Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Annoying Feedback  (Read 2171 times)

Online Steely Dan

Surely all feedback - AW, UKP etc - should be taken with a pinch of salt? It takes all sorts and a scan through the reviews section on here shows time and again that one man's likes are another man's turn offs. Reviews are basically a waste of time in any format - films/food/football teams etc. The main purpose on here, as far as I can tell, is to vent spleen/brag/express puzzlement
So are you seriously thinking that AW bullshit and reviews on here are in the same league, and that reviews on here are basically a waste of time?  And that the purpose of this site is to vent etc?

That is a bit disrespectful and also not correct.  I am guessing that you really don't think either of these things, that you are trying to be funny or something. Are you?

Offline smiths

Surely all feedback - AW, UKP etc - should be taken with a pinch of salt? It takes all sorts and a scan through the reviews section on here shows time and again that one man's likes are another man's turn offs. Reviews are basically a waste of time in any format - films/food/football teams etc. The main purpose on here, as far as I can tell, is to vent spleen/brag/express puzzlement - always excepting any review I may leave, which is of course, an entirely factual portrayal of the event (real or imagined)!

Unless you are very lucky to find a WG to 'go steady' with (and/or frightened to experience women in all their multitude of guises), the odd bad punt is always going to be balanced by the occasional good punt - the rest fall in the middle. Half the attraction for me is finding out which.

Anyway - let's treat punters with respect as we are all well worth listening to and wow, without us, this totally amazing site would not be here.........

Depends who has left the feedback in my view so its not ALL for me anyway. There is NO comparison between a site run by low lifes who have NO interest in helping punters and UKP though. Reviews on here are most certainly not a waste of time but are and have been very useful to me and many other punters in reality.

Offline seward

I don't understand how AW and UKP can be compared as both being worthless UKP is a very useful guide and the feedback isn't just a one sided WGs appreciation fest it brings bad service into the light for proper scrutiny! If anyone thinks UKP reviews are worthless then book a negative WG review and tell us all the result I'll bet it won't be a happy outcome. So if you doubt this forums validity prove us wrong. I personally look forward to your report Clintstolemyface :unknown:

Offline clintstolemyface

My point is that reviews are a personal opinion and therefore inherently biassed. It doesn't matter what forum they are on and the very fact that some of you take such exception to being 'compared' with AW is exactly the issue - you have your bias and presumably AW patrons have theirs.

I find it rather comical that most of the WGs reviewed on here are AW girls yet you view AW reviews with disdain. I think the point of the original post was to vent spleen at the pointlessness of some of the descriptors used in the reviews. That's fair enough, but as a recent member of the site, I see that a number of reviews on here are equally as subjective - just because you don't use the words (treat her well etc) doesn't stop those sentiments coming through.

The difference here, is that there is a right to reply/demand more information/abuse the reviewer for being soft/abuse the reviewer for being the WGs pimp, based again on the readers interpretation of the review.

Incidentally, I was trying to be light hearted, rather than funny (maybe they are the same thing), but again, like WGs, my personal opinion on humour might be different to your's, which is what makes the world go round - and occasionally crash and burn. I've also noticed a propensity for people to get their heads blown off when they raise them above the parapet - which was another reason to lighten the post.

Ho Hum......
Banning reason: Posting like a prossie pretending to be a punter

Offline lkiu6433

Reviews in any type of service industry can oftentimes be invaluable especially if they are impartial, independent and the reviewer is relatively anonymous i.e. UKP.
UKP and AW are not even in the same league.

Why is it that I'm getting the impression you are a prossie that's perhaps had a fair few bad reviews on here masquerading as a punter.
Banning reason: Making threats

My point is that reviews are a personal opinion and therefore inherently biassed. It doesn't matter what forum they are on and the very fact that some of you take such exception to being 'compared' with AW is exactly the issue - you have your bias and presumably AW patrons have theirs.

I find it rather comical that most of the WGs reviewed on here are AW girls yet you view AW reviews with disdain. I think the point of the original post was to vent spleen at the pointlessness of some of the descriptors used in the reviews. That's fair enough, but as a recent member of the site, I see that a number of reviews on here are equally as subjective - just because you don't use the words (treat her well etc) doesn't stop those sentiments coming through.

The difference here, is that there is a right to reply/demand more information/abuse the reviewer for being soft/abuse the reviewer for being the WGs pimp, based again on the readers interpretation of the review.

Incidentally, I was trying to be light hearted, rather than funny (maybe they are the same thing), but again, like WGs, my personal opinion on humour might be different to your's, which is what makes the world go round - and occasionally crash and burn. I've also noticed a propensity for people to get their heads blown off when they raise them above the parapet - which was another reason to lighten the post.

Ho Hum......

Seems you should maybe try and be funny elsewhere like www.dicksareus.com

Offline 7x5

It's funny what an hour's sleep, some good weather, a good film, and a little adventure can do for one's mood. An eidetic memory and a series of strange events coupled with sleep deprivation can lead to many interpretations, but sometimes, just sometimes, it's just possible everything can be a coincidence and someone can roll the dice and get snake eyes several times in a row, albeit it isn't bloody likely.

I may be harsh at times but that is life, but don't mistake my tone for being disrespectful. The disrespectful thing to do here would be to lie through my teeth. You may have stopped respecting your parents when they slapped you as a child, but when you get older, you realised sometimes it needs to be done. You should be thankful it wasn't a kick in the teeth.

I may be new as a punter, but I'm not new to prostitutes. During my childhood, several of them were what you would call family friends. I've seen all of the shit they had to go through. When you meet a woman who only fucks just to make ends meet, they have one bad client who either slaps them about or rips out their earrings, leaving them both physically and mentally scarred for life, and then they turn to drugs just to get through it, then they have to keep fucking to pay for the drugs, and then get abused even more, it isn't very nice. And no, my mother wasn't a prostitute, she came from a good family and just fell in love with the wrong man and thought she could change him. But my piece of shit of a father was the drug dealer.

If it makes me a little bit weird because when I meet a WG and don't stick my tongue in their mouth, whip my cock out and say suck it bitch, then so be it. I'm weird. It's because I remember they're not just a pussy, they are a person too.

Don't get all buddy buddy now though, I'm not looking for a butt fucking brady bunch happily ever after. Just some understanding. :drinks:
Banning reason: When 3 long term members report you at the same time it's time to go.

Offline Leveve

'The difference here, is that there is a right to reply/demand more information/abuse the reviewer for being soft/abuse the reviewer for being the WGs pimp,'

Hence UKP reviews are self policed by forum members into being more credible, so there is a big difference between UKP and AW reviews...  :unknown:
« Last Edit: March 25, 2016, 07:55:10 PM by Leveve »

Offline smiths

My point is that reviews are a personal opinion and therefore inherently biassed. It doesn't matter what forum they are on and the very fact that some of you take such exception to being 'compared' with AW is exactly the issue - you have your bias and presumably AW patrons have theirs.

I find it rather comical that most of the WGs reviewed on here are AW girls yet you view AW reviews with disdain. I think the point of the original post was to vent spleen at the pointlessness of some of the descriptors used in the reviews. That's fair enough, but as a recent member of the site, I see that a number of reviews on here are equally as subjective - just because you don't use the words (treat her well etc) doesn't stop those sentiments coming through.

The difference here, is that there is a right to reply/demand more information/abuse the reviewer for being soft/abuse the reviewer for being the WGs pimp, based again on the readers interpretation of the review.

Incidentally, I was trying to be light hearted, rather than funny (maybe they are the same thing), but again, like WGs, my personal opinion on humour might be different to your's, which is what makes the world go round - and occasionally crash and burn. I've also noticed a propensity for people to get their heads blown off when they raise them above the parapet - which was another reason to lighten the post.

Ho Hum......

Yes ho hum and over and out from you. :thumbsdown:

Offline Nagilum

'The difference here, is that there is a right to reply/demand more information/abuse the reviewer for being soft/abuse the reviewer for being the WGs pimp,'

Hence UKP reviews are self policed by forum members into being more credible, so there is a big difference between UKP and AW reviews...  :unknown:

Agreed.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2016, 01:32:55 AM by Nagilum »

Mate, I may be smarter and nicer than most people, but I don't often have time for pleasantries which hide sincere thoughts or the patience to speak to people as if they were a child. I'm honest and blunt, to save time I swear a lot, which pisses a lot of people off. As such my intentions are often misunderstood.

It should have gone without saying that when I was talking about feedback, I was talking about AdultWork feedback, when I was talking about reviews, I was talking about UKP reviews. The two are clearly not the same thing, especially when AdultWork refers to their reviews as field reports.

Your post irked me somewhat as it is quoting almost word for word many recent AW feedbacks of a popular WG I have seen on many occasions, of such many of the AW feedbacks were my own. More to the point, your behavior is that of a previously banned member known to use several accounts to try to drum up business or fuck people over on their white knight crusade. Cliche or not, you do not get to decide what one person has to say, think or feel about another though you are well within you right to grumble about it, and I'm well wiithin mine to not give a fuck.

Now it may be just due to stress, I could be being paranoid, or on the rare occasion I could be mistaken, if which case I am sorry, but it could be that the aforementioned person is dumber than a second coat of paint given as they call people from their work telephones without using a withheld number, replicate a similar posting style and strike up seemingly innocuous but actually quite specific conversations out of the blue.

As for 'treat them nice' - Buddha says don't be a cunt. As someone who grew up in a household with domestic violence and had relatives who have suffered emotional abuse, I find the slapping and such to be somewhat disrespectful. Any man who hits, forces, coerces, stalks, or otherwise negatively manipulates a woman or treats than as anything less than a person is no man in my book.

Shame you didn't add short and to the point as one of your many qualities.

Offline 7x5

Shame you didn't add short and to the point as one of your many qualities.

Everything is relative. I'm used to writing with much more depth and detail than the average person can be bothered to read. It was as short and to the point as I could make it without being lost in translation.
Banning reason: When 3 long term members report you at the same time it's time to go.

Everything is relative. I'm used to writing with much more depth and detail than the average person can be bothered to read. It was as short and to the point as I could make it without being lost in translation.

Well, thank you for your brevity so we plebs didn't get lost in your verbosity.

My personal hate is 'wow!'  The number of times this word appears is ridiculous. Who says that in real life?
What makes me suspicious about AW feedback is that the same words and phrases appear time and time again, as though they are written by the same people.
Anyone who believes a word of AW feedback is  :wacko:
Agree entirely. I noticed one woman on AW who had about five reviews, four of which began with "Wow!" (And all ostensibly from different people. ) Funny that. Or is it just that people feel they ought to put a few brief words of useless crap, and "wow" sums things up in a suitably meaningless way?

Offline nike

Everything is relative. I'm used to writing with much more depth and detail than the average person can be bothered to read. It was as short and to the point as I could make it without being lost in translation.

Did someone get out of the wrong side of the bed? :timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout:

Everything is relative. I'm used to writing with much more depth and detail than the average person can be bothered to read. It was as short and to the point as I could make it without being lost in translation.


Has anyone else sussed our patronising, condescending friend 7x5 shares a striking resemblance to the banned member who called himself Terry7incher? He would always post wordy bollocks and make reference to him making it easy for other members to read.

Offline 7x5

Did someone get out of the wrong side of the bed? :timeout: :timeout: :timeout: :timeout:

I'm not sure I have been on the right side for the best part of a month, hence my paranoia has probably been running rampant. That is not to say I wasn't right to have my little rant, or that my points were invalid, or that it was possible the OP could have started the topic on account on someone other than me.

From the feedback quoted, I got the impression they did.

"If Carlsberg made women they would have surely broken the mould when they made Pattie. A truly natural beauty, inside as well as out. One of a kind."
"couldnt make it but i shall book her when im free next"
"In 30mins she is good, in 1hr she is great. I had to take up swimming just to keep up! Treat her well guys as time spent with Pattie is of the very best"
"understanding that i couldnt come due to work. i look forward to seeing her :) xxx"

The OP never did get back to confirm or deny any of the specifics, just some spurious political spin before they fucked off somewhere else. Not that it matters anymore.


Has anyone else sussed our patronising, condescending friend 7x5 shares a striking resemblance to the banned member who called himself Terry7incher? He would always post wordy bollocks and make reference to him making it easy for other members to read.

I'm an analyst. I don't know how to deal with people or their feelings, nor do I very much care normally so long as shit gets done. If I have to break things down so that a minority of people are not left behind then so be it. My name isn't Terry, my punting name was never Terry, and my username isn't a reference to the size of my dick. It does get bigger, but sometimes it is on my head :P
« Last Edit: March 29, 2016, 09:14:48 AM by 7x5 »
Banning reason: When 3 long term members report you at the same time it's time to go.

Online dubs

You can suggest what you like op. I like the phrase "sucks likes a Dyson" and your opinion isn't going to change that.

To me, that just means she has a breakdown halfway through the job.



I'm an analyst. I don't know how to deal with people or their feelings, nor do I very much care normally so long as shit gets done. If I have to break things down so that a minority of people are not left behind then so be it. My name isn't Terry, my punting name was never Terry, and my username isn't a reference to the size of my dick. It does get bigger, but sometimes it is on my head :P

In which case you will understand when I say that your social ineptitude is obvious and I think we already knew your dick is your most prominent facial figure.

Offline 7x5

In which case you will understand when I say that your social ineptitude is obvious and I think we already knew your dick is your most prominent facial figure.

I am actually way more polite in person, and no, that is not because I am a keyboard warrior - I rant at people in public too, but with the benefit of tone and a giggle or a cheeky smile my words are given proper context.

Re-reading the OP's reply, I'm actually struggling to deal with the quoted italics on the default colour theme. If I could change it to black and white that would help a lot. My initial reply was via phone and I didn't look at it since. You have my apologies on the accusations of being an adversary, Fagin Again, but not on the principles of freedom of speech.

I just really need some good quality sleep and hopefully I'll get some sanity back.

And I'm glad you have noticed my features madeinwales56. In that case, fancy kissing it better? :lol:
« Last Edit: March 29, 2016, 10:05:38 AM by 7x5 »
Banning reason: When 3 long term members report you at the same time it's time to go.

Humour is not your forte either.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)