Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: A bit of an introduction and some advice required please (newbie)  (Read 6041 times)

Offline NIK

I'm not familiar with some of the terminology on the boards, is there a glossary?
What's a fluffy?

Ignorant Tel

And again.

Offline skittish

And again.

Thanks for the welcome Nik,

I'm a little miffed that my ignorance makes me a troll.
Everybody here has been helpful so far and there has been some good light hearted humour.
I'm a little alarmed by the remarks of the site owner, I've been registered for a few days and was dubious about posting for fear of ridicule.

One afternoon of posts is not really giving someone a fair chance, but if you'd sooner I stopped posting I'll respect your wishes.

Shame I thought I would get on ok here.

Tel

Offline AnthG

I'm a little miffed that my ignorance makes me a troll.

You have to appreciate the sheer amount of people that sign up and pretend to be a punter. Unfortunately the sisterhood have too much time and too much hate and thus they do stuff like this, often.

Offline NIK

Thanks for the welcome Nik,

I'm a little miffed that my ignorance makes me a troll.
Everybody here has been helpful so far and there has been some good light hearted humour.
I'm a little alarmed by the remarks of the site owner, I've been registered for a few days and was dubious about posting for fear of ridicule.

One afternoon of posts is not really giving someone a fair chance, but if you'd sooner I stopped posting I'll respect your wishes.

Shame I thought I would get on ok here.

Tel

I suggest you go and have a look at Prossynet.
As to your original query it depends how much you have to spend. If you want a dinner date prior to sex then you won't expect much change out of £500. If it's sex you want then you'd be better biting the bullet and just getting on with it. You could have three, four or even five punts for that price.

And yes we are called punters.

Hopefully you have already learned oodles in your short time here.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2012, 11:15:58 PM by NIK »

Offline skittish

You have to appreciate the sheer amount of people that sign up and pretend to be a punter. Unfortunately the sisterhood have too much time and too much hate and thus they do stuff like this, often.

That's the nature of forums I guess, I daren't ask who the fuck the sister hood are, but if I was a hateful troll would I not be posting on every body's threads spreading my hatred. I thought I was behaving in a respectful civilised manor. I have no ulterior motive if Nik cares to look I signed up with my everyday email addy which happens to be my full name, I've nothing to hide.

Tel

Offline NIK

That's the nature of forums I guess, I daren't ask who the fuck the sister hood are, but if I was a hateful troll would I not be posting on every body's threads spreading my hatred. I thought I was behaving in a respectful civilised manor. I have no ulterior motive if Nik cares to look I signed up with my everyday email addy which happens to be my full name, I've nothing to hide.

Tel

Don't worry about stuff such as Prossienet, fluffies, neanderthals or the sisterhood, just concentrate on having some punts, but make sure you steer clear of 'courtesans.'

Offline skittish

Don't worry about stuff such as Prossienet, fluffies, neanderthals or the sisterhood, just concentrate on having some punts, but make sure you steer clear of 'courtesans.'

I'm guessing there's a pun or two in there, and I intend to concentrate on some punts and I'll try and give something constructive back to the membership once I get started.

Tel

sorry but i also suspect that tel is pulling the wool.
Only time will tel :unknown:

Offline SuffrageforNuffrage

She does not care what you look like. Prostitution 101.

Hi Skittish,

I REALLY, TRULY hope to be of help to you with regard your endeavor and compliment the vast wealth of advice, suggestions tips and potent warnings the guys on here have already, and will continue to, offer you, but from the perspective of a WG, pro$$ie, prostitute, whore, hooker......semantics........some people care, on this matter, I am not one ;) 

Skittish, you are evidently an intelligent, measured individual and you will of course come to your own conclusions.  As someone with NO REASON possibly conceivable to support any idea I may have a biased towards this site over any other (apart from the fact I happen to like this site over all the others), to quickly address your query about the value of auto-censored (or Pro$$ienet which you will normally find it referred to here, and to be honest, despite its arguable 'crudeness' it pretty much DOES ACCURATELY sum the state of affairs out)  I am in NO way a popular or favored member here, in fact the very opposite yet I STILL chose to activate membership on here rather the PN even tho this site IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF PUNTERS and the other (despite its claims) IS for the BENEFIT OF PROSTITUTES.

A photo is 100% absolutely NOT expected, in NO WAY required, is NEVER 'the norm' and to be honest, almost without exception simply NOT desired.  As with so many things, there are exceptions to every rule: you, Skittish, in this case, are the example of this.  MOST guys, who deem it either desirable or productive to send (almost always unsolicited) 'pics' to escorts, often more 'au fait' with the workings of the punting 'scene', are the EXACT kind of guy a WG will immediately block and disregard oon the basis of being one or all of a combination of; timewaster, chancer, delusional fantasist, narcissist, megalomaniac or just a plane pain in the arse! :lol:  Please don't be to quick to judge them/us for this, though, Skittish, as, trust me, nine times out of ten, WG clicks yee ol' link, WG says 'hello' to the one eyed MONSTER(OSITY) of the uninvited punter, all in the knowledge that said punter sits awaiting the results of his genius tactic, knowing that 'surely an unrelenting desperation to not only secure an appointment with him will engulf WG, but that, on this occasion, the fee for the 'appointment' will, due to this pictorial depiction of his 'awesomenessessess', be 'waved'..................by HIM! :P

The point is YOU are CLEARLY NOT IN ANY WAY ONE SUCH INDIVIDUAL!  It would be a travesty, many on here have already cited a determination to help you avoid, if you were to unfortunately succumb demoralizing tactics of the predatory, uncaring selfish WG's that DO make up an ELEMENT of my colleagues; colleagues, lacking in; empathy, personal integrity, education and the general sense of self dignity these attributes tend to bring along with them.  It would simply be a scandal if, the; decent, genuine, up-front WG'S out there, who are in this industry and strive to meet individuals just like you (the 'gold dust' of punters); lose you to the dirge of our profession for ANY reason so I hope to have been of help on this and the further questions you've posed of which I may be of help, from a WG point of view, again, backing up the invaluable advice of the colorful bunch on here, who at the end of the day, really ARE on YOUR side, REALLY!

Offline SuffrageforNuffrage

I'm not familiar with some of the terminology on the boards, is there a glossary?
What's a fluffy?

Ignorant Tel

A 'fluffy' is a term really used primarily to refer to other punter by punters.  One punter will deem another a 'fluffy' if he is considered to have 'fallen' for the myths created, perpetuated, and encouraged, by a certain type or group of prostitutes (almost always to their own advantage), and in digesting these 'fluffyisms' unwittingly forgets that the main point and focus of the whole punting experience should be about the satisfaction of the punter (here, here! btw), and over time, evolves into almost a 'joke' punter as in the re[orts left bu such a guy will almost always contain mostly references to flattery and display more of a concern about how the WG will feel about what he has written and if he will then be 'in the bad books' as a result, rather than writing a turn reflection of the punt.  Obviously a MASSIVE gripe due to the fact many 'non-fluffy' punters have been duped by putting their faith (quite rightly) in a fellow punters review, only to find it a complete work of fiction, thus, the non fluffy being 'done over' by, not only the WG (which they always are half ready for, at least!) but but another punter!!!!!!  Double 'fucked over-ness'; that's gonna suck!

A fluffy: a punter, who, through his own eagerness to please or be 'known' for satisfying WG's, forgoes his loyalty to his fellow punters in the pursuit of something ficticious; the genuine affection (on a purely out of hours basis) of a WG.

That's my splurge on it anyways.  The boys will have bigger and better for you :-)

Offline Wayang

One punter will deem another a 'fluffy' if he is considered to have 'fallen' for the myths created, perpetuated, and encouraged, by a certain type or group of prostitutes (almost always to their own advantage), and in digesting these 'fluffyisms' unwittingly forgets that the main point and focus of the whole punting experience should be about the satisfaction of the punter (here, here! btw), and over time, evolves into almost a 'joke' punter as in the re[orts left bu such a guy will almost always contain mostly references to flattery and display more of a concern about how the WG will feel about what he has written and if he will then be 'in the bad books' as a result, rather than writing a turn reflection of the punt. 

Credit where credit is due - this is the first 120 word sentence that I have seen on UKP.  Cheats a bit with a couple of bracketed phrases but still over 110 words.

Must be educated!

Offline AnthG

Credit where credit is due - this is the first 120 word sentence that I have seen on UKP.  Cheats a bit with a couple of bracketed phrases but still over 110 words.

Must be educated!
I seen my

She does not care what you look like. Prostitution 101.
And then a 581 word reply under it and thought, what have I said now.

Suffrage you seriously need to reduce your posts down quite a bit. I lost track reading this on the two times I tried.

Offline Matium

Fluffy = someone who disguises a sexual transaction with the trappings of romance

Acolyte = Arse licker

A full list of acronyms is here:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=6887.msg100612#msg100612

I defined "fluffy" in 11 words and "acolyte" in two.

Always best to be succinct.

Offline Outcallguy

Have to agree with the majority here.

There no reason to think an escort is going to be better company than a lady on a dating site (or any female friend) when you're out for dinner.
The only difference is you're paying the escort to eat with you, rather than just getting to know someone.

As has been said start a profile on plenty of fish, for your dates and arrange meetings with escorts for sex.

I wouldn't worry about not being able to perform, the thrill of seeing an escort for the first time should be more than enough.

After seeing a couple of WGs you'll realise you don't have enough in common to have a date with them, or you'll meet one you get on with really well and can take out.
I've met a few whom I've seen socially as well as for sex.

Offline AnthG

I've met a few whom I've seen socially as well as for sex.
And was that paid for?

Offline Outcallguy

No, we just met for coffee.
There a few geeky girls on AW who I get on with well.

I'm not sure I agree with the idea of paying to take a girl out for dinner, but that's a whole other thread in itself.

Offline SuffrageforNuffrage

I seen my
And then a 581 word reply under it and thought, what have I said now.

Suffrage you seriously need to reduce your posts down quite a bit. I lost track reading this on the two times I tried.

Ant, I respect you because you are a person,  I don not respect much of the contents of your contributions.  Why do you deem is 'serious' that I reduce the lengths of my posts?  Whether or not this is a point of 'importance' I, either; should, would or may consider, may I respectfully yet articulate to you excplicitly, the miniscule likely-hood of my employing the advice from by a member for whom I do not credit as being aas 'stable', 'constant' and as genuine in their contribution, compared with basically most of the other members on here (even those who do not like me) 

Your statement is dripping oil, Ant, in my opinion, oil from the residue of the chip remaining on your shoulder from a few replies I made to one of your long winded, dithering, self approval seeking posts.  This is a cute attempt to 'jump on the bandwagon' and posssible garner favour with those folks on here you are so eager to emulate.

The fact you lost track after line two of my post, Ant, is not something, if I were you I would have written to support my case, if I were you, as this implies you are under the impression I have; a preference or opinion or acknowledgment or fleeting emotion towards you reading my posts or not when if fact ...............I so not.

Thanks you for your time, however, misguided it may have been  :)

Offline AnthG

Ant, I respect you because you are a person,  I don not respect much of the contents of your contributions.  Why do you deem is 'serious' that I reduce the lengths of my posts?  Whether or not this is a point of 'importance' I, either; should, would or may consider, may I respectfully yet articulate to you excplicitly, the miniscule likely-hood of my employing the advice from by a member for whom I do not credit as being aas 'stable', 'constant' and as genuine in their contribution, compared with basically most of the other members on here (even those who do not like me) 
I am sorry my posts are not to your liking.

Your statement is dripping oil, Ant, in my opinion, oil from the residue of the chip remaining on your shoulder from a few replies I made to one of your long winded, dithering, self approval seeking posts.  This is a cute attempt to 'jump on the bandwagon' and posssible garner favour with those folks on here you are so eager to emulate.
I do not even remember what post you are talking about.

All I do remember is in a thread where many people were suggesting you were a troll a few days back. I posted against the tide that I do not think you were. I never jump on bandwagons. I often speak against the tide with my own beliefs. This often gets me in trouble with forums.

The fact you lost track after line two of my post, Ant, is not something, if I were you I would have written to support my case, if I were you, as this implies you are under the impression I have; a preference or opinion or acknowledgment or fleeting emotion towards you reading my posts or not when if fact ...............I so not.

Thanks you for your time, however, misguided it may have been  :)
The problem is it took you 581 words to say something that could be said in at most 100.

Quoting your post my waterfox spell checker is a constant barrage of red miss-spelling warnings for your posts. You use terrible grammar too and it just makes it nigh on impossible to read what you say.

Offline AnthG

Your statement is dripping oil, Ant, in my opinion, oil from the residue of the chip remaining on your shoulder from a few replies I made to one of your long winded, dithering, self approval seeking posts.
And just so you can see this "chip" is not only gone, but was never there in the first place

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=8766.msg129978#msg129978

Quote from: AnthG
Can I also say I do not think Suffrage is a troll neither. I think she is a just a little hyper sensitive - which to be honest is not a criticism. And she also seemingly likes to be the person to speak out for others.

I appreciate I am not a great judge of character as I also thought Soroya was not a troll. But am pleased what I noticed was also seen by other members in Wayang and Lex too.

But to be honest given your extreme over reaction to what was a simple bit of advice - that a number of people made, not just me; Wayang and Matium said this too. I am kind of thinking I am wrong in my previous conclusion.

Offline SuffrageforNuffrage

I am sorry my posts are not to your liking.
I do not even remember what post you are talking about.

All I do remember is in a thread where many people were suggesting you were a troll a few days back. I posted against the tide that I do not think you were. I never jump on bandwagons. I often speak against the tide with my own beliefs. This often gets me in trouble with forums.
The problem is it took you 581 words to say something that could be said in at most 100.

Quoting your post my waterfox spell checker is a constant barrage of red miss-spelling warnings for your posts. You use terrible grammar too and it just makes it nigh on impossible to read what you say.

Simply couldn't be bothered to take too much time with the reply, Ant as I find you condescending, patronising and fluctuating in your loyalties, opinions and view points which I have follwoed over time and have seen then consistently contradictory, favor seeking, biased and simply weak n there understanding of prostitutes, which your posts are more often about than that of being a punter.  Just a bit irkesome to have to listen to you spout off about why pro$$ies do x, why they wear y, but I have never mentioned it.  The breaking point came for me upon you offering your urgent advice to me.

Offline Ali Katt

Quote
I think if members are unwilling to post because there is too much babble about nothing, then something needs to be done. I put suffrage on an ignore list simple. I don't read her essay long posts.

Offline AnthG

Simply couldn't be bothered to take too much time with the reply, Ant as I find you condescending, patronising and fluctuating in your loyalties, opinions and view points which I have follwoed over time and have seen then consistently contradictory, favor seeking, biased and simply weak n there understanding of prostitutes, which your posts are more often about than that of being a punter.  Just a bit irkesome to have to listen to you spout off about why pro$$ies do x, why they wear y, but I have never mentioned it.  The breaking point came for me upon you offering your urgent advice to me.
Well now you have said it. Thanks

Offline SuffrageforNuffrage

Ant, in my opinion, you are a few months behind the date of play.  I think most that did think I was a troll, and there were a signiicant number, no longer hold this opinion.  I feel there is a general consensus of acceptance that I am not a troll.  Think it was just one individual that claimed me to be a troll the other day you mention.  MANY DO NOT LIKE ME but that is not the same as them thinking me a troll

Offline SuffrageforNuffrage

Apologies.  That will the the last post/comment regarding this at all, on this thread at least.  Sorry if I have gone off-topic.

Offline AnthG

Ant, in my opinion, you are a few months behind the date of play.  I think most that did think I was a troll, and there were a signiicant number, no longer hold this opinion.  I feel there is a general consensus of acceptance that I am not a troll.  Think it was just one individual that claimed me to be a troll the other day you mention.  MANY DO NOT LIKE ME but that is not the same as them thinking me a troll
The topic in site issues where everyone is calling you a troll. And where Wayang, myself and Lex suggested you were not (which my post is quoted from) is from October 15th. 10 days ago.

I think you need to calm down as like my post said you do seem to fly off the handle at any challenge or criticism. You can take that suggestion as condescending, but I am meaning it well intended when I say it.

I often say my intentions with posts (which I agree can come across as odd) as the written form does not convey intentions well. And many times in the punting world - especially escorts. You fly off the handle and misunderstand peoples intentions with their posts


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)