Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Platinum Cindy - Chelsea Bridge  (Read 11334 times)


74 review(s) for X PLATINUM x CINDY X (71 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Nagilum

I don't think anyone will take that childish nonsense too seriously, she has a VG reputation after all.  However your comments on the other hand might give her a wake up call regarding treating all her clients equally respectfully, those going in blind have the security of your review behind them and others who have eventually come out of the woodwork.  If only she took your review with grace and put her hands up instead of insinuating you were a liar  (your review wasn't too harsh considering)  then It might have been nipped in the bud.  I have to say she looks gorgeous, hope everything gets back to normal for her and she can get back to delivering the services she has been noted for.  :thumbsup:  Wishing you a great next punt, I'm sure many of us on here will do the same.  ;)

I once more find myself in agreement +1

Offline Andyply

 :) At least she won't drown with those puppies  :kissgirl:

Offline ramrodronnie

I wonder if I can get PC's negative struck off. Not holding my breath.



Your Negative on AW was legitimate Nagilum, why try to get it struck off? Ratings are there for a reason. You rated your time on AW as a Negative with Cindy for justifiable reasons that you have highlighted in your Negative Review on here.
So I think that you should just let it stand.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline johnny34

Your Negative on AW was legitimate Nagilum, why try to get it struck off? Ratings are there for a reason. You rated your time on AW as a Negative with Cindy for justifiable reasons that you have highlighted in your Negative Review on here.
So I think that you should just let it stand.

I think Nagilum was referring to the negative she left him.



Your Negative on AW was legitimate Nagilum, why try to get it struck off? Ratings are there for a reason. You rated your time on AW as a Negative with Cindy for justifiable reasons that you have highlighted in your Negative Review on here.
So I think that you should just let it stand.

What the lies against him ?

What reason do they serve ?

Offline Andyply

Quote
I think Nagilum was referring to the negative she left him.
Exactly what I thought.  This is why there are so many fluffy reviews on AW for fear of reprisal   :dash: I only go by ukp  :thumbsup:

Offline ramrodronnie

I think Nagilum was referring to the negative she left him.


If he was? Then obviously I retract what I said johnny34
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline ramrodronnie

Exactly what I thought.  This is why there are so many fluffy reviews on AW for fear of reprisal   :dash: I only go by ukp  :thumbsup:


Same with me Andyply. I obviously misunderstood. Yes Nagilum should try to get Cindy's AW Negative on him removed.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline ramrodronnie


Same with me Andyply. I obviously misunderstood. Yes Nagilum should try to get Cindy's AW Negative on him removed.


I've just seen that you have managed to get Cindy's AW Negative on you removed Nagilum. Well done.  :thumbsup: :hi:
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline Andyply


I've just seen that you have managed to get Cindy's AW Negative on you removed Nagilum. Well done.  :thumbsup: :hi:
:thumbsup:  He should now be offered a full refund  :rolleyes:
Is that closure?  :timeout:

Offline smiths

I think this went a little bit too far.
Once upon a time I had very aggressive person seeing me for a booking which for obvious reasons I didn't wanna see again. In return that was the feedback I got from a booking that I deleted.
Let's not get too crazy about it. I can understand OP had a bad time and I don't doubt he has right to express himself. But it's a little bit out of hand now. Anybody can leave feedback like this without providers accepting the booking. What a malicious person.

A/W isn't UKP and is run by low lifes so I am not surprised what is left on their and that it might stay or take time to be deleted and for the record unless I had proof positive I wont be blindly believing as fact that she didn't leave or ask someone else to leave that feedback in order to gain sympathy on here, and yes that's how devious some WGs can be, but that's not to say she did do that as I don't know as fact whether she did or not but its not inconceivable to me.

 But this thread is about her fucking the OP over and then making it worse with her subsequent actions. She just might learn to offer ALL punters the same good service or risk this happening again after this thread and the other negative one the other day.

Offline Andyply

Quote
But this thread is about her fucking the OP over and then making it worse with her subsequent actions. She just might learn to offer ALL punters the same good service or risk this happening again after this thread and the other negative one the other day
:thumbsup: Well said, as VW often points out, this site is for he benefit of punters (not being screwed over and put in a dangerous position) not for WG's and/or their pimps.

Offline macdart

I have to agree with the OP. I had a 2 hour meeting with Cindy towards the end of last year. As others have stated I booked the meet for months in advance so was looking forward to it. In total of the 2 hours I think there was only about an hour of action and only 2 pops which left me frustrated, the rest of the time was her chatting away. Now Im probably partially to blame for this as I should have been more forward, however at the time I was new to the game, of which I told her, and I guess in my head I thought she would be more forward with starting the action With hindsight I wish I had let her know I was unhappy like the OP did, readng the review makes me want to leave my own for my own experince but dont want to seem to be jumping on any bandwagons

Offline iPad3

I have to agree with the OP. I had a 2 hour meeting with Cindy towards the end of last year. As others have stated I booked the meet for months in advance so was looking forward to it. In total of the 2 hours I think there was only about an hour of action and only 2 pops which left me frustrated, the rest of the time was her chatting away. Now Im probably partially to blame for this as I should have been more forward, however at the time I was new to the game, of which I told her, and I guess in my head I thought she would be more forward with starting the action With hindsight I wish I had let her know I was unhappy like the OP did, readng the review makes me want to leave my own for my own experince but dont want to seem to be jumping on any bandwagons

Macdart, don't take this the wrong way but you need to drive your punts, I've had a number with Cindy and if I want to fuck solid for 2 hours I tell her and she provides, on other occasions I've chatted for a good 30mins, my choice and again she delivers. Post or not is up to you but the is advice given to me by a more experienced member when I started out and it's stood me in good stead.

Your money,your punt!!

Offline macdart

cool thanks for the advice ipad. As i said I was new to the game of which I had told her and so was naive in thinking she would take control

Macdart, don't take this the wrong way but you need to drive your punts, I've had a number with Cindy and if I want to fuck solid for 2 hours I tell her and she provides, on other occasions I've chatted for a good 30mins, my choice and again she delivers. Post or not is up to you but the is advice given to me by a more experienced member when I started out and it's stood me in good stead.

Your money,your punt!!

Good advice, you must make clear what you expect, if not delivered then you have an excuse to be really pissed !

Offline smiths

I have to agree with the OP. I had a 2 hour meeting with Cindy towards the end of last year. As others have stated I booked the meet for months in advance so was looking forward to it. In total of the 2 hours I think there was only about an hour of action and only 2 pops which left me frustrated, the rest of the time was her chatting away. Now Im probably partially to blame for this as I should have been more forward, however at the time I was new to the game, of which I told her, and I guess in my head I thought she would be more forward with starting the action With hindsight I wish I had let her know I was unhappy like the OP did, readng the review makes me want to leave my own for my own experince but dont want to seem to be jumping on any bandwagons

A pity you didn't do a review around the time, this is a big problem on here, some not doing reviews when they haven't been entirely happy with the service offered. As I see it you are the one paying so a good WG should be asking you what you want and getting on with it, it is however always best in my opinion to instigate with WGs as some are bone idle and happy to chat and run the time down. You are free to do a review if you so wish, there is no time limit on doing one and especially if the WG is still actively working.

Offline ramrodronnie

I have to agree with the OP. I had a 2 hour meeting with Cindy towards the end of last year. As others have stated I booked the meet for months in advance so was looking forward to it. In total of the 2 hours I think there was only about an hour of action and only 2 pops which left me frustrated, the rest of the time was her chatting away. Now Im probably partially to blame for this as I should have been more forward, however at the time I was new to the game, of which I told her, and I guess in my head I thought she would be more forward with starting the action With hindsight I wish I had let her know I was unhappy like the OP did, readng the review makes me want to leave my own for my own experince but dont want to seem to be jumping on any bandwagons


With every respect to you macdart. And I can fully understand about you not wanting to jump on any bandwagon. But I must reiterate what I said earlier in this thread. All Reviews are an Important Part Of This Forum. If we all Reviewed with honesty, (no matter how popular a girl is) then we would all know better what the WG is like generally.
Banning reason: Undesirable

Offline collector


I've just seen that you have managed to get Cindy's AW Negative on you removed Nagilum. Well done.  :thumbsup: :hi:
Actually it's still there  :unknown:

Offline fredpunter

A/W isn't UKP and is run by low lifes so I am not surprised what is left on their and that it might stay or take time to be deleted and for the record unless I had proof positive I wont be blindly believing as fact that she didn't leave or ask someone else to leave that feedback in order to gain sympathy on here, and yes that's how devious some WGs can be, but that's not to say she did do that as I don't know as fact whether she did or not but its not inconceivable to me.

 But this thread is about her fucking the OP over and then making it worse with her subsequent actions. She just might learn to offer ALL punters the same good service or risk this happening again after this thread and the other negative one the other day.

Not sure she'd be that devious but I have heard it suggested she has a friendly punter who will leave negatives on AW for other girls if she asks him to - there's plenty of scumbags about.

Not sure she'd be that devious but I have heard it suggested she has a friendly punter who will leave negatives on AW for other girls if she asks him to - there's plenty of scumbags about.

Maybe she short timed the guy that dies that for her also !

Not sure she'd be that devious but I have heard it suggested she has a friendly punter who will leave negatives on AW for other girls if she asks him to - there's plenty of scumbags about.

Girls arranging to leave negatives for other girls seems hard to believe given that negs on AW are so rare. Why would PC need to do that when by all accounts she seems to get booked up 3 mths in advance. Hardly needs to be scared of the competition although after all of this hiatus she might need to be!

Offline smiths

Not sure she'd be that devious but I have heard it suggested she has a friendly punter who will leave negatives on AW for other girls if she asks him to - there's plenty of scumbags about.

Indeed there are Fred and is why I don't trust many punters and especially WGs. The fact is a smart WG knows UKP is THE punting forum to get punters and good feedback off of so there could be many thousands of pounds or more at stake for a WG to do all she can to avoid bad feedback/reviews getting on here, if that means bribing some punters so be it, that's a small price to pay.

Offline fredpunter

Girls arranging to leave negatives for other girls seems hard to believe given that negs on AW are so rare. Why would PC need to do that when by all accounts she seems to get booked up 3 mths in advance. Hardly needs to be scared of the competition although after all of this hiatus she might need to be!

she has previous form for joining this forum to diss other girls - including girls she had worked with in the past and girls she was still working with at the time! She is no angel ... and her pimp boyfriend is even worse.

There have been hints on this forum that she has recently been dissing other wgs in meetings with punters as well. 

she has previous form for joining this forum to diss other girls - including girls she had worked with in the past and girls she was still working with at the time! She is no angel ... and her pimp boyfriend is even worse.

There have been hints on this forum that she has recently been dissing other wgs in meetings with punters as well.

OK I am fairly new to all of this compared with some and basically a rather naive and trusting individual. I'll try and toughen up to the world of punting...




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)