Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: YOUNG BABYGIRL - sort of B&S with a difference - switched to a stunning bird  (Read 5065 times)


1 review(s) for YOUNG BABYGIRL (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline smiths

I think it's hypocritical to come out with principles in a situation like this.
One must take the opportunity presented - I'd be a fool to walk if the girl I meet in the flat - not being the one I went for, was better looking, sexier, and met me with all the positive vibes, flirtation and attractiveness I want - and to confirm service and price.
For all I know, the brunette was the other girl in the flat - and she was busy whether she was or wasn't that girl in any case - however, I was blown away by this beauty.

I always walk IF the vibes are shit, girl is shit, services aren't what I want - or combinations of all three.
If I walk into a walk up or brothel and am met with girls I've never seen before - I will take my pick IF I find one who ticks boxes.
And if I walk into a flat to meet a 8/10 girl and am met with 9/10 why the fucking hell would I be a complete cock wand walk?

Sure, walk if the B&S isn;t up to scratch - but was this an actual B&S in the classic sense? Why would they bait me with an inferior girl and switch to a superior one?

I would and have walked when I knew I had been switched but the switch was attractive, her being attractive cant overcome the fact she is a low life in my view and I don't want anything to do with low lifes let alone give them my cash. Obviously what you do is up to you but punters on here have every right to express their views on B&S as they wish just as you have every right to express yours.

My long held view is by punting with WGs you know have bait and switched you  just encourages them to continue to do it whereas UKP is here to help punters avoid low lifes who are prepared to do this. On the planet I punt on a known bait and switch cant result in a positive review however attractive and/or good the service received was, you clearly disagree and its your right to give this WG a positive review.

Offline G.Raff

Give the man a break, he posted a review which is an account of his experience. He clearly stated that it was a B&S, and is not telling any of us to go there.
I for one will not go, and I suspect many others won't, but that doesn't take away from his positive experience which he accurately reported here.
This is what a review is all about. it's a personal subjective account of the experience. Readers can make their own opinion.

Offline ramrodronnie

Blimey. I wished I'd said nothing now. Spider All I said was, generally B&S doesn't often work out in the punters favour. On this occasion, as it turned out, you were lucky and got yourself a babe.

This sort of thing is often debated on threads, and the general consensus is that B&S shouldn't generally be tolerated.
I'm sure that if any other punter had have been in your shoes, and was confronted (baited) with this babe instead of the one you booked, we all would have jumped at the chance to fuck the arse off her.

But the reality is this doesn't often happen. On this occasion you were a lucky lucky boy, so good luck to you, you got baited, and ended up with an absolute babe.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline smiths

Blimey. I wished I'd said nothing now. Spider All I said was, generally B&S doesn't often work out in the punters favour. On this occasion, as it turned out, you were lucky and got yourself a babe.

This sort of thing is often debated on threads, and the general consensus is that B&S shouldn't generally be tolerated.
I'm sure that if any other punter had have been in your shoes, and was confronted (baited) with this babe instead of the one you booked, we all would have jumped at the chance to fuck the arse off her.

But the reality is this doesn't often happen. On this occasion you were a lucky lucky boy, so good luck to you, you got baited, and ended up with an absolute babe.

You obviously didn't read my post above as I posted I haven't and wouldn't punt with a WG who I knew as a B&S as her being a low life liar ensures I walk. For me its a principle.

Offline ramrodronnie

You obviously didn't read my post above as I posted I haven't and wouldn't punt with a WG who I knew as a B&S as her being a low life liar ensures I walk. For me its a principle.


I apologise for getting your profile name wrong smiths.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline ramrodronnie

I think it's hypocritical to come out with principles in a situation like this.
One must take the opportunity presented - I'd be a fool to walk if the girl I meet in the flat - not being the one I went for, was better looking, sexier, and met me with all the positive vibes, flirtation and attractiveness I want - and to confirm service and price.
For all I know, the brunette was the other girl in the flat - and she was busy whether she was or wasn't that girl in any case - however, I was blown away by this beauty.

I always walk IF the vibes are shit, girl is shit, services aren't what I want - or combinations of all three.
If I walk into a walk up or brothel and am met with girls I've never seen before - I will take my pick IF I find one who ticks boxes.
And if I walk into a flat to meet a 8/10 girl and am met with 9/10 why the fucking hell would I be a complete cock wand walk?

Sure, walk if the B&S isn;t up to scratch - but was this an actual B&S in the classic sense? Why would they bait me with an inferior girl and switch to a superior one?


Blimey. I wished I'd said nothing now. Spider All I said was, generally B&S doesn't often work out in the punters favour. On this occasion, as it turned out, you were lucky and got yourself a babe.

This sort of thing is often debated on threads, and the general consensus is that B&S shouldn't generally be tolerated.
I'm sure that if any other punter had have been in your shoes, and was confronted (baited) with this babe instead of the one you booked, we all would have jumped at the chance to fuck the arse off her.

But the reality is, this doesn't often happen. On this occasion you were a lucky lucky boy, so good luck to you, you got baited, and ended up with an absolute babe.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline Jimmyredcab

I see the "gentleman" has been banned.     :(

Just for the record this is what I would have done if I experienced bait and switch where the substitute was better ------- I would have gone ahead with the punt ------------- however I would NOT have given a positive review, I would have given a warning on here that the establishment can't be trusted.    :hi:

Bait and switch is wrong, pure and simple ----------- it is not a grey area.    :hi:

Offline diddy

I see the "gentleman" has been banned.     :(

Just for the record this is what I would have done if I experienced bait and switch where the substitute was better ------- I would have gone ahead with the punt ------------- however I would NOT have given a positive review, I would have given a warning on here that the establishment can't be trusted.    :hi:

Bait and switch is wrong, pure and simple ----------- it is not a grey area.    :hi:
Fair point actually, I was finding this thread a bit twisted all round until you clarified you would have gone ahead as I was thinking as a cock-realist surely anyone in their right mind would have fucked her under the circumstances described...I do get the ethical B&S stance bit also (cant resist saying its a bit ironic debating ethics here though really innit  :D) and not perpetuating it so your compromise stance is about right in my eyes. Shame he got banned though, I liked his reviews personally..
« Last Edit: February 26, 2016, 06:39:22 PM by diddy »

Offline Andyply

Quote
she then gave me her number and asked me to call her - as friends rather than as a customer.
:timeout: a little worrying..... :cry:..........will end in tears.

For what its worth, if I had a "positive" bait & switch I'd likely stay because cock would be in charge at that point, review it, certainly mention the b&s, report my experience but certainly not recommend the establishment/provider group

Offline ramrodronnie

I see the "gentleman" has been banned.     :(

Just for the record this is what I would have done if I experienced bait and switch where the substitute was better ------- I would have gone ahead with the punt ------------- however I would NOT have given a positive review, I would have given a warning on here that the establishment can't be trusted.    :hi:

Bait and switch is wrong, pure and simple ----------- it is not a grey area.    :hi:


Agreed Jimmy.  :thumbsup:
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline Nagilum

To be fair I saw this coming.

A B&S is an automatic negative.  Its deceit towards punters, so by condoning it gives with a positive review gives credence to the actions of the WG, and possibly her pimp.

While the OP managed to have a good punt, the unavoidable truth cannot be escaped.




Offline Nagilum

Err no I'm sorry, I paid for coach and that's what I want.
I do not want an upgrade to business or first class with a comfy bed, free vintage champagne and gourmet food!!!!!

C'mon guys give him a break. B & S is about being screwed over with something inferior to what you believe you may have booked.

Sure the principle is one thing. The reality is another. I see nothing wrong with the OP staying - at his choice - and reporting his overall experience as a positive one here.
Surely the main point of our forum is to impart information
It's not about dogmatism surely? :hi:

Come on TT you know better than that.  I'm for you trying to douse the flames, but deep down we know its not acceptable.

Offline Nagilum

This is all I am going to say on the matter - from the Punting Wiki

Consensus of most UKP posters
Bait and Switch is very bad behaviour and should be discouraged. It is very unhelpful to give B&S people money, even when the switch is to an equally attractive girl. As long as punters give them money, they will keep doing it. If all punters walked when the girl booked is not there, the practice would die out. While clearly this is not going to happen in the short term, it is still the right thing to do.


Now I personally never want to see a punter on here saying B&S is acceptable, if you do I am going to scratch every review you have done and reject it.  That's how strongly I feel about it.

Offline ramrodronnie

This is all I am going to say on the matter - from the Punting Wiki

Consensus of most UKP posters
Bait and Switch is very bad behaviour and should be discouraged. It is very unhelpful to give B&S people money, even when the switch is to an equally attractive girl. As long as punters give them money, they will keep doing it. If all punters walked when the girl booked is not there, the practice would die out. While clearly this is not going to happen in the short term, it is still the right thing to do.


Now I personally never want to see a punter on here saying B&S is acceptable, if you do I am going to scratch every review you have done and reject it.  That's how strongly I feel about it.


Absolutely agreed Nagilum. And it should be hammered home about the rule regarding B&S. If any of us are Bait and Switched, even if we get what we feel is a better, more classy, prettier WG. And we have had a great time with her.
It Should Be Given A Negative Review, and pointed out clearly in the Review what is going on in the establishment.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Now I personally never want to see a punter on here saying B&S is acceptable, if you do I am going to scratch every review you have done and reject it.  That's how strongly I feel about it.
I agree. I have fortunately only been subjected to three B & S's. Two were reasonable looking but I decided to walk each time and move to plan B. POF.

Offline smiths

Fair point actually, I was finding this thread a bit twisted all round until you clarified you would have gone ahead as I was thinking as a cock-realist surely anyone in their right mind would have fucked her under the circumstances described...I do get the ethical B&S stance bit also (cant resist saying its a bit ironic debating ethics here though really innit  :D) and not perpetuating it so your compromise stance is about right in my eyes. Shame he got banned though, I liked his reviews personally..

I have a principle so wouldn't fuck such a low life, what I would do is walk and book a regular and fuck her instead.

Offline smiths

This is all I am going to say on the matter - from the Punting Wiki

Consensus of most UKP posters
Bait and Switch is very bad behaviour and should be discouraged. It is very unhelpful to give B&S people money, even when the switch is to an equally attractive girl. As long as punters give them money, they will keep doing it. If all punters walked when the girl booked is not there, the practice would die out. While clearly this is not going to happen in the short term, it is still the right thing to do.


Now I personally never want to see a punter on here saying B&S is acceptable, if you do I am going to scratch every review you have done and reject it.  That's how strongly I feel about it.

The Wiki advice is exactly the stance I take yet even on this thread some are questioning it, just shows that if on UKP some are questioning it how many punters not on UKP would punt with these low lifes.

Offline Nagilum

The Wiki advice is exactly the stance I take yet even on this thread some are questioning it, just shows that if on UKP some are questioning it how many punters not on UKP would punt with these low lifes.

I worry, I really do because they are fuelling the behaviour.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I worry, I really do because they are fuelling the behaviour.

The problem is quite simply this ------------ an erect penis does not have a conscience.    :hi:

Offline smiths

The problem is quite simply this ------------ an erect penis does not have a conscience.    :hi:

Some of us no longer think with our dicks and have plan B options available redcab so don't need to punt with WGs we know have bait and switched us. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline Steely Dan

Personally I am not asking for perfect behaviour.  I am totally against drink driving but I did it once.  Go on, call my a hypocrite, I can take it.  I am still against drink driving.  I might do it again some day.  I am a shit.

But if I were the chair of the anti-DD club, and I drove drunk daily, THAT would make me a total cunt. I am not and I wont.

So I am totally against B&S.  Will never support it.  My last punt was B&S and I walked.  But had she been ultra hot would I have stayed?  Perhaps.  But the fact that I am no Mother Teresa does not change my position.  So no criticism of JRC from me.

But I wont book a B&S expert again.  For selfish reasons. Never know what I will get. Plenty of Fish.

Offline TheMaster

Think some of these guys have a hard on for you spidey!
Banning reason: Another one crying racism

Offline ramrodronnie

I worry, I really do because they are fuelling the behaviour.


This has been a fear for me for as long as I can remember Nagilum. These brainless morons just think with their dicks, and fuel this behaviour from the WGs, and their pimps.
The problem is, how do we deal with it? Especially if they're not members of this forum.
Banning reason: Undesirable

My long held view is by punting with WGs you know have bait and switched you  just encourages them to continue to do it whereas UKP is here to help punters avoid low lifes who are prepared to do this. On the planet I punt on a known bait and switch cant result in a positive review however attractive and/or good the service received was, you clearly disagree and its your right to give this WG a positive review.

Some people have done the bait a negative and the switch positive, anyway the content of reviews is far more important to me than an arbitrary grade IMHO.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)