Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Please Do A Review.  (Read 1113 times)

Offline smiths

After reading once again that some punters on here have had a bad experience with a WG be that at the punt or in her communications before the agreed punt but not done a review and only revealed this information after another punter did a negative review on the same WG i want to ask punters to please post a review up if you experience this off a WG. It could save other punters experiencing the same and save some money and time.

Forget about the rules of making a booking on A/W, on UKP a review CAN be done if a WG accepts your booking verbally or by email/text, a read of the rules top right of the forum clearly state this. So the WG or the punter NOT confirming an A/W booking request or whatever isn't relevant on here. The fact is some WGs use that booking system to fuck punters about.

So please if a WG fucks you about once she has accepted your booking and your not happy about it do a review, it only needs to be a few lines as long as it clearly explains whats occurred and please include her A/W numbered link so it would then link in any other A/W reviews she has on here under that numbered link. If you really don't know how to do a link say so in your review and i am sure someone will help show you how, its really really easy, but don't let not knowing how put you off doing the review.

vw

  • Guest
Yes had to point this out to clarkeonthecourse who has subsequently done a negative of the PlasticNosed Cindy or what ever her name is.

Seems many are confused with AW booking, many of us don't use the AW booking system and still do a review.

These after a negative posters really get on my nerves unless they are new to the forum and still getting used to it.

And another not if you are messed about before an eventual positive review please mention the messing about in the review it helps identify timewasters, you may be a hoop jumping circus animal but some people don't want to perform circus tricks for prossies !

Offline threechilliman

Completely agree smiths, this could have saved me two or three times. Guys, point out the shit ones please then none of us have to TOFTT.

tcm

Offline Jerboa

Yes agree fully, but for whatever reason there are plenty of punters who either don't want to rock the boat, on a popular escort, or can't be arsed writing their own review, but will chip in on another neg review, ffs it's a anonymous website why are they scared?

Offline Bangers and Gash

Yes had to point this out to clarkeonthecourse who has subsequently done a negative of the PlasticNosed Cindy or what ever her name is.

 :lol: I really hope that name sticks.  :lol:

Offline cueball

Good post smiths

Reviews are the life blood of this site.

All of my punts get run through the ukp search function before I make any steps towards seeing any lass.

I have a giggle and plenty of banter but my main reason is to glean info out of all the other members.

I've put a bit back in though  :D

Offline dkn

This place is the best!  Not been here for too long, but at last I have more than useless AW to base my punting on.  Thinking back to some of the disasters I've had in the past, UKP has put paid to that...  :yahoo:

I'd get more reviews in myself if only I got round to trying new talent, but at least I've reviewed everyone I've seen in the last year or so, who's still on AW at least.

Online rockharders

Yes agree fully, but for whatever reason there are plenty of punters who either don't want to rock the boat, on a popular escort, or can't be arsed writing their own review, but will chip in on another neg review, ffs it's a anonymous website why are they scared?

Partly because of the fluffy white knight brigade who slither out of the sewers every now and then. A bunch of luvved up two faced cunts who pretend to be nice until someone slates their forum darlings. This can be deeply unpleasant.

Also, some members do take the piss out of some members choice of women which can be a bit unsettling, but who gives a shit you are right it is anonymous.

Shame there are a lot of leechers but then again UKP is a free public service so that is to be expected.

Offline Nagilum

Yes had to point this out to clarkeonthecourse who has subsequently done a negative of the PlasticNosed Cindy or what ever her name is.

Seems many are confused with AW booking, many of us don't use the AW booking system and still do a review.

These after a negative posters really get on my nerves unless they are new to the forum and still getting used to it.

And another not if you are messed about before an eventual positive review please mention the messing about in the review it helps identify timewasters, you may be a hoop jumping circus animal but some people don't want to perform circus tricks for prossies !

I just pointed it out to karl986 too. He had the same experience.


Offline Jerboa

Partly because of the fluffy white knight brigade who slither out of the sewers every now and then. A bunch of luvved up two faced cunts who pretend to be nice until someone slates their forum darlings. This can be deeply unpleasant.

Also, some members do take the piss out of some members choice of women which can be a bit unsettling, but who gives a shit you are right it is anonymous.

Shame there are a lot of leechers but then again UKP is a free public service so that is to be expected.

Unpleasant? Getting blown up or shot at with RPG's is unpleasant, listening to some bollox of a few fan boy white knights not so much.  :hi:

Offline iPad3

the PlasticNosed Cindy or what ever her name is.


Really!!!, hardly neccasary!

Your right to say it though obviously
« Last Edit: February 21, 2016, 08:04:51 am by iPad3 »

vw

  • Guest
Really!!!, hardly neccasary!

Your right to say it though obviously
What ever  neccasary means ?  :unknown:

and

Yes  :hi:


Offline Steve2

Negative reviews are really usefull to help other punters. Positive reviews often make it harder to see the girl in question as I know to my cost  :hi:

Offline Nagilum

Now that the White knights have bern cleared, it should make it easier for members to post without fear of being shouted down.

Thank you for the reminder Smiths.

jcdmj12

  • Guest
Completely agree.

I admit that I don't always review the gems I find, at least to start with (for various reasons, including the fact that a great experience is often subjective), but if I have a negative, I ALWAYS review it.  Nobody should have to put up with a shit punt for the sake of it.

jcdmj12

  • Guest
Negative reviews are really usefull to help other punters. Positive reviews often make it harder to see the girl in question as I know to my cost  :hi:

FWIW I think that negatives are more valuable than positives - the problem with positive reviews are:

a. Everyone is different, what I find amazing, you may find just 'ok', so if I tell you that WG x is the best thing ever, I may be building your expectations up unrealistically
b. Very busy full time WGs can't sustain that level of performance over time.  If they see too many punters they burn out.  That means you're either going to be in for a long wait to see them, or their standards will slip

Whereas a shit WG who shouldn't be in the job will stay fairly predictably shit, she is unlikely to improve suddenly.