemistry just doesn't flow. I realise prossies get paid to put on a performance but even then nothing is guaranteed. I've had punts where I haven't clicked with the girl but I wouldn't post a negative review. And I can be an awkward cunt at the best of times. As for warning a prossie that she is going to get a negative review. What the fuck is that all about?
Seems to be lots of posts about a bit of a non event.

[James999]

Not sniping, but in checking out what you're on about, I realise I've said almost exactly the same thing as Jimmyredcab,

Jimmy hasn't posted on this thread, and your quote clearly shows the source of your anger, that he dared to neg Michelle, so you drag that over to this thread to get your revenge (on behalf of Michelle) that's both cuntish behaviour & white knighting, I hope Michelle rewards you for your efforts,   

[bristolqwerty]

It's all gone on a bit ~ still I'd expect much more than he received especially after being paid handsomely for my trouble, she's pretty enough to initiate some response IF the effort was there. Lie back and think of England (Bank of England) 
Q: Who was the worlds first carpenter? A: Eve, because she made Adams banana stand
😜

[Hartman]

It was you who suggested a full refund, but as mentioned earlier, your issue is not about the Punt or the thread, rather your sniping at Bangers because he gave a neg to michelle 

Sorry if I have missed something, but who is 'Michelle'?

[smiths]

Becaseu he couldnt. Blacklist me if u wish im not cold hearted at all . Look at all the negatives he has left Esp for popular girls this man was set on leaving me a neg before he even showed up. He is entitled to his review But he made the whole 90 mins Very horrible for me i tried my best.

That's a serious allegation in my book, he was set on leaving a negative review before he even showed up. He is indeed entitled to his review on a punters forum, as usual some white knights have come charging on, pricks every one of them, in fact they are a cancer and blight on punting with their arse licking crawling up WGs and/or pimps.

If I were interested in you which is a definite never in this lifetime would this review put me off you, no it wouldn't but Bangers has every right to post his view of the punt as he wishes.

[vw]

Jimmy hasn't posted on this thread, and your quote clearly shows the source of your anger, that he dared to neg Michelle, so you drag that over to this thread to get your revenge (on behalf of Michelle) that's both cuntish behaviour & white knighting, I hope Michelle rewards you for your efforts,   

Clearly DRM is a white knight who has only ever fucked 2 prossies Michelle and Adelle if he thinks people review all their punts.  I know I dont, dont imagine you do, bangers has said he doesn't and even jimmy doesn't.

DRM is wanker of the highest order hijacking other reviews to white knight a locked thread !  Maybe WOTW candidate !

Doubt Michelle will reward him, it is a bit  pathetic really, a bit of an embarrassment to her !

[rumbler]

On it's own the negative review would've been taken in context against the many positives.  However, I expect there are many like me who aren't very vocal on the forums who will blacklist rebecca due to the white knighting going on.

[smiths]

With 15 negative out of 25 reviews, either B&G is very unlucky or a difficult person to please.  If I only enjoyed my hobby 40% of the time, I'd give up and try something else.

As has been said this is bollocks, reviews DONT necessarily equate to how many good or bad punts a punter has, though I would hope punters do a negative to warn others. I certainly don't review all my good punts.

[vw]

Sorry if I have missed something, but who is 'Michelle'?

Michelle independent one of DRM's only 2 ever punts/fucks going buy his own rules that all punters review everything, she had a negative a while back from Bangers which is locked, and DRM has chosen to bring that over onto this review to further attack Bangers to save Michelle's honour even though note even needed.

[Hartman]

Blimey, a lot of effort to go to to protect the 'honour' of a fucking prossie! It like a soap opera. 

[LoneWolf2020]

why did rebecca still take his money even after she realised they weren't 'clicking'?

[fairfield]

Its not the honour of a prossie that worries me, but the trolling of B&G.  Am sure he can defend himself, but it still stinks.   

With 15 negative out of 25 reviews, either B&G is very unlucky or a difficult person to please.  If I only enjoyed my hobby 40% of the time, I'd give up and try something else.

The neg reviews are way more helpful than the +ve.  You really think we like describing how our punts go wrong??  Its to help others avoid same mistakes and possibly improve our own And B&G's 'success' rate  is much better than mine anyway.

Is this the 'EAS'  that i read about?  - people make 'friends' with a prossie on here and then stomp all over the reviewer when he posts a neg ? Do they want this site to be so ridiculously positive like AW?
I've neutraled/almost negged a WG well reviewed on here. Starting to think they're off-limits.

 

[Sonny Crockett]

why did rebecca still take his money even after she realised they weren't 'clicking'?

Because they only care about the money!!! That's why!!!

[smiths]

Its not the honour of a prossie that worries me, but the trolling of B&G.  Am sure he can defend himself, but it still stinks.   
The neg reviews are way more helpful than the +ve.  You really think we like describing how our punts go wrong??  Its to help others avoid same mistakes and possibly improve our own And B&G's 'success' rate  is much better than mine anyway.

Is this the 'EAS'  that i read about?  - people make 'friends' with a prossie on here and then stomp all over the reviewer when he posts a neg ? Do they want this site to be so ridiculously positive like AW?
I've neutraled/almost negged a WG well reviewed on here. Starting to think they're off-limits.

 

Yes this is what these white knight pricks do, they are trying to undermine UKP, it will NOT work though as those of us that care will continually challenge these people. NO WG is off limits so my advice is do an honest review and you will get back up if white knights start their shit.

[Marmalade]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

I have no idea what happened to this thread, it seems to have drifted way off topic. So to bring it back onto topic I just wanted to say that I have recently seen this lovely lady and she was fantastic.  So I believe all the positives much more than this negative (i booked her based on all her positive feedback here and it is all very well deserved).

It's so sweet when someone sees a "lady" 
and there's me thinking the review section was about prostitutes. 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[fairfield]

...... I realise I've said almost exactly the same thing as Jimmyredcab, so if I'm a white knight, so is Jimmy.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=65661.msg838248#msg838248
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=65661.msg838322#msg838322

Great minds think alike eh?

...and if you and Jimmy are trying to suggest that WG's are NOT "fussy" and choosy - the you both must be living in an alternative punting universe.
At the start i used to be completely honest with the WG's - "OAP/60+ seeks DFK/heavy boob play" - didn't want me or her to have any illusions or unpleasant surprises.
Then was number blocked 4 times in same day, all 4 well reviewed on AW, 2 of them also +ve'd on here. None cd be arsed even explaining.  Now i use "mature gent seeks.... " and no more blocking.
Ofc now i get 'failure to click' as reason for lack of delivery of promised services, but they still take my money!!
So this is why i find reviews like B&G's here so helpful. and long may they continue.   
       

[LoneWolf2020]

its funny how they fail to click with certain punters yet they never fail to take the money.

[Sonny Crockett]

its funny how they fail to click with certain punters yet they never fail to take the money.

Exactly..... This is too much of a common occurrence!!!!

[cueball]

At least the little bun fight between punters has taken the sting out of the negative review. She's been shielded well, I can see a free ham shank coming here, well, at least a little kiss

Damsel saved

[threechilliman]

This review and subsequent thread sounds very similar to my Mandy review in the East Mids. I booked her because of so many positives, turned up and got a very average punt. I'm actually now very wary about girls with vast numbers of positives.

It might also explain the PM's I received on holiday last week from boo boo asking if I'd seen her and left a -ve.......

tcm

[James999]

It might also explain the PM's I received on holiday last week from boo boo asking if I'd seen her and left a -ve.......

Perhaps she was hoping to bury this review, she is clearly very manipulative, happy to promote herself by posting on threads about other girls yet strangely quiet on this thread and the issues it highlights 

[vw]

This review and subsequent thread sounds very similar to my Mandy review in the East Mids. I booked her because of so many positives, turned up and got a very average punt. I'm actually now very wary about girls with vast numbers of positives.

It might also explain the PM's I received on holiday last week from boo boo asking if I'd seen her and left a -ve.......

tcm

So Yogi bears mate boo boo thought you were bangers ?

[cueball]

It might also explain the PM's I received on holiday last week from boo boo

Perhaps she was hoping to bury this review

boo boo thought you were bangers ?

Clear as mud to me, I'm confused. Help us out here boo boo

[vw]

Clear as mud to me, I'm confused. Help us out here boo boo

Are TCM and Bangers the same person ?   

Is DRM USH in disguise ?   

Will Cueball ever pot the brown in Bristol?   

[Sonny Crockett]

It might also explain the PM's I received on holiday last week from boo boo asking if I'd seen her and left a -ve.......

tcm

She asked if you saw her and left a neg????? Totally devious of her.

[cueball]

Will Cueball ever pot the brown in Bristol?   

Link?

[Bangers and Gash]

Are TCM and Bangers the same person ?   

Is DRM USH in disguise ?   

Will Cueball ever pot the brown in Bristol?   

External Link/Members Only

Eh, what? I'm confused and starting to feel nauseous ..... it's like I'm sitting on Rebecca's sofa once again. 

[threechilliman]

Are TCM and Bangers the same person ?   

I can assure you we're not.

The question took me by surprise, but only when I read this review did the thought occur to me. Some of the posts since my first on this thread do make her appear very like Mandy. Very similar indeed.

tcm

[smiths]

I can assure you we're not.

The question took me by surprise, but only when I read this review did the thought occur to me. Some of the posts since my first on this thread do make her appear very like Mandy. Very similar indeed.

tcm

I am somewhat puzzled, I assume you mean left -ve feedback on A/W for her as she would know you hadn't done a review on here as she can check that obviously.

[threechilliman]

I am somewhat puzzled, I assume you mean left -ve feedback on A/W for her as she would know you hadn't done a review on here as she can check that obviously.

Mandy wasn't booked via AW, all done via UKE. Rebecca I haven't seen, which is why her question puzzled me. I was asked the question by boo boo last week about whether we'd met as she was aware I'd left a less than complimentary review for a girl with 30 odd reviews. Seemed strange at the time and then I came across this review....

tcm

[smiths]

Mandy wasn't booked via AW, all done via UKE. Rebecca I haven't seen, which is why her question puzzled me. I was asked the question by boo boo last week about whether we'd met as she was aware I'd left a less than complimentary review for a girl with 30 odd reviews. Seemed strange at the time and then I came across this review....

tcm

Still doesn't make sense to me. Boo Boo who is Rebecca as she got banned using Rebecca twice if I recall correctly before being allowed to return as Boo Boo would know by checking your reviews if you had done one on her. IF she had been asking had you seen her but not done the review yet I can see a reason for contacting you. All sounds very odd to me but the point is a WG shouldn't be PMing punters asking such questions on here in my view.

I would of reported it to admin as I immediately did when Little Katie PMed me unsolicited trying to manipulate me then when I told her NOT to PM me again sending me another PM getting abusive which led to her banning.

[cueball]

Still don't stack up....

See reply no 7.. boo boo states she's been waiting for this review from bangers for two weeks

Tcm says she pm'd him last week asking if he's seen her.

I suspect another motive, I suspect a green one request to take the heat out off this one, get an established member to positively review, hey presto, everything is fixed and you're only as good as your last review.

It's all smelling a bit manipulative is this 

Still confused 

[Placebo88]

Mandy wasn't booked via AW, all done via UKE. Rebecca I haven't seen, which is why her question puzzled me. I was asked the question by boo boo last week about whether we'd met as she was aware I'd left a less than complimentary review for a girl with 30 odd reviews. Seemed strange at the time and then I came across this review....

tcm

As a member all she has to do to see her full list of reviews is click on the link directly below the review which shows that she has no other negative reviews , only one neutral.Maybe there was a clicking problem with the link ?

All reviews are attached to the usernames of the members who posted them , and multiple accounts are not allowed on UKP , so her question makes no sense at all.

Some escorts get way too absorbed with UKP ; it is meant to be for the benefit of punters.They can definitely learn from reading their reviews , but getting into all this conspiracy nonsense and intriguing - making a good job of your bookings will get better rewards on the site than wasting your time trying to control it with backstage manoeuvreing .

[Sonny Crockett]

This is just too bizarre.

[threechilliman]

Still doesn't make sense to me. Boo Boo who is Rebecca as she got banned using Rebecca twice if I recall correctly before being allowed to return as Boo Boo would know by checking your reviews if you had done one on her. IF she had been asking had you seen her but not done the review yet I can see a reason for contacting you. All sounds very odd to me but the point is a WG shouldn't be PMing punters asking such questions on here in my view.

I would of reported it to admin as I immediately did when Little Katie PMed me unsolicited trying to manipulate me then when I told her NOT to PM me again sending me another PM getting abusive which led to her banning.

At the time I didn't think anything of it as we had some comms about a potential booking a while back which came to nothing. It's only on reading this today that the penny dropped that there might have been other reasons (not sure what) for her contacting me. I think the initial question was 'Have I seen you?' - read into that what you will.

Who knows, but I won't be pursuing an appointment with her now.

tcm

[Johny Stone]

Maybe rebecca thought she has seen tcm? I mean she thought tcm is bangers? Hence why she pmed tcm asking if he saw her? Anyhow, it`s strange 

[threechilliman]

Still don't stack up....

See reply no 7.. boo boo states she's been waiting for this review from bangers for two weeks

Tcm says she pm'd him last week asking if he's seen her.

I suspect another motive, I suspect a green one request to take the heat out off this one, get an established member to positively review, hey presto, everything is fixed and you're only as good as your last review.

It's all smelling a bit manipulative is this 

Still confused 

You might just be right on that. Bit naughty if you ask me.

tcm

[threechilliman]

Maybe rebecca thought she has seen tcm? I mean she thought tcm is bangers? Hence why she pmed tcm asking if he saw her? Anyhow, it`s strange 

Yep, that's what I thought, once I'd read the thread. She saw bangers and thought it was me she'd seen. If we'd booked via AW or phone she wouldn't know who was who. Bizarre.

tcm

[cueball]

Yep, that's what I thought, once I'd read the thread. She saw bangers and thought it was me she'd seen. If we'd booked via AW or phone she wouldn't know who was who. Bizarre.

tcm

Narr, she wouldn't pm you last week tcm thinking it were you, she knew a fortnight ago that bangers was going to review their "car crash" meeting.

Still confused 

[smiths]

Still don't stack up....

See reply no 7.. boo boo states she's been waiting for this review from bangers for two weeks

Tcm says she pm'd him last week asking if he's seen her.

I suspect another motive, I suspect a green one request to take the heat out off this one, get an established member to positively review, hey presto, everything is fixed and you're only as good as your last review.

It's all smelling a bit manipulative is this 

Still confused 

Yes this sounds the most likely reason, check TCM hasn't seen her and left a review anywhere and if he hasn't try to manipulate him into doing a positive for her. Still that's a hell of a risk to take as his revelation of it shows, and thanks to him for posting about it on this thread.

[Bangers and Gash]

Yes this sounds the most likely reason, check TCM hasn't seen her and left a review anywhere and if he hasn't try to manipulate him into doing a positive for her. Still that's a hell of a risk to take as his revelation of it shows, and thanks to him for posting about it on this thread.

Bingo! 

..... because a review from someone like TCM with 75 reviews easily outweighs my neg. 

[EnglishRebecca121]

OH for godness sake i have no need to pm members looking for fake reviews ! i have 30 positives and 1 negative and plenty of work. i pmed tmc last week as i noticed on uke he had put a post out looking for sw girls then i saw him put up a post about seing someone with 30 +reviews being a bad punt i quote from the thread

"I've advertised 3 times on there seeking services. The first got a few responses and I picked one, which turned out to be a disappointing punt, despite her having 30 odd +ve reviews. The other two got no response whatsoever.

tcm

   

so i put 2 and 2 together and made 7 thinking he may have met me and had a dissapointing time and if that had been the case id like to ask him what i could have done better. i got it wrong as tmc told me via pm he hadnt seen me.

Simple as that !! blimey its madness some of the accusations flying around, bangers had a crap time and has the right to his review, this is going wayyyy of track now.

[cueball]

Simple as that !! blimey its madness some of the accusations flying around, bangers had a crap time and has the right to his review, this is going wayyyy of track now.

I'm glad you've replied, you know what we're like, if you leave us to our own devices we'll have you responsible for everything from bad weather to world famine.

Excellent comedy though

[James999]

thinking he may have met me and had a dissapointing time

DO many people have a disappointing time then? you tried to imply earlier in this thread that it was Bangers fault, now t turns out you know of other times where you've disappointed clients 

[Sonny Crockett]

OH for godness sake i have no need to pm members looking for fake reviews ! i have 30 positives and 1 negative and plenty of work. i pmed tmc last week as i noticed on uke he had put a post out looking for sw girls then i saw him put up a post about seing someone with 30 +reviews being a bad punt i quote from the thread

"I've advertised 3 times on there seeking services. The first got a few responses and I picked one, which turned out to be a disappointing punt, despite her having 30 odd +ve reviews. The other two got no response whatsoever.

tcm

   

so i put 2 and 2 together and made 7 thinking he may have met me and had a dissapointing time and if that had been the case id like to ask him what i could have done better. i got it wrong as tmc told me via pm he hadnt seen me.

Simple as that !! blimey its madness some of the accusations flying around, bangers had a crap time and has the right to his review, this is going wayyyy of track now.

Not necessary to do that I say. It would have been better keeping that to yourself instead of PM'ing him.

[flintstone]

I'm sure you have plenty of work ER, I've tried to book a few times.

At first this thread started putting me off, but now i'm more intrigued to see ER. 

[Roth]

I'm sure you have plenty of work ER, I've tried to book a few times.

At first this thread started putting me off, but now i'm more intrigued to see ER.

Hopefully you won't have a gash experience.