Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Tosspot Field Reports on AdultWork  (Read 2036 times)

Offline ickydicky

Kno what gets right on my tits? :angry: those arsehole tosspot wankers who write fluffy field reports on AW saying "I'm not going to go in to details about what went on between the lady and me blah blah bleeding blah" for fux sake pal she is a hoor she flogs are fanny she is not some blushing virgin. :angry: ten minutes after this arsehole has left she will have someone elses cock up her fanny, or her arse or in her mouth. thats what hoors do and what we pay them to do. :dash:

thats why this site is invaluable and why the aw feedback/field report system fucken useless :diablo:.
Banning reason: Previously banned (stevieshake)


Offline ickydicky

Calm down dear!

aye bad for the heart but sure you know what i mean and probably agree.
Banning reason: Previously banned (stevieshake)

Offline chico1000

It appears that line is must come off a tick list it's abused so often.  8 out 10 decent prossies welcome a bit of detail in the field reports because a, it sounds genuine and b, it's a better advert/endorsement for them.  Agree there either delusional or lazy.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline ickydicky

It appears that line is must come off a tick list it's abused so often.  8 out 10 decent prossies welcome a bit of detail in the field reports because a, it sounds genuine and b, it's a better advert/endorsement for them.  Agree there either delusional or lazy.

aye if a hoor fucks well or gives a great bj or takes a length up the chocolate box then she will want it known so those who want to fuck her, be blown or slip a length up the arse know that she does it. delusional just about sums up these wankers who really think the hoor is bashful about what she does.
Banning reason: Previously banned (stevieshake)

Offline RandyF

Kno what gets right on my tits? :angry: those arsehole tosspot wankers who write fluffy field reports on AW saying "I'm not going to go in to details

Careful. More than a few of those same gents, are also members here  :)  It's all about currying favour with the hoor anyway, it's not for the readers benefit.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline auldie63

aye if a hoor fucks well or gives a great bj or takes a length up the chocolate box then she will want it known so those who want to fuck her, be blown or slip a length up the arse know that she does it. delusional just about sums up these wankers who really think the hoor is bashful about what she does.
Not always, even since the comparitively short time I have been on here I have met a couple of WGs who have specifically told me not to post anything about them on here or any other such site, even though the post would have been positive.
Obviously for that reason I will not be posting their details.

Offline Roger De Her

Not always, even since the comparitively short time I have been on here I have met a couple of WGs who have specifically told me not to post anything about them on here or any other such site, even though the post would have been positive.
Obviously for that reason I will not be posting their details.


+1

Given that they are my Service Provider, the value of my stock with the WG is much more important to me than that value with other readers of a (mostly)?anonymous discussion Forum.

AW feedback performs a number of different functions,  and different WGs have differing views on this issue too.

Roj
Banning reason: Complaining about thread warning punters about criminal prossie

Offline chico1000

There is definately a few good ones that want to fly under the radar on here.  No wonder when you get one or two pricks who troll ever review without any real experience or any justification to talk about.
Banning reason: Troll

Offline auldie63

AW feedback could be written by the brothers Grimm for all the truth in it usually.

AW feedback could be written by the brothers Grimm for all the truth in it usually.

agree. Is it a rule that the field report have to be positive?

Offline JazzMan

I don't use AW much through the booking system.
The last time I did the girl ask me to give her a positive review and she would give me one.
So we both just cut & paste some crap from other reviews.
I don't know if this is the normal practice?
Banning reason: Slagging off membership

Offline Courtney

So we both just cut & paste some crap from other reviews.
I don't know if this is the normal practice?

It wouldn't surprise me if it is the normal practice....there is a lot of samey, cringeworthy, cheesy, embarrassing nonsense.

I've never done a FR and never intend to. A FB is enough from me. :hi:

Offline Burnside

After reading this i went on to my profile to see about a field report (not that i want to do one), but get more of a idea of what is required.
there was 2 questions on there that was a bit stupid.
1 Q. It says did the escort genuinely enjoy the date.
   A. She is a prossie that get's fucked for a living, how many folk can say they go to work to enjoy it, as i would imagine there looking at the pound note signs once a booking is confirmed, not fantastic I've got Johnnie Walker coming next. :sarcastic:

2 It states did you get the g.f.e you was expecting, not all of us are going for g.f.e, and won't apply to all, this is just a way to boost the prossies profile, as the punter wont get anything extra for it, and i will do feedback now and again, but stuff the field reports where the sun doesn't shine. :(
« Last Edit: March 25, 2016, 09:58:06 AM by Burnside »
Banning reason: Previously banned (the good 1) aka Jamie Eldridge

Offline Andy1967


+1

Given that they are my Service Provider, the value of my stock with the WG is much more important to me than that value with other readers of a (mostly)?anonymous discussion Forum.

AW feedback performs a number of different functions,  and different WGs have differing views on this issue too.

Roj

Agree while they may be wg I still respect them same as they respect what I want. Manners cost nothing.

Kno what gets right on my tits? :angry: those arsehole tosspot wankers who write fluffy field reports on AW saying "I'm not going to go in to details about what went on between the lady and me blah blah bleeding blah" for fux sake pal she is a hoor she flogs are fanny she is not some blushing virgin. :angry: ten minutes after this arsehole has left she will have someone elses cock up her fanny, or her arse or in her mouth. thats what hoors do and what we pay them to do. :dash:

thats why this site is invaluable and why the aw feedback/field report system fucken useless :diablo:.
Ickydicky does a make a valid point that AW feedback is so devoid of useful content as to be pointless. However, I do not understand why he needs to express himself in such infantile and abusive terms. His choice, I suppose.

Having checked the AW FB for the now notorious Lucy UK of Dunfermline, I was stunned by the actual encounter which ranked among my worst ever punts. Yet the FB was positive, nay, glowing mostly.
Aw FB is marginally useful in weeding out unreliable WGs, however. As we know, nothing pisses a punter off more than than being let down, especially at the last moment; this elicits a refreshingly honest angry response.

Offline ickydicky

didn't mention feedback  - which is fb. what gets on my tips, as i said, was Field Reports - FR - which say "what happened between the lady and me shall remain private". Naw! we want to know so we can decide if she gives what we want. :diablo:
Banning reason: Previously banned (stevieshake)

Sorry, Ickydicky; I didn't read your post carefully. Yes, I agree.
The only useful info from some of these coy Field Reports is whether you can get parked outside the location! Fat lot of good in the greater scheme of things.

Offline chico1000

Another thing that annoys me is when punters just type characters or repeat words just to meet the word count. Why go to the effort of raising a fr in the first place without putting some detail in.
Banning reason: Troll

Another thing that annoys me is when punters just type characters or repeat words just to meet the word count. Why go to the effort of raising a fr in the first place without putting some detail in.

That's one thing I have NEVER been accused of  :D :lol:

Offline Burnside

Another thing that annoys me is when punters just type characters or repeat words just to meet the word count. Why go to the effort of raising a fr in the first place without putting some detail in.
+ 1 , and not much point in doing a negative field report as the prossie won't show it by the looks of it.
I suppose you could  always like it and share it on social media  :sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
Banning reason: Previously banned (the good 1) aka Jamie Eldridge

Offline bensonhedges20

Theres a minimum word count if i recall.

Its why you get people giving into detail as initially they didnt want to



Banning reason: Troll

Offline RandyF

The best people to ask, about these horrific self indigent AW field reports would be the writers!

Doesn't look like the Scottish culprits are going to enter this thread though eh.  :D :lol:  They didn't bank on there 'aren't I adorable' masterpieces making them all so easily identifiable did they  :)
Banning reason: Troll

Offline Rangerslad

I gave that nutcase english and busty negative feedback and she in turn wrote a whole load of shite about me on my feedback which has put some girls off me booking with them even though I have loads of positive feedback from well established girls.

Offline RandyF

I gave that nutcase english and busty negative feedback and she in turn wrote a whole load of shite about me on my feedback which has put some girls off me booking with them even though I have loads of positive feedback from well established girls.

Yeah unfortunately that's how it works mate.  You'll only get some vindictive slag shitting all over your feedback, if your ever even remotely honest.  Totally worthless.
Banning reason: Troll




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)