I wasn't going to post as she's not 'nasty' but re read reviews and thought, if I d believed these I d not have booked. Most of the other reviews on Olivia are on the money. That said whenever I've spoken to Amour they have been straight and have steered me away from one girl to another. They did say that all her feedback recently has been good. In the past they had pointed me at her and said we know the feedback has been poor if you have any problems we'll refund
. I should probably have booked then...http://www.newcastleescortsagency.co.uk/escort_view.php?esctitle=North+Tyneside+Escort+Olivia
Perhaps I was unlucky but I d have had more fun with baby oil, xhamster and my hand.
Body 9/10. Lovely early 20s body, just enough curves
Face 6/10 not as pretty as I d expected [that s personal taste, I thought a bit Bigg market]
Flat 7/10 typical non city centre WG property
Appointment... kissing, no [kiss, turns cheek away, kiss, turns cheek away, kiss, turns cheek away - message received]. OWO well yes but not getting anywhere
close to CIM. RO... yes but no fingers - even on the outside. You'd have thought I'd tried anal with a cucumber. Note to WGs.. usually if a guy goes down he's doing it because he wants you to enjoy evn if only a little. It's no trouble for a guy to have round 1, roll onto his back and say 'right love get him ready for round 2, it will take about 10 min'.
Sex in miss' and uses that trick that some [bad] WGs have of positioning their thighs so you can penetrate but not at all deeply [halfway in]. I understand why but it defeats the object.
Talks a lot but where with Amber it's either nerves or 'just her' you get the distinct impression that it s just to waste a bit of time.
She has a great body and she's not nasty but that s where it ends. She's much more an average 'Manchester Sauna' type than an 'Amour Escort'. Overall whenever we were 'intimate' she could have been reading a paperback.
Even if she's the only girl working unless you want a great body but no more, save your money.