Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Annoying Feedback  (Read 2176 times)

Offline Fagin Again

I think I've read somewhere on this site comments about the kind of Adult Work feedback practices that are silly and annoying.  Such as writing, "Treat her well, guys!"  (So does that mean that an escort who isn't as attractive or as good in bed as hoped should be slapped around the face and have their kitchen spoons stolen...?)

Likewise, "If Carlsberg made escorts" and "Sucks like a Dyson" have, I suggest, run their course.

Also I'm always puzzled by, "I went around for the rest of the day with a smile on my face."  People who go around smiling all day look half-witted, and run the risk of being sectioned.

But the greatest feedback crime of all is people who leave feedback for bookings that never took place!

Positive feedback, plus "She had to cancel, but sounds nice. Hope to see soon."  Grrrrrrr.

And the worst variation on the above greatest crime...?

When a girl leaves a neutral feedback score (but polite text) for a meeting that didn't take place because the girl herself cancelled!  Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Adult ... Work ... feedback ... should ... only ... ever ... be ... for ... a ... sex ... session ... that ... actually ... took ... place ... !

Banning reason: Idiot

AW feedback is fine as it is.

I just ignore it and don't care !

Offline smiths

I think I've read somewhere on this site comments about the kind of Adult Work feedback practices that are silly and annoying.  Such as writing, "Treat her well, guys!"  (So does that mean that an escort who isn't as attractive or as good in bed as hoped should be slapped around the face and have their kitchen spoons stolen...?)

Likewise, "If Carlsberg made escorts" and "Sucks like a Dyson" have, I suggest, run their course.

Also I'm always puzzled by, "I went around for the rest of the day with a smile on my face."  People who go around smiling all day look half-witted, and run the risk of being sectioned.

But the greatest feedback crime of all is people who leave feedback for bookings that never took place!

Positive feedback, plus "She had to cancel, but sounds nice. Hope to see soon."  Grrrrrrr.

And the worst variation on the above greatest crime...?

When a girl leaves a neutral feedback score (but polite text) for a meeting that didn't take place because the girl herself cancelled!  Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

Adult ... Work ... feedback ... should ... only ... ever ... be ... for ... a ... sex ... session ... that ... actually ... took ... place ... !

A/W feedback is fucking useless in the main in my view and very often cant be trusted but seeing as A/W is run by low lifes it comes as no surprise to me.

Its just fortunate to punters who know about UKP that it exists so they can locate good WGs and avoid bad ones.

I do groan when they do a proper field report and under the "physical" heading they just say: Looked gorgeous in a black dress. I'm like, what!? Is she tall, short, fat, skinny, busty, leggy, pretty....... Who gives a monkey's about the flipping dress?????? And as for the "what happened next is private" line - words fail me!

Offline Moresomes

" I wont go into details"   :dash: :dash:

Offline Roth

A gentleman never tells ....  :scare: :scare: :dash: :dash:

I do groan when they do a proper field report and under the "physical" heading they just say: Looked gorgeous in a black dress. I'm like, what!? Is she tall, short, fat, skinny, busty, leggy, pretty....

I like it when they say shit like ''she looked amazing, everybody in the high end restaurant stared as we walked in.'' Yeah, they were probably thinking ''look at that grey old bloke and his pro$$ie date''  :D

Offline Roth

I like it when they say shit like ''she looked amazing, everybody in the high end restaurant stared as we walked in.'' Yeah, they were probably thinking ''look at that grey old bloke and his pro$$ie date''  :D

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline Sonny Crockett

I just hate AW feedback these days.
Banning reason: Troll

"Treat her well." Is she a fucking pet?

Offline Chuckman

"Treat her like a princess". What, take her for a drive in Paris?

You can suggest what you like op. I like the phrase "sucks likes a Dyson" and your opinion isn't going to change that.

Offline 7x5

Blah blah blah

I never did see the appeal of fuckwits writing positives for events that never even happened. Positive for what? :dash:

I'm glad you enjoyed having a rant at some of the feedback I left for meets that did happen though, but if you don't like them, you know what you can do right? :lol: I write them as much for my benefit as the WG's and I write my reviews for the benefit of others. If I were to bitch and moan, I'd say with all this talk, where the fuck are your reviews? :unknown:

I had feedback left to use up and I had to think of something else to put there. In fact I only recently noticed I can delete the booking request which removes the leave feedback option altogether. I'll bear that in mind and leave less of them for repeat visits in future. But you ain't gonna stop me getting a little creative from time to time, sorry, but I'm not sorry :hi:
« Last Edit: March 22, 2016, 06:11:03 AM by 7x5 »
Banning reason: When 3 long term members report you at the same time it's time to go.

Online NIK

My personal hate is 'wow!'  The number of times this word appears is ridiculous. Who says that in real life?
What makes me suspicious about AW feedback is that the same words and phrases appear time and time again, as though they are written by the same people.
Anyone who believes a word of AW feedback is  :wacko:

Offline Henry 1X

From the other side, I used to get things like "great oral technique, had me cumming in minutes"  :D
Nowadays, it tends to be more often than not "nice respectful gentleman, would see again"  :(

It's all bollox on there anyway  :dash:
Banning reason: Previously banned (Yorkie44)

My personal hate is 'wow!'  The number of times this word appears is ridiculous. Who says that in real life?

Mine is 'amazing!!' I see it used all the time, even here on UKP. I've met some good pro$$ies, but never one that deserved such an accolade. To be called 'amazing' she'd have to pull a bouquet of flowers out her pussy and leave a damp patch on the bed that accurately resembles the Turin Shroud.

Offline Fagin Again

I'm glad you enjoyed having a rant at some of the feedback I left for meets that did happen though, but if you don't like them, you know what you can do right? I write them as much for my benefit as the WG's and I write my reviews for the benefit of others. If I were to bitch and moan, I'd say with all this talk, where the fuck are your reviews?

My comments were purely about feedback on Adult Work – not feedback here on UKP – and in any case I was certainly not targeting any individual.  As far as I know, I've never read any of your UKP reviews.

My “less important” point was that there are certain clichés that appear over-frequently in AW feedback.  A number of the people who’ve posted on this thread seem to agree.

My “main” point, as per your comment ...

I never did see the appeal of fuckwits writing positives for events that never even happened. Positive for what? 

… related to the pointlessness of people leaving comments for meetings that are cancelled by mutual consent.

So at least we agree on something!
« Last Edit: March 22, 2016, 08:19:52 AM by Fagin Again »
Banning reason: Idiot

Offline James999

Often the reason no details is that it's the pro$$ie writing th ereview and wants to promote herself but scared of tripping herself up  :wacko:

A gentleman never tells .... 

" I wont go into details"   

Offline 7x5

My comments were purely about feedback on Adult Work

Mate, I may be smarter and nicer than most people, but I don't often have time for pleasantries which hide sincere thoughts or the patience to speak to people as if they were a child. I'm honest and blunt, to save time I swear a lot, which pisses a lot of people off. As such my intentions are often misunderstood.

It should have gone without saying that when I was talking about feedback, I was talking about AdultWork feedback, when I was talking about reviews, I was talking about UKP reviews. The two are clearly not the same thing, especially when AdultWork refers to their reviews as field reports.

Your post irked me somewhat as it is quoting almost word for word many recent AW feedbacks of a popular WG I have seen on many occasions, of such many of the AW feedbacks were my own. More to the point, your behavior is that of a previously banned member known to use several accounts to try to drum up business or fuck people over on their white knight crusade. Cliche or not, you do not get to decide what one person has to say, think or feel about another though you are well within you right to grumble about it, and I'm well wiithin mine to not give a fuck.

Now it may be just due to stress, I could be being paranoid, or on the rare occasion I could be mistaken, if which case I am sorry, but it could be that the aforementioned person is dumber than a second coat of paint given as they call people from their work telephones without using a withheld number, replicate a similar posting style and strike up seemingly innocuous but actually quite specific conversations out of the blue.

As for 'treat them nice' - Buddha says don't be a cunt. As someone who grew up in a household with domestic violence and had relatives who have suffered emotional abuse, I find the slapping and such to be somewhat disrespectful. Any man who hits, forces, coerces, stalks, or otherwise negatively manipulates a woman or treats than as anything less than a person is no man in my book.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2016, 12:43:22 PM by 7x5 »
Banning reason: When 3 long term members report you at the same time it's time to go.

Offline Still-alive

To be called 'amazing' she'd have to pull a bouquet of flowers out her pussy

Sticky Vicky in Benidorm does that every night!
Banning reason: Constant attacks on UKP on UKE

Offline Ben4454


I think the most humorous feedback i've ever seen is a punter claiming that a working girl changed his life..
Banning reason: Ignored admin warning after temporary banning and signed up to malicious troll anti-UKP site

Offline Fagin Again

Mate, I may be smarter and nicer than most people, but I don't often have time for pleasantries which hide sincere thoughts or the patience to speak to people as if they were a child. I'm honest and blunt, to save time I swear a lot, which pisses a lot of people off. As such my intentions are often misunderstood.

It should have gone without saying that when I was talking about feedback, I was talking about AdultWork feedback, when I was talking about reviews, I was talking about UKP reviews. The two are clearly not the same thing, especially when AdultWork refers to their reviews as field reports.

Your post irked me somewhat as it is quoting almost word for word many recent AW feedbacks of a popular WG I have seen on many occasions, of such many of the AW feedbacks were my own. More to the point, your behavior is that of a previously banned member known to use several accounts to try to drum up business or fuck people over on their white knight crusade. Cliche or not, you do not get to decide what one person has to say, think or feel about another though you are well within you right to grumble about it, and I'm well wiithin mine to not give a fuck.

Now it may be just due to stress, I could be being paranoid, or on the rare occasion I could be mistaken, if which case I am sorry, but it could be that the aforementioned person is dumber than a second coat of paint given as they call people from their work telephones without using a withheld number, replicate a similar posting style and strike up seemingly innocuous but actually quite specific conversations out of the blue.

As for 'treat them nice' - Buddha says don't be a cunt. As someone who grew up in a household with domestic violence and had relatives who have suffered emotional abuse, I find the slapping and such to be somewhat disrespectful. Any man who hits, forces, coerces, stalks, or otherwise negatively manipulates a woman or treats than as anything less than a person is no man in my book.

Gosh.

In my posts here I always aim to be general ... polite ... and careful ... because there are a few quite fierce people here, and, like most people, I try to avoid provoking ferocity.

To answer your points.

It should have gone without saying that when I was talking about feedback, I was talking about AdultWork feedback, when I was talking about reviews, I was talking about UKP reviews. The two are clearly not the same thing, especially when AdultWork refers to their reviews as field reports.
I misunderstood.  I thought you were referring to "feedback" / reviews on here.  Mea culpa.

Your post irked me somewhat as it is quoting almost word for word many recent AW feedbacks of a popular WG I have seen on many occasions, of such many of the AW feedbacks were my own.
I've just checked your two reviews on UKP, and see they both relate to the north, so I assume that applies also to your AW feedbacks.  I live near the south coast.  It's therefore inconceivable that I've ever read any AW feedbacks you've left, unless either you travel in my area, or the particular escort you mention sometimes works in my area, or both.

More to the point, your behavior is that of a previously banned member known to use several accounts to try to drum up business or fuck people over on their white knight crusade.
I can assure you that this is the one and only profile I have ever had on UKP.

Cliche or not, you do not get to decide what one person has to say, think or feel about another though you are well within you right to grumble about it, and I'm well wiithin mine to not give a fuck.
Fair point.  Free speech all round.  However I couched  my remarks in mild and light-hearted terms, and I'm a little taken aback that they have been taken so personally.

Now it may be just due to stress, I could be being paranoid, or on the rare occasion I could be mistaken, if which case I am sorry, but it could be that the aforementioned person is dumber than a second coat of paint given as they call people from their work telephones without using a withheld number, replicate a similar posting style and strike up seemingly innocuous but actually quite specific conversations out of the blue.
I repeat that I am who I am, and haven't got the time, energy or temperament for the kind of contortions in which your "adversary" indulges.

As for 'treat them nice' - Buddha says don't be a cunt. As someone who grew up in a household with domestic violence and had relatives who have suffered emotional abuse, I find the slapping and such to be somewhat disrespectful. Any man who hits, forces, coerces, stalks, or otherwise negatively manipulates a woman or treats than as anything less than a person is no man in my book.
Here, with respect, I think you've missed my point.  I know I'm not the only person here who dislikes "Treat her well, guys!" in feedback.  I would assume that all UKP members automatically treat every girl they meet with respect and decency, even if the girl turns out to be less attractive or less skilled than they might have hoped.  The implication of "Treat her well, guys!" is that, unless we were given this encouragement, we might not treat her well – or, alternatively, that we should treat her better than we treat other, lesser girls who don't "deserve" to be treated as well because they don't give as much satisfaction.
Banning reason: Idiot

Offline 7x5

I'm stuck replying on my phone so I can't see exactly what I'm replying to but I'll try to cover the gist of it.

Despite my obvious lack of patience to converse with any form of eloquence, anyone who ever knew me and read my words in my voice would know I'm disgruntled at best. If I were fierce, you would know all about it! Passionate is probably more appropriate.

As for taking it personally, given as you are catching me at a bad time with some very specific quotes, it is hard not to.

I'd certainly hope the majority of punters would treat WG's as human beings, but the simple fact is many don't, so yes, the knuckle draggers do reminding from time to time, and no, there is no such thing as a lesser woman, only different and stating treat them well will not necessarily infer that there are, but it might imply that anyone who doesn't may find themselves in a spot of bother.

In the grand sceheme of things, a friendly reminder will likely do more good than harm.

Take from that what you will.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2016, 07:40:01 PM by 7x5 »
Banning reason: When 3 long term members report you at the same time it's time to go.

Offline ramrodronnie

AW feedback is fine as it is.

I just ignore it and don't care !


I also ignore most of it. And a lot of it is best ignored, and a waste of valuable time reading.

But I agree with the OP. AW FB isn't fine at all. A great deal of it is deceptive, and lies. But when any new punter joins he's believing everything he reads. But to give a WG a Positive FB if they haven't even seen is unforgivable!
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline clintstolemyface

Surely all feedback - AW, UKP etc - should be taken with a pinch of salt? It takes all sorts and a scan through the reviews section on here shows time and again that one man's likes are another man's turn offs. Reviews are basically a waste of time in any format - films/food/football teams etc. The main purpose on here, as far as I can tell, is to vent spleen/brag/express puzzlement - always excepting any review I may leave, which is of course, an entirely factual portrayal of the event (real or imagined)!

Unless you are very lucky to find a WG to 'go steady' with (and/or frightened to experience women in all their multitude of guises), the odd bad punt is always going to be balanced by the occasional good punt - the rest fall in the middle. Half the attraction for me is finding out which.

Anyway - let's treat punters with respect as we are all well worth listening to and wow, without us, this totally amazing site would not be here.........

Banning reason: Posting like a prossie pretending to be a punter


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)