Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Indigo Rose - London Tour  (Read 6080 times)


12 review(s) for IndigoRose (8 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Online smiths

She does seem a strange one she gets very catty towards other girls me including when try to give helpful advice, she talks like someone in the 40s and seems to have a very odd attitude towards other working girls which i really do not like

She has a bad attitude towards people who challenge her posts, then she goes for the sympathy vote by saying how many people hate her, actually using the word hate in a post the other day.

Good point about her talking like someone in their 40s or trying to, indeed she does BUT her immaturity shines through when she makes a comment like, I have debated with people smarter than you, designed of course as a put down and to make herself seem smart. Thing is she IS a WG and all her talk cant disguise the fact her reviews on here are pretty poor overall, as I said all talk and bluster. She needs to up her game or her rep on here will become really bad.

Offline hendrix

That sounds like a bloody awful time OP, she's never been on my "to do" list with her limited services anyway. Hope your next punt is a lot better! :hi:

Sorry you had such an unsatisfying punt.
I was about to see her when she confirmed all services were covered.
I am an Owo and ideally a Cim man too, so politely declined.
Missed a bullet there from the sound of it  :hi:

Offline lkiu6433

There is a huge difference between letting the punter take the lead in a booking (something all decent prossies do anyway regardless of style or inexperience) and being a lazy unenthusiastic and unskilled service provider.

Based on all the evidence out there (particularly her horrible posting style on UKE) it's clear to see that she just doesn't have the skills or head for this job. Clearly out of her depth.
Banning reason: Making threats

There is a huge difference between letting the punter take the lead in a booking (something all decent prossies do anyway regardless of style or inexperience) and being a lazy unenthusiastic and unskilled service provider.

Based on all the evidence out there (particularly her horrible posting style on UKE) it's clear to see that she just doesn't have the skills or head for this job. Clearly out of her depth.

Unfortunately have discounted the reviews of anyone that gave her a positive months ago, when you read shit like this from someone that gave her a positive review !

needed the basics explained such as having to wank me to get me hard enough to pop on a condom

WTF

Offline CelticWarrior2

She has also tweeted yesterday about the cleanliness of her latest client, seemingly in response to this review.


One of the talents of a decent WG is that she can read her client's needs, and adjust her service accordingly (within her own boundaries).


She seems to think she can respond to a fair UKP review by providing a counter argument just like she does with comments on UKE and probably as a sex worker activist responding to the latest anti-prostitution articles in the news.  It doesn't work like that love.

+1
Excuses are like arseholes, everybody has one and they all stink. Her attitude has stunk for a while and I'm surprised she gets any trade.
Banning reason: Trolling another member + Reposting despite post deletion


What does UKE mean? UKE is short for www.UKEscorting.com

Online Cunning Punt

I am not usually a fan of WGs commenting on this site because, apart from the fact it is a punters' forum, they usually make stupid comments and add nothing to the discussion.

However, I welcome the two on this thread because this girl is making unjustified, inaccurate and potentially damaging comments about the OP.

If you had some sympathy with this girl before, then you won't after reading the self-justifying bullshit on her blog.

+1
Excuses are like arseholes, everybody has one and they all stink. Her attitude has stunk for a while and I'm surprised she gets any trade.

She operates from Plymouth, so not much competition, and her fees, while more than many of us would pay, are fairly average.

In addition, let's be frank, she gets trade largely because she is a teenager and a lot of guys like shagging younger girls and many don't really care about service.
 

Offline CelticWarrior2

She operates from Plymouth, so not much competition, and her fees, while more than many of us would pay, are fairly average.

In addition, let's be frank, she gets trade largely because she is a teenager and a lot of guys like shagging younger girls and many don't really care about service.

I'm aware of her credentials from researching the Exeter (where she does outcalls) scene as I visit there regularly for work; it is a punting wasteland - far worse than Plymouth. I can understand how she makes a living in the SW but there are enough young, fit and talented SP's in London willing to provide a decent service without her bringing her self opinionated freak show on tour here which sounds increasingly more like a convoluted psychology experiment in human behaviour for her studies rather than a genuinely vocational and commercial pursuit.
Banning reason: Trolling another member + Reposting despite post deletion

Sorry to hear this was a shit punt but I've only got a little sympathy for the OP. This was hardly a. TOFTT punt, one of UKPs more prolific members had made it very clear what you get with this SP and she's said as much herself. I have avoided booking her for precisely the reason that I need some give and take even if I have to take the lead a bit. Once more, sorry that this was money badly spent but what's the point of a review site if you ignore the reviews?

Offline Andyply

Unfortunately have discounted the reviews of anyone that gave her a positive months ago, when you read shit like this from someone that gave her a positive review !

WTF

It would help the ukp community if you didn't just quote snippets VW - I for one will NEVER defend poor service but PLEASE quote me fully buddy or you'll be the one accused of deceiving others  :thumbsup:  I said others would find this infuriating but being a dirty bastard I kinda enjoyed this as I knew she was inexperienced, new, 19 and therefore exactly what I was after at the time, as I HAD actually seen her before.  I'm pretty pissed with you that you'll twist words to backup your own judgement - I'd rather deal with facts like my hero Rafa Benetiz as it helps others on here and allows them not to waster their hard earned money.  I''ll show you how...
Quote
Prossies for everyone really, we all have different needs.
  your quote referring to her  = with nothing left out - you seemed quite understanding yourself pal?  :blush:
Quote
Glad you had a good time anyway JankG  :hi:
oh and this too.......  I don't mind anyone criticizing this escort as my 2nd time was less than spectacular (as noted on here)  but questioning my honesty behind a keyboard  :angry:
« Last Edit: March 12, 2016, 09:41:06 PM by Andyply »

Online Placebo88

Sorry to hear this was a shit punt but I've only got a little sympathy for the OP. This was hardly a. TOFTT punt, one of UKPs more prolific members had made it very clear what you get with this SP and she's said as much herself. I have avoided booking her for precisely the reason that I need some give and take even if I have to take the lead a bit. Once more, sorry that this was money badly spent but what's the point of a review site if you ignore the reviews?

I tend to agree with this.Sorry to hear that the OP received such poor value for money , and there are things in the review that go beyond what was previously reported ( issues with size ) , but her style is already well documented in prior reviews and she is clear that she has limited sexual aptitude in her profile.

From the original Neutral rating of this review the social part at the beginning and chat must have been very good to counterbalance how bad the sexual side of things went.If the booking had been a social only one it sounds like the OP would have given a positive , but clearly paying £230 for 2 hours of chat is mental .

The review does not say anything about oral or reverse oral , did either of these happen ? Also in her AW response she said that penetration was offered but she wanted to use lube due to size , if the case this sounds reasonable enough to me and in my experience most escorts use lube ; especially the busy ones - got to look after the tools of their trade .

For a lot of punters she will be a disastrous choice , but some of her other reviews show that she does have her own niche in the market for certain kinds of punter.Best for those comfortable with taking the lead and determining the whole course of the booking , and wanting a ( seemingly ) sexually inexperienced and uncertain ingenue .

I get the impression that the Op slipped into date mode and lost the plot of what was really taking place.You have paid your money and that entitles you to full access of everything on an escort's likes list for the time of your booking ; you do not have to wait and see if she offers , just ask her for it .

It would help the ukp community if you didn't just quote snippets VW - I for one will NEVER defend poor service but PLEASE quote me fully buddy or you'll be the one accused of deceiving others  :thumbsup:  I said others would find this infuriating but being a dirty bastard I kinda enjoyed this as I knew she was inexperienced, new, 19 and therefore exactly what I was after at the time, as I HAD actually seen her before.  I'm pretty pissed with you that you'll twist words to backup your own judgement - I'd rather deal with facts like my hero Rafa Benetiz as it helps others on here and allows them not to waster their hard earned money.  I''ll show you how...  your quote referring to her  = with nothing left out - you seemed quite understanding yourself pal?  :blush: oh and this too.......  I don't mind anyone criticizing this escort as my 2nd time was less than spectacular (as noted on here)  but questioning my honesty behind a keyboard  :angry:

At least i do quotes where people can click and see the rest unlike you !

If people want a context they can click, unlike your failed attempts !

Offline Andyply

At least i do quotes where people can click and see the rest unlike you !

If people want a context they can click, unlike your failed attempts !

I've no idea what you are about.  I offered a full quote where YOU suggested that she's not for everyone but maybe ok for some, then congratulated our mutual friend on a good punt.
Sorry you couldn't be more wrong.  Only quoting snippets doesn't  allow others to see the full picture buddy, it's wrong, it's disrespectful to both myself and our ukp community as its false and done behind he safety of a keyboard. I'd never truly know what AndyPly was on about from just reading your edited version.  Anyway as we both kind of agree on the escort - lets move on - onward and upwards  :thumbsup:

I've no idea what you are about.  I offered a full quote where YOU suggested that she's not for everyone but maybe ok for some, then congratulated our mutual friend on a good punt.
Sorry you couldn't be more wrong.  Only quoting snippets doesn't  allow others to see the full picture buddy, it's wrong, it's disrespectful to both myself and our ukp community as its false and done behind he safety of a keyboard. I'd never truly know what AndyPly was on about from just reading your edited version.  Anyway as we both kind of agree on the escort - lets move on - onward and upwards  :thumbsup:

Not sure what you don't understand you can click my quotes to see where they come from and who wrote your attempts son;t say who wrote it and on which thread !

Might help in future if you figured out that.

Anyway, why argue over bad prossies my pint was she was clueless !  Happy Days !   :drinks:

Offline Andyply

Quote
I tend to agree with this.Sorry to hear that the OP received such poor value for money , and there are things in the review that go beyond what was previously reported ( issues with size ) , but her style is already well documented in prior reviews and she is clear that she has limited sexual aptitude in her profile.
+1     some don't seem to understand the word "limitations" in terms of punting = her likes list and AW profile. BUT still if someone pays that amount of money and you don't think you can offer vfm ( sorry a coffee,chat and wank isnt suffucient)  then surely let the guy know.  Genuinely gutted he wasted £230 as I would be devastated myself  :cry:

Offline Andyply

Ok, but you could've mentioned I knew she needed guidance and expected/enjoyed this aspect as I'm a dirty, perverted bastard and wasn't just accepting shite service per say,  ;)  that's my point.  Anyway.....

Quote
Anyway, why argue over bad prossies
  +1  :kissgirl:  I still love you  :)
« Last Edit: March 12, 2016, 10:43:27 PM by Andyply »

Sorry to hear about this negative experience OP! I don't understand why you wanted to meet her in the coffee shop before the 'punt'.  :unknown:

Her comms sound shit.

Issues about size  :thumbsdown:

Covered services aren't for me so I won't be joining in the debates..


Offline Andyply

Quote
I don't understand why you wanted to meet her in the coffee shop before the 'punt'.
at least she wasn't latte  :sarcastic:
he wanted a cup and saucier punt  :sarcastic:
wanted to discuss the possibility of spooning her  :sarcastic:
saw it as a sweetener  :sarcastic: 

at least she wasn't latte  :sarcastic:
he wanted a cup and saucier punt  :sarcastic:
wanted to discuss the possibility :lol: of spooning her  :sarcastic:
saw it as a sweetener  :sarcastic:
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline CelticWarrior2

Shame for the OP only the coffee got a grinding on this occasion.  ;)
Banning reason: Trolling another member + Reposting despite post deletion

Offline Andyply

We shouldn't Mocha, lets stop stirring.....

Offline ramrodronnie

There is a huge difference between letting the punter take the lead in a booking (something all decent prossies do anyway regardless of style or inexperience) and being a lazy unenthusiastic and unskilled service provider.

Based on all the evidence out there (particularly her horrible posting style on UKE) it's clear to see that she just doesn't have the skills or head for this job. Clearly out of her depth.


Sorry to read about your rubbish punt OP. She clearly sounds out of her depth lkiu6433. She sounds either too young/immature. But whatever, even at 19 she knows right from wrong. IMO she's a young girl who's trying it on with some of us punters. What she did with the OP is just out and out theft, no question.

She should either get out of the game, or start upping her game to try to repair some of the damage she's done.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline ramrodronnie

Unfortunately have discounted the reviews of anyone that gave her a positive months ago, when you read shit like this from someone that gave her a positive review !

WTF


If all of her bookings have gone like it did with the OP? It now tends to question the Positive Reviews she's had? Which isn't good if that really is the case??
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline scarebear



The review does not say anything about oral or reverse oral , did either of these happen ? Also in her AW response she said that penetration was offered but she wanted to use lube due to size , if the case this sounds reasonable enough to me and in my experience most escorts use lube ; especially the busy ones - got to look after the tools of their trade .

I get the impression that the Op slipped into date mode and lost the plot of what was really taking place.You have paid your money and that entitles you to full access of everything on an escort's likes list for the time of your booking ; you do not have to wait and see if she offers , just ask her for it .

No Oral (covered or otherwise or Reverse) offered. No penetration offered (lube or no lube, if she had wanted it, then i would have accepted, without question). I think i did lose the plot a bit trying to be nice to a young girl who was obviously staring out.

I think the whole problem here is partly my fault, im not one for having to ask for everything. And in hindsight paying that amount of money i should have. I would say that ALL of the other WG's i have seen have never just laid there and waited for me to make the move, they have always initiated various "activities" and herein lies the part of the problem.

Anyway for me lesson learnt, and i hope there is some valuable advice to other members out there.



Tbh, mate, the "young, inexperienced" line doesn't wash with me and other punters should not go into a booking with that in mind. I'd guess that Indigo has seen 100+ cocks by this point in her career and judging by her posts and blog, she's fully switched on about the nature of sex work. This total passivity is just the service she offers and she doesn't try to hide it. If you book her expecting any different then you're deluded. Similarly, I wouldn't book someone like Gabbi-Ella then complain that she's a bit full on. Got to do your research and take notice of other reviews.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)