Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: The Private Gallery is good...  (Read 5262 times)

Offline haystacks79

But it is a general unwritten understanding that PGs will contain the girls face if the main profile does not.

I must be the only one here that doesn't expect a PG to contain a face pic, unless it says it does! But then, I've said before that a face pic hasn't been essential to me anyway.

Offline AnthG


IMHO (so as not to offend anyone) the idea of the PG is crap. 
One of those rare times I will disagree with you completely as I think PGs are a brilliant idea.

I say this as many times escorts say they cannot show their face for fear of being found out that they do this. The Private gallery means only those prospective customers can see your face.

Therefore why the need to still hide your face beats me. It honestly suggests like the girl/pimp knows she is unattractive/bait & switch.

Offline haystacks79

But why the hell pay for the marketing brochure?  I don't pay to get a car brochure, a holiday brochure, an MandS brochure............

It's not unusual to have to pay for technical catalogues and similar, which could be considered as marketing brochures. The Maplin catalogue for instance.

Online Jimmyredcab

But why the hell pay for the marketing brochure?  I don't pay to get a car brochure, a holiday brochure, an MandS brochure............

Some girls think that by hiding their face picture in the private gallery it has less chance of being seen by their old Granny or next door neighbour.   :unknown:

Just to clarify ----------------- you are happy to meet a girl with no idea of what she looks like.  ????????????????

To say i have no idea what she would look like is wrong. I do my research and it's payed off for me so far. Punting has risks and i don't need
to see a girls face before i meet her. Sure, i would like their face as it would give me a better picture of what she looks like and i could make my decision more easily based on that. However, i appreciate their need for discretion and to maintain a private life, surely everyone deserves that. If they don't want to put a face pic then that's their choice and i can either respect that and meet her anyway or just solely meet with girls with face pics. I don't know the hidden intracacies of private galleries because i've never bought one. As a generalisation, most of these girls are attractive, why would men want to pay to have sex with unattractive women? But i guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I can always walk out remember.

Offline AnthG

As a generalisation, most of these girls are attractive, why would men want to pay to have sex with unattractive women? But i guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I can always walk out remember.
I was actually going to say this earlier on in my previous post but then thought not. As someone has previously said similar on auto-censored a while back.

But really is they are not. Many, many times I have bought a PG and then been shocked as the girl was simply not attractive. And I have extremely lower standards compared to others it seems.

Pretty much all bookings for me with escorts are with girls in the 7/10 range. I rarely get to see her face as I use agencies pretty much exclusively due to the pickings on AW being slim to none.

Offline Wayang

It's not unusual to have to pay for technical catalogues and similar, which could be considered as marketing brochures. The Maplin catalogue for instance.

Totally irrelevant.

Come on - we are not talking a sophisticated product here.  On my last check 50 percent (+ or - 5 percent) of the world's population have a marketable product, a v*g*n*, and a certain percentage are selling that product.

You want my custom before I spend £100+ - you show me the goods.

Offline AnthG


You want my custom before I spend £100+ - you show me the goods.
I think the problem is, you live in London which is where I believe you punt you are spoiled for choice. In many other cities  its a take what you get and accept it affair.

Offline Wayang

Some girls think that by hiding their face picture in the private gallery it has less chance of being seen by their old Granny or next door neighbour.   :unknown:

So if you want to make the big money that these WGs command to have to take a risk!

As I see it some WGS are open with their extended family about their career choice; some are not.  Of those that are not I guess the 'family' has a  pretty clear idea of her career.  The expensive life style gives it away!

Offline Outcallguy

I think it's safe to say there are some of us (myself included) who can be very turned off by a face that is not to our liking a BOBFOC.
And for us it is very important we see a face pic before the meeting.

The PG seems to be the best place to put a face pic as only those users who are keen are likely to pay to see the PG. Joe blogs probably won't trawl through every AW profile hoping he's going to find his friends are working girls.

Offline Kitty

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 187
From her profile ----------

Watersports is £30 extra as it involves a lot of pre-planning.

No, it doesn't, you simply drink a pint of water an hour before the booking.   :dash:

That's the worst you have to throw at me?
I make my WS bookings last a while... one pint is definitely not adequate considering the service I provide. If I do WS, I do it properly.

Offline Kitty

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 187
I'm also unsure how your post was relevant to the thread JRC?

Offline Ali Katt

I have said before that AW is for browsing but seldom for buying.

IMHO (so as not to offend anyone) the idea of the PG is crap.  WGs are in a business where they are marketing their bodies for f*ck*ng.  They are selling their c*nts.
Why should anyone pay to see more 'explicit' photos.

Can you think of any marketable product where the seller hides key information which you can only access after you have paid a  fee?

As to photos on the open site I could/would never punt with a WG showing her shoving a bottle up her c*nt, as some do. Fully and sensibly clothed with a face picture is the minimal to attract my attention.  Clothed because you get a good idea of her 'taste' and photo so that I can check what I ordered is what I am being delivered.
I agree with most of this; they simply charge because they can. Why would someone pay extra say for fingering? but some do. I think lingerie shots are useful, fully clothed shots are not enough, they're useful for seeing tatts, marks, C-scars, piercings, etc etc.

Offline AnthG

That's the worst you have to throw at me?

For some reason when you started posting I had you pictured in my mind as someone who was around 45 years old and either a frequent poster on auto-censored, or ex frequent poster. Not sure why in hindsight I just did.

All I can say now is jesus I did not think someone who looked like you would ever post on forums.

I make my WS bookings last a while... one pint is definitely not adequate considering the service I provide. If I do WS, I do it properly.
Firstly I don't think anything is being thrown at you in terms of criticisms. It is just something that often gets commented that its odd why escorts charge more for WS when really all they need to do is drink water before the booking so there is no extra expenditure to justify the extra costs.

Your reasoning I have bolded is confusing me. Are you saying you 'go' twice in a WS booking or what exactly?

Offline mudlark

I must say I have never used the feature - my main thought being that if the pictures in the public gallery are not enough to go on, I will just move on the next profile.  I'm a bit stubborn like that and don't want to spend any money rewarding crap profiles! That and I don't really want to start paying out for Adultwork credits.  I have been more tempted to pay for the PG a little while after a good punt (not too sure why, maybe to remind me of it I guess) and if I could pay for it with paypal, probably would have done.

That said, in general the good pictures are non photoshopped pictures with a face.  A photoshoot can be nice but the heavily photoshopped photos start to all look very samey, where the models look a bit like plastic manequins and don't really give much of an indication of what the girl actually looks like .

Also, not all "no face shots" are created equal.  In this specific example I would say some of the ones on Kitty's profile are enough to go on and you can kind of tell what she looks like.

Online Jimmyredcab

That's the worst you have to throw at me?
I make my WS bookings last a while... one pint is definitely not adequate considering the service I provide. If I do WS, I do it properly.

You make watersports sound like a fine art, it isn't.   :dash: :dash:

Offline Daffodil

You make watersports sound like a fine art, it isn't.   :dash: :dash:

 :D +1

With regard the op, I think pgs are good too and have saved me a lot of money. I do expect to see a face picture and I think it should be stated when there isn't one. That said, to avoid pg scams, I will have often had contact with the girl in question beforehand and will have simply asked.

Face pictures are important when I'm choosing to meet (and I don't see any reason at all why they can't be provided, if only via email), but not essential as I live in a bit of a punting desert so can't be overly picky. One of my best punts was with a girl who does not have face pics.

Kitty's profile would be fine with me as I think her pictures give a very reasonable idea of what she looks like in spite of the blurring.

Online Jimmyredcab

  One of my best punts was with a girl who does not have face pics.

Yes, it can happen, but wherever possible I will choose a girl who is happy to show her face.

Would you buy an article of clothing for £120 without seeing it first, no of course you wouldn't.

Offline Daffodil

Yes, it can happen, but wherever possible I will choose a girl who is happy to show her face.

Would you buy an article of clothing for £120 without seeing it first, no of course you wouldn't.

It's easy to have such an outlook when you live in London, I'm sure I would be the same.

Also, as the profile will invariably show body shots/head shots with face obscured a more accurate analogy would be, 'would you buy an article of clothing without seeing it's sleeve first?'.

Finally, face is important to me, but it's not to a lot of guys. They're more interested in body/services/etc so I'm sure they'd be happy to proceed without seeing the face.

Online Jimmyredcab



Finally, face is important to me, but it's not to a lot of guys. They're more interested in body/services/etc so I'm sure they'd be happy to proceed without seeing the face.

Sadly, some guys would fuck anything.   :thumbsdown:

Offline Wayang

Sadly, some guys would fuck anything.   :thumbsdown:

Without a face picture I would not even look at the hourly rate.

How can you be certain that you are punting with the same girl unless you have a face picture.

No wonder guys complain so much about dud punts if they don't know whom they are f*ck*n?

Online Jimmyredcab

Without a face picture I would not even look at the hourly rate.

How can you be certain that you are punting with the same girl unless you have a face picture.

This is especially true when dealing with agencies, with blurred faces they can just send you any girl, you would be none the wiser.  :thumbsdown:

Offline Daffodil

Again, it all comes down to the amount of choice you have. In an ideal world I would like a face picture, a phone number, a verification photo and an intro movie. I doubt even in London that you can be that picky.

It's risks/benefits. As face is important to me, if one isn't displayed I will ask for one. If one is not forthcoming I may still choose to punt but will limit the distance I travel. I have also been upfront with the pro$$ie and said if I make a booking without a face picture and I find they are not attractive when I arrive I will simply walk.

I am a realist and understand that I can't have it my own way all of the time.

Online Jimmyredcab



I am a realist and understand that I can't have it my own way all of the time.

I want it my own way as often as possible.
It is my money, I set the conditions.
If all punters had my outlook then pro$$ies would have to show their face or go bankrupt.

Offline Wayang

I want it my own way as often as possible.
It is my money, I set the conditions.
If all punters had my outlook then pro$$ies would have to show their face or go bankrupt.

Agreed - no face picture with which to match up the WG to her AW ad - no punt
No telephone number - no punt
No price list (occasional)  - no punt.

If I am buying a service I expect the ad., to sell  me the product.  I am after all the buyer.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)